Skip to main content
Download PDF

Evaluation of a dementia awareness game for health professions students in Northern Ireland: a pre-/post-test study

BMC Medical Education volume 24, Article number: 677 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Dementia is a prevalent global health issue, necessitating comprehensive education for healthcare practitioners and students. Nursing and pharmacy students, provide support across healthcare settings often working as frontline caregivers. Therefore, it is imperative to equip these students with a profound understanding of dementia. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a serious dementia game co-designed with stakeholders, students, and people living with dementia improved the attitudes of nursing and pharmacy students.

Methods

A pretest-posttest design was used to assess the attitudes of health professions students (nursing and pharmacy) towards dementia. The Approaches to Dementia Questionnaire (ADQ) was administered before and after playing a serious Dementia Game. The ADQ measured the total score, Hope subscale, and Recognition of Personhood subscale. Matched pairs t-test was used for analysis conducted with IBM SPSS statistics 27.

Results

A diverse cohort of 505 participants from one university in Northern Ireland participated, with 461 matched pairs used for analysis. Both nursing and pharmacy students demonstrated a significant increase in overall dementia attitudes post-gameplay, with nursing students showing an increase from 79.69 to 83.59 and pharmacy students from 75.55 to 79.86. Subscales for Hope (Nursing = 28.77 to 31.22, Pharmacy = 26.65 to 29.20). and Recognition of Personhood also exhibited significant improvement (Nursing = 50.93 to 52.38, Pharmacy = 48.89 to 50.67). Demographic data revealed predominantly female participants, a lack of personal connections to dementia, and varied training experiences.

Discussion

The study highlights the efficacy of the serious Dementia Game in enhancing attitudes to dementia amongst health professions students, indicating its potential as an educational tool. The study contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting serious games and gamification in healthcare education.

Peer Review reports

Background

Throughout primary, secondary, and tertiary healthcare settings, healthcare professionals play a crucial role in providing comprehensive support [1] to those with dementia, from the initial stages of pre-diagnosis to end-of-life care [2]. Each year, over 10 million new cases of dementia are documented, with more than 55 million individuals affected globally [3]. Nurses and pharmacists are integral members of the healthcare workforce worldwide [4,5,6,7]. Consequently, individuals receiving a dementia diagnosis often receive assistance from both student nurses and student pharmacists, who represent the future of healthcare [8, 9]. To prepare for their clinical placements, these students require a solid foundation in dementia education to effectively provide care and support to individuals living with dementia [10].

Within higher education institutions, dementia education must be integrated into the curriculum to adequately fulfil the educational requirements and standards set forth by the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) and the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC). Within the author’s institution, dementia is extensively integrated into the nursing and pharmacy undergraduate programs, covering various biomedical aspects of care. These include the aetiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations of dementia diseases, nursing and medical interventions, pharmacology, non-pharmacological treatments, and palliative care. However, aspects of patients’ emotions upon diagnosis and how to communicate effectively with people living with dementia are not always explicitly covered in both undergraduate programmes. To address this gap, the Alzheimer’s Society ‘Dementia Friends’ program has been introduced to both programmes [11, 12]. This initiative, part of a global effort, aims to raise awareness and cultivate empathy among learners, recognising the pivotal role of nurses and pharmacists in supporting individuals with dementia across various stages of care [11, 13]. Moreover, the recent COVID-19 pandemic, alongside advancements in digital technology, has led to the emergence of more digital or asynchronous learning opportunities in higher education. One innovative approach is the use of digital serious games to enhance learning experiences.

A recent systematic review and meta-analysis [14] suggests that digital games can be equally beneficial as a stand-alone or multi-component programme while appealing to a wide population regardless of age or gender. Gamification is a concept that combines gaming components with teaching to raise student engagement levels in a classroom setting [15]. A serious game helps players learn the material and hone their skills through gaming [16]. A growing number of studies have shown that using “serious games” to train health professionals can increase participation, user retention, knowledge, and cooperation [14, 17]. The use of serious games is a well-known teaching strategy in the realm of nursing education [16, 18,19,20,21,22] and pharmacy education [23,24,25]. Supporters of digital gaming also stress the games’ accessibility and practicality [26]. Serious games offer a novel method of teaching and improving comprehension; for instance, knowledge of dementia could be enhanced through the use of serious games in healthcare education [27].

This study builds upon prior research demonstrating significant enhancements in nursing student knowledge following the use of a digital game [27]. Expanding upon this foundation, our aim is to broaden the scope of evaluation to explore the potential impact of serious games on not only knowledge acquisition but also on the cultivation of positive attitudes and values towards dementia among nursing and pharmacy students. To our knowledge, no empirical studies have evaluated the effectiveness of a digital serious game to enhance undergraduate nursing and pharmacy students’ attitudes of dementia. Therefore, the aim of this project was to evaluate the impact of a dementia serious game on the attitudes of nursing and pharmacy students.

Methods

Intervention—the dementia game

A digital serious game called The Dementia Game [28] was co-designed through stakeholder involvement, student nurses and with people living with dementia [29]. It is a web-based application (HTML5) that operates on any device with an internet connection. Multiple-choice questions regarding dementia are provided in a random order, and players must follow a path to the finish line by answering these questions correctly. These questions were jointly developed with people living with dementia to ensure key misconceptions about dementia were addressed. Points are awarded for answering questions correctly, and additional points are awarded for finishing the game. Players can challenge others to a game and record their scores. Participants have unlimited access to playing the Dementia Game and each game takes around 90 seconds to complete. The serious game is freely accessible here: www.dementiagame.com.

Design

A pretest-posttest design was used to determine the effectiveness of the serious digital game on a cohort of health professions students (nursing and pharmacy undergraduate students). Before and after playing the Dementia Game, health profession students’ attitudes towards dementia were assessed using the Approaches to Dementia Questionnaire (ADQ) [30].

Participants

Potential participants were recruited by two gatekeepers who were independent from this study. The gatekeepers provided eligible participants (Table 1) with access to the serious game as part of their existing education on dementia before their first taught class on dementia. The gatekeepers also wrote to students to inform them about the evaluation for this study which involved a pre-test before playing and a post-test after playing. All participants were informed that they could play the game without undertaking the pre- or post-test. The total available sample was 624 (n = 544 from nursing and n = 80 from pharmacy). Nursing students were in Year 1 of their degree, Pharmacy students were in Year 3 of their degree. A total of n = 505 students responded to at least the pre-test survey (80.93% response rate) and n = 461 fully completed the study (73.87% response rate).

Table 1 Inclusion/exclusion criteria for participants
Full size table

Evaluation questionnaire

The 19-item Approaches to Dementia Questionnaire (ADQ) [30] with modifications validated by Cheston et al. [31] has been demonstrated to be a valid and reliable instrument [30,31,32]. Each item has a five-point Likert scale measuring level of agreement/disagreement, giving a possible total score range of 19–95, with higher scores demonstrating a more positive attitude towards people living with dementia. Two further subscales measure ‘Recognition of personhood’ focusing on how a person with dementia is viewed as an individual with capabilities; and ‘Hope’ indicating either an optimistic or pessimistic approach to someone with dementia. Overall, the ADQ makes it possible to assess health professions students’ attitudes towards dementia by measuring the extent to which those playing the game acknowledge people affected by dementia as unique individuals with the same value as any other person, and it also highlights any sense of optimism or pessimism the person had about the abilities and the future of a person affected by dementia [28].

A short demographic questionnaire of seven questions was also appended to the pre-game questionnaire, including three questions related to students’ experiences of knowing someone with dementia, working with those living with dementia, and training/education received about dementia.

Data collection

The students who chose to participate in the study completed the pre- and post-questionnaires during a four-week period when they had access to the game. The pre-test questionnaire was the initial time point (T0), and participants had seven days to complete the questionnaire via a web link. Following the conclusion of the pre-test period, a weblink to the serious game was emailed to every participant, by one of the independent gatekeepers, who had completed the pre-test questionnaire and gave their online informed consent to play the game. The game was fully accessible to these participants across four weeks and there were no restrictions as to the number of times it could be played. At the midpoint of this gaming period (the end of week two), an email with instructions on how to access the game was redistributed to every participant by both gatekeepers. Access to the game was closed after four weeks. Participants were then emailed their post-test questionnaire (T1) to complete. Participants had access to the post-test questionnaire for 14 days, and a reminder email was issued after one week (Fig. 1). Data collection was carried out between March 2022 and May 2023.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Data collection flow chart

Full size image

Ethics

This study received ethical approval by Queen’s University Belfast’s Faculty of Medicine, Health, and Life Sciences Research Ethics Committee (MHLS 22_57). Online informed consent was obtained from all questionnaire participants. All methods were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki [33].

Consent

All eligible participants (n = 505) were informed via email of the study and their ability to participate by a person unrelated to the project. It was highlighted that their decision to take part in the study was voluntary and would not affect how they progressed through the course or how well they performed on a module. Students needed access to their own laptop, tablet, or phone to complete the questionnaires and play the game. Participants were unable to interact with a non-digital format of the intervention or complete hard copies of the questionnaires due to the intervention’s mode of delivery.

Data analysis

All data were transferred from MS Forms to a MS Excel spreadsheet, where they were cleaned, coded and scored according to the ADQ guidelines. Data were quality checked by two members of the research team (PS and GC). Demographic data were reviewed using descriptive analysis. Matched pairs for the ADQ scores at baseline and follow-up were analysed using dependent t-tests, with a two-tailed significance level set at α = 0.05. Mean gain was reported for each, and a Bonferroni corrected alpha cut off to control for false positive risk with multiple significance tests (p < 0.008 was significant). Alpha (0.05) was divided by the number of significance tests (6) to get the value of p = 0.008. Analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS statistics 27 [34].

Results

In total, 505 participants completed the pretest questionnaire and subsequently played the Dementia Game (74 pharmacy students and 431 nursing students). Of these, 461 participants then also completed the posttest questionnaire, therefore only 461 matched pairs were used for analysis (reflecting 8.71% attrition from pre-test to analysis). This missing data occurred due to the students not completing the post-test questionnaire, despite having accessed the game. Participants were not supervised during data collection, and so this attrition could not be mitigated further. Table 2 provides the demographics of these respondents in addition to their responses to the three dementia-related questions posed. Of the 461 respondents, the vast majority were female (n = 418), with 82.4% (n = 380) between the age 18–25 years. Nearly two-thirds (n = 304) did not have a family member or close friend living with dementia, just over half (57%) had worked with people living with dementia, and 50.8% had no training/education about dementia. Of those that had completed some form of training or education about dementia (n = 225), the majority (62%, n = 140) had done so outside of the university setting (Table 2).

Table 2 Demographics of participants who completed both questionnaires (n = 461)
Full size table

Overall, the mean ADQ total score for the nursing students (n = 395) demonstrated a significant increase from 79.69 (± 6.08) pretest to 83.59 (± 6.08) posttest (p < 0.001). Similarly, a significant increase in mean scores were found for the Hope and Recognition of Personhood subscales (both p < 0.001) (Table 3).

Table 3 Paired t-test (n = 395) of pre-game (T0) and post-game (T1) ADQ scores for nursing students
Full size table

Overall, the mean ADQ total score for the pharmacy students (n = 66) demonstrated a significant increase from 75.55 (± 5.84) pretest to 79.86 (± 6.70) posttest (p < 0.001). As per the nursing students, a significant increase in mean scores were found for the Hope and Recognition of Personhood subscales (both p < 0.001) (Table 4).

Table 4 Paired t-test (n = 66) of pre-game (T0) and post-game (T1) ADQ scores for pharmacy students
Full size table

Discussion

This study demonstrated a significant increase in overall attitudes to dementia following the game-based intervention. Predominantly, participants were female (418 out of 461), and approximately 82% were within the 18–25 age bracket. Notably, a substantial portion of participants lacked personal connections to people living with dementia as they did not have family members with the condition. Additionally, over half reported no formal dementia-specific training, with the majority of those who did receive training obtaining it externally. It’s also noted that a high number of student nurses have worked with people with dementia, but pharmacist students hadn’t. This would appear to indicate that, irrespective of personal experience, the dementia game has the potential to improve nursing and pharmacy student attitudes to dementia.

Among nursing students, a statistically significant improvement in dementia-related attitudes was observed post-gameplay, with average scores increasing from 79.69 to 83.59. This change was statistically significant, reflecting a meaningful advancement in understanding and recognising the personhood of individuals with dementia. Similarly, pharmacy students exhibited notable improvements in their dementia-related scores, rising from an average of 75.55 to 79.86 post-gameplay.

Asynchronous learning, as was a feature of the dementia serious game, while offering flexibility and convenience, comes with its own set of challenges [35, 36]. One significant hurdle is the potential for conflicting schedules and external commitments among learners. This can make it difficult for students to allocate dedicated time for studying and engaging with course materials. Additionally, asynchronous learning requires a high degree of self-discipline and motivation, as there are no fixed class times or immediate interactions with instructors or peers. This lack of real-time engagement can sometimes lead to feelings of isolation or detachment from the learning process [37]. Moreover, without the structure of regular class meetings, students may struggle with time management and procrastination. It is essential for learners to actively manage their own progress and ensure they stay on track with the curriculum. Lastly, technological issues, such as access to reliable internet and compatible devices, can pose barriers to effective asynchronous learning for some individuals [38]. However, like previous studies on serious gaming, the response rate of 505/624 (80.93%) illustrates potential student appetite for participating in gamified modes of learning [27, 28, 39].

While the use of an asynchronous digital serious game proved effective in improving students’ attitudes towards dementia in this study, its application in healthcare education does not guarantee universally successful learning experiences [27, 28].

Caserman and colleagues [40] suggest that there are limited serious games for healthcare education that adhere to rigorous quality standards addressing both the serious and game components. Well-designed serious games seek to cultivate positive emotions, motivating players to persist in their engagement, leading to heightened interest in the gameplay and improved academic performance [41]. A recent meta-analysis [42] on serious game use in education also advocated for understanding learners’ attitudes toward serious game-assisted learning, emphasising the need to design suitable pedagogical strategies catering to diverse learner needs and for educators to develop appropriate serious games, enhancing learning outcomes. Therefore, future evaluations of serious games should also evaluate student perspectives on game entertainment, the usability of the serious game, and student attitudes toward the integration of serious games in education.

Strengths/limitations

The study exhibits several strengths, including the integration of a co-designed serious game about dementia into nursing and pharmacy curricula at one university in Northern Ireland. Real-world stakeholder involvement in developing the serious game also ensures relevance and applicability. The large sample size of 505 participants with an 80.93% response rate across two healthcare disciplines is also a strength of this study as it enhances the reliability of the findings. This study also does have some limitations, including potential bias in sample demographics, predominantly comprising females in the 18–25 age group. This study did not include a control group, which limits generalisability. Additionally, recruiting a smaller number of pharmacy students posed challenges in statistical analyses, resulting in an uneven distribution between nurses and pharmacy students. Further, this study is limited to two disciplines at one university. Therefore, future work needs to include other professions across multiple universities. Finally, the study does not explore the entertainment value of the serious game, leaving room for future research in exploring the balance between seriousness and engagement.

Conclusion

Serious games can be an effective means of learning in educational settings. Well-designed serious games lead to heightened interest in the gameplay, which may improve academic performance. Engaged players are more likely to become deeply immersed in the learning experience provided by serious games. The current study demonstrates the impact of utilising a serious digital game on healthcare professional students’ understanding of dementia. Overall, there was a statistically significant increase in overall attitude towards dementia following the game-based intervention. Consequently, digital serious games hold the potential to reach a wide audience and emerge as a fitting tool for enhancing dementia awareness, as showcased in this research.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

MHLS:

Medicine, Health, and Life Sciences

ADQ:

Approaches to Dementia Questionnaire

NI:

Northern Ireland

UK:

United Kingdom

References

  1. Geese F, Schmitt KU. Interprofessional collaboration in complex patient care transition: a qualitative multi-perspective analysis. Healthcare 2023 Jan 27;11(3):359.

  2. Eisenmann Y, Golla H, Schmidt H, Voltz R, Perrar KM. Palliative care in advanced dementia. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:543966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organisation. Dementia [Internet]. [cited 2020 Aug 6]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dementia.

  4. Royston C, Mitchell G, Sheeran C, Strain J, Goldsmith S. Optimisation of dementia care in care homes: dementia care framework (innovative practice). Dementia. 2020;19(4):1316–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aldridge Z, Oliver E, Gardener H, Dening KH. Admiral nursing—a model of specialist dementia care in acute hospitals. SAGE Open Nurs. 2020;6:2377960820952677.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gibson C, Goeman D, Pond D. What is the role of the practice nurse in the care of people living with dementia, or cognitive impairment, and their support person (s)? A systematic review. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dodd S, Carter G, Christie A, Mitchell G. Exploring nurse and nursing student experience of using an artist-produced photobook to learn about dementia. BMC Nurs. 2022;21(1):237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Griffiths P, Bridges J, Sheldon H, Thompson R. The role of the dementia specialist nurse in acute care: a scoping review. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24(9–10):1394–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hill B. Protecting student nurses is crucial to saving the nursing workforce. Br J Nurs. 2020;29(13):787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Craig S, Improving Dementia Care, RCN Magazines. 2020. Available from: https://www.rcn.org.uk/magazines/students/2020/improving-dementia-care.

  11. Craig S, Wilson CB, Mitchell G. Translating ‘dementia friends’ programme to undergraduate medical and nursing practice: a qualitative exploration. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stevenson L, Yu A, Haughey S, Barry H. Delivery of the Dementia friends programme on the MPharm degree course: a qualitative exploration of pharmacy students’ perspectives. Int J Pharm Pract. 2021;29(S1):i42. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riab015.051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mitchell G, McGreevy J, Carlisle S, Frazer P, Traynor M, Lundy H, Diamond M, Agnelli J. Evaluation of ‘Dementia friends’ programme for undergraduate nursing students: innovative practice. Dementia. 2017;16(8):1075–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. DeSmet A, Van Ryckeghem D, Compernolle S, Baranowski T, Thompson D, Crombez G, Poels K, Van Lippevelde W, Bastiaensens S, Van Cleemput K, Vandebosch H. A meta-analysis of serious digital games for healthy lifestyle promotion. Prev Med. 2014;69:95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ratinho E, Martins C. The role of gamified learning strategies in student’s motivation in high school and higher education: a systematic review. Heliyon. 2023 Aug 9.

  16. Wang Y, Xiao LD, Huang R. A comparative study of dementia knowledge, attitudes and care approach among Chinese nursing and medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Smiderle R, Rigo SJ, Marques LB, Peçanha de Miranda Coelho JA, Jaques PA. The impact of gamification on students’ learning, engagement and behavior based on their personality traits. Smart Learn Environ. 2020;7(1):3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bickford B, Daley S, Sleater G, Hebditch M, Banerjee S. Understanding compassion for people with dementia in medical and nursing students. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kafadar AH, Barrett C, Cheung KL. Knowledge and perceptions of Alzheimer’s disease in three ethnic groups of younger adults in the United Kingdom. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Banerjee S, Farina N, Daley S, Grosvenor W, Hughes L, Hebditch M, Mackrell S, Nilforooshan R, Wyatt C, de Vries K, Haq I. How do we enhance undergraduate healthcare education in dementia? A review of the role of innovative approaches and development of the Time for Dementia Programme. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017;32(1):68–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Day-Black C. Gamification: an innovative teaching-learning strategy for the Digital Nursing Students in a Community Health nursing course. ABNF J. 2015;26(4).

  22. Malicki A, Vergara FH, Van de Castle B, Goyeneche P, Mann S, Preston Scott M, Seiler J, Meneses MZ, Whalen M. Gamification in nursing education: an integrative literature review. J Continuing Educ Nurs. 2020;51(11):509–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dudzinski M, Greenhill D, Kayyali R, Nabhani S, Philip N, Caton H, Ishtiaq S, Gatsinzi F. The design and evaluation of a multiplayer serious game for pharmacy students. In European Conference on Games Based Learning 2013 (p. 140). Academic Conferences International Limited.

  24. Kayyali R, Wells J, Rahmtullah N, Tahsin A, Gafoor A, Harrap N, Nabhani-Gebara S. Development and evaluation of a serious game to support learning among pharmacy and nursing students. Currents Pharm Teach Learn. 2021;13(8):998–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lambertsen RT, Tang S, Davies J, Morecroft C. Serious gaming for pharmacy education: Development of a serious games for teaching pharmacist communication and drug administration in a virtual hospital setting. In2016 9th International Conference on Developments in eSystems Engineering (DeSE) 2016 Aug 31 (pp. 151–156). IEEE.

  26. Lee JH, Holmes D, Lobe B. Media format matters: users’ perceptions of physical versus digital games. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2016;53(1):1 – 0.

  27. Craig S, Stark P, Wilson CB, Carter G, Clarke S, Mitchell G. Evaluation of a dementia awareness game for undergraduate nursing students in Northern Ireland: a Pre-/Post-Test study. BMC Nurs. 2023;22(1):177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Carter G, Brown Wilson C, Mitchell G. The effectiveness of a digital game to improve public perception of dementia: a pretest-posttest evaluation. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(10):e0257337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mitchell G, McTurk V, Carter G, Brown-Wilson C. Emphasise capability, not disability: exploring public perceptions, facilitators and barriers to living well with dementia in Northern Ireland. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lintern TC. Quality in dementia care: evaluating staff attitudes and behaviour. United Kingdom: Bangor University; 2001.

  31. Cheston R, Hancock J, White P. A cross-sectional investigation of public attitudes toward dementia in Bristol and South Gloucestershire using the approaches to dementia questionnaire. Int Psychogeriatr. 2016;28(10):1717–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cheston R, Hancock J, White P. Does personal experience of dementia change attitudes? The Bristol and South Gloucestershire survey of dementia attitudes. Dementia. 2019;18(7–8):2596–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(4):373.

    Google Scholar 

  34. IBM Corp. IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, Version 27.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Picciano AG. Developing an asynchronous course model at a large, urban university. J Asynchronous Learn Networks. 1998;2(1):1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Jorgensen D. The challenges and benefits of asynchronous learning networks. InDistance learning 2012 Oct 12 (pp. 3–17). Routledge.

  37. Caprara L, Caprara C. Effects of virtual learning environments: a scoping review of literature. Educ Inform Technol. 2022;27(3):3683–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rahiem M. Technological barriers and challenges in the use of ICT during the COVID-19 emergency remote learning.

  39. Mitchell G, Leonard L, Carter G, Santin O, Brown Wilson C. Evaluation of a ‘serious game’on nursing student knowledge and uptake of influenza vaccination. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(1):e0245389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Caserman P, Hoffmann K, Müller P, Schaub M, Straßburg K, Wiemeyer J, Bruder R, Göbel S. Quality criteria for serious games: serious part, game part, and balance. JMIR Serious Games. 2020;8(3):e19037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Jones C, Scholes L, Johnson D, Katsikitis M, Carras MC. Gaming well: links between videogames and flourishing mental health. Front Psychol. 2014;5:76833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhonggen Y. A meta-analysis of use of serious games in education over a decade. International Journal of Computer Games Technology. 2019;2019.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express sincere appreciation to Mrs. Susan Carlisle, formally the Director of Education in the School of Nursing and Midwifery, and Mrs. Lyn Stevenson from the School of Pharmacy at Queen’s University Belfast, who acted as independent gatekeepers in facilitating access to both nursing and pharmacy students. Additionally, we would like to thank Melvin Bell and his colleagues at Focus Games Ltd for their support in this study.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland

    Stephanie Craig, Gillian Carter, Patrick Stark, Gary Mitchell, Sonya Clarke & Christine Brown Wilson

  2. School of Pharmacy, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland

    Heather E. Barry

Authors
  1. Stephanie Craig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heather E. Barry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gillian Carter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Patrick Stark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gary Mitchell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sonya Clarke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Christine Brown Wilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors have agreed on the final version of this paper and agree to be accountable for the findings. All authors have been involved in substantial contributions to the conception (SC, HB, GC, PS, GM, SC, CBW), design of the work (SC, CBW, GC, GM, ); the acquisition, analysis, interpretation of data (GC, PS); have drafted the work or substantively revised it (SC, GC, PS, GM). The authors read and approved the final manuscript (SC, HB, GC, PS, GM, SC, CBW).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie Craig.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study received ethical approval by Queen’s University Belfast’s Faculty of Medicine, Health, and Life Sciences Research Ethics Committee (MHLS 22_57) in 2022. Online informed consent was obtained from all questionnaire participants. All methods were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki [33].

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Craig, S., Barry, H.E., Carter, G. et al. Evaluation of a dementia awareness game for health professions students in Northern Ireland: a pre-/post-test study. BMC Med Educ 24, 677 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05656-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05656-z

Keywords

BMC Medical Education

ISSN: 1472-6920

Contact us