Research article | Open | Open Peer Review | Published:
Role-play for medical students learning about communication: Guidelines for maximising benefits
BMC Medical Educationvolume 7, Article number: 3 (2007)
Role-play is widely used as an educational method for learning about communication in medical education. Although educational theory provides a sound rationale for using this form of simulation, there is little published evidence for its effectiveness. Students' prior experiences of role-play may influence the way in which they engage in this method. This paper explores students' experiences with the aim of producing guidelines for maximising the benefits of role-play within this learning context.
First-year undergraduate medical students participated in a role-play session as part of their communication programme. Before and after the session, students completed questionnaires. In the pre-session questionnaire, students were asked about their experiences of role-play and asked to identify helpful and unhelpful elements. Immediately after the session, students answered similar questions in relation to the role-play activity they had just completed. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse quantitative data and qualitative data was thematically analysed.
284 students completed evaluation forms. Although 63 (22.2%) had prior unhelpful experiences, most students (n = 274; 96.5%) found this experience helpful. Summary findings were that students reported the key aspects of helpful role-play were opportunities for observation, rehearsal and discussion, realistic roles and alignment of roles with other aspects of the curriculum. Unhelpful aspects were those that evoked strong negative emotional responses and factors that contributed to a lack of realism.
Role-play was valued by students in the acquisition of communication skills even though some had prior unhelpful experiences. Guidelines for effective role-play include adequate preparation, alignment of roles and tasks with level of practice, structured feedback guidelines and acknowledgment of the importance of social interactions for learning.
Although role-play is regularly used to develop communication skills in medical students [1–12], there are few published papers that evaluate role-play as an educational method. Our experience of using role-play to teach students about communicating has met with mixed success. Introducing role-play to a group almost always meets with resistance and/or anxiety from some students. This is manifested in student apprehension, reporting of prior unhelpful experiences and not taking role-play seriously. Other researchers have also reported similar preconceptions to role-play. Stevenson and Sander (2002) reported that "role-play and student presentations" are the least preferred teaching method by 32% of new medical students . Of these students, 75% believed it to be ineffective while 25% reported personal reasons (e.g. embarrassment) for their response.
Role-play as a simulation methodology
Role-play is used as a training method to acquire knowledge, attitudes and skills in a range of disciplines and with learners of different ages (e.g. acquisition of language skills , cross-cultural training [15, 16], business and human resources [17, 18]. Despite its widespread use, role-play is fairly consistently defined in the education and training literature. Van Ments (1989) defines role-play as:
"... one particular type of simulation that focuses attention on the interaction of people with one another. It emphasises the functions performed by different people under various circumstances. The idea of role-play, in its simplest form, is that of asking someone to imagine that they are either themselves or another person in a particular situation. They are then asked to behave exactly as they feel that person would. As a result of doing this they, or the rest of the class, or both, will learn something about the person and/or situation. In essence, each player acts as part of the social environment of the others and provides a framework in which they can test out their repertoire of behaviours or study the interacting behaviour of the group." 
This definition clearly demonstrates that role-play is a form of simulation and acknowledges the importance of the social context of learning. Jones (1982) highlights this notion in role-play for learning second languages:
"In order for a simulation to occur the participants must accept the duties and responsibilities of their roles and functions, and do the best they can in the situation in which they find themselves" .
This interdependence in learning may prove to be a barrier for some students who for various reasons may be unfamiliar or unwilling to give of themselves in role-play . Burns and Gentry (1998) describe the importance of gradual introduction of role-play as students may be unaccustomed to working experientially and that cultural barriers may impede student engagement .
Role-play activities can be performed in different ways. For the acquisition of patient-centred interviewing skills we tend to use the approach in which students play their role as a medical student so they are expected to perform as they would in real clinical encounters. However, there are many variations on this theme. Role-play can be fully scripted (all players act from verbatim scripts) or partially scripted (players have certain prompts – often an opening line). Alternatively, one player (e.g. patient) is given a description of their role while the other (e.g. student) is provided with their task. Players can rotate through roles within a single role-play (switching) with the intention of gaining insight into other roles or perspectives or players can be substituted at various points in the role-play by observers. Some role-play activities use role cards as a way of inserting new information into a role-play.
Maier (2002) suggests that role-play method be selected according to whether the educational goal addresses knowledge, attitudes or skills. In the acquisition of knowledge, role-plays can be valuable to observe and then discuss – the experience of the role-players themselves is less important than the opportunity to observe, understand and assimilate information. For attitude development especially that which focuses on change of affect, then role-plays should be loosely structured so that players experience emotions spontaneously. While for skills acquisition, the opportunity for repeated opportunities with feedback is critical .
Role-play as an educational method draws on a range of theories. Experiential learning is especially important in the acquisition of skills. Kolb & Fry (1975) describe four "learning environments" in their theory of experiential learning  – Affectively-oriented (feeling), symbolically-oriented (thinking), perceptually-oriented (watching), behaviourally-oriented (doing). Within each environment there are two tasks. First, "grasping" which consists of concrete experiences and abstract conceptualisation. Second, "transforming" which consists of reflection and action. Learning is enhanced when learners are encouraged to use all four "environments." Structured role-play with feedback enables learners to complete both tasks in each of the four "environments."
Knowles (2005) has set out principles associated with adult learning. These have evolved since his first publications in the 1970's. They include the learner having a need to know, is self-directed, has and draws on diverse experiences, has a readiness to learn, that the learning should be problem-centred and that there is an internal motivation to learn . Role-plays should be created and implemented with these principles in mind.
Schon's (1983) work on reflective practice is also relevant in role-play . Based on his observations of different professional groups, Schon describes how when faced with unexpected events or problems, professionals respond by reflecting-in-action or later by reflecting-on-action. Reflection-in-action or "thinking on your feet" is a process by which a practitioner draws on a repertoire of experiences – images, ideas, actions, patterns in order to make sense of the problem confronting them. The practitioner aims to place the problem within their own frame of reference in order to seek out the best solution and anticipate its' consequences. Reflecting-on-action or "retrospective thinking" occurs after the unexpected event or problem and has particular relevance for feedback since discussion of what has taken place can help the practitioner broaden their base of experience and so extend their repertoire. Again, structured role-play enables learners to reflect both "in" and "on" action.
Kneebone (2005) describes a theory-based approach to learning clinical skills in simulation drawing on literature on expertise, supportive tailored tutoring, learning within a professional context and affective elements of learning. Using this theory he identifies criteria for evaluating simulations:
Simulations should allow for sustained and deliberate practice in a safe environment and that simulations ensure skills are consolidated and aligned with other curricula activity
Simulations should provide access to expert tutors who are available only when needed
Simulations should map on to real life clinical experience
Simulation-based learning should provide a supportive, motivational and learner-centred environment 
Although Kneebone describes these criteria in relation to learning clinical procedures, we argue that they are relevant to medical interviewing since communication is the core clinical skill and has many technical elements. All clinician-patient encounters have structural components – a beginning, middle and end. Although often described as "process" elements within medical interviewing, communication skills can be articulated in the same way as technical aspects of clinical procedures. Therefore, the criteria developed by Kneebone should be considered in constructing and implementing role-plays aimed at developing clinical communication.
Role-play activities in our communication programme
First-year medical students at Imperial College participate in role-play activities. Table 1 outlines the broad content and educational methods in our first-year communication programme. The goal of the first session in which students use role-play includes developing competence in specific skills associated with medical interviewing. In tutor-led groups of approximately 30, students break into trios to perform role-play. We use a structured approach to role-play in which students rotate through the roles of interviewer, patient and observer. Potentially each role may benefit students as they are encouraged to adopt different perspectives. Although the "patient" roles vary within these activities, the "student" and "observer" tasks remain consistent. For example, the interviewer's task is to practice medical interviewing with a specific focus (Table 2). The observer's role is to identify skills demonstrated and areas of content explored as well as facilitate feedback to the interviewer using structured guidelines (Table 3). Patient roles provide an overview of key aspects of the presenting complaint and are sufficiently flexible to be played by students in our diverse cohorts (Table 4). Each role is allocated 5 minutes preparation, 5 minutes in role-play and 10 minutes in feedback. Part of the feedback process involves a brief period in which reflection on performance is encouraged and after the session, students are encouraged to write reflections. Between each role-play, the large group convenes and discusses issues that emerged in the role-plays as well as checks on the "role-play" process.
Because the students are in their third week of medical school, tutors are unlikely to have had an opportunity to develop a relationship with them. Tutors are encouraged to use the following questions to promote discussion and reflection in the large group:
How many of you asked about the patient's ideas, concerns and expectations?
Did your group encounter difficulties with the introduction? The information gathering? The closure?
Did you follow guidelines for feedback? If so, were they helpful?
Did you experience any difficulties in role-play?
First-year undergraduate medical students participated in the role-play session described above. Before and after the session, students completed questionnaires with closed and open-ended questions. In the pre-session questionnaire, students were asked about their prior experiences of role-play, if they were helpful (yes or no response) and then asked to identify helpful and unhelpful aspects (free text). Immediately after the session, students were asked to complete the same evaluation form that asked whether the role-play was helpful and again, helpful and unhelpful aspects but this time related to the role-play experience in this session. Qualitative data was using SPSS 14.0 for descriptive statistics. Qualitative data was thematically analysed by both authors and then key concepts identified and negotiated for agreement. The study took place in the academic year 2002/2003. Students completed the forms as part of their usual session evaluation that is not compulsory but is built into the session schedule. The study was approved within our College requirements for course evaluations and dissemination of results. Students were assured that all responses were anonymous, would be used to improve future sessions and findings would be disseminated in our professional community.
This paper reports on a questionnaire based study exploring first year medical students' experiences of role-play with a particular focus on supporting the acquisition of patient-centred interviewing skills. The study aims to identify key elements for establishing effective role-play addressing the following questions:
To what extent do students find role-play valuable?
What are helpful and unhelpful aspects of role-play?
284 students completed written forms before and after the session representing 88.8% of the cohort. Demographic data was not collected from students.
One hundred and ninety-nine students (70.1%) reported experience with role-play and in a range of contexts. For example, learning about negotiation, presenting, public speaking, interviewing aspects, acting out scenarios for group discussion of ethical or other controversial issues and developing dramatic skills. Two hundred and twenty-one students (77.8%) stated that role-play was valuable for learning while the remainder (n = 63; 22.2%) reported it was not valuable.
In free text comments students reported role-play was valuable for gaining insight into their own and others' behaviours, increasing understanding of certain issues and rehearsing skills. Free text comments include:
"It (role-play) is a pleasant and practical way of learning and evaluating your capabilities."
"Can be amusing and interesting because it brings to life situations which may be encountered..."
Unhelpful experiences identified by students focused on emotional responses that impede learning (e.g. embarrassment, intimidation, anxiety).
"I found my nervousness interfered with my ability to address the issue."
Lack of realism of roles, setting and task were also cited as unhelpful.
"I find it very false and difficult particularly with people I don't know"
"You behave differently when you are being observed."
Unsuitable environments, not taking role-play seriously and unstructured, vague non-specific feedback were also considered as unhelpful.
After the session, 96.5% of students (n = 274) reported that role-play had been helpful for learning. Table 5 contains examples of a range of students' free text comments. Common themes include opportunity for rehearsal, importance of preparation, to receive feedback, to experience perspectives of patient and interviewer, to practice in relative safety (no consequence to patients) and to develop other professional skills such as giving and receiving feedback, facilitating and participating in discussion of peer's behaviours.
Table 6 contains comments on unhelpful aspects as experienced in the session. The comments fall into similar categories as those identified in the pre-session questionnaire. That is, role-play was unhelpful when students experienced emotions of embarrassment, vulnerability and anxiety, when roles lacked realism, when students did not behave as they might in a real situation, if students had poor "acting" skills, when there was inadequate preparation, when there was uncertainty about the quality of peer feedback, lack of clarity in instructions, lack of opportunity to immediately transfer the experience to real clinical practice and a noisy environment.
Students' suggestions to improve role-play are reported in Table 7 and focus on personal, educational and organisational aspects of sessions although these categories overlap. Most comments address issues raised in the previous question on unhelpful aspects of role-play. More time, more opportunities for role-play (interview more than once so you can try to improve within the same session), more realistic roles, increased tutor enthusiasm, more feedback from tutors and where possible to work with students who are less well known to you.
Role-play was reported to be an effective means of learning communication skills. After participating in the session in this study, almost all students reported role-play as valuable compared with 70.1% at the pre-session questionnaire. Students identified helpful and unhelpful aspects of prior and current experiences with those in this session reported as overwhelmingly positively. Table 8 summarises guidelines for effective role-play based on the students' responses to pre- and post- session questionnaires. The guidelines reflect principles of adult learning as identified by Knowles et al (2005) . In particular, the "need to know," "readiness to learn" and "orientation to learning (problem-centred)." These role-play guidelines also complement the criteria that Kneebone (2005) sets out to evaluate simulations . To more completely meet the criteria in relation to the session described here, we would need to provide additional role-play opportunities, ensure access to expert tutors is available and make further attempts to increase realism. The guidelines also support those outlined in a recent paper by Joyner and Young (2006) that appear to be based on their extensive experience although no empirical data is presented .
In relation to experiential learning theory, our session guidelines in which students are encouraged to consider each orientation of the Kolb and Fry's (1975) four learning environments – thinking, feeling, watching and doing – may explain why the role-play experience in this study was valued . With small group feedback and large group post-interview discussions each of these orientations is explored.
We believe that the structured feedback process together with the process of completing the questionnaire and reflecting on role-play as an educational method may benefit students. Structured feedback directed students to think about what had taken place in each role-play as well as the value of role-play before and after participating in the session. This prompted students to draw on their prior experience – an important component of adult learning as well as promoting reflection-on-action. Even though we are working with trainee rather than fully fledged professionals we aim to instill the notion of reflection-in-action by actively prompting students to analyse what they have done in their role-play and how this experience relates to their own and others' experiences.
Our results differed to Stevenson and Sander (2002) with fewer students in our cohorts thinking role-play unhelpful – even at the pre-session questionnaire . More information about individual students as well as cohorts may provide clarity. However, caution should of course be exercised in extrapolating results to all students in all medical schools.
The importance of social interactions in role-play are not always emphasised in this methodology and may be a significant reason why some students fail to engage. The role-play guidelines draw attention to the need for social exchange between participants in order to have successful role-play.
Like most educational methods, role-play on its own probably contributes only a little to the development of patient-centred interviewing skills. However, as part of the broader communication programme at Imperial College that uses a wide range of methodologies addressing knowledge acquisition, attitude and skills development, role-play appears to be beneficial. For this reason it is difficult and in some ways unreasonable to try to evaluate the impact of singular educational methods. It is also important to recognise that students learn in different ways and that role-play may be a preferred method for students who learn through concrete experiences.
We explored students' prior experiences as well as those from the session in order to differentiate previous and current experience. There was little evidence that students' prior experiences influenced the way in which students responded to the current session. However, we believe this was related to the investment at the beginning of the session in completing questionnaires and acknowledgement of prior difficulties together with other features of the session (e.g. peer learning, structured feedback etc).
The study formed part of the communication programme and so students' responses may have been biased with students providing socially desirable responses. However, medical students at our school seem able to be honest and direct in their evaluation of educational experiences. The responses were only gathered from first year students and may not reflect those of students who are further through medical education, graduates or students in other medical schools. Data on age, gender and cultural differences of students was not collected in this study but may have provided further insight. However, College records show that this cohort closely resembles others in our medical school (over the past 5 years) – most are direct entrants from school, slightly more females than males and a very broad cultural base.
We asked students a closed-ended question about helpfulness of role-play and so forced students to make a clear directional choice. It may have been more helpful to ask students about their level of agreement with a statement about the value of role-play.
Investigating the impact of role-play on actual learning is an obvious area to explore since we focused our study on students' perceptions of learning. However, as outlined above, this is often conceptually unsound and methodologically difficult. Future research could explicitly test these guidelines in a range of practices. It would also be valuable to focus research on why some students continue to fail to engage in role-play. Eliciting the views of teachers in facilitating role-play work would also provide an additional perspective.
Although role-play is widely used as a learning activity in communication and interpersonal skills training, students do not always find it helpful. This study explored students' prior experiences in role-play in an effort to identify, acknowledge and deal with some of these difficulties in a communication programme that relies heavily on role-play as a learning activity. The results identify elements for consideration when using role-play with novice students for developing communication skills. We have provided a theoretical foundation for the use of role-play as an educational method in the broader context of simulations. Future research should investigate the relevance of these guidelines for more experienced students and practitioners and in different contexts.
Hargie O, Dickson D, Boohan M, Hughes K: A survey of communication skills training in UK Schools of Medicine: present practices and prospective proposals. Medical Education. 1997, 32 (1): 25-34. 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1998.00154.x.
Charlton R: Using role-plays to teach palliative medicine. Medical Teacher. 1993, 15 (2–3): 187-193.
Steinert Y: Twelve tips for using role-plays in clinical teaching. Medical Teacher. 1993, 15 (4): 283-291.
Mann B, Sachdeva A, Nieman L, Nielan B, Rovito M, Damsker J: Teaching medical students by role-playing: a model for integrating psychosocial issues with disease management. Journal of Cancer Education. 1996, 11 (2): 65-72.
Skelton J, Hammond P, Fitzmaurice D, Wiskin C: The acceptability of whole context role-play. Education for General Practice. 1997, 8 (3): 206-212.
Nestel D, Kidd J, James V: Inter-professional shared learning: a workshop on communication for screening blood donors. Learning in Health and Social Care. 2002, 1 (4): 229-238. 10.1046/j.1473-6861.2002.00029.x.
Nestel D, Kidd J, Muir E, Plant M, Thurlow S: Modelling the lay expert for first-year medical students: the actor-patient as teacher. Medical Teacher. 2002, 24 (5): 562-564. 10.1080/0142159021000042649.
Henderson P, Johnson M: Assisting medical students to conduct empathic conversations with patients in a sexual medical clinic. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2002, 78 (4): 246-9. 10.1136/sti.78.4.246.
Joyner B, Young L: Teaching medical students using role-play: Twelve tips for successful role-plays. Medical Teacher. 2006, 28 (3): 225-229. 10.1080/01421590600711252.
Wagner PJ, Lentz L, Heslop SD: Teaching communication skills: A skills-based approach. Academic Medicine. 2002, 77: November 1164..
Wylie K, Hallam-Jones R, Dianes B: Review of an undergraduate medical school training programme in human sexuality. Medical Teacher. 2003, 291-5. 10.1080/0142159031000100382.
Ang M: Advanced communication skills: Conflict management and persuation. Academic Medicine. 2002, 77: 1166-10.1097/00001888-200211000-00034.
Stevenson K, Sander P: Medical students are from Mars – business and psychology students are from Venus – University teachers are from Pluto?. Medical Teacher. 2002, 24 (1): 27-31. 10.1080/00034980120103441.
Jones K: Simulations in Language Teaching. 1982, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge
Cross cultural training: Meeting the needs of our linguistically and culturally diverse community. Victorian Interpreting and Translating Services, Melbourne. 1982, [accessed September 21, 2006], [http://www.vits.com.au]
Thom DH, Tirado MD, Woon TL, McBride MR: Development and evaluation of a cultural competency training curriculum. BMC Medical Education. 2006, 6: 38-10.1186/1472-6920-6-38. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-6-38
Sutcliffe M: Using role-play to teach business students: Challenging the teacher, supporting the learners. 2006, [accessed September 21, 2006], [http://www.business.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/reflect/conf/2002/sutcliffe/sutcliffe.pdf]
El-Shamy S: Role-play Made Easy: 25 Structured Rehearsals for Managing Problem Situations and Dealing with Difficult People. 2005, Pfeiffer: London
Van Ments M: The Effective Use of Role Play: A Handbook for Teachers and Trainers. 1989, New York: Nichols Publishing
Tompkins PK: Role Playing/Simulation. The Internet TESL Journal. 1998, IV: 8-[accessed June 13, 2006], [http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Tompkins-RolePlaying.html]
Burns AC, Gentry JW: Motivating students to engage in experiential learning: a tension-to-learn theory. Simulation and Gaming. 1998, 29: 133-151.
Maier HW: Role playing: Structures and educational objectives. The International Child and Youth Care Network. 2002, [accessed June 13, 2006], [http://www.cyc-net.org/cyc-online/cycol-0102-roleplay.html]
Kolb DA, Fry R: Toward an applied theory of experiential learning. Theories of Group Process. Edited by: Cooper C. 1975, John Wiley: London
Knowles MS, Holton EF, Swanson RA: The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development. 2005, Elsevier: USA, 6
Schon DA: The Reflective Practitioner. 1983, Jossey-Bass: San Francisco
Kneebone R: Evaluating clinical simulations for learning procedural skills: A theory-based approach. Academic Medicine. 2005, 80 (6): 549-553. 10.1097/00001888-200506000-00006.
The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/7/3/prepub
Dr Jane Kidd was involved in the original data collection when she was a lecturer at Imperial College London. Margaret Reau entered the data. The study took place as part of the regular curriculum and received no external funding.
The authors do not have competing interests (financial or non-financial) in undertaking or publishing this paper.
DN devised the study, analysed the data and wrote the paper. TT analysed the data and revised the paper. Both authors read and approved the final version.