Skip to main content

Can ultrasound novices develop image acquisition skills after reviewing online ultrasound modules?

Abstract

Background

Point-of-care ultrasound is becoming a ubiquitous diagnostic tool, and there has been increasing interest to teach novice practitioners. One of the challenges is the scarcity of qualified instructors, and with COVID-19, another challenge is the difficulty with social distancing between learners and educators. The purpose of our study was to determine if ultrasound-naïve operators can learn ultrasound techniques and develop the psychomotor skills to acquire ultrasound images after reviewing SonoSim® online modules.

Methods

This was a prospective study evaluating first-year medical students. Medical students were asked to complete four SonoSim® online modules (aorta/IVC, cardiac, renal, and superficial). They were subsequently asked to perform ultrasound examinations on standardized patients utilizing the learned techniques/skills in the online modules. Emergency Ultrasound-trained physicians evaluated medical students’ sonographic skills in image acquisition quality, image acquisition difficulty, and overall performance. Data are presented as means and percentages with standard deviation. All P values are based on 2-tailed tests of significance.

Results

Total of 44 medical students participated in the study. All (100%) students completed the hands-on skills evaluation with a median score of 83.7% (IQR 76.7–88.4%). Thirty-three medical students completed all the online modules and quizzes with median score of 87.5% (IQR 83.8–91.3%). There was a positive association between module quiz performance and the hands-on skills performance (R-squared = 0.45; p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant association between module performance and hands-on performance for any of the four categories individually. In all four categories, the evaluators’ observation of the medical students’ difficulty obtaining views correlated with hands-on performance scores.

Conclusions

Our study findings suggest that ultrasound-naïve medical students can develop basic hands-on skills in image acquisition after reviewing online modules.

Peer Review reports

Background

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is rapidly becoming a more ubiquitous diagnostic and treatment tool in various medical specialties. Training in this imaging modality is required in emergency medicine residency education, but POCUS is extending into other specialties and settings. The increasing interest in this modality is driving the earlier integration of ultrasound education into the medical school curriculum. Medical students are learning how to use ultrasound to augment their physical examination skills, and they are seeing the utility in this imaging modality for their future careers [1].

In addition to didactics, one of the critical components of ultrasound education is teaching the psychomotor skills in performing ultrasound examinations. This development of ultrasound muscle memory typically requires hands-on practice in the form of in-person proctoring by an ultrasound expert. However, one of the challenges with educating an ever-growing base of learners is the scarcity of resources, especially qualified teachers and equipment. Methods for addressing this problem vary widely, from flipped classroom instruction to using telemedicine platforms [2]. Fuchs et al. showed that medical students can learn cardiac ultrasound through electronic learning platforms as well as their validated bedside in-person cardiac course [3]. These methods for teaching traditionally hands-on examinations/procedures are especially important in today’s COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) pandemic. With social distancing and cancellation of in-person teaching sessions, direct observation and in-person teaching of novices have become difficult and perhaps, non-existent. Therefore, ultrasound educators must be creative in creating an alternative way to deliver both the medical knowledge-based and psychomotor learning.

Ultrasound education platforms are constantly evolving and improving their products to meet the growing demand. Several of these platforms are simulation-based, virtual reality-based, or web-based modules [4,5,6]. It is unclear if these tools can replace more traditional teaching methods of didactics and in-person hands-on training sessions [7, 8]. Because of this, we wanted to explore the effectiveness of an online training program to learn hands-on skills. This online training program is comprised of various modules for frequently used POCUS examinations. Each module is comprised of a lecture section demonstrating the technique of POCUS examinations and a multiple-choice exam at the end of each module to test knowledge retention. Students’ progression and test scores are viewable by the instructor.

To our knowledge, there are no studies exploring learning ultrasound and hands-on skills solely based on online modules, only those that explore purely online modules without a hands-on assessment or more traditional methods of a didactics component and hands-on training [8,9,10]. Therefore, our objective for this study was to determine if ultrasound-naïve operators (first-year medical students) can learn ultrasound technique and develop the psychomotor skills necessary to acquire ultrasound images after only reviewing online modules.

Methods

Study aim, design, and setting

The aim for the study for this study was to determine if ultrasound-naïve operators can learn ultrasound technique and develop the psychomotor skills for ultrasound image acquisition after reviewing online modules. This was a prospective cohort educational study conducted at an academic medical center. The study falls under our College of Medicine’s umbrella institutional review board (IRB) as approved education research according to the pre-determined requirements of the College of Medicine’s original IRB approval. Inclusion criteria were: first-year medical students who were ultrasound-naïve, which was ultimately, the study population. Participants gave informed consent. Participation in this study was voluntary, and it is not a part of their standard medical school curriculum. Sample size was solely determined by the number of students who volunteered to be in the study and not determined a priori. It was presumed that this sample of ultrasound-naïve students was representative of the first-year medical students as a whole, based on their ultrasound experience. Data collection and analysis were performed in September 2017.

Study protocol

We assigned four core anatomy and physiology ultrasound examination online modules to ultrasound-naïve medical students (aorta/IVC, cardiac, renal, and superficial) and tested their hands-on skills after they completed modules which contained education on indications, normal sonoanatomy, ultrasound technique along with online quizzes. Students had three weeks to complete approximately 9 h of online learning and quizzes. The week after the completion deadline, the students completed in-person hands-on evaluations of image acquisition and perceived learner difficulty by Emergency Medicine Ultrasound-trained faculty and fellows. A short questionnaire was also administered at the end of the hands-on evaluation session. The previously piloted and validated paper questionnaire included items pertaining to opinions regarding the educational intervention and their image acquisition confidence level on a 1 to 10 scale [11, 12].

Online ultrasound learning modules

The SonoSim® Ultrasound Training Solution was chosen for our study because it was already purchased by our simulation center for ultrasound education. Because there was only one physical system and one sham transducer, it was not possible to train several students at the same time using the sham transducer. So, we opted for an online-only training plan.

The online modules were from SonoSim® Ultrasound Training Solution. SonoSim® Ultrasound Training Solution (Santa Monica, CA) is an education and technology company that markets ultrasound training modules with integrated simulated hands-on ultrasound training, didactic instruction, and assessment. The integrated simulated hands-on ultrasound training (sham ultrasound probe for hands-on practice within the SonoSim application/laptop) was not used for this study. This ultrasound training system is designed to provide similar training as traditional in-person training sessions. Four ultrasound anatomy and physiology modules were pre-selected for our study, and volunteer medical students were given three weeks to review these four pre-selected online SonoSim® modules and to complete the associated quizzes. SonoSim® Ultrasound Training Solution modules take approximately 2 h each to complete. Each module uses still images, videos, and narration to teach learners basic anatomy and physiology of the particular body part along with sonographic anatomy and physiology. The modules also cover ultrasound scanning technique with narrated videos demonstrating probe placement and movement. There are in-module and end-of-module assessments. Module progress and end-of-module examination performance can be seen by the instructor. Links to more detailed module descriptions are included in the supplementary materials.

Assessment

After completion of the training modules, in the following week, each medical student was asked to acquire certain ultrasound views on standardized patients (Additional file 1). Assessors for this course were department of Emergency Medicine Ultrasound fellowship-trained faculty and fellows with expertise in bedside ultrasound. The primary outcome measure was performance in image acquisition. Assessment was conducted using a set rubric akin to the Likert scale (Additional file 1). The students were asked to acquire sonographic images of the aorta/IVC, heart, kidneys, and soft tissue. The assessors could give up to 2 points depending on the requested image or question. The level of difficulty each student had with the four hands-on components was rated by the evaluator based on their perception of the learners’ ease at obtaining particular views. At the end of the hands-on assessment, each student completed a three-question survey regarding their experience. Additional Files 1 and 2 are the hands-on evaluation form and the medical student survey.

Data analysis

All analyses were performed using Stata 11 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX). Data are presented as means and percentages with standard deviation. All P values are based on 2-tailed t-tests of significance. P values of less than 0.05 are considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 44 first-year medical students enrolled in the study. There were 23 females (52.3%) and 21 males (47.7%). Ninety-five percent (42/44) of the students reviewed all of the SonoSim® training modules, while 75% (33/44) reviewed all the online modules and completed the associated quizzes receiving a median score of 87.5% (IQR 83.8–91.3%). All (100%) students participated in the hands-on skills evaluation with a median score of 83.7% (IQR 76.7–88.4%). There was a positive association between performance on the module quizzes and performance during the hands-on skills evaluation (R-squared = 0.45; p < 0.001) (Table 1). When analyzed individually, there was no statistically significant association between module performance and hands-on performance for any of the categories, except for aorta/IVC (Table 1). Table 2 shows that the students who did not complete all the modules consistently scored lower than those students who completed the modules in their entirety. On all four categories, the evaluators’ observation of the medical students’ difficulty obtaining views correlated with their hands-on performance scores (Table 3). Additional File 3 shows the collected data points in more detail and Additional File 4 shows more data analysis. Table 4 shows the results of the paper questionnaire that was completed by the students.

Table 1 SonoSim® Online Module Performance Scores and Hands-On Assessment Scores
Table 2 Hands-On Assessment Scores of Participants Who Completed 100% of Modules Versus Participants Who Did Not Complete All the Modules
Table 3 Average Hands-on Assessment Scores for All Students and Perceived Level of Difficulty by Evaluator
Table 4 Post-Assessment Survey Results

Discussion

As point-of-care ultrasound continues to permeate through nearly every specialty, it is important for software development, simulation developers, and any ultrasound education source to be mindful of key components required to cultivate ultrasound skills. Previous literature suggests that core psychomotor skills and fundamental motor skills are developed and subsequently applied during each ultrasound examination performed [13]. These skills are used by the operator to move and manipulate the transducer in response to sensory information such as the image on the screen or the feel of a chest wall rib. However, the traditional model of ultrasound training is in-person, hands-on practice either with live models or costly simulators [1, 4, 7, 14]. These in-person training sessions are resource-intensive, requiring expensive equipment and highly trained instructors. Time, effort, financial, and space restraints are also challenges educators face [1, 15]. To mitigate some of these issues, we sought to find alternatives in point-of-care ultrasound education. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, there is no better time to explore various platforms to maintain consistent education delivery and high-quality learning, while protecting the health of learners and educators. Ultrasound educators, in particular, are brainstorming creative ways to ensure their ultrasound novices are receiving both the medical knowledge and the psychomotor training they need to develop the muscle memory required for competency [14].

In our study, we chose to use the SonoSim® Ultrasound Training Solution, which was already purchased by our simulation center for ultrasound education. Since there was only one physical system and one sham transducer, it was not possible to train several students at the same time using the sham transducer. Instead, we opted to assign four core ultrasound examination online modules: aorta/IVC, cardiac, renal, and superficial, to ultrasound-naïve medical students and tested their hands-on skills after they completed modules which contained education on indications, normal sonoanatomy, ultrasound technique along with online quizzes. We chose to test the students at three weeks because clinical skills retention rates are established to show significant decline between weeks 6 and 12, and we wanted to avoid time as a factor in poor hands-on assessment outcomes [16]. This conclusion was also supported by Bosse et al’s study, which showed frequent, repetitive skills training sessions and feedback result in a strong improvement of early procedural skill acquisition [17]. Studies which include a robust hands-on component show more lasting results of skills retention on the scale of months to a year [18, 19]. However, because our study is only assessing knowledge retention from online didactics, we opted to assess the students shortly after they reviewed the online modules.

Based on our results, ultrasound-naïve medical students who performed well on the online ultrasound module quizzes overall also performed well on the hands-on assessments overall. However, when evaluated separately, only the aorta/IVC module performance correlated with the hands-on performance for that exam type. The evaluation of all 44 students’ hands-on assessment scores revealed that their review of the online modules translated into their ability to acquire various images on a standardized patient. Evaluators’ perception of the students’ difficulty acquiring images correlated to their hands-on scores.

The range of hands-on assessment scores is 46.5 to 97.7%. This range includes students who did not complete all the online modules, but for those who did complete all of the modules and their corresponding quizzes, the average hands-on score was 82.2%. Table 2 shows the differences in hands-on scores of both students who completed 100% of them modules and those who did not. Consistently, the students who did not complete the specific module performed worse than the students who did. Some students reviewed the content of the modules but did not complete the associated quizzes. It appears that those who completed all modules and quizzes performed better, showing a testing effect. This shows that those who learned sonographic anatomy and sonographic technique from the modules were able to acquire ultrasound images on live patients.

Literature has already shown that with online materials, in-person didactic teaching, and hands-on practice sessions, medical student ultrasound novices can achieve a level of competency in POCUS [20]. Our study suggests that perhaps medical students can learn a significant amount of ultrasound from asynchronous learning materials. Although our study did not evaluate the hands-on practice capabilities of the SonoSim® Ultrasound Training Solution, we believe that the online modules are a good start to learning ultrasound and a useful tool for repetition and knowledge retention. Because the modules include narrated videos demonstrating practical, hands-on placement of ultrasound transducers on live models, this is akin to in-person live demonstrations. These videos provide a visuo-spatial approach to bedside ultrasound, allowing the students to at least learn transducer placement for image acquisition, which is a good start to achieving competence.

All of our medical students also agreed that these modules are a good start to learning sonographic anatomy. Although majority of the students stated that the modules were adequate to learning sonographic technique and they had confidence in acquiring ultrasound images, their hands-on scores showed much room for improvement. The modules would be best utilized as an adjunct to hands-on learning and practice.

Nicholls et al. discusses the importance of psychomotor skills in ultrasound education and how they are the foundation of performing ultrasound examinations [13]. Therefore, these modules alone cannot allow medical students achieve mastery of POCUS. Furthermore, hands-on scanning is required to identify anatomical variations, tactile feedback, and pathology. Training should also progress beyond simulators to ultrasound machines used for patient care, so students develop familiarity and confidence in using these machines during their rotations. Previous investigations have identified that repetitive and active educational experiences, feedback, and embedding the education into the curriculum can maximize the learning experience [21].

Technical competency in ultrasound is built upon sustained deliberate practice, and our study shows that online education modules can provide this to a certain extent [22,23,24]. In this ever-evolving educational environment, this asynchronous learning resource can be a useful in the ultrasound education toolbox. Our results suggest that novices could potentially use this as an introductory learning tool and improve their skills with additional hands-on practice, which can be in the form of patients or simulators.

This project also shows promise in using asynchronous online learning modules for training medical personnel in military settings, where resources are scarce, and the environments may be austere.

With in-person ultrasound curricula transforming into virtual learning curricula, online learning modules with scanning technique can be integrated into tele-training. We believe our study has filled in a knowledge gap in the current literature. As discussed above, traditional methods of teaching ultrasound include both didactics (either in-person or asynchronous) and a hands-on training session. Because of the challenges we face during the COVID-19 pandemic, in-person trainings may not be feasible. If ultrasound novices can learn hands-on concepts by completing online modules, perhaps this can ultimately translate into a training model where medical providers can directly perform basic ultrasound examinations on patients after reviewing videos of online ultrasound educational content. We acknowledge this may only work for basic ultrasound applications and not for applications which require complex probe maneuvering techniques. We also recognize that this is only one learning platform out of innumerous resources. Programs may not be able to use SonoSim® because of cost, limitations with having a physical learning computer system, etc., and with virtual reality (VR) training tools expanding into the realm of medical education, virtual reality resources may become an educational tool staple.

Limitations

This study is limited by its small sample size at a single institution, and the sample size was not determined a priori. Although this study was conducted early in the medical students’ first year of medical school, they have basic knowledge of anatomy and also an eagerness and interest in learning. These factors could have influenced the results, and we did not have a control group to control for these variables. Furthermore, not all students completed all of the modular components which could have underestimated the ability of SonoSim® modules to train. The hands-on assessment tool was not piloted nor validated prior to implementation. Although we established positive correlation between SonoSim® modules and hands-on acquisition of skills, further research exploring integration of SonoSim® modules with real-life hands-on training is needed. We did not investigate skills retention or effectiveness in the real-world clinical environment. Lastly, this study was not designed to assess overall impact or effectiveness of this simulation-based ultrasound system.

Realism and generalizability of these of these teaching techniques may be limited. Our study only evaluates one particular product and may not be generalizable.

Conclusion

Our study findings suggest that ultrasound-naïve medical students can develop basic hands-on skills in image acquisition after reviewing online modules that teach ultrasound technique. This is particularly relevant during the COVID-19 pandemic, when teaching resources are greatly limited. Asynchronous learning has become the backbone of medical education curricula. Students are expected to have reviewed educational materials before short in-person trainings. Our study showed that there is value in online modules to teach procedures that require psychomotor training, such as performing ultrasound examinations.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional files.

References

  1. 1.

    Rempell JS, Saldana F, DiSalvo D, Kumar N, Stone MB, Chan W, Luz J, Noble V, Liteplo A, Kimberly H, Kohler M. Pilot point-of-care ultrasound curriculum at Harvard Medical School: early experience. West J Emerg Med. 2016;17(6):734–40. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2016.8.31387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Smith A, Addison R, Rogers P, Stone-McLean J, Boyd S, Hoover K, Pollard M, Dubrowski A, Parsons M. Remote mentoring of point-of-care ultrasound skills to inexperienced operators using multiple telemedicine platforms: is a cell phone good enough? J Ultrasound Med. 2018;37(11):2517–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Fuchs L, Gilad D, Mizrakli Y, Sadeh R, Galante O, Kobal S. Self-learning of point-of-care cardiac ultrasound - can medical students teach themselves? PLoS One. 2018;13(9):e0204087. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Jensen JK, Dyre L, Jørgensen ME, Andreasen LA, Tolsgaard MG. Collecting validity evidence for simulation-based assessment of point-of-care ultrasound skills. J Ultrasound Med. 2017;36(12):2475–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Dyre L, Nørgaard L, Tabor A, Madsen ME, Sørensen JL, Ringsted C, et al. Collecting validity evidence for the assessment of mastery learning in simulation-based ultrasound training. Ultraschall Med. 2016;37:386–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hani S, Chalouhi G, Lakissian Z, Sharara-Chami R. Introduction of ultrasound simulation in medical education: exploratory study. JMIR Med Educ. 2019;5(2):e13568. https://doi.org/10.2196/13568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Jensen JK, Dyre L, Jørgensen ME, Andreasen LA, Tolsgaard MG. Simulation-based point-of-care ultrasound training: a matter of competency rather than volume. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018;62(6):811–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Haskins SC, Feldman D, Fields KG, Kirksey MA, Lien CA, Luu TH, et al. Teaching a point-of-care ultrasound curriculum to anesthesiology trainees with traditional didactic lectures or an online E-learning platform: a pilot study. J Educ Perioper Med. 2018;20(3):E624.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bustam A, Noor Azhar M, Singh Veriah R, Arumugam K, Loch A. Performance of emergency physicians in point-of-care echocardiography following limited training. Emerg Med J. 2014;31(5):369–73. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2012-201789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hylton DA, Shargall Y, Finley C, Agzarian J, Fahim C, Hanna WC. A novel online education module to teach clinicians how to correctly identify ultrasonographic features of mediastinal lymph nodes during endobronchial ultrasound. CJS. 2020;63(1):E62–8. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.000119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Adhikari S, Situ-LaCasse E, Acuña J, Irving S, Weaver C, Samsel K, Biffar DE, Motlagh M, Sakles J. Integration of pre-intubation ultrasound into airway management course: a novel training program. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020;24(3):179–83. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Amini R, Camacho LD, Valenzuela J, Ringleberg JK, Patanwala AE, Stearns J, Situ-LaCasse EH, Acuña J, Adhikari S. Cadaver models in residency training for uncommonly encountered ultrasound-guided procedures. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2019;6:238212051988563. https://doi.org/10.1177/2382120519885638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Nicholls D, Sweet L, Hyett J. Psychomotor skills in medical ultrasound imaging. J Ultrasound Med. 2014;33(8):1349–52. https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.33.8.1349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Boniface MP, Helgeson SA, Cowdell JC, Simon LV, Hiroto BT, Werlang ME, Robison SW, Edwards GG, Lewis MD, Maniaci MJ. A longitudinal curriculum in point-of-care ultrasonography improves medical knowledge and psychomotor skills among internal medicine residents. AMEP. 2019;10:935–42. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S220153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Johri AM, Durbin J, Newbigging J, Tanzola R, Chow R, De S, et al. Cardiac point-of-care ultrasound: state-of-the-art in medical school education. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018;31(7):749–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2018.01.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Fisher J, Viscusi R, Ratesic A, Johnstone C, Kelley R, Tegethoff AM, Bates J, Situ-Lacasse EH, Adamas-Rappaport WJ, Amini R. Clinical skills temporal degradation assessment in undergraduate medical education. J Advanc Med Educ Professionalism. 2018;6(1):1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bosse HM, Mohr J, Buss B, Krautter M, Weyrich P, Herzog W, Jünger J, Nikendei C. The benefit of repetitive skills training and frequency of expert feedback in the early Acquisition of Procedural Skills. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15(1):22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0286-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Reed T, Pirotte M, McHugh M, Oh L, Lovett S, Hoyt AE, Quinones D, Adams W, Gruener G, McGaghie WC. Simulation-based mastery learning improves medical student performance and retention of Core clinical skills. Simul Healthc. 2016;11(3):173–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Boet S, Borges BC, Naik VN, Siu LW, Riem N, Chandra D, et al. Complex procedural skills are retained for a minimum of 1 yr after a single high-Fidelity simulation training session. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107(4):533–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aer160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Parks AR, Atkinson P, Verheul G, Leblanc-Duchin D. Can medical learners achieve point-of-care ultrasound competency using a high-fidelity ultrasound simulator?: a pilot study. Critical UltraSound. 2013;5(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2036-7902-5-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005;27(1):10–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590500046924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ericsson KA. Deliberate Practice and the Acquisition and Maintenance of Expert Performance in Medicine and Related Domains. Academic Med. 2004;79(Suppl):S70–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wang EE, Quinones J, Fitch MT, Dooley-Hash S, Griswold-Theodorson S, Medzon R, Korley F, Laack T, Robinett A, Clay L. Developing technical expertise in emergency medicine--the role of simulation in procedural skill acquisition. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(11):1046–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00218.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Promes SB, Chudgar SM, Grochowski CO, Shayne P, Isenhour J, Glickman SW, et al. Gaps in procedural experience and competency in medical school graduates. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16(Suppl 2):S58–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00600.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

The primary and senior authors have received financial support from the National Foundation of Emergency Medicine through the Scholars/Mentor Program. This study was also funded in part by the University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson’s Academy of Medical Education Scholars (AMES) Research Grant and University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson Department of Emergency Medicine Seed Grant. The funds served to protect time for the authors’ to perform research projects, and the funding body served no specific role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ES made substantial contributions to the conception/design of the work; the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data; and drafted the manuscript. JA made substantial contributions to the acquisition of the data and the manuscript draft. DH made substantial contributions to the acquisition of the data and the manuscript draft. RA made substantial contributions to the manuscript draft. SI made substantial contribution to the acquisition of the data. KS made substantial contribution to the acquisition of the data. AP made substantial contribution to the analysis and interpretation of the data. DB made substantial contribution to the acquisition of the data. SA made substantial contributions to the conception/design of the work and made substantial revisions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elaine Situ-LaCasse.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study falls under our College of Medicine’s umbrella institutional review board (IRB) as approved education research according to the pre-determined requirements of the College of Medicine’s original IRB approval. Study participants were first-year medical students at our institution, who are ultrasound-naive. Participation in this study was voluntary.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Hands-on evaluation form used by the point-of-care ultrasound experts to evaluate medical students’ hands-on ultrasound performance.

Additional file 2.

Medical student survey after hands-on portion completion.

Additional file 3.

Data collected from study with descriptive statistical analysis.

Additional file 4

Data analysis and p-values.

Additional file 5.

Links to SonoSim modules and descriptions.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Situ-LaCasse, E., Acuña, J., Huynh, D. et al. Can ultrasound novices develop image acquisition skills after reviewing online ultrasound modules?. BMC Med Educ 21, 175 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02612-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Point-of-care ultrasound
  • Medical student ultrasound education
  • Simulation
  • Ultrasound education
  • Asynchronous learning