Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Female trainees believe that having children will negatively impact their careers: results of a quantitative survey of trainees at an academic medical center

BMC Medical Education201818:260

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1373-1

  • Received: 21 February 2018
  • Accepted: 31 October 2018
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Medical training occurs during peak childbearing years. However, the intense workload, long work hours, and limited financial compensation are potential barriers to having children during this time. Here, we aimed to identify gender-based differences in beliefs and experiences of having children during graduate medical education. We hypothesized that both genders face significant challenges, but women are more likely to experience stressors related to work-family conflicts.

Methods

We administered an anonymous web-based survey to all trainees at an academic medical center. Primary outcomes were gender differences in beliefs and experiences of having children during training. Multivariate logistic regression was performed using independent variables of gender, specialty type (surgical vs. medical), and parental status.

Results

In total, 56% of trainees responded (60% women, 40% men; n = 435). Women were more often concerned about the negative impact of having children and taking maternity leave on their professional reputation and career. The majority of women expressed concern about the potential negative impact of the physical demands of their jobs on pregnancy. Among parents, women were more likely than men to be the primary caregivers on weeknights and require weekday childcare from a non-parent.

Conclusions

Women face greater work-related conflicts in their beliefs and experiences of having a family during graduate medical education. Trainees should be aware of these potential challenges when making life and career decisions. We recommend that institutions employ solutions to accommodate the needs and wellbeing of trainees with families while optimizing training and workload equity for all trainees.

Keywords

  • Graduate medical education
  • Gender
  • Work-family conflicts
  • Parenthood

Background

Despite the challenges of graduate medical education, including intense work, long hours, high stress levels, and limited financial compensation, an increasing proportion of trainees are choosing to have children. [1, 2] Current trainees face a different set of challenges than trainees of prior generations. First, as a greater proportion of medical trainees are women, those who wish to become mothers during training face the challenge of balancing their professional obligations with the medical needs of pregnancy and childbirth. Second, professionals in the millennial generation are far more likely to be dual-career couples, which poses much greater logistical challenges for having children. [3] Thus, in contrast to male trainees with stay-at-home spouses that were more common decades ago, today’s male trainees are more likely to have working spouses and thus face the challenge of balancing their professional obligations with increased responsibilities of parenthood.

The impact of childbearing on trainees’ personal and professional lives as well as on training programs is significant. The rules and culture of many specialties that affect having children during training have not adapted to the changing demographics and realities of current trainees. As a result, female physicians are more likely to delay parenthood relative to other professional women, potentially because of the risk of obstetrical complications due to the physical stress of training, limited parental leave and childcare options, and workweek requirements from certifying boards. [47] It is unclear to what extent these factors affect male trainees in their family planning decisions. Understanding the challenges and concerns of both male and female trainees is critical to the ability of training programs and graduate medical education in the U.S. to successfully foster the next generation of physicians.

The aims of this study were to identify differences between men and women in their concerns and experiences regarding having children during training. We hypothesized that despite both genders facing significant challenges associated with having children during training, women would (1) more likely believe that parenthood would negatively affect their careers, (2) more often postpone parenthood due to job-related factors, and (3) bear a greater burden of primary childcare responsibility than their male counterparts.

Methods

The investigators designed a series of survey questions to probe the experiences of trainees about having children (a blank copy of this can be seen in Additional file 1). The Stanford University Institutional Review Board approved the study. Ten volunteers tested the survey for clarity and the investigators adjusted questions based on their feedback. All resident and fellow trainees at Stanford University Medical Center received an invitation to complete the survey via a link in their email to a secure and HIPAA-compliant online platform (QuestionPro, San Francisco, CA); those who completed it received a $10 gift certificate. We sent an email reminder after one week, and closed the survey after two weeks.

Our primary outcome measures were gender differences in concerns and experiences of having children during graduate medical education. Specifically, we analyzed the results from questions 8b-8 k, 10–13, 16b-16 k, 17–20, 28–30, 35, and 36 (Supplement). The relevant survey questions are detailed in Tables 1, 3, and 4. The outcome variable was the proportion of respondents who responded “strongly agree” or “agree” to the statements detailed in Tables 1 and 4, where indicated. We used Chi-square tests to analyze categorical variables, considering p < 0.05 significant. We performed multivariate logistic regression for outcome variables that differed significantly between male and female respondents, using independent variables of gender, specialty type (medical vs. surgical), and parental status. The outcome variables for the regression analyses are detailed in Tables 2 and 5. We used STATA/SE 13.1 statistical software.
Table 1

Concerns about Having Children among Male and Female Trainees

 

Overall %

Male %

Female %

p-value

Adequacy of resources for having children (% responding “strongly agree” or “agree”)a

 I don’t have time for a/nother child

84.2

80.1

87.1

NS

 I don’t have money for a/nother child

72.9

76.5

70.7

NS

 I don’t have enough stability in my life for a/nother child

63.8

65.1

63.1

NS

 I don’t have the adequate resources for childcare

75.9

83.0

71.5

0.03

 I am worried about physical demands of my job and pregnancy (females only)

77.9

Impact of children on professional life (% responding “strongly agree” or “agree”)a

 I am worried I will be a burden on colleagues by taking parental leave

55.4

42.5

63.3

< 0.0001

 I do not feel that I can take parental leave

52.1

58.4

48.2

NS

 I am worried about how I will be perceived professionally if I have a/nother child

28.6

10

41.2

< 0.0001

 I am worried about the impact of (more) children on my future career

40.2

26.8

49.5

< 0.0001

Level of interest in having children

 I think about having children sometimes, often, or all the time

81.8

74.4

86.7

0.005

 I discuss the topic of having children with friends and colleagues (response: yes)

85.5

74.1

92.7

< 0.0001

How do you feel when you think about having (more) children? (% responding “strongly agree” or “agree”)a

 Happy and excited

73.6

77.9

70.9

NS

 Anxious

78.4

73.8

81.1

NS

 It’s a source of stress in our relationship

20.4

21.8

19.6

NS

 Sad

14.0

12.2

15.2

NS

 Emotionally neutral

11.7

11.0

12.3

NS

How worried are you about the possibility of never having children? (non-parents only)

 Very or somewhat worried

64.3

46.6

75.5

< 0.0001

 Not worried, although do want kids

35.7

53.4

24.5

< 0.0001

 Don’t know if want kids

7.0

8.7

6.0

NS

 Don’t want kids

1.2

0

2

NS

aResponse choices were on a Likert scale: strongly agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, strongly disagree, prefer not to say

Table 2

Multivariate Models of Resident Perceptions of Having Children During Residency, Using Independent Predictors of Gender, Specialty Type (Surgical vs. Medical), and Parental Status

 

Female

Surgical

Parent

 

OR

(95% CI)

p

OR

(95% CI)

p

OR

(95% CI)

p

I am worried that having children will negatively affect how I will be perceived professionally

7.5 (4.02, 13.8)

0

2.24 (1.28, 3.95)

0.005

2.05 (1.20, 3.52)

0.009

I am worried that I will be a burden on colleagues by taking parental leave

2.32 (1.51, 3.59)

0

2.29 (1.34, 3.89)

0.002

0.57 (0.36, 0.92)

0.022

I am worried about the negative impact of (more) children on my future career

2.76 (1.76, 4.33)

0

1.10 (0.67, 1.83)

NS

1.20 (0.75, 1.94)

NS

I do not have the adequate resources for childcare

0.5 (0.30, 0.85)

0.01

1.18 (0.63, 2.2)

NS

0.49 (0.29, 0.82)

0.007

I do not feel like I can take parental leave

0.66 (0.42, 1.02)

NS

2.9 (1.69, 4.98)

0

0.85 (0.53, 1.37)

NS

Parental leave is not available to me

0.33 (0.18, 0.59)

0

2.60 (1.39, 4.87)

0.003

1.00 (0.53, 1.88)

NS

Results

In total, 435 of the 776 (56%) residents and fellows who received the survey responded (60% women, 40% men). The age distribution and relationship status were similar between genders. A greater proportion of male versus female trainees were parents (26% vs. 22%, p = 0.02).

The majority of men and women shared concerns about lacking the time, money, or stability to have children (Table 1). In addition, most trainees of either gender felt happy and excited (74%) but also anxious (78%) about the prospect of having children. Among trainees who were not already parents, a higher proportion of women felt sad when thinking about having children (16.8% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.047) and worried that they may never have children (75.5% vs. 46.6%, p < 0.0001) (Table 1).

The genders differed in their beliefs of how parenthood might affect their professional careers. Compared to men, a higher proportion of women worried that having a child during training would lead to negative professional perceptions of them (41% vs. 10%, p < 0.0001), adversely impact their future careers (50% vs. 27%, p < 0.0001), and burden their colleagues (63% vs. 43%, p < 0.0001) (Table 1). In a multivariate regression controlling for gender, specialty type (medical vs. surgical), and parental status, female gender remained predictive for the belief that having a child during training would negatively affect their professional reputations [odds ratio (OR) 7.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4–14, p < 0.0001], adversely affect their career (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.8–4, p < 0.0001), and burden their colleagues (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.5–3.6, p < 0.0001) (Table 3). Male gender and not having children were factors associated with the belief that they lack adequate resources for childcare. Over half of all trainees did not feel they could take family leave, although most knew it was available to them (Table 2).
Table 3

Training Program-related Factors Affecting Trainees’ Decisions to have Children

 

Overall %

Male %

Female %

p-value

Perceived training program support of trainees having children

 Extremely or somewhat supportive

78

72.3

81.5

NS

 Extremely or somewhat unsupportive

9.8

14.8

6.6

0.023

 Neither supportive nor unsupportive

12.3

12.9

11.9

NS

Parental leave

 Parental leave is not available to me (strongly agree or agree)*

17.9

28.9

11.6

< 0.0001

How long is maternity leave?

 < 6 weeks

5.3

4.1

6.3

0.003

 6 weeks

25.8

13.4

34.3

< 0.0001

 > 6 weeks

17.7

11.6

21.5

0.009

 Don’t know

51.2

70.9

37.9

< 0.0001

How long is paternity leave?

 2 weeks or less

35.6

37.8

34.0

NS

 > 2 weeks

4.2

5.2

3.5

NS

 Don’t know

60.2

57.0

62.5

NS

Do you feel this amount of leave is adequate?

 Yes

11.6

8.1

14.1

NS

 No

42.1

35.5

46.9

0.02

 Don’t know

44.7

55.7

37.9

0.0006

Work-week requirements for advancement

Does your program or certifying board mandate a minimum number of workweeks per year?

 Yes

42.1

48.3

38.3

0.04

 No

7.9

5.8

9.4

NS

 Don’t know

50

45.9

52.3

NS

Do these rules influence your decision to have children?

 Yes

43.3

33.7

51.5

0.016

 No

31.1

43.4

20.6

0.001

 Don’t know

16.1

10.8

20.6

NS

When is the optimal time to have a child?

 Medical school

10.6

9.2

11.6

NS

 Junior residency years

2.8

3.4

2.3

NS

 Senior residency years

16.1

14.4

17.4

NS

 Research residency years

28.7

29.3

28.6

NS

 Fellowship

19.8

18.4

20.8

NS

 In practice, first 5 years

32.2

36.2

29.7

NS

 In practice, after 5 years

9.7

9.2

10.0

NS

 No optimal time

48.5

40.8

53.3

0.013

*Response choices were on a Likert scale: strongly agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, strongly disagree, prefer not to say

While 78% of all trainees reported that their training programs were at least somewhat supportive of them having children, a higher proportion of men than women felt their programs were unsupportive (15% vs. 7%, p = 0.02), did not believe that parental leave was available to them (29% vs. 12%, p < 0.0001), were unsure of the amount of leave they could take (57% of men vs. 38% of women, p < 0.0001), or felt the amount was inadequate (56% of men vs. 38% of women, p = 0.0006) (Table 3). Rules on minimum workweeks required for advancement were more likely to influence women than men in their decisions to have children (52% vs. 34%, p = 0.016); women were more likely to believe that there was no optimal time to have children (53% vs. 41%, p = 0.013).

Male and female trainees who were already parents had comparable levels of dissatisfaction with their abilities to provide adequate time (85% dissatisfied), finances (68% dissatisfied), and emotional resources (48% dissatisfied) (Table 4). Childcare responsibilities differed significantly between genders. On weekdays, the primary caregivers for male trainees’ children were more likely to be their partners (52% vs. 9%, p < 0.0001), whereas children of female trainees were ten-fold more likely (Table 5) to be under the care of daycare, nanny, or extended family (91% vs. 48%, p < 0.0001). Female versus male trainees were more often the primary caregiver on weeknights (47% vs. 17%, p = 0.001; OR 4.9, p = 0.001) and weekends (OR 2.7, p = 0.02) (Tables 4 and 5).
Table 4

Experience of Being Parents during Graduate Medical Education

 

Overall %

Male %

Female %

p-value

Satisfaction with ability to provide adequate resources to care for child(ren)

(% who “strongly agree” or “agree” with the statements)

I am satisfied with my ability to provide adequate time to care for my child(ren)

14.9

23.8

8.8

NS

I am satisfied with my ability to provide financial resources to take care of my child(ren)

32

36.4

29.1

NS

I am satisfied with my ability to provide adequate emotional resources to take care of my child(ren)

51.6

51.2

52.9

NS

Primary Caregiver for Child(ren) on:

Weekdays

 Trainee’s partner

27.9

52.2

8.9

< 0.0001

 Other (daycare, nanny, extended family)

72.1

47.8

91.1

< 0.0001

Weeknights

 Trainee

33.3

17.4

47.4

0.003

 Trainee’s partner

61.9

76.1

49.1

0.01

 Other (daycare, nanny, extended family)

4.8

6.5

3.5

NS

Weekends

 Trainee

53.3

41.3

63.2

NS

 Trainee’s partner

41.9

52.2

33.3

NS

 Other (daycare, nanny, extended family)

4.8

6.5

3.5

NS

Table 5

Multivariate Models of Childcare Responsibilities among Residents who are Parents, using Independent Factors of Gender and Specialty Type (Medical vs. Surgical)

 

Female

Surgical

 

OR

95% CI

p

OR

95% CI

p

Primary caregiver on weekdays

 Trainee’s partner

0.10

0.03, 0.29

< 0.0001

0.67

0.20, 2.28

NS

 Other

10.28

3.48, 30.32

< 0.0001

1.50

0.44, 5.10

NS

Primary caregiver on weeknights

 Trainee

4.87

1.89, 12.54

0.001

0.22

0.06, 0.84

0.027

 Trainee’s partner

0.27

0.11, 0.64

0.003

3.83

1.14, 12.82

0.03

 Other

0.55

0.09, 3.41

NS

0.94

0.10, 8.92

NS

Primary caregiver on weekends

 Trainee

2.67

1.16, 6.19

0.022

0.17

0.05, 0.52

0.002

 Trainee’s partner

0.42

0.18, 0.97

0.04

5.66

1.94, 16.53

0.002

 Other

0.55

0.09, 3.41

NS

0.94

0.10, 8.92

NS

Discussion

This study examined gender differences in the concerns of trainees of having children during graduate medical education. The most striking differences between male and female trainees were in their beliefs about the impact of parenthood on their professional careers. With adjustment for specialty type, female trainees were more likely to worry that having children would engender poor professional perceptions of them and negatively impact their future careers. These concerns are valid interpretations of not only the cultural milieu of academic medicine, but also the pervasive biases within our society at large, which has led to the “motherhood penalty.” [8] The unfortunate reality is that trainees who are pregnant or mothers face workplace discrimination. [9] Program directors believe parenthood negatively impacts female trainees’ more than male trainees’ work. [10] These biases are not unique to the medical field, and affect working women across industries and socioeconomic classes. A job applicant experiment demonstrated that compared to women without children, mothers are considered less competent and committed, require higher exam scores, are held to stricter performance and punctuality rules, are offered lower salaries, and are less likely to be promoted or hired. In contrast, fathers are considered more committed and promotable than non-fathers, face less strict punctuality standards, and are offered higher salaries. [11] Subconscious or conscious recognition of these pervasive biases in our society is likely to also affect medical trainees.

The majority of trainees were happy but anxious about the prospect of having children. This anxiety could be attributed to concerns about the ability to provide for children due to limited time, finances, and stability. Training program-related concerns also likely influence trainees’ decisions regarding children. Only 12% of trainees felt that the length of parental leave was adequate, with many male trainees unaware they were eligible for leave. In addition, trainees feared that having children would prevent them from graduating on time. These concerns are warranted, as 40% of pediatric residents had to extend their training due to maternity leave. [1214]

The postpartum stressors examined in our study included feelings of guilt over colleagues’ increased workloads due to parental leave, which occurred more commonly in females. Other studies have shown that peers evaluate female trainees poorly after pregnancy and often feel anger and resentment toward pregnant residents due to their increased workload. [15, 16] Although men were less likely to be concerned about the professional ramifications of having children, they were more likely to feel unable to take parental leave.

In addition to concerns of negative professional ramifications that are commonly experienced by women across industries, women in graduate medical education face some unique challenges due to the nature of the work. Most female trainees worried whether the physical demands of their jobs were compatible with a healthy pregnancy, consistent with studies reporting that female trainees tend to defer pregnancy due to concerns for complications from work-related stressors. [13] These concerns are not unfounded, as increased physical stress is associated with pregnancy complications. [6, 17] In fact, female trainees are at higher risk for preterm labor, miscarriage, intrauterine growth restriction, placental abruption, and hypertension compared with spouses of male residents and the general population [1623]; complication rates among surgeons exceed women in the lowest income brackets. [24]

Another stressor that especially affected women was the greater burden of childcare. Female versus male trainees more often were the primary caregiver on weeknights and required weekday childcare services, increasing the financial burden. [25] Other stressors include an unpredictable work schedule and the difficulty of breastfeeding after maternity leave. [26, 27] The inherent stress of early parenthood is compounded by the lack of institutional resources, as only 38% of academic hospitals have on-site childcare and less than 60% have lactation spaces. [10] Workplace stigma against pumping breast milk at work and the lack of time to do so may impact the duration of breastfeeding. [28]

A limitation of this study is the potential for response bias, as trainees who feel more strongly about these matters may be more likely to respond. Another potential confounder is the amount of financial pressure experienced by our respondents may be particularly pronounced due to the high cost of living in the Bay Area.

Our study illustrates the need for trainees, faculty, training programs, and certifying specialty boards to recognize these challenges, and proactively address them. Most trainees would like to welcome children into their lives, but have legitimate concerns over whether having children is compatible with training. These concerns affect both male and female trainees, as the increase in dual-career families leads to increased difficulty with balancing career and family. Indeed, two-thirds of millennials find it difficult to manage both the personal and professional aspects of their lives. [3] We offer the following recommendations for the academic medical establishment to address these needs of trainees in the pipeline:
  1. 1.

    Training programs should have formal written parental leave policies and comprehensive education about them. [29] The majority of programs lack formal policies that address parental leave, coverage for residents on leave, and work expectations for pregnant trainees. [2931] Policies vary widely among programs, and are often not well-communicated. [32]

     
  2. 2.

    Programs should allow all trainees to take at least six weeks of paid parental leave and up to six additional weeks of unpaid leave; programs should also protect pregnant trainees from physically taxing work schedules to mitigate potential risks to maternal and fetal health. The American Academy of Pediatrics advocates that each residency program have a parental leave policy that at least conforms to the Family and Medical Leave Act, which entitles employees to 12 weeks of leave within one year of birth or placement of a foster or adopted child, with at least 6–8 weeks paid. [12, 33] Longer length of maternity leave is associated with improved maternal mental and physical health. [3438]

     
  3. 3.

    Faculty mentors should help set realistic expectations. The effects of motherhood on occupational prestige and wages attenuate over time, such that working mothers in their 50s are on par with childless women. [8] The implication for academic medicine is that women’s career paths may follow a different pattern of academic productivity over time than their male colleagues.

     
  4. 4.

    Institutions should foster a supportive work environment through coverage plans for trainees on leave, dedicated lactation spaces and time, and affordable childcare. Paying clinical associates to cover the workload of a trainee on parental leave would alleviate the burden on other trainees. Establishing dedicated lactation spaces and awareness of the need for pumping breaks would protect the choice of mothers to continue breastfeeding. [39] Affordable on-site childcare with extended hours may be the only way many trainees can logistically have children with their on-call responsibilities.

     
  5. 5.

    A competency-based model for advancement should be based on the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education milestones, rather than the number of work weeks. This individualized approach to education and competency allows for more flexibility in the length of training while ensuring that trainees are ready for independent practice. [40]

     

Conclusions

Finding solutions to allow trainees to take longer parental leaves while maintaining quality and equity for other trainees is necessary for a sustainable graduate medical education workforce. Physicians should not be expected to defer having children until after training, risk their or their infants’ health due to heavy workloads, or forgo critical baby bonding time. In the long run, the willingness and ability of academic medical centers to accommodate these needs while maximizing education and workload equity will create a more stable and robust workforce. [41]

Abbreviations

CI: 

Confidence interval

OR: 

Odds ratio

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was funded by a grant from the Clayman Institute for Gender Studies at Stanford University. This funding body had no role in the design of the study; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; and the writing of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

Due to concerns about the potential ability to identify individual participants using their demographic information and survey answers, we cannot make the complete dataset available. We have made the survey available as a supplementary material.

Authors' contributions

CK was responsible for conception and design of the study, creation of the survey, data collection, data analysis and interpretation, drafting the article, and critical revisions. RY drafted the article and did critical revisions. PD performed data analysis and interpretation, as well as critical revisions. CM contributed to conception and design of the study, data interpretation, and critical revisions. SG contributed to data analysis and interpretation, and critical revisions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Stanford University Institutional Review Board approved the study (Protocol #29777). All participants consented to the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
(2)
Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA

References

  1. Potee RA, Gerber AJ, Ickovics JR. Medicine and motherhood: shifting trends among female physicians from 1922 to 1999. Acad Med. 1999;74:911–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Smith C, Galante JM, Pierce JL, et al. The surgical residency baby boom: changing patterns of childbearing during residency over a 30-year span. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5:625–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Young E. Global study: work-life challenges across generations. Millennials and parents hit hardest; 2015.Google Scholar
  4. Livingston G. For most highly educated women, motherwhood doesn't start until the 30s. Pew Research Center; 2015. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/01/15/for-most-highly-educated-women-motherhood-doesnt-start-until-the-30s/. Accessed 6 Nov 2018.
  5. Troppmann KM, Palis BE, Goodnight JE, et al. Women surgeons in the new millennium. Arch Surg. 2009;144:635–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Turner PL, Lumpkins K, Gabre J, et al. Pregnancy among women surgeons: trends over time. Arch Surg. 2012;147:474–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Pham DT, Stephens EH, Antonoff MB, et al. Birth trends and factors affecting childbearing among thoracic surgeons. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98:890–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Kahn JR, García-Manglano J, Bianchi SM. The motherhood penalty at midlife: long-term effects of children on Women's careers. J Marriage Fam. 2014;76:56–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferris LE, Mackinnon SE, Mizgala CL, et al. Do Canadian female surgeons feel discriminated against as women? CMAJ. 1996;154:21–7.Google Scholar
  10. Sandler BJ, Tackett JJ, Longo WE, et al. Pregnancy and parenthood among surgery residents: results of the first Nationwide survey of general surgery residency program directors. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222:1090–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Correll SJ, Bernard S, Paik I. Getting a job: is there a motherhood penalty? Am J Sociol. 2007;112:1297–339.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Section on Medical Students Rs, and Fellowship Trainees, Childhood CoE. Parental leave for residents and pediatric training programs. Pediatrics. 2013;131:387–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Blair JE, Mayer AP, Caubet SL, et al. Pregnancy and parental leave during graduate medical education. Acad Med. 2016;91:972–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Lerner LB, Baltrushes RJ, Stolzmann KL, et al. Satisfaction of women urologists with maternity leave and childbirth timing. J Urol. 2010;183:282–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Krause ML, Elrashidi MY, Halvorsen AJ, et al. Impact of pregnancy and gender on internal medicine resident evaluations: a retrospective cohort study. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32:648–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Finch SJ. Pregnancy during residency: a literature review. Acad Med. 2003;78:418–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Seguin RE. Pregnancy and the working woman: a review. J Ark Med Soc. 1998;95:115–8.Google Scholar
  18. Osborn LM, Harris DL, Reading JC, et al. outcome of pregnancies experienced during residency. J Fam Pract. 1990;31:618–22.Google Scholar
  19. Gabbe SG, Morgan MA, Power ML, et al. Duty hours and pregnancy outcome among residents in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:948–51.Google Scholar
  20. Behbehani S, Tulandi T. Obstetrical complications in pregnant medical and surgical residents. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015;37:25–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Merchant SJ, Hameed SM, Melck AL. Pregnancy among residents enrolled in general surgery: a nationwide survey of attitudes and experiences. Am J Surg. 2013;206:605–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Katz VL, Miller NH, Bowes WA Jr. Pregnancy complications of physicians. West J Med. 1988;149:704–7.Google Scholar
  23. Phelan ST. Sources of stress and support for the pregnant resident. Acad Med. 1992;67:408–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Lerner LB, Stolzmann KL, Gulla VD. Birth trends and pregnancy complications among women urologists. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:293–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Chen MM, Yeo HL, Roman SA, et al. Life events during surgical residency have different effects on women and men over time. Surgery. 2013;154:162–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Cole S, Arnold M, Sanderson A, et al. Pregnancy during otolaryngology residency: experience and recommendations. Am Surg. 2009;75:411–5.Google Scholar
  27. Dixit A, Feldman-Winter L, Szucs KA. "frustrated," "depressed," and "devastated" pediatric trainees: US academic medical centers fail to provide adequate workplace breastfeeding support. J Hum Lact. 2015;31:240–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Bresnahan M, Zhuang J, Anderson J, et al. The "pumpgate" incident: stigma against lactating mothers in the U.S. workplace. Women Health. 2018;58(4):451-65.Google Scholar
  29. Dixit A, Feldman-Winter L, Szucs KA. Parental leave policies and pediatric trainees in the United States. J Hum Lact. 2015;31:434–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Garza RM, Weston JS, Furnas HJ. Pregnancy and the plastic surgery resident. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139:245–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Humphries LS, Lyon S, Garza R, et al. Parental leave policies in graduate medical education: a systematic review. Am J Surg. 2017;214(4):634–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Weiss J, Teuscher D. What provisions do Orthopaedic programs make for maternity, paternity, and adoption leave? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474:1945–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Division. USDoLWaH: Family Medical Leave Act. 2017. https://www.dol.gov/whd/fmla/. Accessed 8 Nov 2018.
  34. Staehelin K, Bertea PC, Stutz EZ. Length of maternity leave and health of mother and child--a review. Int J Public Health. 2007;52:202–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Aitken Z, Garrett CC, Hewitt B, et al. The maternal health outcomes of paid maternity leave: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2015;130:32–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Dagher RK, McGovern PM, Dowd BE. Maternity leave duration and postpartum mental and physical health: implications for leave policies. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2014;39:369–416.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Chatterji P, Markowitz S. Family leave after childbirth and the mental health of new mothers. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2012;15:61–76.Google Scholar
  38. Shepherd-Banigan M, Bell JF. Paid leave benefits among a national sample of working mothers with infants in the United States. Matern Child Health J. 2014;18:286–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Tsai SY. Impact of a breastfeeding-friendly workplace on an employed mother's intention to continue breastfeeding after returning to work. Breastfeed Med. 2013;8:210–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. ACGME: Milestones Guidebook for Residents and Fellows., 2017.Google Scholar
  41. Jagsi R, Tarbell NJ, Weinstein DF. Becoming a doctor, starting a family--leaves of absence from graduate medical education. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1889–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement