Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Willingness to volunteer and readiness to practice of undergraduate medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey in Indonesia

BMC Medical Education volume 21, Article number: 138 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The question to involve or restrict medical students’ involvement in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic response remains contentious. As their state of preparation and perceptions in volunteering during this pandemic have yet to be investigated, this study aims to evaluate Indonesian medical students’ willingness to volunteer and readiness to practice during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

A web-based survey was conducted among undergraduate medical students throughout Indonesia. Socio-demographic and social interaction information, in addition to willingness to volunteer and readiness to practice, were obtained using a self-reported questionnaire. The significance level was set at 5%.

Results

Among 4870 participants, 2374 (48.7%) expressed their willingness to volunteer, while only 906 (18.6%) had adequate readiness to practice. Male students, students with prior volunteering experience in health or non-health sectors, and students from public universities or living in Central Indonesia (vs Java) had higher scores of willingness and readiness to volunteer. Students from Sumatra also had better preparedness (odds ratio [OR] 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15–2.12, p = 0.004), while the opposite occurred for students from Eastern Indonesia (OR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.44–0.89, p = 0.002)–when compared to students from Java. In addition, compared to students with high family income, students from lower-middle income families were less willing to volunteer (OR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.59–0.98, p = 0.034), though those with low family income had better readiness (OR 1.51, 95% CI: 1.10–2.08, p = 0.011). Shortage of medical personnel, sense of duty, and solicitation by stakeholders were the main reasons increasing the students’ willingness to volunteer; whereas contrarily fear for own’s health, absence of a cure, and fear of harming patients were the primary factors diminishing their willingness to volunteer.

Conclusion

Our findings indicated that many Indonesian medical students are willing to volunteer, yet only few of them were ready to practice, indicating that further preparations are required to maximize their potentials and minimize their exposure to hazards. We suggest that their potentials as a firm support system during the pandemic should not be overlooked, and that the integration of relevant courses to the medical curricula are imperative to prepare for future public health emergencies.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has placed a significant burden on healthcare systems, resulting in millions of cases and deaths worldwide. Indonesia, the largest archipelago country in the world, has been the hardest-hit nation in Southeast Asia with several hundred thousands of cases and tens of thousands of deaths [1]. The current Indonesian health system is struggling to keep up with the perpetual COVID-19 case surges as recurrent shortage of medical supplies had been reported [2]. Furthermore, this was aggravated by the alarming rate of mental breakdown and death tolls among healthcare workers (HCWs) [3], thus raising concerns on the possibilities of medical staff shortages [2], in which the question remains whether to involve medical students as relief aids during this ongoing crisis or not [4].

The role of medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic remains contentious as their participation varies across countries. While some countries integrated their education into COVID-19 response systems, other countries specifically enforce policies to limit medical students’ involvement in medical practices [5]. In Indonesia, several student-led organizations have actively participated in the pandemic response by steering fundraising campaigns and providing continuing supports to HCWs. However, most of these initiatives were conducted in non-clinical settings, while their participation in medical care remains vague [6]. Although recently clerkship students have been assigned to teaching hospitals by implementing strict health protocols to facilitate their learning through direct patient exposures, their current involvement might not be sufficient reinforce HCWs given the ethical dilemma of their competence and patient care obligation [7]. Nonetheless, these enterprises signify the potentials of medical students as an integral part of the national healthcare system.

To the best of our knowledge, the willingness to volunteer and readiness to practice of medical students in Indonesia have yet to be investigated. In fact, the investigation of these aspects is saliently important in order to assess their preparedness to partake in pandemic responses and to shape the medical curricula to prepare for future public health emergencies [8, 9]. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the willingness to volunteer and readiness to practice of undergraduate medical students in Indonesia during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

This study is part of a bigger project (“The willingness to volunteer and readiness of Indonesian medical students during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic”) conducted by the MEDICO-19 Research Group. The study protocol has been approved by the Health Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia and Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital (758/UN2.F1/ETIK/PPM.00.02/2020). All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Study design and participants

A cross-sectional survey was conducted among undergraduate medical students in Indonesia from 13 July to 11 October 2020. All data were collected online via a self-reported questionnaire using Google Forms (docs.google.com/forms). Participants were recruited with a snowball sampling method through social media and emails. Upon questionnaire distribution, participants were encouraged to forward the link to other relevant respondents.

The study population involved all undergraduate medical students in Indonesia with access to the internet. Prior to filling the questionnaire, respondents were provided with an online informed consent form, in which they had to answer a yes-no question to confirm their willingness to participate in this study. Respondents were informed that they had the rights to withdraw their consents at any time without any entailing consequences, and that all information would be kept anonymous and confidential throughout the study.

The minimum required sample size was calculated with an online sample size calculator (Raosoft, Inc., Seattle, WA) [10]. As we were unable to obtain the exact number of undergraduate medical students in Indonesia, the population size was estimated to be ~ 62,500 students. With a margin of error of 5% and a confidence level of 99%, a minimum of 657 participants were required in this study.

Measurement tool and data management

Development of the questionnaire was performed through thorough literature search of similar studies [11,12,13,14], which was then modified to match the relevant context, validated, and presented to the respondents in Bahasa Indonesia. The initial survey was drafted in English and was translated to Bahasa Indonesia through forward and backward translation by GL, AMP, and IA – in order to ensure the language validity of the questionnaire. Validation of the questionnaire was first performed by two independent experts (AF and ISW) to ascertain the appropriateness and sufficiency of the contents. Subsequently, the questionnaire was pilot tested on 30 participants, in which their responses were obtained for items comprehension and validity and reliability testing [15].

The questionnaire consisted of four primary sections: socio-demographical variables, social interaction history, willingness to volunteer, and readiness to practice. Socio-demographic characteristics including age and sex, institution, level of education, household conditions, marital status, socioeconomic status, and history of chronic diseases were obtained in this study. Socioeconomic status was determined according to family income, where family income of ≤IDR 1,500,000, IDR 1,500,000-2,500,000, IDR 2,500,000-3,500,000, and ≥ IDR 3,500,000 were classified as low, lower-middle, upper-middle, and high-income class, respectively [16].

The second section aimed to investigate the respondents’ volunteering experience as well as COVID-19 contact and disease history. The third and fourth sections were presented in five-point Likert scales ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree”. The third section consisted of respondents’ willingness to volunteer (if healthy and able to), and possible reasons underlying their willingness and reluctance to volunteer. COVID-19 volunteering opportunity was defined as any voluntary activities, regardless of its sectors (i.e. health or non-health), aiming to alleviate the burden of the COVID-19 pandemic [17]. The final section aimed to assess the respondents’ readiness to volunteer [12] through 11 questions (maximum score: 55 points), where higher scores indicated better preparedness. Readiness to practice was determined from the respondents’ confidence in volunteering and state of preparation as COVID-19 volunteers. This section oriented the development of professional identity formation among undergraduate medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic, including their adaptations and coping strategies, perceived roles during the pandemic, and their extent of readiness to take part in the COVID-19 management, which encompasses prior experience in volunteering, knowledge and understanding on COVID-19, and COVID-19 courses enrolled [12, 18]. Items in the fourth section were tested for internal reliability using Cronbach’s alpha, which resulted in a coefficient of 0.767, indicating high internal reliability [19].

Statistical analysis

Submitted responses were extracted from Google Forms to the MS Excel® for Office 365 MSO ver. 2002 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, 2018) for cleaning and coding. Subsequently, the cleaned dataset was analysed using SPSS 24.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and visualized using R ver. 4.0.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) [20] with an additional ggplot2 package [21]. Dichotomous data were presented in frequencies and proportions, while continuous data in mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median (interquartile range [IQR]), depending on data normality as tested with Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests.

Analysis of willingness to volunteer and readiness to practice was performed by dichotomizing the scores by cut-off points. According to the Bloom’s criteria [22], sum scores of ≥80% (≥44 points) indicated good readiness to practice. For willingness to volunteer, score of 1–3 denoted hesitance to volunteer, while score of 4–5 indicated likeliness to be willing to volunteer [23]. The association of independent variables with willingness to volunteer and readiness to practice was analysed using asymptotic Pearson’s chi-squared or Monte Carlo exact tests (for dichotomous variables) and Mann-Whitney U (for continuous variables). Covariates associated with each outcome at p ≤ 0.20 were included in the multivariate analysis. In addition, to explore the reasons influencing the participants’ willingness to volunteer, Goodman and Kruskal’s gamma statistic (G) was utilized. The significance level was set at 5% for all analyses.

Results

Characteristics of study population

A total of 4870 valid participants with a median age of 20 years (IQR: 19–21) were included for analyses. Most of the respondents were female (69.8%), and a majority resided in Java (86.9%). About 80.6% participants were still in their pre-clinical years, while the proportion of those from public and private universities was almost equal (Table 1). In terms of socioeconomic status, most respondents were living with their families during questionnaire completion with a median household size of four people (IQR: 3–5 people). In addition, most participants were not living with elderlies (76.3%), were not married (99.5%), and did not have any history of chronic illness (93.5%), whereas almost half of them were living with children. The majority of the participants were from high socioeconomic groups (78.5%).

Table 1 Characteristics of participants stratified by willingness to volunteer and readiness to practicea
Full size table

A large share of the participants had had experience as volunteers in non-health sectors (64.7%), while only 17.7% stated that they had volunteered in health sectors. Intriguingly, a remarkable number of participants stated that they did not know their own and family’s history of COVID-19 infection (17.4 and 13.4%, respectively), neither did they know about their history of direct physical contact with COVID-19 patients (22.3%). Only 3.4% participants reported that they had engaged in physical contacts with COVID-19 patients, and only 0.7% had been infected by the COVID-19. Further details on the participants’ characteristics can be seen on Table 1.

Prevalence of and factors associated with willingness to volunteer and readiness to practice

Our findings indicated that nearly half of the participants were willing to volunteer during the COVID-19 pandemic (48.7%), including 626 participants (12.9%) who expressed their strong willingness. However, only 906 respondents (18.6%) yielded adequate readiness score. Willingness to volunteer varied by sex, location, institution type, and volunteering experience, whereas readiness to practice varied across age, sex, location, institution type, academic level, family income, history of chronic illness, volunteering experience, and history of physical contacts with COVID-19 patients (Table 1).

After adjusting for confounders, we discovered that sex, location, institution type, family income, and volunteering experience were independent determinants of willingness to volunteer (Table 2). Male students and students living in Central Indonesia (i.e. Kalimantan and Sulawesi) were 1.14 (95% CI: 1.01–1.23, p = 0.038) and 2.26 (95% CI: 1.46–3.48, p < 0.001) times more likely to be willing to volunteer, while those from lower-middle families were 24.2% less likely to be willing to volunteer during the pandemic (OR 0.76 [95% CI: 0.59–0.98], p = 0.034)–when compared to those from high-income families. Additionally, students with prior volunteering experience in health or non-health sectors were more likely to be willing to volunteers (OR 1.67 [95% CI: 1.42–1.96] and OR 1.63 [95% CI: 1.44–1.84], respectively; both p < 0.001; Fig. 1a).

Table 2 Multivariate analysis on factors associated with willingness to volunteer and readiness to practicea
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Results of multivariate logistic analysis on factors associated with Indonesian undergraduate medical students’ willingness to volunteer and readiness to practice. COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; COVID-19 phys. cont. history, history of physical contacts with COVID-19 patients; IDR, Indonesian Rupiah

Full size image

Similar to willingness to volunteer, male students (OR 1.46 [95% CI: 1.25–1.71], p < 0.001), public university students (OR 1.28 [95% CI: 1.09–1.50], p = 0.002), and students living in Central Indonesia also had better preparedness (OR 2.05 [95% CI: 1.33–3.17], p = 0.001; Fig. 1b). Interestingly, students residing in Sumatra were also more likely to yield better readiness when compared to students living in Java (OR 1.56 [95% CI: 1.15–2.12], p = 0.004), while the opposite trend was observed for students living in Eastern Indonesia (OR 0.629 [95% CI: 0.44–0.89], p = 0.009). Students with experience as health or non-health volunteers also had higher readiness score (OR 2.00 [95% CI: 1.67–2.39] and OR 1.68 [95% CI: 1.41–1.99], both p < 0.001). Lastly, we also revealed that students with low family income was 51.2% more likely to be ready to practice during the COVID-19 pandemic (OR 1.51 [95% CI: 1.10–2.08], p = 0.011).

Possible reasons underlying hesitancy to volunteer

To further elaborate our findings on the willingness to volunteer, we queried several common reasons that might potentially influence the decision of undergraduate medical students to take part in the COVID-19 response system. We discovered that shortage of medical personnel and self-obligation were the main drivers in determining the willingness to volunteer (G = 0.689 and G = 0.607, respectively; both p < 0.001). In addition, solicitation to volunteer by the government or stakeholders and sanctions for hesitance to volunteer also yielded positive correlation with willingness to volunteer (Table 3). Astoundingly, remuneration had no effect on medical students’ decision to volunteer (G = − 0.014, p = 0.462), though provision of monetary compensation when their services resulted in infection or death seemed to increase their willingness to volunteer (G = 0.062, p = 0.001 and G = 0.114, p < 0.001; respectively).

Table 3 Reasons associated with willingness and hesitance to volunteer
Full size table

On the other hand, the most important reasons underlying the students’ reluctance to volunteer were fear for own’s health and the absence of a cure (G = − 0.221 and G = -0.205, respectively; both p < 0.001). Moreover, other reasons including fear of harming patients (G = -0.117, p < 0.001), followed by scarcity of personal protective equipment (PPE; G = -0.059, p = 0.002) and fear for family’s health (G = − 0.048, p = 0.021) also affected their willingness to volunteer.

Discussion

As future healthcare professionals, medical students are regarded as those with closest capability to take part in battling the current pandemic [9]. Nevertheless, their potentials in fighting this pandemic, especially in Indonesia, have yet to be well-investigated. According to our findings, we discovered that a considerable number of medical students was willing to voluntarily support the care system during the pandemic. However, this was not accompanied by a proportional number of participants with adequate readiness to practice, indicating that further preparations are required to ensure that they are equipped with sufficient knowledge and aptitude [9]. This is in accordance to the findings of previous studies in Ireland [24] and Germany [5] which reported high rates of willingness to volunteer among medical students [5, 24] with relatively low rates of readiness to practice [24].

Further analysis revealed that place of residence and institution type played significant roles in determining willingness to volunteer and readiness to practice. These effects may potentially be elucidated by the fact that state-university students and students residing in Central Indonesia and Sumatra had higher rate of prior health volunteering experience (public vs private: 21.1% vs 13.8%; Central Indonesia vs Java: 23.3% vs 16.8%; Sumatra vs Java: 28.3% vs 16.8%). However, the interaction between these variables are complex, and future investigations should aim to elaborate possible reasons underlying these trends. Moreover, we also observed that male students had higher willingness and readiness to volunteer. Although the rationale of this interplay has yet to be discovered, our findings were consistent with previous studies [25, 26], thus further consolidating the evidence. Our findings also indicated that students with lower family income had lower rates of willingness to volunteer, which was concordant with the previous findings by Niebuur et al. [27]. Despite this, these students yielded higher score in readiness to practice, which may result from their prior experience on the privilege gap in medicine [28].

In addition, volunteering experience, either in health or non-health sectors, was also one of the strongest determinants influencing the willingness to volunteer and readiness to practice of Indonesian medical students. One possible explanation is that volunteering activities may increase their values (selfless virtues), understanding (knowledge and experience), enhancement (self-satisfaction), career (career-related experience), social (fortification of social relationship), and protection (alleviation of negative feelings or personal problems) [29], which may create a positive feedback loop resulting in increased willingness and readiness. Furthermore, these students are also more likely to be affiliated with volunteering organizations, thus further acclimatizing their environment to volunteerism [13]. These findings imply that medical institution and relevant stakeholders should encourage students to take part in volunteering activities to enrich them with invaluable knowledge and experience, which in turn may also be beneficial for the students’ values and career [29].

We observed that moral values linked to medical profession were the primary reason underlying the willingness of medical students in Indonesia to volunteer during the pandemic. Their altruism was expressed by their strong willingness to volunteer if medical staff shortage occurs or if they were requested to volunteer. Furthermore, monetary incentives were not associated with increased willingness – further signifying their selfless traits. On the contrary, most students expressed concerns for potential harms to their own and family’s health; in addition to paucity of PPE, which also reduced their willingness to volunteer, indicating that a systematic planning of allocation of volunteers and assurance of adequate PPE are required to prevent them from being exposed to unnecessary risks [9]. In addition, the fact that fear of causing harm to patients still influenced their decisions further emphasized that proper trainings are urgently needed. Clinical confidence as one of prerequisites to fully participate in clinical activities is reported to be influenced by adequate training programs [30], which is also vital to tackle global health emergencies [31]. The altruistic attitude of medical students, when equipped by adequate training and protection, may foretell the potential force of medical students as a firm support to the national health system.

Altogether, our findings indicated that the potential influence of Indonesian medical students in mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic should not be overlooked. However, further preparations are essential to ensure that they can volunteer effectively without exposing them to unnecessary harms. These preparations may be achieved through distance learning and practical activities which enable students to engage with similar real-world circumstances [32]. The feasibility of such programs have been proven by Christensen et al. [33], which stated that online trainings on equipping and disposing PPE resulted in comparable performances to offline instructor-led trainings. In Indonesia, a medical institution has implemented a massive open online course (MOOC) to equip medical students with essential biomedical, clinical, and epidemiologic knowledge on COVID-19. Furthermore, the course also provided basic skills trainings including infection prevention and control, mass education, and risk communication through video lessons and webinar sessions [34]. The use of MOOCs during the current pandemic have been shown to be beneficial in strengthening healthcare systems [35]. In addition, these efforts may not only equip them with adequate knowledge and skills, but also potentially inspiring them to further contribute to the healthcare system, thus ultimately benefitting both the students and the communities [13]. Nonetheless, the implementation of such preparations does not necessary imply that medical students may become a reserve for HCWs during an infectious outbreak. In fact, several studies had consistently reported that medical students were concerned about approaching patients infected with unknown diseases. In such cases, it may be plausible to focus the allocation of these volunteering students to activities relating to early levels of prevention with minimum risk of exposure, including health education and promotion, contact tracing and triages, as well as peer supports for isolating patients and HCWs [5, 36, 37]. Contrarily, volunteering opportunity in clinical settings should be strictly limited to clinical-year students, provided that they are well-prepared and protected [32].

Although it is true that the current pandemic may hinder the implementation of conventional medical education, this pandemic also carries an enormous learning opportunity, especially for final-year medical students, as proven by several institutions which had managed to successfully integrate their students to directly partake in pandemic responses [5, 32]. These students may take part in contact tracing, triage, diagnostic swab-testing, and even medical care support, which in turn may provide invaluable experience in collaborative patient care and benefit their career as future physicians [5, 37]. Nonetheless, it should be noted that their trainings and allocated role as volunteers should be based on their core competencies, and their integration to COVID-19 pandemic response system should be prioritized to clinical-year students as they are perceived to yield the most adequate knowledge and experience in clinical practice [7, 32]. Furthermore, their participation should always be voluntary and should satisfy their personal requirements [38].

The current pandemic further emphasizes the need of global health and disaster preparedness among Indonesian medical students. Hence, it is imperative for medical institutions to integrate student-centred and systematic courses to the undergraduate curricula – both in pre-clinical and clinical stages, to ensure that prospective health professionals are adequately prepared for future public health emergencies [8, 9]. These courses should strive to develop skills on multidisciplinary preparedness, health information management, emergency decision making, and leadership during crisis, in addition to basic knowledge and competencies related to global health emergency preparedness, such as basic life support, vaccination, and triage [9, 31, 39]. Furthermore, emphasis should be placed on integrating global health and disaster preparedness courses with the current available programs while still explicitly maintaining the curriculum process to achieve relevant competencies [40]. In the context of Indonesia, with a large number of highly-diverse medical schools, recognition of global health emergency-related competencies in the national competency standards and other learning resources are essential to tackle the need of a more sustainable medical curricula [40, 41].

The strength of our study lies in the relatively large sample size, which enabled us exhaustively explore factors associated with willingness to volunteer and readiness to practice. However, it should be noted that most of our participants resided in Java; which, although it reflected the current proportion of medical schools in Indonesia (45 out of 89 schools [42]), it potentially limited the representability of our findings. Furthermore, this study was limited due to its cross-sectional design, suggesting the inability to explain causations between variables. There are also possibilities that other factors (e.g., ethnicity and religion), which were unexplored in this study, might potentially confound our findings, thus future studies should also aim to explore the interplay of these factors. To the extent of our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the willingness and readiness of Indonesian medical students to participate in the COVID-19 response system, thus providing indispensable insights to policymakers to maximize the potentials of these students as an unyielding support to the national health system and to better prepare for future public health emergencies.

Conclusion

Many undergraduate medical students in Indonesia were willing to volunteer during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, further preparations are required as only few students yielded satisfactory readiness score. We discovered that sex, prior volunteering experience, type of university, place of residence, and socioeconomic status were independent factors associated with willingness to volunteer and readiness to practice. We also revealed that shortage of medical staffs and moral obligations were the primary reasons underlying their willingness to volunteer, whilst fear for personal health and absence of a cure were the strongest motives negatively impacting their willingness to volunteer.

Our findings suggested that proper trainings and protections are urgently required to ensure that these students can volunteer effectively in this pandemic, and that policymakers should not overlook the potential force of medical students as a support to the health system. Medical institutions should also seek to integrate global health and disaster medicine to the medical curricula, thus contributing to the mitigation of future public health emergencies.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to the government’s data sharing policy which we abide by, since our project was funded by the government, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

COVID-19:

Coronavirus disease 2019

CI:

Confidence interval

HCW:

Healthcare worker

IQR:

Interquartile range

OR:

Odds ratio

PPE:

Personal protective equipment

SD:

Standard deviation

References

  1. Indonesia: WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard | WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. 2020. World Health Organization. https://covid19.who.int/region/searo/country/id. Accessed 27 Oct 2020.

  2. van Empel G, Mulyanto J, Wiratama BS. Undertesting of COVID-19 in Indonesia: what has gone wrong? J Glob Health. 2020;10(2):020306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sunjaya DK, Herawati DMD, Siregar AY. Depressive, anxiety, and burnout symptoms on health care personnel at a month after COVID-19 outbreak in Indonesia: a documentary research using Rasch model analysis. Res Sq. 2020;21:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Klasen JM, Vithyapathy A, Zante B, Burm S. “The storm has arrived”: the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on medical students. Perspect Med Educ. 2020;9:181–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Drexler R, Hambrecht JM, Oldhafer KJ. Involvement of medical students during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey study. Cureus. 2020;12(8):e10147.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lazarus G, Mangkuliguna G, Findyartini A. Medical students in Indonesia: an invaluable living gemstone during coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Korean J Med Educ. 2020;32:237–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Miller DG, Pierson L, Doernberg S. The role of medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ann Intern Med. 2020;173:145–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Watson A, McKinnon T, Prior SD, Richards L, Green CA. COVID-19: time for a bold new strategy for medical education. Med Educ Online. 2020;25(1):1764741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. O’Byrne L, Gavin B, McNicholas F. Medical students and COVID-19: the need for pandemic preparedness. J Med Ethics. 2020;46:623–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Raosoft sample size calculator. Raosoft, Inc. 2020.

  11. World Health Organization. Survey tool and guidance: Rapid, simple, flexible behavioural insights on COVID-19 - 29 July 2020. 2020.

  12. Al-Ziftawi NH, Elamin FM, Mohamed Ibrahim MI. Assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and readiness to practice regarding disaster medicine and preparedness among university health students. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020;2:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosychuk RJ, Bailey T, Haines C, Lake R, Herman B, Yonge O, et al. Willingness to volunteer during an influenza pandemic: perspectives from students and staff at a large Canadian University. Influenza Other Respi Viruses. 2008;2:71–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Patel R, Wattamwar K, Kanduri J, Nahass M, Yoon J, Oh J, et al. Health care student knowledge and willingness to work in infectious disease outbreaks. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2017;11:694–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsang S, Royse CF, Terkawi AS. Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017;11(Suppl 1):S80–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Herlia DD. Analisis konsumsi rumah tangga miskin di Kelurahan Kebonsari Kulon Kecamatan Kanigaran Kota Probolinggo: University of Muhammadiyah Malang; 2017.

  17. WHO. Roles and responsibilities in preparedness and response. In: Pandemic influenza preparedness and response: a WHO guidance document. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Findyartini A, Anggraeni D, Husin JM, Greviana N. Exploring medical students’ professional identity formation through written reflections during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Public Health Res. 2020;9(s1).

  19. Taber KS. The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res Sci Educ. 2018;48:1273–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag New York; 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Seid MA, Hussen MS. Knowledge and attitude towards antimicrobial resistance among final year undergraduate paramedical students at University of Gondar. Ethiopia BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18:312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shi M, Xu W, Gao L, Kang Z, Ning N, Liu C, et al. Emergency volunteering willingness and participation: a cross-sectional survey of residents in northern China. BMJ Open. 2018;8(7):e020218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gouda P, Kirk A, Sweeney A-M, O’Donovan D. Attitudes of medical students toward volunteering in emergency situations. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2019;14(3):308–11.

  25. Aoyagi Y, Beck CR, Dingwall R, Nguyen-Van-Tam JS. Healthcare workers’ willingness to work during an influenza pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Influenza Other Respi Viruses. 2015;9:120–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mansour A, Alharbi S, Almutiri E, Almutiri M, Almutairi A, Alharbi A. Knowledge, attitudes, and willingness of medical students to volunteer in a disaster at Unaizah College of Medicine, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia. Int J Med Dev Ctries. 2020;4(8):1198–207.

  27. Niebuur J, Van Lente L, Liefbroer AC, Steverink N, Smidt N. Determinants of participation in voluntary work: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nahvi FA. The privilege gap in medicine. Acad Med. 2013;88:907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Clary EG, Snyder M. The motivations to volunteer: theoretical and practical considerations. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 1999;8:156–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. McNair R, Griffiths L, Reid K, Sloan H. Medical students developing confidence and patient centredness in diverse clinical settings: a longitudinal survey study. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Martin A, Blom IM, Whyatt G, Shaunak R, Viva MIF, Banerjee L. A rapid systematic review exploring the involvement of medical students in pandemics and other global health emergencies. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020;2:1–13.

  32. Ashcroft J, Byrne MHV, Brennan PA, Davies RJ, Davies RJ. Preparing medical students for a pandemic: a systematic review of student disaster training programmes. Postgrad Med J. 2020;0:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Christensen L, Rasmussen CS, Benfield T, Franc JM. A randomized trial of instructor-led training versus video lesson in training health care providers in proper donning and doffing of personal protective equipment. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020;14:514–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tim Modul Tanggap Pandemi COVID-19. Modul tanggap pandemi COVID-19 - Untuk mahasiswa kedokteran dan profesi kesehatan. 2020. Medical Education Unit, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia. http://onlinecourse-imeri.fk.ui.ac.id/course/info.php?id=54. Accessed 13 Jan 2021.

  35. Bhattacharya S, Singh A, Hossain M. Health system strengthening through massive open online courses (MOOCs) during the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis from the available evidence. J Educ Health Promot. 2020;9:195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tariq EF, Sah PK, Malik A. The plight of COVID-19 pandemic on medical students and residency applicants. Ann Med Surg. 2020;60:1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Buckland R. Medical student volunteering during COVID-19: lessons for future interprofessional practice. J Interprof Care. 2020;34:679–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Glikman D, Malatskey L, Aviv G, Cohen O, Pelleg Y, Younis JS, et al. Volunteer activity by medical students during the initial phases of covid-19 - the BMJ. BMJ Opinion. 2020; https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/06/12/volunteer-activity-by-medical-students-during-the-initial-phases-of-covid-19/. Accessed 31 Oct 2020.

  39. Patel VM, Dahl-Grove D. Disaster preparedness medical school elective: bridging the gap between volunteer eagerness and readiness. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018;34(7):492–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bandyopadhyay S, Thomas HS, Gurung B, Trout I, Wadanamby SW, Akhbari M, et al. Global health education in medical schools (GHEMS): a national, collaborative study of medical curricula. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20:389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Carney JK, Schilling LM, Frank SH, Biddinger PD, Bertsch TF, Grace CJ, et al. Planning and incorporating public health preparedness into the medical curriculum. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41 4 Suppl. 3.

  42. Daftar Akreditasi Fakultas Kedokteran. Jakarta: Konsil Kedokteran Indonesia; 2020.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the collaborators of the MEDICO-19 Research Group for their contributions in data collection: Muhammad Mufaiduddin (Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia), Ervin Widyantoro Pramono (Faculty of Medicine, Krida Wacana Christian University, Jakarta, Indonesia), Alanis Maryjane Mamahit (Faculty of Medicine, University of Pembangunan Nasional Veteran, Jakarta, Indonesia), Zefo Kiyosi Wibowo (Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia), Gabriel Tandecxi (School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia), Feliani Sanjaya (Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Bali, Indonesia), Felix Kurniawan Adithia (Faculty of Medicine, Widya Mandala Catholic University, Surabaya, Indonesia), Yoriska (Faculty of Medicine, Pelita Harapan University, Tangerang, Indonesia), An Nahl Aulia Hakim (Faculty of Medicine, Hang Tuah University, Surabaya, Indonesia), Astrid Cynthia Latief (Faculty of Medicine, Trisakti University, Jakarta, Indonesia), Rowaida Putri Anggaily Bian (Faculty of Medicine, Sultan Agung Islamic Universiy, Semarang, Indonesia), and Melisa Canggra (Faculty of Medicine, Tarumanagara University, Jakarta, Indonesia).

The authors would also like to acknowledge Prof. Mohamed Izham Mohamed Ibrahim (Head of Research and Graduate Studies – Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar) for the insights in the questionnaire development process and Mrs. Bira Arnetha for the help and support in administering the project. Lastly, the authors would like to thank every institutional officials and fellow students for their help in distributing the questionnaire.

Funding

This project is supported by the Indonesian COVID-19 Research and Innovation Consortium (grant number: 132/FI/P-KCOVID-19.2B3/IX/2020) organized by the Indonesian Ministry of Research and Technology/National Research and Innovation Agency. The funder had no role in study conception, data collection and analysis, manuscript preparation, or decision to publish.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

    Gilbert Lazarus, Azis Muhammad Putera, Nico Gamalliel, Imam Adli, Jason Phowira, Lyanna Azzahra & Bagas Ariffandi

  2. Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Salemba 6, Central, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia

    Ardi Findyartini

  3. Medical Education Center, Indonesia Medical Education and Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

    Ardi Findyartini

  4. Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia

    David Nugraha

  5. Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

    Indah Suci Widyahening

Authors
  1. Gilbert Lazarus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ardi Findyartini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Azis Muhammad Putera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nico Gamalliel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. David Nugraha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Imam Adli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jason Phowira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lyanna Azzahra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Bagas Ariffandi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Indah Suci Widyahening
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: GL, AMP, NG, AF, ISW; Methodology: GL, AF, ISW; Validation & supervision: AF, ISW; Formal analysis: GL and IA; Investigation: GL, NG, AMP, JP, DN, BA; Data curation: GL, IA; Writing – Original draft: GL, AMP, NG, DN; Writing – Review & editing: AF, GL, ISW; Visualization: GL; Project administration: AF, GL, LA, AMP; Funding acquisition: AF, LA, GL; all authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Authors’ information

MEDICO-19 Research Group is a student-initiated group based in the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia (FMUI), Jakarta, Indonesia. The team consists of undergraduate medical students from all over Indonesia concerned about the circumstances of Indonesian medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Supervised by two experts from the Department of Medical Education and Medical Education Center – Indonesia Medical Education & Research Institute (AF) and Department of Community Medicine (ISW) of FMUI, this research group aims to investigate the potential roles of Indonesian undergraduate medical students during the pandemic.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ardi Findyartini.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study obtained ethical approval from the Health Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia and Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital (758/UN2.F1/ETIK/PPM.00.02/2020). All participants had given their consent to participate in the study through an online informed consent from prior to the filling of the questionnaire.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lazarus, G., Findyartini, A., Putera, A.M. et al. Willingness to volunteer and readiness to practice of undergraduate medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey in Indonesia. BMC Med Educ 21, 138 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02576-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02576-0

Keywords