Skip to main content

Table 13 Summary of hypotheses, β values and results

From: Clinical virtual simulation: predictors of user acceptance in nursing education

TAM Components

Hypothesis

Path

β-value

p-value

Result

Internal constructs

H1

SU → GS

  

Not tested

 

H2

BI → SU

  

Not tested

 

H3a

PU → BI

0.11

0.012

Supported

 

H3b

PEOU → PU

0.06

0.45

Not supported

 

H4a

PEOU → BI

-0.11

0.02

Supported

External factors

H3c

SN → BI

0.55

0.096

Not supported

 

H3d

REL → BI

0.43

***

Supported

 

H3e

ENJ → BI

0.29

***

Supported

 

H3f

CSE → BI

-0,02

0.445

Not supported

 

H3g

VOL → BI

0.04

0.196

Not supported

 

H4b

SN → PU

0.02

0.548

Not supported

 

H4c

REL → PU

0.55

***

Supported

 

H4d

ENJ → PU

0.25

***

Supported

 

H4e

VOL → PU

-0.01

0.71

Not supported

 

H4f

CSE → PU

0.01

0.659

Not supported

 

H4g

PLAY → PU

0.02

0.982

Not supported

 

H5a

CANX → PEOU

-0.05

0.49

Not supported

 

H5b

CPLAY → PEOU

0.02

0.517

Not supported

 

H5c

CSE → PEOU

0.1

0.008

Supported

 

H5d

ENJ → PEOU

0.23

***

Supported

 

H5e

REL → PEOU

0.32

***

Supported

  1. PU Perceived usefulness, PEOU Perceived ease of use, BI Behaviour intention to use, REL Relevance for learning, CANX Anxiety with the use of CVS, CSE Self-efficacy in the use of CVS, VOL Voluntariness, PEC Perception of external control, SN Subjective Norm, CPLAY Perceived Playfulness in the use of CVS, ENJ Enjoyability associated with the use of CVS
  2. ***P < .001