Skip to main content

Chinese medical students’ disposition for critical thinking: a mixed methods exploration

Abstract

Background

Critical thinking (CT) is an essential competency for medical students. This study’s aim was to evaluate Chinese medical students’ disposition for CT and to explore the impact of current trends in medical education on students’ CT development.

Methods

We used multistage stratified cluster sampling to recruit a total of 1241 medical students among five different years of training and from three medical institutions in China. The Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory-Chinese Version (CTDI-CV) and self-reported information were used to collect cross-sectional data. Based on the data from the CTDI-CV, 112 medical students in clinical course training from a single institution continued one-year follow-up. Their one-year CTDI-CV score changes were collected regarding various medical education variables.

Results

The mean CTDI-CV score of the 1241 medical students was 287.04 with 729 (58.7%) students receiving a score of 280 or higher. There were statistically significant differences in schools attended(F = 3.84, P < 0.05), year of school attended(F = 10.32, P < 0.001), GPA(F = 6.32, P < 0.01), weekly time spent learning after class(F = 14.14, P < 0.001), attitude toward medicine(F = 28.93, P < 0.001), desire to be a doctor after graduation(t = − 3.35, P < 0.001), familiarity with CT(F = 20.40, P < 0.001), and perception of importance of CT(F = 22.25, P < 0.001). The participants scored the highest on the CTDI-CV subscales of “inquisitiveness” and the lowest on “truth seeking.” The 112 students in the longitudinal study had significantly lower total CT scores after one academic year follow-up.

Conclusions

Chinese medical students generally exhibited positive CT dispositions. The cross-sectional survey and one-year longitudinal study indicated that students’ CT disposition diminished as they progressed through traditional medical training. Our study contributes to understanding the status of Chinese medical education of and influential factors on medical students’ CT disposition.

Peer Review reports

Study descriptor

This study used both cross-sectional exploratory and longitudinal study designs.

Background

Critical thinking (CT) is a philosophical concept, which involves individual characteristics, personality traits, and habits of the mind. It is a pervasive and self-rectifying human phenomenon and refers to dispositions and skills which reveal what is authentic, what to believe, why it is, and how it happens [1]. Medicine is universally acknowledged as a challenging profession due to the sacredness of human life and the complexity and uncertainty of the human body. CT is essential in helping medical students manage complex health situations and solve clinical problems effectively by sound decision-making. Previous studies have shown positive correlations among CT and clinical competency [2, 3], academic success [4], and research skills [5]. Therefore, the Institute for International Medical Education (IIME) has listed “critical thinking and research” as one of the seven essential competencies that a medical graduate should possess as part of the Global Minimum Essential Requirements (GMER) [6]. The Ministry of Education in the People’s Republic of China has also stated that “scientific attitude, innovation, and critical thinking” are essential requirements for Chinese medical graduates [7].

The importance of CT in medical education has been of wide concern in China. Studies have suggested that Chinese medical students exhibit a positive disposition towards CT [8,9,10,11]. However, CT scores were lower than that of health professional students from western countries [12]. Educational factors including curricular model, teaching methods, and evaluation systems were associated with medical students’ CT disposition [9, 11, 13]. The discipline-based curricular, which is widely implemented in China, may not sufficiently encourage development of Chinese medical students’ disposition for CT. This curriculum has isolated phases (theory, clerkship, and internship), limited faculty-student interaction, and a solely knowledge-based evaluation for the discipline-based curricular [14]. As a result, medical educators are becoming increasingly convinced that this model no longer meets the needs of the modern health-care system in China [15, 16].

To our knowledge, the majority of previous studies assessing Chinese medical students’ CT disposition did not include representative samples of study participants [9,10,11, 17]. The impacts of Chinese medical education on medical students’ CT via longitudinal study design was also limited [18]. As a result, this study was conducted to evaluate medical student CT disposition among different medical institutions of China and to explore the impact of medical education on students’ CT disposition via a one-year clinical course follow-up.

Methods

Participants

One thousand two hundred forty-one medical students were recruited by multistage stratified cluster sampling for a cross-sectional survey. In the first stage of the study, three Chinese medical institutions were selected, each of which was classified into a different medical school class to increase sample representation. The Ministry of Education categorizes Chinese medical schools into three classes. The first class of medical schools includes recipients of both the “985” and “211” grants (Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai in this study). The second class includes schools that have only received the “211” grant (Medical College of Soochow University, Jiangsu province). The third class includes schools not supported by national grants (Gannan Medical University, Jiangxi province). The “985” grant is the People’s Republic of China’s government- sponsored initiative to upgrade 30 selected research universities to internationally renowned status. The “211” grant was initiated by the Chinese government in the 1990s with the specific goal of increasing the implementation of pro-higher education policies [19]. In the second stage, two classes were randomly selected from each year of school (first through fifth year) in each institution. Approximately 100 students were chosen from each year within each institution. In the third stage, all students in the selected class were invited to participate in the study. Ultimately, 1521 medical students were invited to participate in this study and 280 students were excluded due to the incomplete data. The response rate was 81.6%. In this study, 615 (49.6%) participants were male and 626 (50.4%) were female. Students ranged from age 18 to 27 years old (mean = 22.04, SD = 1.75). Medical students were divided into three stages by school year. 518(41.7%) students were in basic medical science courses in their first to second years. 545(43.9%) students were in clinical courses in their third to fourth years, and 178(14.3%) students were in their internships in their fifth year. After the cross-sectional survey, 112 medical students from the clinical course stage at Tongji University School of Medicine were selected to participate in a one-year longitudinal study by convenience sampling. Eighty-one of them were third-year students, and 31 were fourth-year students.

Instruments

Chinese critical thinking disposition inventory (CTDI-CV)

The CTDI-CV was translated and modified by Peng [20] based on Facione’s “California Critical Thinking Dispositions Inventory” (CCTDI) [21]. It is a standardized 70-item multiple choice test that examines each of the seven categories of CT disposition, including “truth seeking,” “open-mindedness,” “analyticity,” “systematicity,” “self-confidence,” “inquisitiveness,” and “cognitive maturity.” The overall Content Validity Index (CVI) of this test was 0.89, and the CVI of the test’s subscales ranged from 0.6 to 1. The overall alpha was 0.90, and the subscales alphas ranged from 0.54 to 0.77 [20]. In this study, the Cronbach’s Alpha Score was 0.841. Higher scores indicated stronger CT dispositions. Total scores over 280 and subscales over 40 were considered as positive attitudes towards critical thinking disposition [21].

Self-reported information

Personal information was collected, including (1) demographic factors: gender and age (2) academic factors: “school,” “year of school attended,” “GPA,” (with answers “above average meaning between 3.5-5.0,” “average meaning between 2.5-3.5,” “below average meaning less than 2.5,”), “weekly time spent learning after class” (3) attitude factors: “attitude towards medicine,” “desire to be a doctor after graduation,” “familiarity with CT,” and “perception of importance of CT.”

Procedure

A questionnaire was organized with CTDI-CV and self-reported questions. A pilot study was conducted with 20 medical students at Tongji University School of Medicine before the official study and questionnaire. Both the pilot and official questionnaires consisted of CTDI-CV and self-reported questions. After the pilot study, an official questionnaire was organized and modified based on student feedback. The official questionnaires and consent forms were given to study participants via staff members from students’ respective medical education offices. Study participants were asked to return completed surveys in 2 weeks via a sealed return envelope for confidentiality. Participants were reminded 3 days before the 2-week deadline to complete their questionnaires. After questionnaire completion and collection, responses were analyzed and transformed via SPSS. Questionnaire answers left partially or fully uncompleted were regarded as incomplete answers or non-responses to answers. If missing data was greater than 5%, the questionnaire was excluded. Data analysis was guided by the statistician at our institution. After the cross-sectional survey, the group of 112 medical students at Tongji University School of Medicine completed the CTDI-CV at both the beginning and end of the following academic year. The project was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Tongji Hospital of Tongji University (Registration Number K-2014-020), Medical College of Soochow University (Registration Number SUDA20210122H02), and Gannan Medical University (Registration Number 2014468).

Statistical analyses

SPSS version 19.0 was used to conduct the following tests where relevant: independent T-test, one-way ANOVA, paired T-test, and McNemar test. A p-value of < 0.05 was statistically significant.

Results

Critical thinking disposition for medical students

The CTDI-CV scores ranged from 205 to 383, with a mean score of 287.04 (SD = 29.85). A score higher than the index score of 280 indicated a positive disposition. Chinese medical students in this sample, on average, displayed a positive disposition for CT. Almost 60 % of the students (n = 729, 58.7%) received a score of 280 or higher. In terms of sub-scale scores, the students scored the highest on “inquisitiveness” (index score 40, mean = 44.50 with SD = 6.13) and the lowest on “truth seeking” (index score 40, mean = 37.00 with SD = 6.21). When comparing medical school specific mean scores, Tongji University School of Medicine students received the highest CTDI-CV mean score (290.44) (Table 1).

Table 1 Mean scores of total and sub-scales of CTDI-CV

Comparison of CTDI-CV Total scores with self-reported variables of medical students

There were significant differences among CTDI-CV total scores and variables defined in this study, including CT disposition among schools (F = 3.84, P < 0.05), years of school attended (F = 10.32, P < 0.001), GPA (F = 6.32, P < 0.01), weekly time spent learning after class (F = 14.14, P < 0.001), attitude towards medicine (F = 28.93, P < 0.001), familiarity with CT (F = 20.40, P < 0.001), and perception of importance of CT (F = 22.25, P < 0.001). Notably, “years of school attended” was negatively associated with CTDI-CV scores. Also of note was that medical students with “average GPA” had the lowest CTDI-CV scores vs. those with “above average GPA” who had the highest scores. Furthermore, an independent t-test indicated that the total CTDI-CV scores of students who wished to become medical doctors after graduation was significantly higher than those who did not (t = − 3.35, P < 0.001) (Table 2).

Table 2 Comparison of CTDI-CV total score based on self-reported variables

CTDI-CV Total score change after one-year of clinical courses

The group of 112 students who participated in the one-year longitudinal study exhibited a significant decline in total CTDI-CV scores as well as a decline in most subscales besides “systematicity.” Their mean total score dropped from 318.99 to 304.13. Statistically significant differences were found among total scores as well as the following subscales: “truth seeking,” “open-mindedness,” “analyticity,” “inquisitiveness,” and “cognitive maturity” before and after 1 year (p < 0.001) (Table 3). The percentage of medical students with a positive disposition for CT dropped from 73.21 to 66.96%. Furthermore, this drop was statistically significant by the McNemar test (p < 0.05) (Table 4).

Table 3 Comparison of CTDI-CV total score prior to and following one academic year
Table 4 Comparison of CTDI-CV Classification Prior to and Following One Academic Year

Discussion

CT is a prerequisite for safe practices in medicine. Medical students who are skillful and able to think critically will excel in the modern, complex hospital environment. This necessitates extensive CT development among medical students. Average CTDI-CV score in this study was greater than 280, signifying that Chinese medical students had an overall positive CT disposition. The result echoed recent studies conducted in China by Wang [22] and Pu [18]. In terms of subscales scores, study participants scored the highest on “inquisitiveness” and lowest on “truth-seeking.” Interestingly, this finding echoed a similar finding from a previous study, which suggested that Chinese medical students were curious and enthusiastic to seek knowledge but were less persistent about truth-seeking [11]. However, a study by Bixler revealed that medical students at the Ohio State University College of Medicine demonstrated relatively strong CT with a mean overall score of 310.7 [12]. The differences suggest that Chinese medical students’ CT dispositions are weaker than that of Western countries’ students. Similarly, research by Tiwari [23] and Yeh [24] on nursing students suggested that Chinese health professional students’ CT dispositions were inferior to those of students from Western countries. These CT score differences may be attributed to educational and cultural differences.

Considering the elements of medical education, results of this study demonstrated that Chinese medical students’ disposition for CT gradually decreased as students progress from the stage of basic science courses to the stages of clinical courses and internship. Similarly, the one-year follow-up study of 112 medical students in the clinical stage of their education confirmed that students suffered significant decline in total CT scores and the five sub-scale scores as they progressed through their education. Although the one-year follow-up mean score of CTDI-CV was still above the 280 threshold for “positive disposition,”,the percentage of medical students with a positive disposition for CT has significantly dropped. This may indicate possible significance of this decrease. These results echoed studies abroad, which illustrated that medical students’ CT may improve moderately or decline significantly while in medical school [25, 26]. As we know, three institutions in this study applied traditional discipline-centered curriculum when the investigation was implemented. Methods to improve CT included successful curriculum integration such as by reducing the overlap of different disciplines and giving students greater time to spend on autonomous learning and practicing independent thinking [8] were not implemented. What’s more, active teaching methods such as case studies [27], problem-based-learning (PBL) [28, 29], concept mapping [30], as well as formal assessments [31] were also not widely used. A recent qualitative study on barriers of CT in medical students’ curriculum reveal that this kind of traditional and unchanging system of education was a significant barrier to the implementation of the critical thinking program [32]. As a result, this study suggested that current Chinese medical education may hinder development of medical students’ CT, further highlighting the glaring need to reform.

This study also found several specific educational influencing factors on CT for medical students. The mean CT score achieved by the students at Tongji University School of Medicine was significantly higher than the mean scores achieved by students at the two other medical schools. Tongji is granted both the “985” and “211” grants and can obtain more funding and recourse from the Ministry of Education and government. Readily available funding for medical education in turn attracts more excellent students to enroll and more qualified faculty to teach. The combination of more self-motivated students and superior faculty may contribute to higher CT scores. Furthermore, due to the unsatisfying social and economic circumstances that doctors in China face, some Chinese medical students now have lower desires to become doctors [33]. However, our study found that although only 64.0% of medical students showed a strong interest in medicine, 91.5% still wished to become doctors after graduation. The attitude of students towards their occupations was positively correlated with their CT dispositions. Students who were interested in medicine may spend more time on their studies and had higher GPAs as well as higher CT scores. One explanation for this may be that students who are devoted to medicine will be more motivated to learn independently and think actively [34]. This study found that while 73.3% of students believed that CT was important, only 45.0% of students had an accurate understanding of what critical thinking actually was. These results indicate that although CT has been targeted as an important area needing improvement, it remains relatively neglected when compared to other more in vogue medical education topics such as medical knowledge, clinical practice, and the humanities. CT-related goals and its required methodology should be specified more clearly [35].

There are also cultural differences from China and western countries. China is a collectivist society and does not always encourage thinking outside the norm or questioning authority [36]. Chinese youth who challenge authority may be considered rude or disrespectful. As a result, Chinese youth may learn to avoid confrontation or open discussion with authority and avoid voicing dissenting views [37]. In general, Chinese students are discouraged from questioning teachers as teachers do not want to lose face if they do not know the answers [38]. This setting is not optimal for promoting critical thinking and demonstrates a need to create a safe, supportive, higher learning educational environment [39].

Strengths and limitations

This study and its design had several strengths and limitations. The major strength of this cross-sectional study was its sizeable sample and its representativeness of medical students from multiple different classes of medical schools. Furthermore, a follow-up study design was conducted to verify the impact of medical education on students’ CT disposition as well. However, there were several limitations. Firstly, all data in this study were based on self-reported questionnaires. Therefore, inaccuracies caused by memory biases and subjective attitudes were unavoidable. Secondly, although the CT assessment tool of was widely used among medical students in China, it was only validated among Chinese nursing students, and CTDI-CV scores and statistical significance may not reflect students’ real-word performance or clinical significance. Thirdly, the sample size of the longitudinal study was small. CTDI-CV score was still above the 280 threshold for “positive disposition” at the end of 1 year follow-up although it was significantly decreased. As such, statistical significance may not reflect students’ real-word performance. Lastly, data from 20% of eligible participants was not included in the data analyses, which excluded potentially analyzable data.

Conclusions

In this study, Chinese medical students generally exhibited positive CT dispositions. One-year follow-up comparison showed that the percentage of medical students with a positive disposition for CT has significantly dropped as students progressed through medical education. Academic and perceptive factors were also investigated to benefit Chinese medical educators and to encourage curricula reform. Results from this study contribute to understanding the status of Chinese medical students’ CT disposition.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are in Chinese and are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request but will require translation to English.

Abbreviations

IIME:

International Medical Education

GMER:

Global Minimum Essential Requirements

CTDI-CV:

Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory-Chinese Version

CT:

Critical Thinking

CVI:

Content Validity Index

PBL:

Problem-based-learning

GPA:

Grade point average

References

  1. 1.

    Facione PA. Critical thinking: a statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Millbrae: The California Academic Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Park JA, Kim BJ. Critical thinking disposition and clinical competence in general hospital nurses. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2009;39(6):840–50. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2009.39.6.840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Chang MJ, Chang YJ, Kuo SH, Yang YH, Chou FH. Relationships between critical thinking ability and nursing competence in clinical nurses. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(21–22):3224–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03593.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Scott JN, Markert RJ. Relationship between critical thinking skills and success in preclinical courses. Acad Med. 1994;69(11):920–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199411000-00015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Onwuegbuzie AJ. Critical thinking skills: a comparison of dotoral and master's level students. Colle Student J. 2001;35(3):477–81.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Committee C, Institute for International Medical Education. Global minimum essential requirements in medical education. Med Teach. 2002;24(2):130–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ministry of Education, Ministry of Health. Medical education standards for clinical undergraduate students in China. http://old.moe.gov.cn//publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s3864/201010/xxgk_109605.html. Accessed 22 May 2018.

  8. 8.

    Zhao SG, Wang JJ, Wang XX, Liu ZX, Qin M. Cultivation of critical thinking in the new curriculum of clinical medicine. China Med Herald. 2011;8(33):136–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Tan W, Liu J. Preliminary test of the trend for critical thinking among the medical students. Chin Ment Health J. 2008;22:437–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Chen J, Chen YL, Zheng HX, Li YP, Chen B, Wan XL, et al. Medical education model with core competency as guide, evidence-based medicine as carder and lifelong learning as purpose (1): current status of critical thinking on medical students. Chin J Evidence-Based Med. 2010;10(3):298–302.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Zhang YQ, Li LS, Wu P, Chen Y. Investigation and analysis of critical thinking ability in medical students. J Shanghai Jiaotong University (Med Sci). 2009;29(7):869–72.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bixler GM, Brown A, Way D, Ledford C, Mahan JD. Collaborative concept mapping and critical thinking in fourth-year medical students. Clin Pedi. 2015;54(9):833–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922815590223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Zhao M, Wang WL, Zhang XQ. The research of medical students' critical thinking ability. Chin J School Doctor. 2008;22(3):269–71.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Colucciello ML. Critical thinking skills and dispositions of baccalaureate nursing students--a conceptual model for evaluation. J Prof Nurs. 1997;13(4):236–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-7223(97)80094-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kong W, Peng YX, Fu Y, Tao XN, Liu YL, Zheng J, et al. The investigation and practice of integration of clinical curriculum. Chin J Med Educ. 2009;4:68–9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Sherer R, Dong H, Zhou YF, Stern S, Jiong Y, Matlin K, et al. Medical education reform in Wuhan university, China: a preliminary report of an international collaboration. Teach Learn Med. 2013;25(2):148–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2013.770745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wang X, Sun X, Huang T, He R, Hao W, Zhang L. Development and validation of the critical thinking disposition inventory for Chinese medical college students (CTDI-M). BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):200. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1593-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Pu D, Ni J, Song D, Zhang W, Wang Y, Wu L, et al. Influence of critical thinking disposition on the learning efficiency of problem-based learning in undergraduate medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1).

  19. 19.

    Fan AP, Su TP, Chen YA, Chen CH, Lee CH, Tang W, et al. Humanities and ethics education at Chinese medical schools. Med Teac. 2011;33(1):87.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Peng MZ, Wang GC, Chen JL, Chen MH, Bai HM, Li SG, et al. Validity and reliability of the Chinese critical thinking disposition inventory. Chin J Nurs. 2004;9:7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Facione NC, Facione PA, Sanchez CA. Critical thinking disposition as a measure of competent clinical judgment: the development of the California critical thinking disposition inventory. J Nurs Educ. 1994;33(8):345–50. https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-19941001-05.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Wang J, Wang D, Chen Y, Zhou Q, Xie H, Chen J, et al. The effect of an evidence-based medicine course on medical student critical thinking. J Evid Based Med. 2017;10(4):287–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Tiwari A, Avery A, Lai P. Critical thinking disposition of Hong Kong Chinese and Australian nursing students. J Adv Nurs. 2003;44(3):298–307. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02805.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Yeh ML, Chen HH. Comparison affective dispositions toward critical thinking across Chinese and American baccalaureate nursing students. J Nurs Res. 2003;11(1):39–46. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JNR.0000347617.29413.96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Scott JN, Markert RJ, Dunn MM. Critical thinking: change during medical school and relationship to performance in clinical clerkships. Med Educ. 1998;32(1):14–8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.1998.00701.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Zeinab-Sadat A, Sayyed-Mostafa S, Reza NA, Mehdi N. Assessing critical thinking in medical sciences students in two sequential semesters: does it improve? J Educ Health Promot. 2013;2(1):5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Popil I. Promotion of critical thinking by using case studies as teaching method. Nurs Educ Today. 2011;31(2):204–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.06.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Tiwari A, Lai P, So M, Yuen K. A comparison of the effects of problem-based learning and lecturing on the development of students' critical thinking. Med Educ. 2006;40(6):547–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02481.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kowalczyk N. Review of teaching methods and critical thinking skills. Radiol Technol. 2011;83(2):120–32.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lee W, Chiang CH, Liao IC, Lee ML, Chen SL, Liang T. The longitudinal effect of concept map teaching on critical thinking of nursing students. Nurs Educ Today. 2013;33(10):1219–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.06.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Tai PC. The critical thinking disposition (CTD) of Chinese undergraduate and post graduate nursing students in Hong Kong. Pokfulam: The University of Hong Kong; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kasalaei A, Amini M, Nabeiei P, et al. Barriers of critical thinking in medical students' curriculum from the viewpoint of medical education experts: a qualitative study. J Adva Med Educ, Professionalism. 2020;8(2):72–82.

  33. 33.

    Wang DZ, Zou Y, LI XW, LI YM. Status survey on medical students' professional thinking and the analysis of influencing factors. J Shanghai Jiaotong University (Med Sci). 2014;34(2):230–4.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Valenzuela J, Nieto AM, Saiz C. Critical thinking motivational scale: a contribution to the study of relationship between critical thinking and motivation. Electron J Res Educ Psychol. 2011;9(2):823–48.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Huang L, Zhang X, Yuan Y, Zhu MY, Zhao XD. Critical thinking in medical education: a review of the literature. Chin J Med Educ. 2014;34(4):638–40.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Ken B. Education, culture and critical thinking. England: Routledge; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Gabrenya WK, Hwang K-K. Chinese social interaction: harmony and hierarchy on the good earth. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Zhang H, Lambert V. Critical thinking dispositions and learning styles of baccalaureate nursing students from China. Nurs Health Sci. 2008;10(3):175–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2018.2008.00393.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Mathews SR, Lowe K. Classroom environments that foster a disposition for critical thinking. Learn Environ Res. 2011;14(1):59–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-011-9082-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the study participants from Tongji University School of Medicine, Medical College of Soochow University, and Gannan Medical University for their cooperation and voluntary participation.

Funding

This study was supported by Prof. Xudong Zhao from his two projects, The Outstanding Clinical Discipline Project of Shanghai Pudong (Grant No. PWYgy2018–10) and Shanghai Pudong New Area Health System Discipline Leader Training Program (Grant No. PWRd2019–08). Prof. Zhao was contributed to study design and supervision. It was also supported by Dr. Lei Huang from her project which was Shanghai Pujiang Program (Grant No. 2020PJC097) and Key projects of the Ministry of Education in 2019 under“The 13th Five-year Plan” for national educational science (Grant No. DIA190409). Dr. Huang was contributed to study design, recruitment of participants, data analysis and interpretation and writing of the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LH carried out the study, analyzed the data and wrote the first draft of the paper. NS assisted in design concept and data interpretation. JT and ROK assisted in the interpretation of the results and revision of the paper. APF and XDZ guided the study design and concept, interpreted the results, and critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xudong Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All subjects were given informed consent and all participation was voluntary. This study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Tongji Hospital of Tongji University (Registration Number K-2014-020),Medical College of Soochow University (Registration Number SUDA20210122H02), and Gannan Medical University (Registration Number 2014468).

Consent for publication

n/a

Competing interests

We declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, L., Fan, A.PC., Su, N. et al. Chinese medical students’ disposition for critical thinking: a mixed methods exploration. BMC Med Educ 21, 385 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02801-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Critical thinking disposition
  • CTDI-CV
  • Chinese medical students