Skip to main content

Mobile device: a useful tool to teach inhaler devices to healthcare professionals

Abstract

Background

Proper inhaler device usage is paramount for control of underlying obstructive airway disease. Hence, education to healthcare professionals who will eventually educate patients need to be done effectively. We developed an application for mobile devices for education on six medical inhaler devices, the metered-dose inhaler (MDI), Turbuhaler, Accuhaler, Breezhaler, Ellipta and Respimat, and studied if there were any difference between the application and the manufacturer’s instructions on inhaler technique. The aim of this study is to see if inhaler education via a mobile phone app is comparable to manual instruction for health care professions.

Methods

Participants, who were nursing students, were randomized to learn the inhaler devices via the manufacturer’s instruction guide or a mobile device app designed specifically for education on inhaler devices.

Results

There were 45 participants in each group. 78% of them were females with a median age of 21 (IQR 3). 67% used an Apple mobile device and the remainder used an Android device. The mobile device showed better total improvement points for the Turbuhaler device (262 vs 287 points; P = 0.02). Participants learning from the manufacturer’s guide had a significantly higher total improvement points in the Breezhaler (370 vs 327 points; P < 0.01) and Ellipta (214 vs 174 points; P < 0.01) device. Both interventions showed improvement in total scores for demonstrating the correct usage of all inhaler devices. MDI has the least number of correct steps for both interventions. The participants’ reported their mean (SD) self-rated knowledge was significantly higher for those using the app for all devices as compared to those that did not (4.33 (0.68) vs 4.73 (0.42); P = < 0.01). Self-reported confidence level was found to be higher in the mobile app group, but this was not statistically significant. The app was well received and scored of 4.42 of 5 with regards to its quality.

Conclusion

Using a mobile inhaler app is just as effective to teach inhaler device techniques to healthcare professionals and is likely a more convenient, versatile and important adjunct to learning.

Trial registration

National Healthcare Group Ethics Board (2018/00960).

Peer Review reports

Background

Inhaled bronchodilators and corticosteroids are crucial to the control of chronic obstructive airway diseases such as bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Guidelines have stressed the importance of proper selection and education to patients to ensure effective delivery of inhaled medications [1, 2]. Recommendations include training patients in the proper usage of inhalers and regular assessment of inhaler techniques [3]. Poorly performed inhaler techniques leads to poor outcomes [4, 5]. Quality and effective instructions given by health care professionals (HCP) are key to decrease inhaler mishandling [6].

Previous studies have shown that only 7–28% of HCPs were able to demonstrate the correct metered-dose inhaler (MDI) technique [7,8,9]. A person with suboptimal skills will not be able to educate patients and ensure correct and proper handling of their device. Therefore, it is equally important for HCPs to be equipped with the proper skills and knowledge before they start training patients. In one study, only 13–15% of house staff were able to demonstrate perfect inhaler technique in a traditional large group lectures and handouts [10]. More effective and efficient ways to train HCPs are needed before they take on the task of training patients [11].

Medical devices and software applications (App) s are gradually integrating and assimilating into the medical education [12, 13]. Whether it is on a laptop, portable mobile tablets or personal mobile phones, it is now seen as an important adjunct to learning [14]. Mobile apps are convenient as it allows learning to happen at any time, any place and it is easily accessible [15]. Mobile devices enhance learner engagement and provide instant means of assessment and feedback [16, 17]. App development and mobile technology is advancing rapidly, and it is important that it should remain relevant and the contents appropriate for the target audience. As information is now being digitized, we need to be able to learn to adapt and find innovative ways to direct learning through electronic means.

The current practice for educators and practitioners who are not familiar with the inhalers or have forgotten how to use these devices will have to rely on instructions provided by the company along with recollection of previous tutorials which may not be recent. It has been the main form of reference for educators and HCP responsible for dispensing medications as the instructions are included in the medication package. Reading from the manufacturer’s instructions alone or even watching videos on how to use the inhalers have been shown to be inferior to having a guide [18, 19]. Having been thought and shown how to use the devices is insufficient for retention in healthcare students. Initial learning only happens during the school period and over time, this knowledge will need to be reenforced or it will dissipate [20]. Having an easily accessible personal tutor would likely address these shortfalls in retention of knowledge.

To date, there is no smartphone application available for HCPs to acquire inhaler technique. We developed a mobile phone app to create a reliable resource for HCPs and students to learn inhaler technique and be a source of reference at any time to facilitate just-in-time learning. The app allows the use of finger gestures and phone movements to simulate an inhaler. Using Kolb’s learning cycle of reflective observation by looking at graphic and video demonstrations, conceptualisation of the mechanisms of the different devices, allowing active repeated experiementation to allow the formation of concrete experiences [21]. We hope to evaluate this new method of teaching using an electronic device compared to traditional manual instructions.

We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of learning inhaler skills through a mobile app by assessing acquisition of knowledge and if users are able to demonstrate proper inhaler techniques. We also assessed whether the app is user friendly and to see how receptive users are to learning inhaler techniques through an app.

Methods

Design

This was a randomised controlled trial using a pre and post-test design. The study was conducted from 3rd January to 28th March 2019 in Tan Tock Seng Hospital and was approved by the National Healthcare Group Ethics Board (2018/00960). Participants who were randomised into the control group received the manufacturer’s hard copy instruction guide for all devices that were studied to learn the inhaler technique. Participants who were randomized in the experimental group were given the mobile application Fig. 1. A research assistant was onsite for both groups to help with randomisation and data collection. No direct instructions on inhaler techniques were given to the participants by the research assistant. A medical statistician generated the randomisation numbers via a randomisation software. The randomised results were sealed in individual envelops.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Randomization process during recruitment of participants

Participants

Participants were final year nursing students on their Pre-registration Clinical Placement (PRCP) clinical attachment. The inclusion criteria were (1) Nursing students (2) > 18 years old (3) willing to participate in the study. Participants who (1) had previously worked as an enrolled nurse, (2) had upper respiratory tract infection such as cough, running nose, fever and sore throat, (3) has asthma or any other chronic respiratory condition, (4) or suffering from any medical condition which precludes them from participating, will be excluded from the study. Consent was taken prior to the start of the study. All participants who completed the study received a SGD10 gift card.

App development

A mobile application was developed in English from June 2017 to December 2017 for the Android platform. It engaged learners through three learning styles (i.e., visual, auditory and kinaesthetic), providing for a multisensory approach to learning without the need for physical inhaler devices and human supervision.

The app recreated accurate 3-dimensional models of different types of inhaler devices and remapped steps of using an inhaler onto a mobile phone device. The design was to ensure an intuitive and interaction experience to learn the handling of inhalers. These were achieved through touch manipulation, hand motion and respiratory detection. The app detects touch and swipe gestures near the different parts of the 3D inhaler models on the screen. The user can swipe on the canister of the MDI inhaler to depress it. White smoke particles will emit through the mouth of inhaler in response. The app also uses the mobile phone’s built-in microphone to detect a range of low frequency sounds, specifically the sound produced by inhaling, within a consistent period, and reacts to the detection. Inhaling while white smoke emits from the MDI inhaler model will make particles move faster, representing flow and to give the users a visual sense that they are inhaling the smoke. The Breezhaler model will produce a rattling sound while inhaling, mimicking the medicine tab rattling within the inhaler’s chamber in real life. Finally, the app uses the phone’s accelerometer to detect vertical shake action. The MDI inhaler model will respond to the shake and shake by itself on screen. The purpose is to allow learners to freely manipulate inhalers while learning the correct inhaler technical skills. Screenshots and features of the app are shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Mobile app interface

To ensure correctness, visual guides tell learners how to manipulate inhalers step by step. These were reinforced by visual and audio cues, such as leaking of gas at improper inhaling, providing positive reinforcements and constructive corrections. A demonstration feature was included to give an option to run through steps on how to use an inhaler. The feature resides before the interactive inhaler tutorials, providing students a choice to learn by observing before attempting themselves.

The student assessment quiz was included in the app to assess students of their knowledge to inhalers and related medications. The quiz contained multiple choice questions, which allowed immediate evaluation and conveyed the appropriate answer back to the student. At the end of the quiz, results were displayed to be recorded by assessors.

Intervention

The study consisted of a pre and post-test inhaler technique assessment and a post-intervention questionnaire at the end of the study. Six inhaler devices were used for this study i.e. metered-dose inhaler, Turbuhaler, Accuhaler, Breezhaler, Ellipta and Respimat as these are the common inhalers prescribed in the public hospitals and clinics in Singapore. An assessment checklist compiled from the manufacturers’ instructions brochures was used for the pre and post-test inhaler assessment Additional file 1. The assessors were 3 trained respiratory nursing clinicians with more than 5 years of experience in the field of respiratory medicine from the institution. Each inhaler step is counted as 1 point and the total points for each inhaler recorded before and after each intervention. A pre-test assessment was conducted and each participant were subsequently allocated a minimum of 30 mins up to 90 min to learn all 6 inhaler devices.

Post-test survey

All participants had to complete a questionnaire at the end of the study. The questionnaire was divided into five sections: demographic, prior experience with using mobile phones, prior experience on inhaler devices, self-reported confidence in using the inhaler and self-rated knowledge level. Participants will mark on a scale of not at all, not very, somewhat, very and completely for the self-reported confidence level, while the self-rated knowledge level was marked on a scale between strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree and strongly agree.

In addition to the post-test survey, the experiment group were asked questions pertaining to the app. App related questions were adopted from the Mobile app rating scale (MARs) questionnaire to evaluate the app quality, functionality and graphic design [22]. It consisted of questions asking users on their perception of the app’s engagement, functionality, aesthetics and information quality using a Likert scale from 1 to 5 (1 strongly disagree and 5 strongly agree). The participants were also asked on the subjective quality of the app.

Statistical analysis

Estimating the mean inhaler technique knowledge level in the control group to be 20% and the mean inhaler technique knowledge level in the inhaler mobile app group to be 50% so that the knowledge levels difference to be normally distributed with a standard deviation of 0.5, we will need to study 90 subjects in total, to be able to reject the null hypothesis that there is no difference in mean inhaler technique knowledge level between control and experimental group, with power of 80% and Type I error probability of 0.05. Continuous variables were expressed as mean (standard deviation; SD) or median (interquartile range; IQR) depending on distribution, and categorical variables were expressed as frequency and percentage. We compared differences for continuous variables using two-sample t test depending on the distribution, and χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. χ2 and Fisher exact tests were applied to evaluate the effectiveness of the App on learning inhalers compared with control group. The data analysis is conducted with respect to all steps for each module as well as to each step for each module. Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze participants’ confidence level and knowledge between the two groups. Analyses was done using Stata (version 13.1, College Station, TX: StataCorp LP).

Results

A total of 95 participants were recruited and randomized for the study. One from the control group did not complete the study while 1 from the control group and 3 from the mobile app group spent less than 30 min on the app and hard copy instruction guides and were subsequently excluded. 45 participants from each group eventually completed the study and were subsequently analysed. 78% of participants were female and the median age group was 21 (IQR 3) Baseline characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1. In brief, there were no significant differences between the control and experiment groups in terms of gender distribution, age, and ethnicity. 66.7% of the participants were on an Apple based mobile device while 33% used an Android based mobile device. 33 (73%) in the control group and 34 (76%) in the mobile app group had no prior personal experience using any inhalers. 21 (47%) and 20 (44%) in the control group and the mobile app group respectively had no prior teaching experience with regards to inhaler technique and use.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of enrolled participants

For both groups, all participants had a significant improvement in all inhaler techniques Table 2. The mobile app group was found to have done better with the Turbuhaler device after the intervention. (319 vs 298 points; P = 0.02). The control group did better with the Breezhaler and Ellipta device after the intervention. (370 vs 327 points; P = 0.02 and 214 vs 174 points; P = < 0.01 respectively) There were no difference with regards to the correct usage of the other inhaler devices when using the mobile app compared to conventional teaching of inhalers. Post intervention, both groups achieved the least number of correct steps in MDI device Table 3.

Table 2 Improvement in inhaler demonstration before and after interventions between both groups
Table 3 Total point improvement for each inhaler device post intervention

The participants’ reported their mean (SD) self-rated knowledge was significantly higher for those using the app for all devices as compared to those that did not (4.33 (0.68) vs 4.73 (0.42); P = < 0.01). Although self-reported confidence level was found to be higher in the mobile app group, however, it was not statistically significant Table 4.

Table 4 Self-rated knowledge and confidence level

Ninety-eight percent of users of the mobile app felt that it was a useful teaching tool. All users of the app found it to be engaging (4.24 of 5), functional (4.47 of 5), aesthetically pleasing (4.44 of 5) and informative (4.42 of 5). Subjectively, participants would recommend this to people who they thought would benefit from it (4.51). Participants felt that they will use the app about 3–10 times in the next 12 months. The app was given an overall score of 3.98 out of 5. Despite the well-received performance of the app, the participants were less likely to pay money to purchase the app (score of 2.2 of 5) Table 5.

Table 5 App quality and app subjective rating

Discussion

The education of proper use of inhaler devices especially among student nurses, who may potentially teach patients the proper administration of this life saving device, is of paramount importance. To the knowledge of the authors, this is the first ever reported randomized controlled trial using a mobile app to teach inhaler devices. This study provided opportunities for learners to acquire inhaler techniques and knowledge in a non-classroom setting using a mobile device which is now ubiquitous to everyone. This was compared with the manufacturer’s guide which comes standard in the medication’s packaging and are used as the main form of reference for educators and HCP responsible for dispensing medication to patients. We showed that learning via a mobile app did improve the knowledge and confidence of users. Although this finding was also seen in the group using hard copy learning materials, it was non inferior. There were increase in self-reported knowledge after both interventions. This finding is in keeping with previous studies which revealed an increased in self-reported knowledge after using the app. In one study, 71% of the participants experienced a self-reported improvement in antibiotic knowledge after accessing the application [23].

Higher learning have been shown to improve based on instructional design features such as interactivity, practice exercises, repetition, and feedback [24]. Users use experiential learning to construct knowledge and improve on their technique based on the visual cues and the easily accessible information customized within the app itself [21]. The development of this mobile app was based on a multisensory approach. It allowed intuitive interaction through touch manipulation, respiratory detection, audio and visual cues for immediate feedback. Hence, it is evident that the intuitive interactive features of the app had a significant impact in acquiring inhaler technique skills. This study was done comparing the outcomes on a single time point and immediately post intervention, which may explain why the results in both arms were somewhat comparable. Future studies will have to be done to see if knowledge is retained after a period of time and how convenient it is for HCP to seek reference or practice when needed. The advantage of having the mobile app installed into the mobile phones would be the convenience of access at anytime and anywhere. Our app was designed to be used off line and with pharmacological information of the medications. It is less cumbersome than carrying handwritten notes or text books. These are attributes are helpful and have been shown to assist with learning and revision [25,26,27]. This app has the potential to be used to teach other HCPs and even as a tool to educate patients.

Interestingly, the mobile app group did better in terms of technique with the Turbuhaler, Respimat and metered-dose devices, however, only the Turbuhaler device was significantly better that the control group. One possible reason for the superiority of the Turbohaler device is the need for a tactile feedback of turning the inhaler until a click is heard for learning to occur. The click on the actual device is usually soft and sometimes the inhalation step starts before the medication is properly loaded. Getting this right is important as the formoterol and budesonide combination which is commonly delivered via the Turbuhaler device is now considered first line of treatment for asthma [2]. The Accuhaler, Ellipta and Breezhaler device scored better for the control group. This may be so as the steps for the Accuhaler and Ellipta devices do resemble each other and using similar movements while the Breezhaler requires a physical insertion of a tablet before the actuation of the medication.

All groups achieved the least number of correct steps in metered-dose inhaler device and the most common error was Step 4 “press canister and inhale slowly”. This finding was similar to other studies [6, 10]. This is worrisome as the metered-dose inhaler is one of the commonness form of medication delivery for obstructive airway disease. This might suggest the need to concentrate efforts to improve on these steps and allow just-in-time training and revision to the convenience of the HCP.

The strength of our study is that it was a randomized clinical trial. The app was designed specifically for the purpose of improving the knowledge and technique of inhaler devices which is part of the nursing curriculum. Guo et al. have already shown that integration of mobile technology into the nursing curricula did help improve the learning experience of the students [16]. This study has several limitations. First, this was done at one time point and immediately after an intervention. This can explain why both groups felt confident with their knowledge and perform similarly well in terms of technique. Second, in this study, the participants were only limited to nursing students. The results may be different if the app was tested on medical students, HCP already in the workforce or patients. In addition to that, the sample size was small, which also limits generalization to the larger population.

Conclusion

It is required that HCP are proficient with inhaler technique in order to deliver effective patient teaching. Using a randomised control trial, the study demonstrated the effectiveness of the app in teaching student nurses on inhaler techniques. This study also provides evidence that our mobile app designed to educate about inhalers is just as good as traditional hard copy instructions from the manufacturer but with the advantage of convenience of accessibility. Further studies are required to see if the knowledge and technique acquired is reproducible over time.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated during and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available as this has not been granted by the local ethics board, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

HCP:

Healthcare professionals

MDI:

Metered-dose inhaler

App:

Software application

MARs:

Mobile app rating scale

IQR:

Interquartile range

SD:

Standard deviation

References

  1. GOLD. Gold 2019. Glob Inititiative Chronic Obstr Lung Dis. 2019:1–139. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201701-0218PP.

  2. Global Initiative for Asthma. Global initiative for asthma: global strategy for asthma management and prevention (updated 2020). Rev Fr d’Allergologie d’Immunologie Clin. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0335-7457(96)80056-6.

  3. Janežič A, Locatelli I, Kos M. Inhalation technique and asthma outcomes with different corticosteroid-containing inhaler devices. J Asthma. 2020;57(6):654–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2019.1591442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sulaiman I, Greene G, MacHale E, et al. A randomised clinical trial of feedback on inhaler adherence and technique in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma. Eur Respir J. 2018;51(1). https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01126-2017.

  5. Melani AS. Inhaler technique in asthma and COPD: challenges and unmet knowledge that can contribute to suboptimal use in real life. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2021;14(8):991–1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2021.1929922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Plaza V, Giner J, Rodrigo GJ, Dolovich MB, Sanchis J. Errors in the use of inhalers by health care professionals: a systematic review. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018;6(3):987–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2017.12.032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Frew AJ, Macfarlane JT. Poor inhaler technique may be perpetuated by clinical staff. Practitioner. 1984.

  8. Interiano B, Guntupalli KK. Metered-Dose Inhalers: Do Health Care Providers Know What to Teach? 1993. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1993.00410010105009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Self TH, Arnold LB, Czosnowski LM, Swanson JM, Swanson H. Inadequate skill of healthcare professionals in using asthma inhalation devices. J Asthma. 2007;44(8):593–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/02770900701554334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee-Wong M, Mayo PH. Results of a programme to improve house staff use of metered dose inhalers and spacers. Postgrad Med J. 2003;79(930):221–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/pmj.79.930.221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ndukwe HC, Shaul D, Shin J, et al. Assessment of inhaler technique among fourth-year pharmacy students: implications for the use of entrustable professional activities. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2020;12(3):281–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2019.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wallace S, Clark M, White J. “It’s on my iPhone”: attitudes to the use of mobile computing devices in medical education, a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open. 2012;2(4):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ozdalga E, Ozdalga A, Ahuja N. The smartphone in medicine: a review of current and potential use among physicians and students. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(5):1–14. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tempelhof MW. Personal digital assistants: a review of current and potential utilization among medical residents. Teach Learn Med. 2009;21(2):100–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401330902791321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Walsh K. Mobile learning in medical education: review. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2015;25(4):363–6. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v25i4.10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Guo P, Watts K, Wharrad H. An integrative review of the impact of mobile technologies used by healthcare professionals to support education and practice. Nurs Open. 2016;3(2):66–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Teri S, Acai A, Griffith D, Mahmoud Q, Ma DWL, Newton G. Student use and pedagogical impact of a mobile learning application. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2014;42(2):121–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Axtell S, Haines S, Fairclough J. Effectiveness of various methods of teaching proper inhaler technique: the importance of pharmacist counseling. J Pharm Pract. 2017;30(2):195–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0897190016628961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Crane MA, Jenkins CR, Goeman DP, Douglass JA. Inhaler device technique can be improved in older adults through tailored education: findings from a randomised controlled trial. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2014;24(June):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjpcrm.2014.34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Toumas-Shehata M, Henricks M, Ovchinikova L, Smith L, Bosnic-Anticevich S. Teaching pharmacy undergraduate students inhaler device technique and exploring factors affecting maintenance of technique. Can Respir J. 2018;2018:13–5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1597217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yardley S, Teunissen PW, Dornan T. Experiential learning: AMEE Guide No. 63. Med Teach. 2012;34(2). https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.650741.

  22. Stoyanov SR, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ, Zelenko O, Tjondronegoro D, Mani M. Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health Mobile apps. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2015. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.3422.

  23. Charani E, Kyratsis Y, Lawson W, et al. An analysis of the development and implementation of a smartphone application for the delivery of antimicrobial prescribing policy: lessons learnt. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dks492.

  24. Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Instructional design variations in internet-based learning for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d6c319.

  25. Jonas-Dwyer DRD, Clark C, Celenza A, Siddiqui ZS. Evaluating apps for learning and teaching. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2012;7(1):54–7. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v7i1.1901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Payne KFB, Wharrad H, Watts K. Smartphone and medical related app use among medical students and junior doctors in the United Kingdom (UK): a regional survey. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-121.

  27. Trelease RB. Diffusion of innovations: smartphones and wireless anatomy learning resources. Anat Sci Educ. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.58.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the student nurses of Nanyang Polytechnic and Ngee Ann Polytechnic for their participation in the study; Tan Tock Seng Hospital Nurse Educator Department for their support in this study. This study was supported by TTSH Community Fund and Lily Research Centre Nanyang Technological University.

Funding

This project was funded by the Ng Teng Fong Healthcare Innovation Programme. Open access funding was provided by the Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Department, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SHP contributed to the conception, design, analysis and interpretation of the data, wrote the original draft of the manuscript, approved the submitted version and is personally accountable for the accuracy and integrity of the work. LPN contributed to the conception, design, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data, approved the submitted version and is personally accountable for the accuracy and integrity of the work. CYG contributed to the conception, design, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data, approved the submitted version and is personally accountable for the accuracy and integrity of the work. CLC contributed to the conception, design of the study and the app and approved the submitted version. AKJT contributed to the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data, approved the submitted version and is personally accountable for the accuracy and integrity of the work. HZ and ZS contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data, approved the submitted version and is personally accountable for the accuracy and integrity of the work. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ser Hon Puah.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the National Healthcare Group Ethics Board (2018/00960). All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. The researchers had no position of authority over the participants and all participation was voluntary. Participants signed written consent forms indicating their willingness to participate after explanation of the study objectives.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Puah, S.H., Goh, C.Y., Chan, C.L. et al. Mobile device: a useful tool to teach inhaler devices to healthcare professionals. BMC Med Educ 22, 238 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03302-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03302-0

Keywords

  • Asthma
  • Inhaler
  • Mobile application
  • Inhaler device