Skip to main content
Download PDF

Application of the electronic book to promote self-directed learning in medical technologist continuing education: a cross-sectional study

BMC Medical Education volume 22, Article number: 713 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Continuing education (CE) is essential for health professionals to improve competence in clinical practice, yet many medical technologists still experience barriers to learning in complex clinical settings. To better manage CE and address medical technologists’ learning needs, we developed a learner-centred electronic book (e-book) to promote self-directed learning for medical technologists.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted to explore the acceptability and learning impacts of the e-book as CE material for medical technologists in two medical centres in Taiwan. We designed the learner-centred context in the e-book based on medical technologists’ practice requirements and learning needs. Moreover, we adopted The New World Kirkpatrick Model with four levels (reactions, learning, behaviours and results) to evaluate the e-book’s learning impacts on medical technologists. A total of 280 medical technologists were invited to complete a questionnaire and a post-test, providing learning patterns as well as their satisfaction with the e-book and their learning outcomes after using it.

Results

Most readers had positive learning experiences and better learning outcomes, including knowledge acquisition and behavioural change, after reading the e-book. The e-book became a new CE activity and reached medical technologists in various types of laboratories.

Conclusions

The low-cost and learner-centred e-book effectively overcame CE learning barriers for medical technologists. The interactivity and flexibility of e-learning particularly helped learners to engage in clinical scenarios in laboratory medicine. This study could pave the way for medical educators to build a high-quality e-learning model in CE.

Peer Review reports

Background

Continuing education (CE) is fundamental for healthcare professionals to improve their competence and expertise in an ever-changing healthcare environment [1, 2]. CE is also essential for continuing professional development (CPD), which can drive individual and system changes to contribute to healthcare [3, 4]. While healthcare educators often provide comprehensive training programmes, many professionals still experience learning barriers in complex clinical settings [5, 6], such as feeling overwhelmed by heavy workloads [5,6,7], adapting themselves to different teaching styles and receiving learning materials irrelevant to their work [5, 6, 8]. To better manage CPD, professionals need to take responsibility for CE requirements throughout their professional careers [4, 9], and educators should investigate appropriate educational strategies to facilitate learners’ lifelong learning [10, 11].

Several studies [12,13,14] have shown that an effective educational programme could promote CE learning effectiveness using the following key methods: creating engagement, capturing attention, encouraging self-improvement and targeting learning needs. In spite of ample evidence of learning facilitators in CE, traditional educational meetings or teaching conferences, which are deemed to be ineffective and counterproductive, are still the most widely utilised programmes offered to healthcare professionals [15,16,17]. When educators or systems highly rely on lecture-based learning to share information, many professionals face learning barriers including passive learning [6, 8, 17], fixed schedules [6, 7, 16], short attention span [6, 7, 16], cognitive overload [7, 15, 17] and information redundancy [5, 6, 16]. However, due to a lack of effective educational programmes, many educators or systems still mainly hold educational conferences to meet CE requirements.

Over the past 20 years, self-directed learning (SDL) has been proven to help professionals to overcome learning barriers and acquire new skills and knowledge [17, 18]. SDL is widely used and includes eight elements: (a) it is a process (b) that is initiated by the individual, (c) which may or may not involve the help of others, (d) to identify their learning needs, (e) develop learning goals from these needs, (f) find the necessary resources to attain these goals, (g) select and implement the proper learning strategies to meet their goals, and (h) determine how to measure learning outcomes [19]. Most importantly, SDL encourages professionals to nurture self-motivation in their learning after work [8, 17, 18]. That is because the direct relevance of clinical needs and the consolidation of job knowledge are crucial to professionals, which could enhance their self-motivation towards regular learning [4, 19]. In addition, evidence-based research has shown that digital learning promotes SDL and that it is convenient for professionals to access courses through digital devices in clinical settings, positively impacting learners’ achievements [20, 21]. When digital media are designed to be emerging and habit-forming in the digital age, it is ideal for educators to use these technologies to enrich, extend, and advance learning in different environments [22, 23]. As a result, if educators could build a digital CE programme from the learner’s perspective, making the CE activity more intuitive, readable and enjoyable, they could effectively motivate professionals’ independent learning in various complex work environments.

According to recent investigations into digital learning interventions, electronic books (e-books) can successfully increase learners’ learning motivations through their page fidelity [24, 25], convenience [24,25,26,27] and interactivity [24,25,26,27] when compared to traditional learning approaches [24, 26]. The reason is that e-books, containing a combination of text, images and videos, including animations, self-test questions and other interactive activities, can be read and stored on mobile devices [25, 26]. Moreover, by interacting with the e-book content, learners significantly increase their learning motivation and metacognitive abilities to improve their learning achievement [24,25,26]. As a result, given its flexibility, accessibility, interactivity, usefulness, enjoyment potential and extensibility, the multimedia e-book could be an effective learning tool for professionals in complex clinical settings.

We aimed to optimise medical technologists’ learning experiences and address their learning needs by building a technology-enhanced CE programme. More importantly, two research questions were examined in this study: (1) Does the introduction of an enriched e-book incorporating interactive multimedia elements and learner-centred content could overcome learning barriers for medical technologists? and (2) What concerns do faculty members need to address to close learning gaps in CE for medical technologists? The objectives to achieve the research aim were as follows: 1) to develop an e-book to address learning barriers associated with traditional CE and promote self-learning, 2) to examine if the utilisation of the e-book overcomes learning barriers associated with traditional CE and 3) to evaluate the impact of the e-book on readers according to The New World Kirkpatrick Model, an outcome evaluation model of continuing medical education incorporating four domains or levels: reactions, learning, behaviours and results [28, 29].

Methods

Research design

We conducted a cross-sectional study from January to December 2018 to explore the acceptability and feasibility of using an e-book as a CPD programme for medical technologists in Taiwan. We designed the e-book as a quarterly book four times a year and published it in January, April, July, and October in 2018. After new releases in the e-book, we used convenient sampling to gather information from readers and medical technologists that could access the e-book through links as a CE program. They were informed that all respondents who achieved a score of at least 80% on the post-test would receive 1 h of CE credit. Once readers finished reading the e-book, they were invited to complete an online anonymous structured questionnaire and a post-test. To ensure anonymity and personal privacy, we did not collect any personally identifiable information. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chang Gung Medical Foundation, Taipei, Taiwan (IRB no. 201800144B0). The Chang Gung Medical Foundation Institutional Review Board approved to waive the documentation of informed consent.

Study population

This study was conducted at the Department of Laboratory Medicine of two academic medical centres in Taiwan, specifically, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, which employed 190 and 90 medical technologists, respectively. The inclusion criteria were full-time medical technologists worked in Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital or Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. The exclusion criteria were individuals employed as interns. All 280 medical technologists received e-mails or links to access different issues of the e-book quarterly. Study participants were defined as readers who completed the anonymous feedback questionnaire and post-test.

Data collection

After new releases in the e-book, the questionnaire and post-test were made available online for 3 months. For example, after the e-book was issued in January 2018, data from the feedback questionnaire and the post-test completed between January and March 31 were collected and regarded as reader feedback and learning effects about the January 2018 e-book. The readers were also limited to submit data only once within the specific period. Data about the e-book were collected at four different periods.

e-book design and learning context

The learner-centred context was designed in an e-book format based on investigations on medical education and curricular development [3, 11] and medical technologists’ suggestions by using Flip PDF software version 4.1.10 (FlipBuilder, Hong Kong, China, https://www.flipbuilder.com; Fig. 1). With this e-book design software, articles and figures were resized to the final full text and PDF versions and then converted to HTML5. Additionally, the e-book editor could present dynamic content by adding videos, audio and links in the e-book. Readers could simultaneously access learning materials through the extension function provided by hyperlinks with the integration of multimedia information in the e-book. In addition, articles on knowledge application, information technology in the laboratory, quality improvement, clinical consulting, clinical research, and problem-solving examples were gathered, condensed, rewrote, and applied to the learning context. These learning topics were designed to meet the continuing competence programme requirements of Medical Technologists in Taiwan. In particular, since case-based learning is beneficial to learners’ engagement in specific clinical scenarios in laboratory medicine [30, 31], examples with pictures of the pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical characteristics were provided using e-modules to create a visualisation-based and interactive clinical case for learners. All components of the e-book were available in traditional Chinese. The content was approachable and relevant to clinical practice and had the ideal length. Most importantly, before each e-book was issued, the draft was reviewed by the editorial board of our department comprising senior medical technologists and experts in laboratory medicine.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Advantages of e-book format for readers. The e-book format allows readers to download material from a website, view it online or easily email and read it offline

Full size image

Outcome measurements

Evaluation outcomes were adopted and analysed according to The New World Kirkpatrick Model [28], which incorporates four domains or levels: reactions, learning, behaviours, and results (Fig. 2). An anonymous structured questionnaire and a post-test with 10 multiple-choice questions about the corresponding knowledge were designed to assess readers’ perceptions, acceptance, and satisfaction towards the e-book (Level 1: reactions) and acquisition of knowledge (Level 2: learning). The number of readers who engaged with the e-book quarterly was used to measure the change in behaviour (Level 3: behaviours) since no e-book was published before the programme. Organisational changes (Level 4: results) were evaluated using the completion rate of 1 h of CE credit after they read the e-book since this CE credit was newly available in the organisation. Moreover, questions about learning styles and demographic characteristics were included in the survey to analyse the ability of the e-book to overcome learning barriers associated with traditional CE.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Adoption of The New World Kirkpatrick Model for evaluations of e-book on CE (modified with permission from [28]). This formal evaluation of CPD facilitated a more meaningful application of the e-book

Full size image

Readers were invited to respond immediately through hyperlinks placed at the end of the e-book. The feedback questionnaire was designed by the editorial board and reviewed by experts in laboratory medicine education. A pilot study of 10 individuals was conducted in January 2018 to pre-test the survey questions to determine how understandable these questions were. These questions were developed on the basis of a pilot study and experts’ opinions. The same feedback questionnaire was provided for readers of each issue to identify the changes in reading behaviours and the suggestion for future CE programs. Through the questionnaire, participants provided demographic information, learning patterns, assessments of the feasibility of using the e-book and their acceptance of satisfaction with using it, and learning outcomes after using it. Seven questions were included in the satisfaction measurements and rated on a 5-point Likert scale; an open-ended question was also included to express the respondents’ views on any topic of the e-book. A pilot study of 10 individuals was conducted to pre-test the survey questions in advance. Most people spent about 5 min to finish a 10-question survey, which was acceptable for most people. Furthermore, the questions in the post-test were designed by the editorial board and reviewed by experts in laboratory medicine education. The pre-test was particularly planned for each issue of the e-book, and the questions were designed to ask about the educational content in the e-book. Although each round had different questions, they were tested by the editorial board in advance to ensure that the level of difficulty of these questions was the same in each round for most medical technologists.

Statistical analysis

Data were statistically analysed using Microsoft Excel and SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). For categorical data, results were presented in tables by using frequencies or percentages. The Cochran–Armitage trend test was performed to determine the trends in binomial proportions across the levels of ordinal variables, whilst a chi-square test was performed to determine relationships between categorical variables. The phi correlation coefficient (phi) was used to measure the strength of the association between two categorical variables. Descriptive statistics were conducted to analyse scores and responses to Likert-type questions, which were presented as proportions (%), means, and standard deviations (SDs). In all analyses, two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 280 medical technologists were invited to the study to complete the feedback questionnaire and the post-test during the study period in each round. The response rates to different issues of the e-book in 2018 were 25.0% (70/280), 43.9% (123/280), 43.6% (122/280), and 40.0% (112/280). The readers’ demographic characteristics, CE learning styles, and learning barriers were analysed. The demographic data of readers of different issues of the e-book had no significant differences (Table S1). Most of the study participants were women with a wide range of work experience. The most frequent laboratory specialty of all study participants was clinical chemistry, followed by clinical haematology and microscopy. Moreover, the largest percentages of readers receiving CE highly relied on hospital or healthcare delivery systems and professional associations, whereas more than 50% of the participants spent less than 30 min on educational activities per week. Overall, the major barriers faced by medical technologists in practicing CPD were lack of free time and information overload (Table S1).

Most respondents ‘agreed’ or ‘strongly agreed’ with the items measuring reader satisfaction on different issues of the e-book, including programme organisation, delivery modes, and learning stimulation (Table 1). To some extent, although readers reported less satisfaction in the first issue, satisfaction data in each round displayed the same pattern. The average of the responses to all seven items in each round was > 4, and the highest mean score was for the statement ‘The content and layout of the e-book stimulate my learning’. Moreover, the mean scores for the statement ‘Overall, I am satisfied with the e-book’ were higher than the average. This result indicated that the educational content in the e-book provided a favourable condition for CE. In the feedback, some respondents commented that they enjoyed the e-book for its interactivity (especially for clinical case scenarios), convenience, and topics highly related to clinical practice. However, a few respondents commented that ‘the e-book should focus on general specialty-related subjects’.

Table 1 Participant responses to the e-book from the satisfaction survey
Full size table

In the evaluation of learning effects on knowledge acquisition, readers in each round achieved high scores on the post-test (89.0%, 71.4%, 82.8%, and 77.0%, respectively) after they read different issues of the e-book (Fig. 3). Importantly, most participants mainly took courses provided by healthcare delivery systems (Table S1), whilst more than 50% of participants spent less than 30 min on educational activities per week. The data suggested that the reading engagement of the participants in this e-book programme was higher than that of the participants in previous CPD activities. Throughout the 1-year period, more than 70% of the readers achieved a score of at least 80% on the post-test in each round, successfully earning 1 h of CE credit since the e-book became a new CE activity at the Department of Laboratory Medicine.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Study participants’ post-test results after they read different issues of the e-book

Full size image

In a further analysis of the associations between CPD participation frequency and readers’ self-perceived barriers, significant negative trends were found between participation frequency and language barriers (p trend = 0.0383) from the readers of the 2nd issue e-book (Table 2). Although the negative trends between participation frequency and language barriers were not significantly identified in the readers of other rounds, the frequency distribution indicated that readers with language barriers were more likely to spend less time on CPD programmes. Conversely, higher proportions of readers thought that the learning facilitators of the e-book, including the efficiency of conducting research, availability of the traditional Chinese language, optimal content length, and relevance to clinical practice, could help them overcome the corresponding learning barriers (Table 3). The strength of the relationship between readers’ self-perceived barriers and the corresponding learning facilitators of the e-book was measured using the phi correlation coefficient. Except for the facilitator ‘material-appropriate difficulty’, most readers with self-perceived barriers were more likely to report benefits from the corresponding facilitators including ‘efficiency for researching’, ‘available in Chinese’, ‘optimal content length’ and ‘relevance to clinical practice’. The positive correlation between identified barriers and corresponding facilitators could be detected in readers of different rounds although the correlation relationship did not show up in each round. Notably, the facilitator ‘available in Chinese’ was particularly beneficial to about 20 ~ 30% of readers with ‘language barriers’ in each round. (Table 3).

Table 2 Associations between study participants’ frequency of practicing CE and self-perceived barriers to CPD
Full size table
Table 3 Correlations between study participants’ perceived facilitators of e-book and self-perceived barriers to CPD
Full size table

Discussion

The study aimed to develop an e-book that can address learning barriers associated with traditional CE and promote self-learning among medical technologists. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to create a low-cost quality e-learning model for medical technologists. Because it was free to provide the e-book online, the authors' work and editing process were the only costs involved in the production of the e-book. Furthermore, we adopted The New World Kirkpatrick Model with four levels (reactions, learning, behaviours and results) to evaluate the e-book’s learning impacts on medical technologists. Our study found impacts of the e-book at all four levels, furthering existing research that only examined the lower levels [23, 24]. The e-book became a new CE activity and reached medical technologists in various types of laboratories.

A major finding of this study is that most readers had positive learning experiences and better learning outcomes, including knowledge acquisition and behavioural change, after reading the e-book. However, while most previous investigations have focused on whether e-learning is effective generally [32,33,34], our study further assessed whether the e-book could be used to achieve effective learning outcomes in laboratory medicine. Moreover, we discussed different learning facilitators of the e-book, addressing how this novel educational intervention could have different types of learning effects on participants. Our study results indicated that information overload was inversely proportional to CPD participation frequency. As presented in the materials section, we gathered and condensed the latest information into articles of proper length, making the content easy to accept and read. Most readers held very positive attitudes towards the articles in the e-book and achieved high scores for corresponding questions. Similarly, previous CPD research projects providing concise and accessible updates to healthcare professionals also obtained positive results from respondents [35,36,37]. Based on a literature review of educational interventions [38, 39], the ‘concise writing’ style fits the core concept of cognitive load theory, which recommends that educators present information concisely to minimise the cognitive load.

In line with previous studies [32,33,34], e-learning education can provide results in terms of Kirkpatrick’s Levels 1 to 3 equivalent to those of traditional CE. However, in comparison, because e-learning education enables health professionals under various circumstances to overcome access issues, e-learning can more effectively achieve organisational goals in clinical settings [40,41,42]. In our study, one of the important factors supporting positive changes in organisational impact was the fact that the e-book did not require participants to have a high level of information technology literacy. Moreover, the e-book was offered to participants for free, which likely increased the participants’ commitment to the programme and positively affected attrition. Importantly, similar to a study in Chile [42], our e-learning CE activity was carried out in a systematic way and, as part of the CE programme, achieved Kirkpatrick’s four levels of organisational change.

Furthermore, we also found language barriers to be significant obstacles preventing non-native English speakers from acquiring updated knowledge in CPD programmes. Since language barriers were found to be significantly inversely proportional to CPD participation frequency, almost one-third of readers felt that the e-book’s availability in Chinese strongly supported their learning. Language barriers to medical education are common for non-native speakers, including health professionals in Asian countries [43, 44], Oceania country [45] and several European countries [46,47,48]. In the abovementioned countries, language barriers significantly hinder healthcare professionals’ learning. As a result, in the short term, it is proper to provide language support to professionals struggling due to language barriers; in the long term, further studies and discussions are needed to find a better solution.

To our knowledge, there are no published studies regarding CE that facilitates e-learning while considering medical technologists’ views and preferences. We tried to create a high-quality but low-cost e-learning model to meet the strong demand from both educators and medical technologists. In addition to the abovementioned components, our evaluation also indicated that it is critical for CPD programmes to be useful to learners’ practice. The relative requirements of CE were also found in previous studies on different types of healthcare professionals [49, 50]. We suggest that CPD programmes focus on the actual and predicted practice requirements that could improve learners’ clinical skills and competence. We chose the e-book as the multimedia learning tool for CE for two reasons. First, from the learners’ perspective, the e-book is convenient to use and relevant to medical technologists’ life experiences, since the popularity of reading e-books using mobile devices has been growing rapidly in Taiwan. Second, from the educators’ perspective, it is cheap and easy to produce e-books using PDF files as the basic template for conversions. Moreover, e-books are a powerful educational tool to achieve highly interactive and active learning experiences in medical education. Furthermore, e-books are simple, and they can be disseminated in all clinical settings [23, 24].

Our study has some limitations. This was a cross-sectional study, and there was no control group. Thus, we could not measure the effectiveness of our e-learning model compared to traditional methods. Furthermore, we did not attempt to determine whether our model was more effective; this study aimed to build a low-cost e-learning model for medical technologists and explore how medical technologists perceived the e-book. In this study, the participants were defined as readers who completed the questionnaire and post-test. Therefore, the same medical technologist could have answered the questionnaire for different issues of the e-book and been viewed as different readers. Considering the observations from each round may not be independent from each other, we have presented the results of each round separately. According to the inconsistent results in each round, it seems reasonable to assume that there were demographic differences among readers in each round. Finally, although we identified and then used many facilitators to improve learners’ learning efficiency, it was still difficult to measure the true impact of different facilitators on learning. Because we did not identify and collect data on possible confounding factors, we could not control the influence of any covariates on learning. Such outcomes should be addressed in future studies.

Conclusions

Our cross-sectional study demonstrated that our low-cost and learner-centred e-book effectively overcame many learning barriers in CE for medical technologists. The interactivity and flexibility of e-learning particularly helped learners to engage in clinical scenarios in laboratory medicine. Today, with the distinctive rise of e-learning, our study could pave the way for educators to build a high-quality e-learning model for professionals in CE.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CE:

Continuing education

CPD:

Continuing professional development

SDL:

Self-directed learning

e-book:

Electronic book

References

  1. de Jong J, Visser M, Van Dijk N, van der Vleuten C, Wieringa-de Waard M. A systematic review of the relationship between patient mix and learning in work-based clinical settings. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 24. Med Teach. 2013;35(6):e1181-96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beastall GH. Harmonisation of specialist training and continuing professional development in laboratory medicine: a long but necessary journey. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53:1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ramani S, McMahon GT, Armstrong EG. Continuing professional development to foster behaviour change: From principles to practice in health professions education. Med Teach. 2019;41:1045–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Samuel A, Cervero RM, Durning SJ, Maggio LA. Effect of Continuing Professional. Development on Health Professionals’ Performance and Patient Outcomes: A Scoping Review of Knowledge Syntheses. Acad Med. 2021;96(6):913–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Brien Pott M, Blanshan AS, Huneke KM, Baasch Thomas BL, Cook DA. Barriers to identifying and obtaining CME: a national survey of physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21:168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ducat WH, Burge V, Kumar S. Barriers to, and enablers of, participation in the Allied Health Rural and Remote Training and Support (AHRRTS) program for rural and remote allied health workers: a qualitative descriptive study. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brøndt A, Sokolowski I, Olesen F, Vedsted P. Continuing medical education and burnout among Danish GPs. Br J Gen Pract. 2008;58:15–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jeong D, Presseau J, ElChamaa R, et al. Barriers and Facilitators to Self-Directed Learning in Continuing Professional Development for Physicians in Canada: A Scoping Review. Acad Med. 2018;93:1245–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Regnier K, Kopelow M, Lane D, Alden E. Accreditation for learning and change: quality and improvement as the outcome. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2005;25:174–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bucklin BA, Asdigian NL, Hawkins JL, Klein U. Making it stick: use of active learning strategies in continuing medical education. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21:44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hadadgar A, Changiz T, Masiello I, Dehghani Z, Mirshahzadeh N, Zary N. Applicability of the theory of planned behavior in explaining the general practitioners eLearning use in continuing medical education. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Harden RM, Laidlaw JM. Effective continuing education: the CRISIS criteria. Med Educ. 1992;26:408–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Davis N, Davis D, Bloch R. Continuing medical education: AMEE Education Guide No 35. Med Teach. 2008;30:652–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chorley A, Azzam K, Chan TM. Redesigning continuing professional development: Harnessing design thinking to go from needs assessment to mandate. Perspect Med Educ. 2022;11(2):121–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McConnell KJ, Newlon CL, Delate T. The impact of continuing professional development versus traditional continuing pharmacy education on pharmacy practice. Ann Pharmacother. 2010;44:1585–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cullen MW, Geske JB, Anavekar NS, et al. Reinvigorating Continuing Medical Education: Meeting the Challenges of the Digital Age. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019;94:2501–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. Jama. 1995;274:700–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brigley S, Young Y, Littlejohns P, McEwen J. Continuing education for medical professionals: a reflective model. Postgrad Med J. 1997;73:23–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Knowles M. Self-directed learning: a guide for learners and teachers. New York: Associated Press; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Berndt A, Murray CM, Kennedy K, Stanley MJ, Gilbert-Hunt S. Effectiveness of distance learning strategies for continuing professional development (CPD) for rural allied health practitioners: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17:117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Scott KM, Baur L, Barrett J. Evidence-Based Principles for Using Technology-Enhanced Learning in the Continuing Professional Development of Health Professionals. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2017;37:61–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zainal H, Xin X, Thumboo J, Fong KY. Medical school curriculum in the digital age: perspectives of clinical educators and teachers. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22:428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Han ER, Yeo S, Kim MJ, Lee YH, Park KH, Roh H. Medical education trends for future physicians in the era of advanced technology and artificial intelligence: an integrative review. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19:460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hsiao CC, Tiao MM, Chen CC. Using interactive multimedia e-Books for learning blood cell morphology in pediatric hematology. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu Y, Chou PL, Lee BO. Effect of an interactive e-book on nursing students’ electrocardiogram-related learning achievement: A quasi-experimental design. Nurse Educ Today. 2020;90: 104427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Takacs ZK, Swart EK, Bus AG. Benefits and Pitfalls of Multimedia and Interactive Features in Technology-Enhanced Storybooks: A Meta-Analysis. Rev Educ Res. 2015;85:698–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Archibald MM, Scott SD. Learning from usability testing of an arts-based knowledge translation tool for parents of a child with asthma. Nurs Open. 2019;6:1615–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Moreau KA. Has the new Kirkpatrick generation built a better hammer for our evaluation toolbox? Med Teach. 2017;39:999–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD. Evaluating Training Programs: the four levels. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Guarner J, Amukele T, Mehari M, et al. Building capacity in laboratory medicine in Africa by increasing physician involvement: a laboratory medicine course for clinicians. Am J Clin Pathol. 2015;143:405–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wu AH, LaRocco M, Fath SJ, Simon FA. Evaluation of computer case simulations for teaching clinical pathology to second-year medical students. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 1990;20:154–60.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300:1181–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Vaona A, Banzi R, Kwag KH, et al. E-learning for health professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;1:Cd011736.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Vallée A, Blacher J, Cariou A, Sorbets E. Blended Learning Compared to Traditional Learning in Medical Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22: e16504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ritchie DJ, Manchester RF, Rich MW, Rockwell MM, Stein PM. Acceptance of a pharmacy-based, physician-edited hospital pharmacy and therapeutics committee newsletter. Ann Pharmacother. 1992;26:886–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Love RR, Moorman JE. Continuing medical education with a personalized monthly newsletter. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1984;12:309–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gaikwad N, Tankhiwale S. Interactive E-learning module in pharmacology: a pilot project at a rural medical college in India. Perspect Med Educ. 2014;3(1):15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. van Merriënboer JJ, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. Med Educ. 2010;44:85–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sewell JL, Maggio LA, Ten Cate O, van Gog T, Young JQ, O’Sullivan PS. Cognitive load theory for training health professionals in the workplace: A BEME review of studies among diverse professions: BEME Guide No. 53. Med Teach. 2019;41:256–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Butler CC, Simpson SA, Dunstan F, et al. Effectiveness of multifaceted educational programme to reduce antibiotic dispensing in primary care: practice based randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2012;344: d8173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Belda TE, Gajic O, Rabatin JT, Harrison BA. Practice variability in management of acute respiratory distress syndrome: bringing evidence and clinician education to the bedside using a web-based teaching tool. Respir Care. 2004;49:1015–21.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Isbej L, Uribe J, Carrasco O, et al. Experience of continuing online education in gastroenterology for non specialist medical doctors. Rev Med Chil. 2019;147:1059–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kim MS, Song IG, An AR, Kim KH, Sohn JH, Yang SW. Healthcare access challenges facing six African refugee mothers in South Korea: a qualitative multiple-case study. Korean J Pediatr. 2017;60:138–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Yang M, O’Sullivan PS, Irby DM, Chen Z, Lin C, Lin C. Challenges and adaptations in implementing an English-medium medical program:a case study in China. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19:15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Attrill S, McAllister S, Lincoln M. Predictors of professional placement outcome cultural background, English speaking and international student status. Perspect Med Educ. 2016;5(4):222–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Marmon W, Arnold U, Maaz A, Schumann M, Peters H. Welcome, Orientation, Language Training: a project at the Charité for new international medical students. GMS J Med Educ. 2018;35:Doc59.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Byrne E, Brugha R, McGarvey A. ‘A melting pot of cultures’ -challenges in social adaptation and interactions amongst international medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19:86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Senkbeil S, Hendrych A. Tackling the shortage of skilled personnel. Nursing care facilities of Vivantes Forum for Seniors GmbH educates Vietnamese in geriatric nursing care. Pflege Z. 2015;68:34–6.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Kasvosve I, Ledikwe JH, Phumaphi O, et al. Continuing professional development training needs of medical laboratory personnel in Botswana. Hum Resour Health. 2014;12:46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Burrow S, Mairs H, Pusey H, Bradshaw T, Keady J. Continuing professional education: Motivations and experiences of health and social care professional’s part-time study in higher education. A qualitative literature review Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;63:139–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the medical technologists from Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taiwan who contributed to this research. Furthermore, we want to thank Dr. Ming-Jung Ho for providing suggestions regarding structure development and Chang Gung Medical Education Research Centre for the academic support.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Hsiao-Chen Ning and Kuo-Chien Tsao contributed equally.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan

    Chiao-Ni Wen, Chung-Guei Huang, Pi-Yueh Chang & Kuo-Chien Tsao

  2. Department of Medical Biotechnology and Laboratory Science, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

    Chiao-Ni Wen, Chung-Guei Huang, Pi-Yueh Chang, Hsiao-Chen Ning & Kuo-Chien Tsao

  3. Department of Medical Laboratories Administrative Center, Chang Gung Medical Foundation, Taoyuan, Taiwan

    Tsung-Han Yang

  4. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

    Huey-Ling You

  5. Department of Medical Research and Development Linko Branch, Chang Gung Medical Foundation, Taoyuan City, 333, Taiwan, R.O.C.

    Hsiao-Chen Ning

Authors
  1. Chiao-Ni Wen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chung-Guei Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pi-Yueh Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tsung-Han Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Huey-Ling You
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hsiao-Chen Ning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kuo-Chien Tsao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the conceptual design of the study. CNW performed data collection and analysis, which was supervised by HCN and KCT. HCN and KCT contributed equally to this work, and both HCN and KCT are corresponding authors. CNW drafted the manuscript. All authors critically revised the manuscript and approved its final version. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hsiao-Chen Ning.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The research complied with all relevant national regulations and institutional policies and was performed in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration. Moreover, it was approved by the authors’ Institutional Review Board of Chang Gung Medical Foundation, Taipei, Taiwan (IRB no. 201800144B0). The Chang Gung Medical Foundation Institutional Review Board approved to waive the requirement to obtain informed consent from all participants.

Consent for publication

The informed consent for publication of identifiable information/ images in open access journal was obtained from all study participants.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Table S1. Demographic characteristics and CE learning styles of participants.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wen, CN., Huang, CG., Chang, PY. et al. Application of the electronic book to promote self-directed learning in medical technologist continuing education: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ 22, 713 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03724-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03724-w

Keywords

BMC Medical Education

ISSN: 1472-6920

Contact us