Skip to main content

Table 12 Descriptive statistics of the constructs of the TAM3

From: Clinical virtual simulation: predictors of user acceptance in nursing education

 

N

M

Med

Mo

SD

Asymmetry

Kurtosis

Min

Máx

PU

619

5.34

5.50

6.00

1.19

-0.83

0.62

1.00

7.00

PEOU

619

4.74

4.75

4.75

1.07

-0.41

0.18

1.00

7.00

BI

619

5.21

5.67

7.00

1.63

-0.83

-0.05

1.00

7.00

REL

619

5.07

5.25

6.00

1.18

-0.69

0.35

1.00

7.00

CANX

619

1.50

1.00

1.00

1.07

2.72

7.80

1.00

7.00

CSE

606

6.72

6.67

5.00

1.61

-0.08

-0.27

1.00

10.00

VOL

619

4.77

5.00

7.00

1.61

-0.48

-0.50

1.00

7.00

SN

617

4.14

4.00

4.00

1.61

-0.29

-0.31

1.00

7.00

CPLAY

616

5.59

5.67

7.00

1.14

-0.73

0.27

1.00

7.00

ENJ

619

5.54

6.00

7.00

1.33

-0.99

0.76

1.00

7.00

GS

383

82.90

84.50

84.10a

8.43

-1.12

1.26

52.00

100.00

SU

386

31.85

31.50

43.00

16.84

0.71

1.14

1.00

102.00

Footnote: a There are several modes. The lowest value is presented

  1. REL Relevance for learning, CANX Anxiety with the use of CVS, CSE Self-efficacy in the use of CVS, VOL Voluntariness, SN Subjective Norm, CPLAY Perceived Playfulness in the use of CVS, ENJ Enjoyability associated with the use of CVS, GS Global score, SU CVS use