Skip to main content

The educational paradigm shift—a phenomenographic study of medical teachers’ experiences of practices

Abstract

Background

This paper proposes a novel approach to the development of competence-oriented higher education, a national transformation aimed at harmonising and digitising undergraduate medical and dental education in Finland.

Methods

We apply phenomenography as a viable qualitative method for medical education research. To better understand medical teachers’ expectations towards the change in the educational paradigm, we need to study teachers’ experiences of the current practices in undergraduate medical and dental education. The phenomenographic approach facilitates solid links between research, educational development, and change.

Results

The phenomenographic study maps the qualitatively different ways in which medical teachers experience undergraduate medical and dental education practices. The answers reflect the changing educational paradigm in medical schools, suggesting practical implications for further development of medical and dental education and training. Core content analysis is preferred instructional scaffold for both teachers and students to prioritise the extensive medical education objectives. The change towards competence-based orientation is in progress and national co-operation accelerates its impact.

Conclusion

There is an obvious need to enrich the content of the current curriculum with national guidelines that aim for congruence in assessment and objectives. Our results suggest an assessment application for the theoretical concepts presented and promote the competence orientation of education throughout the curricula of medical and dental undergraduate education. Moreover, our results contribute to current European discourses on competence-based approaches in higher education. Up-to-date pedagogical faculty development programmes are a key prerequisite for teacher empowerment and future orientation in teaching and learning for healthcare professions.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The key factor in ensuring and enhancing the quality of health systems is high-level education that transforms learners into qualified health professionals [1, 2]. A competence-based approach to higher education (HE) has grown in recent years and the European Union promotes the provision of competence-oriented education, training, and learning [3,4,5]; however, the notion of competence includes a variety of attributes, and competence-based models are widely considered to be discipline- and organisation-specific [4]. As Ottenhoff-de Jonge et al. [6] point out, the educational beliefs of medical educators drive their actions while teaching. In general, these unique views on teacherhood are socially constructed and contain both cognitive and affective components [6]. Furthermore, reconceptualising teacherhood is important for medical and dental schools to improve the quality of education and to lead the change from teaching-centred practices to a competence-based orientation with the learner at the centre [6, 7]. In addition, this profound paradigm shift requires re-thinking regarding the faculty development of medical educators. A standardisation of practices is required to avoid inconsistent developmental approaches, which could ultimately affect the quality of health care.

In medical education different frameworks serve various roles outlining characteristics of a competent workforce, facilitating mobility, and developing or assessing professional expertise [7]. Advanced medical knowledge based on basic science is essential for a physician, but in clinical practice they are often assessed based on non-medical expertise, such as collaboration and communication [8]. This study focuses on medical teachers’ different perceptions and sometimes tacit expectations of successful undergraduate medical and dental education.

Widely employed frameworks such as CanMEDs [9] and the British national preferences of “Outcomes for Graduates” [10] are able to describe the abilities physicians are required to have to meet evolving healthcare needs. CanMEDs [9] is a Canadian competency-based framework for medical training that has been widely adopted in specialty training and increasingly in undergraduate medical education around the globe. The competencies of CanMEDs [8] are integrated into postgraduate medical education [8] in Finland, and therefore this framework is worthy of attention in this article. CanMEDs [9] covers a broad perspective of the competence continuum of a physician needed to meet societal needs in an increasingly demanding and evolving health care sector. Frameworks have been recognised in transforming Canadian medical training since the 1990s as valid and practical foundations for excellence in patient care. The aim of the comprehensive CanMEDs framework is to facilitate acquiring up-to-date and sustainable expertise from entering residency programmes to transitions to autonomous practice as well as the continuous development of professional competence.

Currently, there are two prominent approaches to competence assessment in medical education: “an analytic approach that aims to precisely measure observable constituents and facets of competence and a holistic approach that focuses on a comprehensive assessment of competences in complex real situations reflecting actual performance” [11]. Nevertheless, the construction of competence frameworks for healthcare professions is considered challenging due to “potentially inadequate descriptions of practice, variable developmental approaches, and inconsistent reporting and evaluating of outcomes” [8] (p1355). The developmental efforts in HE represent a wide variation in approaches to competence, complicating the achievement of coordinated policies [4]. All domains of medical education must prepare graduates to meet the requirements of the emerging themes, such as patient care and safety [9]. The need for standardised development is obvious.

Comprehensive development towards competence orientation

Traditionally, medical, and dental education programmes have been based on the time spent on training [8]. In competence-based medical education, the capabilities of a graduating student are defined in advance. The extensive adoption of a competence-based approach to medical education aims to integrate theory with clinical practice supporting competence development as a continuum [11,12,13]. The requirements for training even more versatile and qualified physicians and dentists are increasing, and therefore a strong investment is needed to develop the professional skills of medical and dental teachers. The competence-based orientation may seem a rather theoretical and firmly pre-structured process for an experienced teacher [8], and the concepts and practices may be unfamiliar to teachers with a strong academic background [5]; however, the purpose is to adopt practices to support the continuum of professional development throughout students’ studies and working careers. This significant paradigm shift is a key challenge in Finland.

In medical education development has recently focused on identifying and forming the core curricula. The intended curriculum is the part of the curriculum that supports educational objectives and is planned by a curriculum committee [14]. What students actually learn (the learned curriculum) differs from the intended curriculum based on a core content analysis[15]. Moercke and Eika found that “the learned curriculum of clinical skills constituted 75% of the intended curriculum” [14] (p477). Another aspect to the realisation of the intended curriculum is how teachers interpret and implement the given guidelines in the classroom, constituting a taught/enacted curriculum [14, 15]. The assessed curriculum allows the impact of planned and enacted curricula to be evaluated, revealing students’ achievements and acquired competences [15].

Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) refer to the tasks in a professional setting that may be delegated to newly qualified doctors [9]. EPAs promote assessments in authentic settings that require a demonstration of competence in the daily practices of a physician [9]. The transition to competence-based specialist training has also prompted the reform of undergraduate education [8, 16]. Bramley and McKenna [16] report EPAs as a major development in identifying skill gaps in individuals or student cohorts and facilitating improvements. A key responsibility of students is to possess the appropriate level of competence before entering their residency programmes [8, 9]. This outcome-based approach to medical education aims to promote communication, collaboration, and management skills as key competences in addition to advanced medical expertise [8]. These qualities are extremely important to clearly communicate medical information to patients. Cooperation and collaboration are particularly important competences in the daily practice of other health care personnel as well [8].

EPAs are also employed in the evaluation of diverse curriculum models and in identifying curriculum gaps [16]. Ten Cate et al. [17] discuss the practical implications of EPAs for curricular work, which exist alongside their impact on the development of assessment practices and learning environments. According to Rotthoff et al. [11] “the concept of EPAs represents a paradigm between standardization and authenticity or control and trust in competence-based assessment.” They suggest using the “Competence Assessment Continuum Approach” to reorganize and adapt competence assessment. In addition to EPAs, Englander et al. [18] believe curricular development employs milestones and competence metrics describing individual competency. They define “a milestone as an observable marker of an individual’s ability that expresses the stepwise progression of expertise and EPA as a professional task that requires sufficient knowledge, skills, and attitudes and leads to a work outcome” [18] (p582).

Literature is replete with studies [19] indicating a relationship between approaches to teaching and the quality of students’ learning outcomes. Both students’ and teachers’ earlier experiences and perceptions inform the adoption of in-depth approaches in different contexts [19, 20]. Practicing medicine in a work context during the studies highlights potential skills gaps for undergraduates, but the lack of assessment tools makes evaluation scattered [8]. Evans et al. emphasise self-assessment as “a fundamental skill that should be introduced into both undergraduate and postgraduate education” [21] (p513). The ability to assess one's own work critically is often declared a goal of higher education but is seldom explicitly indicated in the curriculum [21, 22]. Still, doctors are expected to regularly assess individual performance, set targets and goals for professional growth, and act accordingly to maintain and continuously develop competence [21, 22]. As a career progresses as a teacher, valid self-assessment becomes even more important. Detailed criteria and performance-based feedback should enhance accuracy in self-assessment of competence [22], as success is measured as advancements in the standard of practice [21].

The multifaceted development of medical education and related educational research efforts serve important societal purposes. Interest in medical education research has grown in recent decades [23, 24]. It should be noted that medical education research is contextual by nature [25]. A paradigmatic change requires the reconstruction of teacherhood and systematic research in medical education, both in classrooms and clinical practice. Moreover, medical teachers should be able to examine their own work and develop teaching and learning research based on it [25, 26]. In addition, attention should be paid to study methods in undergraduate medical education research [23, 27].

Research question

The key research question is as follows: What are medical teachers´ ways of experiencing the undergraduate medical and dental education practices in Finland? The aim is to discover and describe the qualitative variation in teachers’ ways of experiencing the phenomenon.

Methods

This study employed a phenomenographic approach e.g. [28,29,30]. The purpose of phenomenographic research is to explore how people, whether students, teachers, professionals or laymen, understand or experience phenomena and concepts [31]. The core aim is to capture the variations in different conceptions or experiences and the relationships between them. Central to phenomenography is its non-dualist ontological perspective in which persons and the world are considered inseparable [32, 33]. A conception, or a way of experiencing a specific phenomenon, is perceived as a relation between the person and the phenomenon. People’s different ways of conceptualising or experiencing the same phenomenon are viewed as internally related, representing different meanings concerning the phenomenon in question [28, 33]. Thus, the object of phenomenographic research is the phenomenon as experienced by individuals rather than the phenomenon itself.

Phenomenography is grounded on the premise that there is a limited number of ways of experiencing a particular phenomenon and that they are logically related. The primary outcome of phenomenographic analysis is a structured set of logically related categories describing qualitative variations in ways of experiencing or understanding the phenomenon in question at a collective level [34]. Phenomenography is a viable qualitative approach to educational research in HE [27]. It fits within the interpretivism paradigm, which acknowledges that there are multiple, diverse interpretations of reality [27].

Study context and participants

The context of this study is Finnish undergraduate medical and dental education offered by five universities. In 2018, the intake of new students was 879, and the number of working age physicians in Finland [35] was 21,148. Basic medical education lasts for six years and confers a licentiate degree in medicine (360 ECTS credits), and dental programmes last five and a half years (330 ECTS credits). The basis for the educational and practice standards developing undergraduate medical education in Finland was recently updated [36]. The competence objectives are divided into three main categories: professional values and activities, professional skills, and professional knowledge. Competence objectives in dental education are based on the Association for Dental Education in Europe (ADEE) competence objectives. The teaching of clinical skills is integrated into all activities of the discipline-specific clinical period (three to six academic years). Students participate in the work of various hospital departments and health centres, where they learn the necessary medical skills. All medical schools have research programmes for students who wish to undertake scientific work. Student-centred learning methods, such as problem-based learning (PBL), have been introduced [37]. The current development efforts emphasise a competence orientation in medical education and national, discipline-specific collaboration in reaching a consensus on the core content of undergraduate education in medicine and dentistry [38].

The study participants were Finnish undergraduate medical and dental education teachers (n = 17; 6 men, 11 women) with medical degrees with different specialisations (n = 11), ranging in age group 31–35 years (n = 1) to age group of 61–65 years (n = 4). Participants represented various employment backgrounds as medical doctors and as teachers. One was a specialising dentist, and the rest of the doctors were licensed medical specialists, eight specialised in dentistry. Their experience as a graduated physician or dentist ranged from less than 3 (n = 1) to more than 30 years (n = 7) and experience as a teacher from less than 3 years (n = 1) to more than 20 years (n = 1). Six participants had university pedagogical studies (10 ECTS or more), and one of them had teacher’s pedagogical qualifications (60 ECTS) in professional teacher education. Three participants had completed Special Competence Programme in Medical/Dental Education (115 h), which the Finnish Medical Association recognises. Almost half (n = 8) of the respondents lacked the teacher training. The majority of the respondents (11) had participated in some pedagogical short-term training during their careers, however only six of the teachers were involved in continuous pedagogical training within the last three years. One participant didn’t have any pedagogical training.

Data collection

The data were collected in 2020 from three group interviews [39]. Interviews are the most common method used to obtain phenomenographic data, although there are other methods used [30, 40, 41]. Because the aim of this study was to investigate the range of different ways of experiencing the same phenomenon, we considered conducting group interviews an effective method to encourage the participants to express their thoughts, views, and experiences by interacting with one another. Furthermore, we considered group interviews appropriate because the aim of phenomenographic research is to capture collective rather than individual accounts of people’s experiences of a phenomenon. One group interview was conducted in the spring of 2020, and two online group interviews were conducted in the fall of 2020. Interviews were transcribed verbatim. The transcription of 217 min of interviews provided 80 pages for analysis.

Although group dynamics provide advantages during data collection, challenges may also arise, including an expectation of consensus rather than diversity, for which stronger members take the lead while others follow rather than expressing their own opinions and understandings [42]. While a facilitator may be able to mitigate this pressure to conform through clear instructions and the careful probing of the nuances of participants’ opinions as well as ensuring specific members do not dominate, it would be naive to expect that even excellent facilitation can remove all the pressures of social desirability [43]. In general, despite these limitations, the researcher plays a critical role in steering the conversation, involving the silent participants, and inviting participants to specify their views [44]. In the present study, smaller meetings were organised to promote equal opportunities to speak and to be heard. By having everyone participate from the beginning, the interviewer encouraged participants to speak and to feel confident in voicing their opinions. The interview questions were semi-structured [34]. The framework of themes to be explored were addressed by the following broadly structured questions:

How should students’ learning be supported in undergraduate medical and dental education?

What kind of pedagogical models have you personally applied? Which models do you know that are commonly used in medical and dental education?

What kind of pedagogical choices do you recognise as scaffolds for student learning?

What kind of guidance practices should be used to support learning?

How and what kind of learning environments support student learning?

What should the different tasks be like?

What kind of learning materials would be good to use?

How should the evaluation be carried out?

How does competence-based education fit into undergraduate education in medicine and dentistry?

What kind of pedagogical skills should a teacher possess for medical and dental education?

New ideas were discussed during the interviews by the participants, and the questions were asked as part of the discussion in the order in which the topics emerged. Follow-up questions or reformulated questions were asked when necessary to uncover underlying meanings [34]. Set of quantitative multiple-choice questions were used to map explanatory background variables, such as teaching experience and the field of specialisation.

Data analysis

Data were analysed using a phenomenographic approach, following the guidelines and examples provided by Åkerlind [28], Marton [29, 30, 34] and Kettunen and Tynjälä [40]. The first phase of the analysis focused on identifying and describing participants’ ways of experiencing undergraduate medical and dental education practices in general terms. Transcripts were considered as a whole and were repeatedly re-read to obtain and identify the underlying foci and intentions expressed in them. No predetermined categories or theories were used, but they were constituted in relation to the data. A draft set of descriptive categories for collective meaning was developed by comparing and contrasting the identified similarities and differences in expressed sentiments.

The second phase of the analysis sought to delineate the logical relationships among the various categories. The aim was to reveal one way of seeing a phenomenon in comparison to another, more complex one [28, 30]. Common themes of variations in the participants’ ways of experiencing undergraduate medical and dental education practices were identified and used to structure the logical relationships both within and between the categories [28].

To ensure a robust analysis, the data were initially analysed by the first author, and a second opinion was then sought from research colleagues, with whom she met several times. Discussing and revising the categories and their structures in this way confirmed the valid interpretation of the data [40]. The final phase of the analysis focused on ensuring that the categories of description met the three quality criteria defined by Marton and Booth [30]: (a) each category describes a distinctly different way of experiencing the phenomenon; (b) a logical relationship between the different categories is hierarchically represented; and (c) a limited number of categories describing variation are presented.

Results

Data analysis revealed four distinct categories of description reflecting participants’ ways of experiencing undergraduate medical and dental education practices in Finland (Table 1).

Table 1 Medical teachers’ ways of experiencing undergraduate medical and dental education practices in Finland

Description of the categories

In the first category, medical teachers experienced the undergraduate medical and dental education practices as an established situation to which they were accustomed. The competence orientation was based on local competence needs and related implications. The professional needs for competence were determined by teachers as individuals. Teaching was roughly based on the intended curriculum and the teacher’s role was to experiment with practices that were not defined in the official guidelines.

Targeted learning outcomes are listed there [in the curriculum], but how they are actually implemented in teaching is up to the university.

The targeted learning outcomes guide teaching, but how they are achieved is for the teacher to decide.

[Teaching] has been focused on how [knowledge] is applied in practice.

Participants expressed insecurity in teacherhood, and employed a variety of metrics to describe their credibility as teachers, no matter how experienced they were in the field of medicine itself. Learning was considered to be based on repetition, and the ultimate goal of the studies was the study module’s final examination. Medical teachers were familiar and confident with a variety of digital learning solutions that they considered essential instructional scaffolds.

I don’t really know about these pedagogies.

Students simply learn through repetition.

They should graduate, and now they have this big block exam.

The digitization of everyday life can be seen in teaching and in work in the field.

In the second category, medical teachers experienced the educational practices as fragmented requiring reassembly. The competence orientation was regional, reflecting multifaceted healthcare needs in particular areas, such as sparsely populated area of Lapland. Teachers deliberately interpreted the curriculum, referring to the actual curricular content they had been engaged with during their studies years ago.

[In Northern Finland] we have to, for example, teach the graduating course, some of the same things that are part of the competences of an anaesthesiologist or medical specialist.

But, if I think of myself as a student, I think it would be easier and maybe better to [teach] one thing at a time.

A teacher’s role was to exemplify how students will encounter the theoretical subject in actual patient work. Teacherhood was based on appreciation of competence, and expertise in pedagogy and medicine were genuinely respected. A teacher’s mission was to base learning on a connection between theory and practice.

Even if there is research-based teaching, it should be well-linked to clinical, practical work, which is of course the highest level of competence.

The competence to be achieved was described through learning objectives defined based on a core content analysis. Core content analysis was preferred instructional scaffold for both teachers and students to prioritise the extensive medical education objectives.

It is probably easier for the student to concretely understand the targeted learning outcomes.

A core content analysis is a good tool for teachers and for curriculum work, evaluation and…planning teaching methods.

Students [use] the core content for exams in such a way that some only focus on those subjects because you should get through the exam if you know those things.

The third category describes medical teachers' experiences of the educational practices as accelerators of change. Participants expressed that a national consensus on competence orientation is a crucial precondition for development. The curriculum was co-created and experienced as a change agent. The significance of nationwide collaboration and commitment to high-quality medical education were emphasised.

Targeted learning outcomes and a core content analysis are done, and they are the same nationally, and we acknowledge that they exist.

The national [curricula] were created together by four universities.

A teacher’s role was to demonstrate clinical practices in classroom teaching. Teacherhood was experienced as promoting professional empowerment. Learning was based on practical applications, and the goal was to equip students with competence to conduct self-assessment in medical practice. Instructional scaffolds to support this provided students with authentic learning opportunities.

New things are also demonstrated through practice in teaching.

They are quite liberated when the teacher is like an equal peer in a certain way.

I got stuck reading those evaluations made by students about the emergency situation. Although I haven’t seen those situations at all, I claim that I almost know based on their answers what stage of competence development those students are already at, and I think this kind of self-reflection is important.

Systematic clinical work where the student can start small and then progress and develop and receive feedback on that. Then, when the skills have developed, they can do more. This process would naturally include the competence-based approach and targeted learning outcomes.

The fourth category represents medical teachers' experiences of the educational practices through a future orientation. Competence orientation was growing in line with European guidelines and frameworks and curricular development efforts were based on an assessed curriculum. A teacher’s role was to reflect their own experiences and the diverse expectations of students, academia, and medical practice.

General competence goals and assessment criteria are national and EU-based.

Curricula have been updated in the national level subject group.

The realization that has come to me is that basically, I start teaching them, the students, in the style in which I myself learn, and then you notice that not everyone learns well the way I learn.

Teacherhood was believed to provide a decent chance of continuous development. Teachers who had participated in pedagogical training were interested in the new visions, pedagogical models, and tools. They were eager to apply what they learned immediately in their teaching. Learning was based on interprofessional interaction and seen in line with the requirement of professional growth.

When I started studying University Pedagogy, I realized that our course is well-planned.

[We implement] simulations in a treatment room situation in such a way that there is a dental nurse, a patient, and a dentist, and they are role-played.

We should focus on what is essential and important in terms of working life and studying and growing up to be a physician.

The instructional scaffolds that could have supported all previous efforts were assessment criteria. However, all forms, levels, and objectives of assessment were deemed to require considerable improvement.

But, there is a need for development. I recognize that, for example, the assessment criteria are not transparent at all.

I would like more tools for the evaluation of clinical work so that the competences could be assessed.

Relationships between the categories

Teachers’ experiences in undergraduate medical and dental education are shaped by many factors, such as the curriculum defined in official course guidelines, teaching practices, learning processes, and different phases of evaluation and assessment. In the first category, the educational practices were considered in relation to an established situation that offered little to no potential for change. The position of a teacher was not considered influential. The second category describes the fragmented educational practices and unique individual efforts to reassemble fragments. The third category describes the accelerators of change through current development efforts. The factors considered crucial for nation-level upheaval, harmonisation, and digitisation were collaboration and co-creation. The fourth category raises practical implications based on the current understanding of the future. Participants systematically expressed future orientation as the core value of curricula, and emphasised the essence of teachers’ wide-ranging pedagogical competence.

Discussion

Phenomenographic results reveal different ways of experiencing undergraduate medical and dental education practices. The present situation does not appear to be optimal for the development of teaching and learning practices, given that teachers feel insecure about their pedagogical competence as they do not possess common metrics to describe their abilities or performance in a classroom. Moercke and Eika remind us that “educational objectives are often disseminated to teachers under the assumption that goals, learning objectives and checklists are agreed upon by developers, teachers and students alike” [14] (p477). Our findings are in line with their results: the method of implementing intended (planned) curricula seems to position teachers as passive co-operators and thus represents a top-down curriculum design process. Curriculum assessment would provide a sustainable way to evaluate the impact of planned and enacted curricula, as it reveals students’ achievements and acquired competences [15]. EPAs have the potential to be employed in the evaluation of diverse curriculum models or in identifying curriculum gaps [16]. The role of pedagogical experts in the process of defining the core curriculum needs to be discussed further.

In an established situation, aims and actions seem fragmented and a medical teacher’s ability to influence the prevailing conditions limited. Medical teachers have a strong sense of competence and a profound inner drive to review and improve current practices. Medical schools have well-established pedagogical practices worth developing into the digital era. Reactive strategies have been successful during COVID-19 pandemic [45, 46], and our results confirm that teachers are confident and comfortable facilitating already applied pedagogical choices online. However, they are not always able to rationalise their choices as their actions are based on individual experiences as a learner or teacher instead of conscious pedagogical consideration.

Our findings indicate that medical teachers are future orientated and have interest in developing teaching practices and the profession. They thrive as developers when collaboration and co-creation is supported. National interdisciplinary co-operation accelerates their impact. A lack of instructional scaffolds, such as assessment criteria, discourages many of these efforts, from planning to classroom actions. Core content analysis is perceived as an appropriate tool to allocate resources and focus actions as current medical education requires students to master extensive amounts of information. Biesta and van Braak [25] propose a triad of professional qualification, professional socialisation, and professional subjectification to reorient curriculum design, pedagogy, assessment, and evaluation in educational practice. Rotthoff et al. [11] criticise the assumption that the deconstruction of professional roles into variables, such as the trinity of knowledge, skills, and attitudes, automatically leads to comprehensive competences. Still, EPAs have been reported to improve student assessment and are well accepted in workplace assessment [16]. Ruhalahti [20] and Alkhowailed et al. [45] suggest rethinking assessment as an integral step in a learning process, with a deep-learning approach in mind. Our results confirm that practices of authentic assessment have not yet been established [45, 46]. Re-evaluation and empirical substantiation of competence-based assessment is required.

The results reflect doctors' perceptions of the changing educational paradigm in medical schools, suggesting practical implications for the further development of medical and dental education and training. Biesta and van Braak [25] emphasise that aims and actions should always be considered in relation to context. A competence-based approach should enhance accuracy in different forms of assessment as success is always measured as advancement in practice [21, 22]. This paradigmatic change requires the reconstruction of teacherhood and medical education research, both in classrooms and clinical practice. Our results emphasise that a medical teacher's role reflects the diverse expectations of students, academia, and medical practice. This reinforces the notion that systematic teacher research can improve the practice of education [25, 26]. Advanced medical knowledge is based on highest standards of medical science [12], and the latest medical education research should inform teachers’ aims and actions [25]. Future research could study additional educational practices in medical schools focusing on clinical lecturers’ pedagogical competence.

Limitations and strengths

Phenomenographic studies help to improve practice by exploring variations in participants’ experiences of the phenomenon in question, which are illuminated by the dimensions of variation between them e.g. [28, 40]. The results of this study cannot be generalised, but they may be transferable to similar situations or applicable in another context.

The number of participants (n = 17) can be considered appropriate in light of previous phenomenographic studies suggesting that 10 to 15 participants is usually sufficient for capturing variation [27, 47, 48]. The sample was not completely random in that we selected active teachers as respondents. We cannot exclude the possibility that our findings could be an expression of other latent or unexplored dimensions related to the phenomenon.

Conclusions

There is a need to enrich the content of the curriculum with national guidelines aiming at congruence between assessment and objectives. Our results suggest an assessment application of the theoretical concepts delivered and promote the competence orientation at different depths and breadths in medical and dental undergraduate education curricula. Development of assessment criteria is crucial. A holistic view of competence oriented HE should be emphasised. Medical education requires pan-European guidelines, national frameworks, and genuine sectorial/disciplinary collaboration on implementation. Up-to-date pedagogical faculty development programme [49] is a key prerequisite for teacher empowerment and a future orientation in teaching and learning for healthcare professions. Transforming educational beliefs and reconceptualising teacherhood in medical and dental education could increase the prestige of the teaching profession both at the level of society and within the scientific community. Concepts and indicators for medical teachers’ competence are required.

Availability of data and materials

Due to confidentiality agreements, supporting data can only be made available to bona fide researchers subject to a non-disclosure agreement. The anonymized datasets of the current study (in Finnish) are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Passi V, Doug M, Peile E, Thistlethwaite J, Johnson N. Developing medical professionalism in future doctors: a systematic review. Int J Med Educ. 2010;1:19–29. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4bda.ca2a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Govaerts MJB, van der Vleuten CPM, Holmboe ES. Managing tensions in assessment: moving beyond either–or thinking. Med Educ. 2019;53(1):64–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. European Union. Recommendation on key competences for lifelong learning. Off J Eur Union. 2018;C 189:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Davies H. Competence-based curricula in the context of Bologna and EU higher education policy. Pharm. 2017;5(2):17. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy5020017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ipperciel D, ElAtia S. Assessing graduate attributes: building a criteria-based competency model. Int J High Educ. 2014;3(3):27–38. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n3p27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ottenhoff-de Jonge MW, van der Hoeven I, Gesundheit N, van der Rijst RM, Kramer AWM. Medical educators’ beliefs about teaching, learning, and knowledge: development of a new framework. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):176. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02587-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Batt A, Williams B, Brydges M, Leyenaar M, Tavares W. New ways of seeing: supplementing existing competency framework development guidelines with systems thinking. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 2021;26:1355–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-021-10054-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Niemi-Murola L, Merenmies J. Educational objectives of basic medical education as basis for reforming specialist training. Duodecim. 2019;135(5):477–85 (in Finnish).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frank JR, Snell L, Sherbino J, editors. CanMEDS 2015 physician competency framework. Ottawa: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  10. General Medical Council. Outcomes for graduates. https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/outcomes-for-graduates-2020_pdf-84622587.pdf. Accessed 7 Jul 2022.

  11. Rotthoff T, Kadmon M, Harendza S. It does not have to be either or! Assessing competence in medicine should be a continuum between an analytic and a holistic approach. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 2021;26:1659–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-021-10043-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Carraccio CL, Englander R. From Flexner to competencies: reflections on a decade and the journey ahead. Acad Medicine. 2013;88(8):1067–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318299396f.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Carraccio C, Englander R, Gilhooly J, Mink R, Hofkosh D, Barone MA, Holmboe ES. Building a framework of entrustable professional activities, supported by competencies and milestones, to bridge the educational continuum. Acad Med. 2017;92(3):324–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moercke AM, Eika B. What are the clinical skills levels of newly graduated physicians? Self-assessment study of an intended curriculum identified by a Delphi process. Med Educ. 2002;36(5):472–8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01208.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ramia E, Salameh P, Btaiche IF, Saad AH. Mapping and assessment of personal and professional development skills in a pharmacy curriculum. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0533-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bramley AL, McKenna L. Entrustable professional activities in entry-level health professional education: a scoping review. Med Educ. 2021;55(9):1011–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ten Cate O, Chen HC, Hoff RG, Peters H, Bok H, van der Schaaf M. Curriculum development for the workplace using entrustable professional activities (EPAs): AMEE Guide No. 99. Med Teach. 2015;37(11):983–1002. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1060308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Englander R, Frank JR, Carraccio C, Sherbino J, Ross S, Snell L. Toward a shared language for competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 2017;39(6):582–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Trigwell K, Prosser M, Waterhouse F. Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. High Educ. 1999;37:57–70. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003548313194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ruhalahti S. Redesigning a pedagogical model for scaffolding dialogical, digital and deep learning in vocational teacher education. Acta Electronica Universitatis Lapponiensis. 2019;257. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-337-145-3

  21. Evans AW, McKenna C, Oliver M. Self-assessment in medical practice. J R Soc Med. 2002;95(10):511–3. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.95.10.511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gordon MJ. A review of the validity and accuracy of self-assessments in health professions training. Acad Med. 1991;66(12):762–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199112000-00012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Baernstein A, Liss HK, Carney PA, Elmore JG. Trends in study methods used in undergraduate medical education research, 1969–2007. J Am Med Assoc. 2007;289(9):1038–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rees CE, Knight LV. Viewpoint: the trouble with assessing student’s professionalism: theoretical insights from sociocognitive psychology. Acad Med. 2007;82(1):46–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Biesta GJJ, van Braak M. Beyond the medical model: thinking differently about medical education and medical education research. Teach Learn Med. 2020;32(4):449–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2020.1798240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xerri D. The use of interviews and focus groups in teacher research. Clearing House J Educ Strateg Issues Ideas. 2018;91(3):140–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2018.1436820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Stenfors-Hayes T, Hult H, Dahlgren M. A phenomenographic approach to research in medical education. Med Educ. 2013;47:261–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Åkerlind GS. Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. High Educ Res Dev. 2005;24:321–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500284672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Marton F. Phenomenography —describing conceptions of the world around us. Instr Sci. 1981;10:177–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Marton F, Booth S. Learning and awareness. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kettunen J, Tynjälä P. Bridging the gap between research and practice: using phenomenographic findings to develop training for career practitioners. Int J Educ Vocat Guidance. 2022;22:247–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-021-09483-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bowden J. Reflections on the phenomenographic team research process. In: Bowden JA, Walsh E, editors. Doing developmental phenomenography. Melbourne: RMIT University Press; 2005. p. 11–31.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Marton F. The structure of awareness. In: Bowden JA, Walsh E, editors. Phenomenography. Melbourne: RMIT University Press; 2000. p. 102–16.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Marton F. Phenomenography—a research approach investigating different understandings of reality. Thought. 1986;21:28–49.

    Google Scholar 

  35. The Finnish Medical Association. Medical education. 2022. https://www.laakariliitto.fi/en/medical-education/. Accessed 7 July 2022.

  36. University of Helsinki. Valmistuvan lääkärin osaamistavoitteet [Targeted learning outcomes for licentiates of medicine]. 2020. https://www.helsinki.fi/fi/laaketieteellinen-tiedekunta/opiskelu-ja-opetus/valmistuvan-laakarin-osaamistavoitteet. Accessed 7 Jul 2022.

  37. Eskola EL. Information literacy of medical students studying in the problem-based and traditional curriculum. Inf Res. 2005;10(2):n2.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Levy AR, Kulmala P, Merenmies J, Jääskeläinen J, Kortekangas-Savolainen O, Jääskeläinen J, et al. National MEDigi project: systematic implementation of digitalization to undergraduate medical and dental education in Finland. FinJeHeW. 2019;11(4):357–61. https://doi.org/10.23996/fjhw.83309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Brinkmann S. Qualitative interviewing. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  40. Kettunen J, Tynjälä P. Applying phenomenography in guidance and counselling research. Br J Guid Counc. 2018;46:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2017.1285006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Marton F. Phenomenography. In: Husén T, Postlethwaite TN, editors. The international encyclopedia of education. 2nd ed. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1994. p. 4424–9.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Farnsworth J, Boon B. Analysing group dynamics within the focus group. Qual Res. 2010;10:605–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hollander J. The social context of focus groups. J Contemp Ethnogr. 2004;33:602–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241604266988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kettunen J. Career practitioners’ conceptions of social media and competency for social media in career services. Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä, Finnish Institute for Educational Research. Studies, 32. Dissertation. 2007. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-39-7160-1

  45. Alkhowailed MS, Rasheed Z, Shariq A, Elzainy A, El Sadik A, Alkhamiss A, et al. Digitalization plan in medical education during COVID-19 lockdown. Inform Med Unlocked. 2020;20:100432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2020.100432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Currie G, Hewis J, Nelson T, Chandler A, Nabasenja C, Spuur K, et al. COVID-19 impact on undergraduate teaching: medical radiation science teaching team experience. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2020;51(4):518–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2020.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Åkerlind GS. Growing and developing as a university researcher. High Educ. 2008;55(2):241–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9052-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Trigwell K. A phenomenographic interview on phenomenography. In: Bowden JA, Walsh E, editors. Phenomenography. Melbourne: RMIT University Press; 2000. p. 62–82.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Steinert Y, Irby DM, Dolmans D. Reframing faculty development practice and research through the lens of adaptive expertise. Med Teach. 2021;43(8):865–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2021.1931081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. TENK. The ethical principles of research with human participants and ethical review in the human sciences in Finland. 2019. https://tenk.fi/sites/default/files/202101/Ethical_review_in_human_sciences_2020.pdf. Accessed 7 Jul 2022.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of all the interviewees who participated in the study.

Funding

This study has been performed with the support of the Finnish Ministry of Education and Culture, decision number OKM/270/523/2017, Docid: 363635.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The first author coordinated the conception and design of the study, and the drafting and critical review of the paper. Data collection was performed by the first and third author. The fourth and fifth author contributed to the conception and drafting, providing a critical review of the paper throughout the process. The second author contributed to the research methodology in detail. The analysis and interpretation of data was conducted by the first and second author together to ensure research quality. Authors represented both educational and medical sciences in critically approaching the content, ensuring the accuracy and integrity of the work. All authors contributed to the subsequent revision of the article and approved the final manuscript for publication.

Authors’ information

Sanna Brauer, PhD, MA (Education), is a researcher, learning designer and teacher trainer at Oulu University of Applied Sciences. As the principal investigator of Smart Campus team, Brauer explores digital pedagogy, competence-oriented continuous learning, and digital transformation in the world of work. In 2020-2021 she led the national digital pedagogical development for medical education in Finnish universities (MEDigi project). Her current research on motivation and competence-based professional development is positioning future theoretical and practical development efforts in these areas.

Jaana Kettunen, PhD is a researcher professor and vice-director at the Finnish Institute for Educational Research of the University of Jyväskylä, Finland. She is also a research associate at the Florida State University’s Center for the Study of Technology in Counseling and Career Development, USA. Her research revolves around career guidance practice and policy with a special interest in the design and use of information and communication technology. She has an extensive background in qualitative and interpretive research, including phenomenography.

Anna Levy, PhD, MSc (Nursing Science), coordinated national MEDigi project (2019-2021) for the Faculty of Medicine at University of Oulu. MEDigi is part of the national development work of medical education. Her research efforts focus on general‬ study orientation of medical students and‬ expertise in medicine at different stages of medical education.‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬

Jussi Merenmies, MD, PhD, is a Senior Clinical Lecturer in Paediatrics and the Progamme Director of Degree Programme in Medicine at The Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital. He is a specialist in Paediatrics and Paediatric Nephrology.

Petri Kulmala, MD, PhD, is a Professor of Medical Education and the Dean of Education at the University of Oulu, Medical Faculty, and a Specialist in Paediatrics and Paediatric Allergology at the Oulu University Hospital, the Clinic for Children and Adolescents, Oulu, Finland.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanna Brauer.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethical approval for this study was deemed unnecessary by The Northern Ostrobothnia Hospital District Regional Ethics Committee (30/08/2022). This study in educational sciences is not medical research as stipulated in Finnish legislation (Medical Research Act 488/1999), and therefore does not require approval from the statutory ethics committee.

Research was conducted following the Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK’s set of guidelines [50]. The dignity and autonomy of human research participants was respected, and the research did not cause significant risks, damage or harm to research participants, communities, or other subjects of research. Participation was voluntary and an electronic informed consent was acquired. The corresponding author lead data collection and anonymization of the data. Confidentiality and anonymity of respondents were guaranteed throughout the research and publication processes.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brauer, S., Kettunen, J., Levy, A. et al. The educational paradigm shift—a phenomenographic study of medical teachers’ experiences of practices. BMC Med Educ 23, 29 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04013-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04013-w

Keywords

  • Undergraduate medical education
  • Medical teacher
  • Phenomenography
  • Competence orientation
  • Curriculum