Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
4 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
3 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Trudie Roberts |
6 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - willemina molenaar |
14 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - VIKRAM JHA |
15 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jane MacDougall |
31 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Thea van Roermund |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
31 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
4 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Trudie Roberts |
15 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - willemina molenaar |
22 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jane MacDougall |
23 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - VIKRAM JHA |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
18 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Thea van Roermund |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
18 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
8 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Thea van Roermund |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
8 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
10 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Thea van Roermund |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
10 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
13 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Thea van Roermund |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
13 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
28 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
28 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6920-11-42 |
You can find further information about peer review here.