Skip to main content

Teachers' ideas versus experts' descriptions of 'the good teacher' in postgraduate medical education: implications for implementation. A qualitative study



When innovations are introduced in medical education, teachers often have to adapt to a new concept of what being a good teacher includes. These new concepts do not necessarily match medical teachers' own, often strong beliefs about what it means to be a good teacher.

Recently, a new competency-based description of the good teacher was developed and introduced in all the Departments of Postgraduate Medical Education for Family Physicians in the Netherlands. We compared the views reflected in the new description with the views of teachers who were required to adopt the new framework.


Qualitative study. We interviewed teachers in two Departments of Postgraduate Medical Education for Family Physicians in the Netherlands. The transcripts of the interviews were analysed independently by two researchers, who coded and categorised relevant fragments until consensus was reached on six themes. We investigated to what extent these themes matched the new description.


Comparing the teachers' views with the concepts described in the new competency-based framework is like looking into two mirrors that reflect clearly dissimilar images. At least two of the themes we found are important in relation to the implementation of new educational methods: the teachers' identification and organisational culture. The latter plays an important role in the development of teachers' ideas about good teaching.


The main finding of this study is the key role played by the teachers' feelings regarding their professional identity and by the local teaching culture in shaping teachers' views and expectations regarding their work. This suggests that in implementing a new teaching framework and in faculty development programmes, careful attention should be paid to teachers' existing identification model and the culture that fostered it.

Peer Review reports


In times of change in medical education, teachers are often asked to adapt to a new concept of what being a good teacher includes [1, 2]. These new concepts represent what is considered to be best educational practice and are often developed by experts outside the departments where the changes are to be implemented. The concepts are based on an analysis of the teachers' tasks and/or educational theory and operationalized in competency profiles and evaluation questionnaires [311]. However, teachers have their own ideas about what it means to be a good teacher, and these ideas are not necessarily in line with new concepts [2, 12, 16, 20]. When new concepts and teachers' views are too widely divergent, teachers may feel unable to fulfil their new role. This can cause feelings of guilt leading to resistance and loss of self-confidence and motivation [2, 16, 20]. This is clearly a most undesirable effect that should be considered by managers who want to implement new educational methods and trainers who design faculty development programs in order to achieve the new competencies[12, 2428].

Whereas experts' ideas are mainly theory based, teachers' ideas about good teaching tend to be mainly rooted in their own educational experiences and memories, which are context based and generally rather unstructured [20, 29]. Subsequently, teachers' ideas are strongly influenced by feedback from other stakeholders in educational practice: colleagues, administrators and trainees. Some ideas are confirmed, others are criticized. Teachers reflect upon feedback, asking themselves: "is it true what others are saying about me" [20, 3032]. They also think about the effectiveness of their teaching in terms of their trainees' learning outcomes [29, 33, 34]. Gradually, teachers' ideas become strong convictions to which they cling to in times of change.

This study addresses the conflict between teaching concepts in a new competency profile that was introduced and teachers' views on teaching in the postgraduate programmes for family medicine in the Netherlands (Table 1). The programmes consist of two main strands: work-based learning with a family physician as supervisor and a department-based day release programme. Traditionally, the teachers of the day release programme are family physicians and psychologists. They are appointed as group coaches and combine part-time teaching with their work as a practising family physician or psychologist. The programme consists of weekly small group sessions in which trainees reflect on scientific topics and their personal functioning. They also practise communication skills and share experiences. In the new teaching competency framework, the distinction between family physician- as- teacher and psychologist- as- teacher is only noticeable in relation to competency 0 (Role as an expert).

Table 1 The new competency profile of the teacher in postgraduate education for family physicians

Based on anticipated resistance to the implementation of the new competency profile and looking for ideas for an effective faculty development programme, we sought the coaches' views on the good teacher and compared these with the views reflected in the new competency framework.

Our aim was to answer two research questions:

  1. 1.

    What are teachers' ideas of 'the good teacher'?

  2. 2.

    To what extent do teachers' views correspond with the concept of 'the good teacher' described in the new competency profile?



Because of the open character of the first research question, we conducted a qualitative interview study [35], involving semi-structured individual interviews with teachers. The interviews were tape-recorded, transcribed and analysed using software for qualitative research (Kwalitan).

In order to address the second research question, we examined the match between the competencies in the framework and the themes that emerged from the interviews by linking the views of the teachers to the competencies in the framework (TvR) and discussing the links with two researchers (TvR and FT) until consensus was reached.

Interview framework

We searched the literature for methods to explore teachers' views[1315, 17, 21, 22].. We used an interview framework based on grounded theory that was used in a study of teachers' professional development by Kelchtermans[14, 15]. From this framework four interview topics were derived: self image, job motivation, task perception and the teachers' perspective with regard to the future of the training programme. A fifth topic, used as the opening topic of the interviews, related to teachers' initial experiences. Three pilot interviews were conducted to determine whether the framework was effective in eliciting teachers' views of good teaching. These pilot interviews were not included in the analysis. One of the authors (AS) checked the pilot interviews and judged that the information obtained was relevant. The interview framework was used for all the interviews (Table 2).

Table 2 Interview framework


Teachers from two departments were invited to take part in the study. All participants received written assurance that the interviews would be analyzed anonymously and confidentially. They all agreed to participate and gave informed consent.

We first interviewed all teachers of one department and then continued to interview teachers from the other department until saturation of information was reached. Participation was voluntary and the teachers determined the location of the interview. The interviews lasted one hour and were taken in a quiet room in the interviewee's department, except for one interview which, at the teacher's request, was conducted in the teacher's practice. All interviews were audio recorded and the recordings were erased after a transcript and an anonymous summary were made. Notes taken by the interviewers were used to determine whether new information was emerging.


The transcripts were entered into qualitative data analysis software (Kwalitan). Two researchers (TvR and FT) conducted the analysis. After independently coding the transcripts, they discussed the coding until full agreement was reached. Controlling for synonyms and discussion about duplicates led to a total of 161 different codes. Next, the researchers identified fragments with relevance to the first research question, explored connections between the fragments and categorized the codes. In a process of constant comparison of codes and categories, a tree structure was developed and unrelated codes were discarded, all by consensus. Finally, the researchers discussed their analyses and agreed on the final six themes. After the themes were summarized, the co researcher (FT) and the co-authors (AS, BB and HB) gave feedback on the fragments which the first author proposed to use in determining a match with the competency profile and to illustrate the results. For each theme, two or three fragments were selected by consensus.


We addressed the second research question by matching the teachers' views of the 'good teacher' that emerged from the interviews with the teaching competencies described in the competency profile (Table 3). First, the views of the teachers were summarized for each theme. We then identified which competencies of the competency profile matched the teachers' views and summarized these.

Table 3 Example



Table 4 shows the characteristics of the teachers who participated in the interviews.

Table 4 Characteristics of the teachers who participated in the interviews


The information from the answers of the teachers could not be adequately captured by the interview topics as they yielded more, and more varied information than expected. The analysis resulted in six themes that reflected the data: professional identification, relationship with trainees, learning through socialization, knowledge, motivation to teach and change.

We present the results for each theme with illustrative quotes from family physicians-as-coaches (FP) or psychologists-as-coaches (P).

Research question 1: What are the teachers' ideas of 'the good teacher'?

Theme 1 Professional identification

The teachers indicated that the word 'teacher' evoked ideas of authority, unequal relationships and the role of an expert, which they felt were not consistent with how they saw their role as a group coach. They were more comfortable with an interpretation of their role as that of a wiser colleague who helps trainees in reflecting on their experiences.

Teachers expressed doubts as to whether they were able to teach trainees anything new. When they first took up the coaching role, they did not always have a clear view of what it involved.

  • 'Teacher' evokes an image of standing in front of the. I don't really feel that I have anything to offer that trainees haven't already experienced. I have always worked from a group coach perspective, helping trainees reflect on their work. I still can't say the word: 'teacher' (P22).

  • I have to get used to this academic position. I didn't realize this when I first took this job as a group coach. (FP18).

Theme 2 Relationship with trainees

On the one hand the teachers wished to look upon trainees as adults and highly educated future colleagues whose expectations they wanted to meet. They felt that the best way to achieve this was by acting as a 'group coach', facilitating reflection on experiences. On the other hand, the teachers also saw themselves in a sort of parental role, based on their conviction that they knew better than the trainees what was good for them.

  • Trainees see me first and foremost as a group coach. But when I turn out to be an expert on some subject, then they suddenly see me as a teacher (FP17).

  • With my co-teacher, as a team, we alternate between the father and mother role. You feel responsible for their well being (FP5).

  • When trainees say 'we know what we need as future family physicians', you must hear what they really need. (P11)

Theme 3 Learning to be a teacher

Teachers in departments of family medicine learn from and with each other. Every new teacher is initially mentored by an experienced colleague. All the interviewees had learned how to be a teacher within the specific culture of their department and could name some colleagues that had been important for their development or had a dominant position in the department.

  • We hardly ever consult experts, so, the level of teaching never exceeds that of the best teacher in the group (P24).

  • My mentor was very dominant. I adopted the way we do things around here. (P7).

  • I learned a lot from X. He always came up with something new to discuss with the trainees. Just like that (snapping his fingers) (FP8).

Theme 4 Knowledge

The teachers viewed themselves as coaches rather than medical experts. They did not think they were expected to show medical knowledge, but emphasized the importance of their knowledge about group dynamics. Expertise in doctor patient communication was also an area they considered important for teaching, as well as enthusiasm for the profession and building relationships with patients.

  • As their teacher I don't have to know all the ins and outs of medicine, such as how to treat all kinds of cardiovascular problems in family medicine practice (FP26).

  • Well, the main thing is communication with patients. I think that's one of my specialties (P27).

  • You have to know about group dynamics. One group was very difficult to handle and then I began to doubt my abilities as a group coach. Fortunately, the chemistry with the next group was good (FP3).

Theme 5 Motivation to teach

The main reasons the teachers gave for being a postgraduate teacher were: witnessing the trainees' personal development, feeling a member of a guild and a welcome diversion in a busy working week in their own practice. The teachers felt that their work would be more interesting if they were given a certain level of autonomy in their teaching and they expected the department to give them that autonomy. Most of the teachers were inspired just by working with trainees but others looked for other challenges and teamwork.

  • I teach because it gives me satisfaction. You see trainees struggling for answers. That's real synergy! But I need to be challenged. If that's missing, I get bored (P1).

  • The institute has to allow you to do the things you think are important (FP8).

Theme 6 Change

Recently, educational changes were implemented in the departments and new teaching behaviours were introduced by the departmental management teams. The teachers experienced these changes as just more work, because they no longer had a clear view of what was expected of them. It is not only changes within the department but also changes within the teachers themselves that influence teachers' work with trainees.

  • I think there are too many changes that are enforced by departmental management. When a new project is launched, what are we supposed to stop doing? But that's never a point of discussion (P25).

  • The problem is that I have to give out a message that is not mine. That diverts attention away from the things we should really be doing (FP16).

  • At first I was a lecturer but now I prefer a more consultative style (FP5).

Research question 2: Comparison of the teachers' views and the views of the competency-based model

In order to address the second research question, we identified which competencies of the competency profile matched the teachers' views and summarized these in Table 5.

Table 5 Summary of Teachers' views


We investigated how postgraduate teachers, who develop and facilitate small group sessions for postgraduate trainees in family medicine practice, view 'the good teacher' and compared these views with the description of 'the good teacher' in a recently introduced competency-based teaching framework.

The teachers that took part in this study are family physicians and behavioural scientists who act as a team in coaching small groups of family physician trainees. They were interviewed as one group of teachers because the competency framework refers to a general concept of teachers and distinguishes family physicians and psychologists only in the expert dimension. Though their backgrounds differ, we did not find differences in their beliefs about teaching. The family physicians and the behavioural scientists see themselves as health care providers. This seems to unify them in their beliefs about teaching and their identification with their role as coaches. Coaching is felt as closely related to their roles in practice as family physicians or psychologists.

When we compare the teachers' views with the concepts described in the competency framework, we seem to be looking in two mirrors that reflect clearly dissimilar images. When they look into a new mirror, teachers truly believe they could do better and indicate that they would like to enhance their competencies, but at the same time they hold on to the beliefs and methods they have learned through experience. In this situation, training by holding up a new competency framework does not automatically lead to acceptance of a new concept of teaching. It also does not automatically lead to the demonstration of the desired competencies. Clearly, there are other processes to be considered as well.

Two major processes appear to have the greatest relevance from the perspective of implementation of new educational methods. The first process is that of identification [36, 37]. This is an interesting issue which we were not aware of when we started this study. For the teachers, the word teacher conjured up an image that held little attraction for them: an authority who teaches trainees new knowledge and skills. Coaching feels more familiar and is closely bound up with their role as a health care professional. In the literature this is known as "work-group identification" [37]. This means that professionals tend to identify with the values and demands of their profession rather than with those of a different organization, such as the department of medical education[20, 36, 37]. The second process that plays an important role is that of the organizational culture. As soon as a family physicians or a psychologist is appointed as a group coach, experienced mentors start up a socialization process which shapes their new professional development as a teacher. In such a learning environment, the new teacher not only learns 'how to teach', but is also initiated into the do's and don'ts of teaching in the local departmental culture. Literature confirms that the impact of educational innovations on teachers is not a purely individual process but occurs in interaction with others [2, 30, 31]. The loss of certainties and confrontation with the unfamiliar are a source of concern. Trainers and leaders who influence and coordinate these very complex innovation processes should be mindful of the fact that new teaching behaviour is not only a matter of 'can or cannot' but also a matter of value and norms related choices of the teachers involved [2, 20].


The main findings of this study are the key roles played by feelings regarding professional identity and the local teaching culture in shaping teachers' views and expectations with regard to their work. This can be interpreted as an important message for managers implementing educational change and for designers of faculty development programmes. Before, during and after the implementation of new educational methods, careful attention should be paid to teachers' existing identification model and the culture that fostered it. Similarly, faculty development programmes should not only focus on teaching 'new' concepts but also on discussing the 'old' concepts of teaching.

In view of the importance of the departmental teaching culture that emerged from this study we recommend further studies to investigate the design and effects of teachers' learning environments analogous to studies of the learning environments of students and trainees.

Limitations and strengths of the study

A limitation of this study is that we studied a rather small population, because qualitative research is time consuming as it requires detailed analysis of a large amount of fairly unstructured data. It is a strength of this study is that we took time to collect data until saturation was reached. We also took time to listen to teachers' opinions, which yielded unexpected and valuable insights into their views on teaching.


  1. 1.

    Irby DM, Wilkerson L: Educational innovations in academic medicine and environmental trends. J Gen Intern Med. 2003, 18: 370-376. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21049.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    van den Berg R: Teachers' meanings regarding educational practice. Review of Educational Research. 2002, 72: 577-625. 10.3102/00346543072004577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Boor K, Teunissen PW, Scherpbier AJ, van d V, van de LJ, Scheele F: Residents' perceptions of the ideal clinical teacher--a qualitative study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008, 140: 152-157. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.03.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Buchel TL, Edwards FD: Characteristics of effective clinical teachers. Fam Med. 2005, 37: 30-35.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Copeland HL, Hewson MG: Developing and testing an instrument to measure the effectiveness of clinical teaching in an academic medical center. Acad Med. 2000, 75: 161-166. 10.1097/00001888-200002000-00015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Fluit CR, Bolhuis S, Grol R, Laan R, Wensing M: Assessing the Quality of Clinical Teachers: A Systematic Review of Content and Quality of Questionnaires for Assessing Clinical Teachers. J Gen Intern Med. 12-8-2010

  7. 7.

    Harden RM, Crosby JR: The good teacher is more than a lecturer. Medical Teacher. 2000, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    McMillan WJ: "Then you get a teacher"--guidelines for excellence in teaching. Med Teach. 2007, 29: e209-e218. 10.1080/01421590701478264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Molenaar WM, Zanting A, van BP, de GW, Baane JA, Bustraan JA, Engbers R, Fick TE, Jacobs JC, Vervoorn JM: A framework of teaching competencies across the medical education continuum. Med Teach. 2009, 31: 390-396. 10.1080/01421590902845881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DH, Wolfhagen IH, Muijtjens AM, Scherpbier AJ: The development of an instrument for evaluating clinical teachers: involving stakeholders to determine content validity. Med Teach. 2008, 30: e272-e277. 10.1080/01421590802258904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Sutkin G, Wagner E, Harris I, Schiffer R: What makes a good clinical teacher in medicine? A review of the literature. Acad Med. 2008, 83: 452-466. 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31816bee61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Agius SJ, Willis SC, McArdle PJ, O'Neill PA: Managing change in postgraduate medical education: still unfreezing?. Med Teach. 2008, 30: e87-e94. 10.1080/01421590801929976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Chan K: Validation of a measure of personal theories about teaching and learning. 2001, Ref Type: Report

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kelchtermans G: Getting the Story, Understanding the Lives - from Career Stories to Teachers Professional-Development. Teaching and Teacher Education. 1993, 9: 443-456. 10.1016/0742-051X(93)90029-G.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kelchtermans G, Vandenberghe R: Teachers Professional-Development - A Biographical Perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 1994, 26: 45-62. 10.1080/0022027940260103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Konings KD, Brand-Gruwel S, van Merrienboer JJG: Teachers' perspectives on innovations: Implications for educational design. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2007, 23: 985-997. 10.1016/j.tate.2006.06.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mann KV, Holmes DB, Hayes VM, Burge FI, Weld Viscount P: Community family medicine teachers' perceptions of their teaching role. Medical education. 2009, 35: 278.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Norton L, Richardson JTE, Hartley J, Newstead S, Mayes J: Teachers' beliefs and intentions concerning teaching in higher education. Higher Education. 2005, 50: 537-571. 10.1007/s10734-004-6363-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Pajares MF: Teachers Beliefs and Educational-Research - Cleaning Up A Messy Construct. Review of Educational Research. 1992, 62: 307-332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Stillwaggon J: Performing for the students: Teaching identity and the pedagogical relationship. Journal of Philosophy of Education. 2008, 42: 67-83. 10.1111/j.1467-9752.2008.00603.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Taylor EW, Tisdell EJ, Gusic ME: Teaching beliefs of medical educators: perspectives on clinical teaching in pediatrics. Med Teach. 2007, 29: 371-376. 10.1080/01421590701510553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Williams RG, Klamen DL: See one, do one, teach one--exploring the core teaching beliefs of medical school faculty. Med Teach. 2006, 28: 418-424. 10.1080/01421590600627672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Dukerich JM, Golden BR, Shortell SM: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: The impact of organizational identification identity and image on the cooperative behaviors of physicians. Administrative Science Quarterly. 2002, 47: 507-533. 10.2307/3094849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Glenn JM: Curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical education-a unifying perspective. Med Teach. 2010, 23 (4): 2001 Jul Ref Type: Report

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Hendricson WD, Anderson E, Andrieu SC, Chadwick DG, Cole JR, George MC, Glickman GN, Glover JF, Goldberg JS, Haden NK, Kalkwarf KL, Meyerowitz C, Neumann LM, Pyle M, Tedesco LA, Valachovic RW, Weaver RG, Winder RL, Young SK: Does faculty development enhance teaching effectiveness?. J Dent Educ. 2007, 71: 1513-1533.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Steinert Y, Mann K, Centeno A, Dolmans D, Spencer J, Gelula M, Prideaux D: A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8. Med Teach. 2006, 28: 497-526. 10.1080/01421590600902976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Steinert Y, Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Boudreau JD, Fuks A: Faculty development as an instrument of change: a case study on teaching professionalism. Acad Med. 2007, 82: 1057-1064. 10.1097/01.ACM.0000285346.87708.67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Wilkerson L, Irby DM: Strategies for improving teaching practices: a comprehensive approach to faculty development. Acad Med. 1998, 73: 387-396. 10.1097/00001888-199804000-00011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    MacDougall J, Drummond MJ: The development of medical teachers: an enquiry into the learning histories of 10 experienced medical teachers. Med Educ. 2005, 39: 1213-1220. 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02335.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hermans HJM: The construction and reconstruction of a dialogical self. Journal of Constructivist Psychology. 2003, 16: 89-130. 10.1080/10720530390117902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Hermans HJM: The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology. 2001, 7: 243-281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Masunaga H, Hitchcock MA: Residents' and faculty's beliefs about the ideal clinical teacher. Fam Med. 2010, 42: 116-120.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Bandura A: Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive-Development and Functioning. Educational Psychologist. 1993, 28: 117-148. 10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Bandura A: Self-Efficacy - Toward A Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review. 1977, 84: 191-215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Juliet M, Corbin & Anselm L Strauss: Basics of Qualitative Research. 2008, Ref Type: Report

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Johnson MD, Morgeson FP, Ilgen DR, Meyer CJ, Lloyd JW: Multiple Professional Identities: Examining Differences in Identification Across Work-Related Targets. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2006, 91: 498-506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    van Knippenberg D, van Schie ECM: Foci and correlates of organizational identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 2000, 73: 137-147. 10.1348/096317900166949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

Download references


The authors would like to thank Mrs Mereke Gorsira for her help in editing this study and translating the competency framework. Our gratitude also goes to all teachers who participated in the interviews.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thea CM van Roermund.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

TvR was principal researcher and wrote the article. FT was co-researcher and contributed to the data analysis. AJJAS was co-author and supervisor during the data collection and the analysis process and gave feedback on the selection of quotations. BJAMB was co-author and gave feedback on the selection of quotations. HJB was co-author and gave feedback on the selection of quotations.

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Roermund, T.C., Tromp, F., Scherpbier, A.J. et al. Teachers' ideas versus experts' descriptions of 'the good teacher' in postgraduate medical education: implications for implementation. A qualitative study. BMC Med Educ 11, 42 (2011).

Download citation


  • Family Physician
  • Good Teacher
  • Release Programme
  • Educational Method
  • Competency Framework