Skip to main content

Developing and evaluating an educational web-based tool for health professions education: the Flipped Classroom Navigator



Flipped classroom pedagogy is a blended learning approach applied in undergraduate health professions education. However, teachers and students may require training to effectively engage in flipped classroom pedagogy. Thus, this study aimed to design, develop, and evaluate a web-based tool for fostering flipped classroom pedagogy in undergraduate health professions education.


This is an educational design-based research with a descriptive evaluation component which was conducted in two steps: (i) design & development and (ii) evaluation of an educational website. An expert panel was formed to evaluate the website by using a website evaluation questionnaire (WEQ). Descriptive statistics were employed to calculate the experts’ agreement level.


An innovative website design was used to provide access to a range of digital devices. The development process occurred concurrently in two steps: (i) website development and (ii) learning content development. The educational website was branded as the Flipped Classroom Navigator (FCN). Based on WEQ scores, the FCN obtained a good level of agreement (≥ 80%) for its’ ease of use, hyperlinks, structure, relevance, comprehension, completeness, and layout.


The FCN is an effective method for providing training to promote flipped classroom pedagogy in health professions education. The FCN achieved good evaluation scores and comments from experts. However, it is also necessary to obtain acceptance from the end-users, which could be the focus of future research. Nonetheless, the expert panel pinpointed areas for further development before introducing the FCN to end-users.

Peer Review reports


Educational practice continues to evolve through technology advancement and blended learning [1]. Blended learning includes face-to-face (F2F) and online teaching–learning components [2]. One of the innovative blended learning approaches is the flipped classroom, where teachers use technology and shift the traditional classroom experience to learners’ own space thus transforming the F2F classrooms into active and applicable educational environments [3, 4]. Flipped classroom pedagogy (FCP) is a relatively new concept and involves using several educational technologies, such as screen and video recorders, a learning management system, online quizzes, and social media platforms [5]. There is growing interest among teachers and students in undergraduate health professional education (HPE) in introductory training in FCP [6, 7]. Thus, it is vital to develop attractive, flexible, and asynchronous training for clinical teachers and students who may be experiencing time challenges when balancing academic and clinical responsibilities [8].

Web-based training (WBT) is popular and recognised as an efficient way to deliver asynchronous training in undergraduate HPE [9, 10]. Such training provides multiple advantages including unrestricted hours of access; freedom from complicated hardware and software; multimedia presentations; asynchronous communication; cost-effectiveness; diverse learning experiences and the opportunity to update content quickly and easily [11, 12].

However, designing and developing an educational website is considerably different from the ordinary website development process [8, 13]. Educational websites are created to activate effective learning rather than being a platform for storing information [14]. Choosing appropriate learning content and a website interface design are crucial for developing an effective educational website [15]. Specifically, three design factors should be considered when developing a high-quality educational website: (i) an education-oriented aspect including effective use of multimedia learning principles and appropriate incorporation of learning material with underlying pedagogical principles; (ii) a user-oriented aspect consisting of website usability, navigation and accessibility; and (iii) a multimedia-oriented aspect incorporating the usage of appealing fonts, typography, texture, colour, graphics, audio and videos [16,17,18,19]. Furthermore, Cook and Dupras (2004) proposed practical steps for developing an effective educational website for HPE [13].

Although website development incorporates several design principles, educational websites are predominantly developed from the perspective of the developing team rather than from the learner perspective [20, 21]. Therefore, it is crucial the educational websites are evaluated by learning content experts to consider the educational and learning value of such websites. This study aimed to describe the development and evaluation of an educational website used to train teachers and students in FCP in the undergraduate health professional education setting.


Study design

This was an educational design-based research project with a descriptive evaluation component. This study was conducted in two steps. The first step was designing and developing an educational website for fostering flipped classrooms in an undergraduate health professional education. The second step was focused on evaluating the educational website from the perspective of a panel of content experts.

Step-1: design and development of an education website

Since the website is created to provide training to health professional educators and students for utilising FCP, we named the educational website “Flipped Classroom Navigator (FCN)”. The core development of the FCN is guided by Cook and Dupras’s [13] practical framework for designing effective educational websites. Cook and Dupras [13] outlined three major essential steps for developing educational websites that employ adult learning principles, namely preparation, development, and implementation and maintenance. The preparation step involves needs analysis, identifying learning outcomes, assessing the opportunity and challenges for the intervention. The development step focuses on creating learning materials and a website skeleton/design. This is conducted by evaluating the nature of the learning content, and whether it promotes active learning, creating strategies for boosting web usage, and evaluating the website before reaching the end-user. Implementation and maintenance is concerned with piloting the website and creating a plan to maintain the website [13].

Step-2: evaluating the educational website

A quantitative approach was used to appraise the FCN website. An expert panel was formed for evaluating the FCN website. Experts in this study consisted of people who are presently involved in Health Professions Education, Flipped Classroom and Educational Technology as teachers or researchers, or curriculum planners at universities or teaching hospitals. There were ten invitations sent to experts from five different countries. Five experts agreed to participate as an expert panel for evaluating the FCN. The expert panel includes an associate dean for teaching–learning (New Zealand), two senior lecturers (Australia and Sri Lanka), a lecturer in eLearning and web support (New Zealand) and a professional teaching fellow with expertise in flipped classroom pedagogy (New Zealand).

Data collection and analysis

Several educational website evaluation methods and tools have been proposed to test websites’ usability, the trustworthiness of content, navigation, and layout [22, 23]. The expert panel critically evaluated the FCN website by using the Website Evaluation Questionnaire (WEQ) [23]. The validity and reliability of the WEQ were tested in several contexts [24]. It is a promising instrument (χ2 = 945.7; df = 669; p =  < 0.001; CFI = 0.97; NFI = 0.94; RMR = 0.06) that was used to evaluate the FCN [23]. The WEQ consists of 23 items which use a five-point Likert scale with responses ranging from 1 (Most Negative) to 5 (Most Positive). Using the Qualtrics online data collection software (, the WEQ was sent to experts with a URL of the FCN ( Descriptive statistics were employed to analyse experts’ feedback. Responses of 4 (positive) and 5 (most positive) were indicative of high levels of satisfaction. Experts’ agreement rating was calculated for each item by summing the number of agreeable responses divided by the number of experts. An agreement level of 0.75 (75%) or above was considered as good and a value above 0.9 (90%) was indicated as excellent [25, 26].


The development process includes two activities: website development and learning content development.

Designing the FCN

This step began with a needs assessment of the FCP in reference to an undergraduate health profession educational context. A baseline survey was conducted to identify the users’ needs and available resources for utilizing FCN [6, 7]. Based on this, intended learning outcomes were developed for the FCN educational website. Then, a core development team was formed, including a web designer, a learning content creator (a health profession educationist), and co-authors (two senior lecturers, and an Associate Professor in medical and clinical education). Regarding content delivery, the website aimed to be compatible for the broadest range of digital devices (including desktop, laptop, smart phone and tablets) and web browsers (including Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer and Safari). WordPress software [27] was employed for designing the FCN. The WordPress was used to automatically reformat the shape of the FCN to be compatible with any screen size.

Developing the FCN

Website development

The core development team decided that website design and development go hand in hand with learning content to achieve the intended learning outcomes of the FCN, and the website design needed to be accessible and user-friendly. The FCN web designer developed the user interface and visual layout, which allowed the user to interact with the FCN. A home page was created that could be used by both teachers and students. The home page helps to direct the route that teachers and students could follow to access two different course content pages (See Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Visual of the FCN home page shown on (A) mobile phone and (B) laptop

The course content pages are the most crucial component of the FCN website (See Fig. 2). An innovative tile-based design was used to create coloured rectangles for each topic. Clicking anywhere on the coloured rectangle directs users to the designated topic page (Home Page -> Course Content Page -> Topic page).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Course content page of the FCN (A) mobile phone view and (B) laptop view

A common website template was used to create each topic. Each topic page starts with a title, followed by an explanatory video and text or graphic description. A formative assessment (quiz) via Qualtrics was included in each topic for assessing the users’ knowledge gain (See Fig. 3). Users could navigate between FCN pages in three different ways: (i) “home” button on the top left of all pages directs users to the home page; (ii) using “Return to Content” key on the top right of the topic page allows users to coming back to the course content page; and (iii) using arrow keys on the bottom of the topic page allows users to go to the next and previous pages (See Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Sample topic page and quizzes of the flipped classroom navigator (A & C) mobile phone view and (B & D) laptop view

Learning contents development

The learning materials of the FCN were developed in accordance with the intended learning outcomes (ILOs) of the training (see Fig. 4). Constructive alignment informed the development of the learning materials. The core development team thoroughly checked the instructional delivery of the online course (learning content), and quizzes were aligned with ILOs [28, 29]. Eight topics for teachers and six topics for students were created in the online training programme (see Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Intended learning outcomes and topics included in the Flipped Classroom Navigator

The course materials were produced in three different forms: word-based illustration (including text explanation, tables, and figures), videos and quizzes. The course materials were developed in three phases: pre-production, production and post-production [30]. In the pre-production phase, the learning content creator (Researcher-1) reviewed relevant literature and drafted scripts for videos and text illustrations. The drafted scripts were cross-checked and reviewed by co-authors for content validity and language suitability.

The production phase started after finalising all scripts. Videos were created using animations, cartoons, and screencasts. Doodly and POWTOON were used to create animations and cartoons [31, 32]. Audacity software was employed in the recording and editing of audio [33]. The video animations and audios were merged and edited in Adobe Premiere Pro to create high-quality (2160p, 4 K) videos [34]. Final videos were uploaded on YouTube (Sample video available for access at: The videos were affixed within the FCN by embedding the unique YouTube link. Text illustrations were typed in WordPress. Figures were created in Adobe Photoshop and uploaded into relevant WordPress pages. Quizzes were created in Qualtrics and embedded within WordPress.

In the post-production phase, the drafted WordPress website was internally reviewed by the core development team. In this regard, the core development team met to discuss the quality of learning materials and usability of the website. Several updates and revisions were made in the internal evaluation phase. Finally, the WordPress site was merged with the actual website domain ( Afterwards, the finalized FCN was shared with the experts’ group for external evaluation.

Evaluating the FCN

Table-1 provides experts’ responses to the FCN website’s evaluation statements and their agreement rate in percentage. Overall, FCN obtained a good level of agreement from the panel of experts for its features of ease of use, hyperlinks, structure, relevance, comprehension, completeness, layout. Specifically, FCN attained 100% agreement from reviewers in relation to: ‘easy to use’, ‘clear structure’, ‘consistency of sufficient information’.

Table 1 Experts’ evaluation of FCN education website

Experts also responded to open-ended questions about how to improve each factor. First, the search function needed to be included within the FCN. Second, the latest evidence should be used to support FCP claims mentioned in the FCN. Third, it is helpful to include a glossary page for novice teachers. Fourth, regarding the background colour of the FCN, some users disliked the dark colour of the FCN’s background. Lastly, an expert suggested incorporating transcripts of the FCN’s videos.


The study aimed to design, develop, and evaluate an educational website for promoting and educating the usage of flipped classroom practices in the undergraduate HPE context. Overall, the FCN production was directed by educational website development principles. Expert’s evaluation indicates that the FCN is an effective tool for providing introductory training to promote flipped classroom pedagogy in undergraduate HPE.

It is necessary to follow systematic approaches in developing an educational website for establishing educational principles to achieve meaningful learning outcomes [9, 13]. Adult learning theory principles were incorporated into the learning materials development process for the FCN [8]. For instance, the FCN’s learning materials encouraged self-directed learning and inspired the learner to apply their prior experience. The design of the FCN’s content page was created to provide clear direction and the strongest motivation to participants before they commit to learning it. Moreover, adult learners were inspired by task-oriented education. Therefore, all learning materials were complemented by quick quizzes with instant feedback. In addition, the topics included in the FCN’s educational videos and website were designed as questions forms to trigger the participants’ reflection. For example, “What is happening in a flipped classroom?” and “How the flipped classroom differs from a traditional classroom?”. Participants’ readiness to learn in the FCN was assessed before starting the development process, where they exhibited their willingness to participate in FCP training [6, 7].

The FCN website’s design and development process was directed by Cook and Dupras’s [13] practical guide for developing educational websites. Moreover, the FCN education website design and development process can be explained according to three perspectives. Firstly, from the communication perspective, the FCN was created to train HPE teachers and students by conveying accessible information. Therefore, our core development team decided to choose an accessible website design for transferring our learning materials. This idea was supported by a study indicating that the webpage’s complexity affects communication effectiveness [35]. Secondly, from the aesthetic perspective, the FCN was designed to attract intended users. For example, the contents page was shaped in the form of a colourful grid layout. Further, learning materials were formed as innovative videos and striking graphic illustrations. The rationale being that this promotes timely user interactivity [36]. More specifically it has been reported that users’ initial aesthetic impressions occur within one second of browsing a website [37]. Thirdly, from the human–computer or machine interaction perspective, the FCN can be effectively accessed by several smart devices, including laptops, smartphones, and tablets. Specifically, the webpage template will be automatically transformed according to interactive device screen sizes and their resolution capability. Moreover, the videos and quizzes incorporated in the FCN were designed as interactive tools with the users. The human–computer or machine interaction plays a crucial role in the efficiency and effectiveness of an educational website [38, 39].

The expert panel’s responses to the WEQ indicated a good level of agreement for the FCN for its’ intended use. Specifically, experts agreed on the FCN’s structure, relevance, easy usage, hyperlink accessibility, comprehension, completeness, and layout. In the field of HPE, there are several tools for assessing the quality of educational websites [13, 40]. However, a dearth of evidence has investigated the practice of evaluating education websites before their inaugural launch [41]. Interestingly, the FCN received good to excellent reviews from the content experts before it was made live to the end-users.

Considering the implications of the FCN, it is proposed as a valuable resource for providing flexible and asynchronous learning among the HPE teachers and students who are busy in the academic and clinical environment and can be used as a complement for face-to-face introductory training for implementing FCP.

Educational technological advancements have resulted in several innovative ways to enhance the teaching–learning process, for example, through using educational software. In addition, the inclusion of smart phones as an essential learning gadget, offers further opportunity for incorporating technology into teaching–learning practice through using software and apps. However, developing software is a relatively complex task. In addition, developers usually pay a subscription charge to upload the educational software into various digital platforms for its distribution (e.g., App Store, Google Play and Microsoft Store). To avoid these challenges, a web-based model of delivery was chosen to develop and distribute FCN due to reduced complexity and low cost, easy updating features for educational website developers and free or cost-effectiveness for end-users. Another strength of the FCN is its straightforward and user-friendly structure which provides unambiguous navigation to users, which was supported by the experts’ evaluation that FCN’s was clearly structured and accessible (culminating in a 100% agreement).

Considering future improvements, firstly, the FCN development team can focus on addressing the feedback from the expert panel, namely attending to background colour, evidence-based practice for supporting FCN claims, and incorporating the suggested enhancements. These include technical changes to the search function, glossary page and transcripts of the FCN’s videos. Secondly, actual end-users (teachers and students from undergraduate HPE) need to use the FCN and, therefore, be able to provide feedback regarding their experience when using the FCN. Thirdly, few learners prefer to read the learning materials in a text book format [21]. Therefore, the FCN development team can explore the possibility to automatically convert the website format as a reader-friendly text, book, or use audiobook instructions. Lastly, it is also possible to create a space for sharing users flipped classroom experiences in the FCN and enabling the users to share the web-blog writings on their website or social media.


The FCN is a web-based educational tool designed and developed to provide asynchronous training to teachers and students in undergraduate HPE. The design and development of the FCN was guided by the educational principles of effective learning. The FCN educational website obtained a good level of agreement from an international expert panel. More specifically, FCN received 80 to 100% acceptance from experts for it being easy to use, having a clear structure and being consistency of sufficient information. We believe that FCN would add value to delivering online induction training for practising FCN. However, the effectiveness of the FCN will be confirmed after being rolled out to the end-users.

Availability of data and materials

All relevant data are within the manuscript.





Flipped Classroom Pedagogy


Health Professional Education


Web-based training


Flipped Classroom Navigator


Website Evaluation Questionnaire


  1. Harden RM, Hart IR. An international virtual medical school (IVIMEDS): the future for medical education? Med Teach. 2002;24(3):261–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dankbaar MEW, Storm DJ, Teeuwen IC, Schuit SCE. A blended design in acute care training: similar learning results, less training costs compared with a traditional format. Perspectives on Medical Education. 2014;3(4):289–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. López Belmonte J, Moreno Guerrero AJ, López Núñez JA, Pozo Sánchez S. Scientific production of flipped learning and flipped classroom in Web of Science. Texto Livre: Linguagem e Tecnologia. 2021;14(1):e26266.

  4. Youhasan P, Chen Y, Lyndon M, Henning MA. Exploring the pedagogical design features of the flipped classroom in undergraduate nursing education: a systematic review. BMC Nurs. 2021;20(1):50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sánchez SP, Belmonte JL, García AMR, Núñez JAL. Competencia digital docente para el uso y gestión analítica informacional del aprendizaje invertido. Cult Educ, Cultura y Educación. 2020;32(2):226–41.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Youhasan P, Chen Y, Lyndon M, Henning MA. Assess the feasibility of flipped classroom pedagogy in undergraduate nursing education in Sri Lanka: A mixed-methods study. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(11): e0259003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Youhasan P, Chen Y, Lyndon MP, Henning MA. University teachers’ perceptions of readiness for flipped classroom pedagogy in undergraduate nursing education: A qualitative study. J Prof Nurs. 2022;41:26–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sisson SD, Hill-Briggs F, Levine D. How to improve medical education website design. BMC Med Educ. 2010;10(1):30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Curran VR, Fleet L. A review of evaluation outcomes of web-based continuing medical education. Med Educ. 2005;39(6):561–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moreno-Ger P, Torrente J, Bustamante J, Fernández-Galaz C, Fernández-Manjón B, Comas-Rengifo MD. Application of a low-cost web-based simulation to improve students’ practical skills in medical education. Int J Med Informatics. 2010;79(6):459–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grunewald M, Heckemann RA, Gebhard H, Lell M, Bautz WA. COMPARE radiology: creating an interactive web-based training program for radiology with multimedia authoring software. Acad Radiol. 2003;10(5):543–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Khan BH. Web-based training: Educational Technology. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cook DA, Dupras DM. A practical guide to developing effective web-based learning. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(6):698–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Alur P, Fatima K, Joseph R. Medical teaching websites: do they reflect the learning paradigm? Med Teach. 2002;24(4):422–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hsu Y-c. Better educational website interface design: the implications from gender-specific preferences in graduate students. Br J Edu Technol. 2006;37(2):233–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Farkas DK, Farkas JB. Guidelines for Designing Web Navigation. Tech Commun. 2000;47(3):341–58.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hsu AL, Chien JL, Sarkany D, Smith C. Evaluating neuroradiology fellowship program websites: a critical analysis of all 84 programs in the United States. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2021;50(2):147–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee M-H, Tsai C-C. Exploring teachers’ perceived self efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to educational use of the World Wide Web. Instr Sci. 2010;38(1):1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wing Shui N. Enhancing the Quality of Educational Website Design through Assessment for Learning Strategies. In: Learning and Performance Assessment: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. edn. Edited by Information Resources Management A. Hershey: IGI Global; 2020;1:1106–1133.

  20. Chiew TK, Salim SS. WEBUSE: Website Usability Evaluation Tool. Malays J Comput Sci. 2003;16(1):47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vo MK, Sharp JC. Design, development, and content creation for an open education physics website for MRT education. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2019;50(2):212–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chumley-Jones HS, Dobbie A, Alford CL. Web-based Learning: sound educational method or hype? a review of the evaluation literature. Acad Med. 2002;77(10):S86-93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Elling S, Lentz L, de Jong M, van den Bergh H. Measuring the quality of governmental websites in a controlled versus an online setting with the ‘website evaluation questionnaire.’ Gov Inf Q. 2012;29(3):383–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Elling S, Lentz L, de Jong M. Website Evaluation Questionnaire: Development of a Research-Based Tool for Evaluating Informational Websites. In: Electronic Government: 2007// 2007; Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2007;4656:293–304.

  25. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Scheel C, Mecham J, Zuccarello V, Mattes R. An evaluation of the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of OccuPro’s functional capacity evaluation. Work. 2018;60:465–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Avila J, Sostmann K, Breckwoldt J, Peters H. Evaluation of the free, open source software WordPress as electronic portfolio system in undergraduate medical education. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16(1):157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jervis LM, Jervis L. What is the constructivism in constructive alignment? Biosci Educ. 2005;6(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Youhasan P, Sivanjali M, Sathaananthan T. Outcome based medical curriculum: features, standards and challenges. Bangladesh J Med Educ. 2019;10(1):34–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Galindo-Neto NM, Alexandre ACS, Barros LM. Sá GGdM, Carvalho KMd, Caetano JÁ: Creation and validation of an educational video for deaf people about cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2019;27:e3130–e3130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nerren JB, Vierra J. Combining Pedagogy and Modern Technology into the Public Relations Classroom: Arousal Theory as a Roadmap for Student Success. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice. 2020;20(1):106-117.

  32. Pratiwi MS. Zulherman, Amirullah G: the use of the powtoon application in learning videos for elementary school students. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2021;1783(1): 012115.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mercer A. The creation of the learning resource “video guide to audacity.” Can Music Educ. 2013;55(1):46.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Al Abbas AI, Jung JP, Rice MK, Zureikat AH, Zeh HJ, Hogg ME. Methodology for developing an educational and research video library in minimally invasive surgery. J Surg Educ. 2019;76(3):745–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Geissler G, Zinkhan GM, Watson RTJJAIS. Web Home Page Complexity and Communication Effectiveness. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2001;2(1):1-46.

  36. Tractinsky N, Cokhavi A, Kirschenbaum M, Sharfi T. Evaluating the consistency of immediate aesthetic perceptions of web pages. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2006;64(11):1071–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pengnate S, Sarathy R, Lee J. The engagement of website initial aesthetic impressions: an experimental investigation. Int J Hum-Comput Interact. 2019;35(16):1517–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. D’Alfonso S, Lederman R, Bucci S, Berry K. The digital therapeutic alliance and human-computer interaction. JMIR Ment Health. 2020;7(12): e21895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ren F, Bao Y. A Review on human-computer interaction and intelligent robots. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak. 2019;19(01):5–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Alyusuf R, Prasad K, Abdel Satir A, Abalkhail A, Arora R. Development and validation of a tool to evaluate the quality of medical education websites in pathology. Journal of Pathology Informatics. 2013;4(1):29–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang N, Hosseini S, Mascarella MA, Young M, Posel N, Fung K, Nguyen LHP. Identifying high quality medical education websites in Otolaryngology: a guide for medical students and residents. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;46(1):42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to convey our sincere gratitude to our website developer, Mr. Zac Miller-Waugh, Education Software Developer, The University of Auckland, for his contribution in the development of the FCN. We are incredibly grateful to the expert panel for evaluating the FCN website.


Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



PY conceptualized and designed the study, performed the study, collected the data, did the statistical analysis and wrote the paper. MAH, YC and ML conceptualized and designed the study, performed the study, and critically appraised the paper for its intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Punithalingam Youhasan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee (Reference Number 024079). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Experts provided their informed voluntary consent before evaluating the FCN.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Youhasan, P., Henning, M.A., Chen, Y. et al. Developing and evaluating an educational web-based tool for health professions education: the Flipped Classroom Navigator. BMC Med Educ 22, 594 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Flipped classroom
  • Modern Web
  • Blended Learning
  • Educational Technology
  • Health Profession Education
  • Web-based interventions
  • Online educational resource