In celebration of Pride month, these Editor's picks highlight our best content on LGBTQ+ issues.
Editor's picks
Articles
-
-
Use of a gamified website to increase pain neurophysiology knowledge and improve satisfaction and motivation among students studying for a degree in physiotherapy: a quasi-experimental study
-
Physicians’ knowledge and sepsis guide implementation in tertiary care hospitals in China
-
How far has the digitization of medical teaching progressed in times of COVID-19? A multinational survey among medical students and lecturers in German-speaking central Europe
-
Quality-assured training in the evaluation of cochlear implant electrode position: a prospective experimental study
-
Student perspective of classroom and distance learning during COVID-19 pandemic in the undergraduate dental study program Universitas Indonesia
-
Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education
-
The relationship between learning styles and academic performance in TURKISH physiotherapy students
-
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning in health professional education: a mixed methods study protocol
-
Sicily statement on evidence-based practice
Aims and scope
Join the Editorial Board
We are recruiting new Editorial Board Members to join our international editorial board, helping to provide expertise on a wide range of different subject disciplines.
Apply nowLatest Tweets
Your browser needs to have JavaScript enabled to view this timeline
BMC Series Blog
Annual Journal Metrics
-
Speed
61 days to first decision for all manuscripts
92 days to first decision for reviewed manuscripts only
201 days from submission to acceptance
15 days from acceptance to publicationCitation Impact
2.463 - 2-year Impact Factor
3.070 - 5-year Impact Factor
1.651 - Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)
0.809 - SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)Usage
4,663,270 downloads (2021)
1,966 Altmetric mentions
Peer-review Terminology
-
The following summary describes the peer review process for this journal:
Identity transparency: Single anonymized
Reviewer interacts with: Editor
Review information published: Review reports. Reviewer Identities reviewer opt in. Author/reviewer communication