Skip to main content

Articles

Page 131 of 131

  1. The effectiveness of teaching critical appraisal to students of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) has not been studied. In this study we attempt to determine if a workshop for final year students at...

    Authors: Edward Mills, Taras Hollyer, Ron Saranchuk and Kumanan Wilson
    Citation: BMC Medical Education 2002 2:2
  2. Little is known about using the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in physical diagnosis courses. The purpose of this study was to describe student performance on an OSCE in a physical diagnosis ...

    Authors: Claus Hamann, Kevin Volkan, Mary B Fishman, Ronald C Silvestri, Steven R Simon and Suzanne W Fletcher
    Citation: BMC Medical Education 2002 2:1
  3. Providing high-quality clinical cases is important for teaching radiology. We developed, implemented and evaluated a program for a university hospital to support this task.

    Authors: Martin Dugas, Christoph Trumm, Axel Stäbler, Ernst Pander, Walter Hundt, Jurgen Scheidler, Roland Brüning, Thomas Helmberger, Tobias Waggershauser, Matthias Matzko and Maximillian Reiser
    Citation: BMC Medical Education 2001 1:5
  4. To assess the level of knowledge for bronchial asthma of the primary healthcare physicians serving a rural population on the island of Crete, both before and immediately after a one-day educational course.

    Authors: Emmanouil Rovithis, Christos Lionis, Sofia E Schiza, Dimosthenis Bouros, Antonis Karokis, loannis Vlachonikolis and Nikolaos M Siafakas
    Citation: BMC Medical Education 2001 1:2

Annual Journal Metrics

  • 2022 Citation Impact
    3.6 - 2-year Impact Factor
    3.9 - 5-year Impact Factor
    1.792 - SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper)
    0.914 - SJR (SCImago Journal Rank)

    2023 Speed
    41 days submission to first editorial decision for all manuscripts (Median)
    191 days submission to accept (Median)

    2023 Usage 
    6,205,310 downloads
    3,103 Altmetric mentions 

Peer-review Terminology

  • The following summary describes the peer review process for this journal:

    Identity transparency: Single anonymized

    Reviewer interacts with: Editor

    Review information published: Review reports. Reviewer Identities reviewer opt in. Author/reviewer communication

    More information is available here

Sign up for article alerts and news from this journal