Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Implementation of the college student mental health education course (CSMHEC) in undergraduate medical curriculum: effects and insights

BMC Medical Education volume 20, Article number: 505 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Extant literature reveals that medical students suffer from various mental health problems in the process of learning medicine. However, there are few studies evaluating the implementation of a mental health education course in medical curriculum. The current study aimed to test the effectiveness of an 8-week intensive mental health education course, the College Student Mental Health Education Course (CSMHEC), and to gain further insights on how the course could be improved from students’ feedback.

Methods

This is a quasi-experimental study with both quantitative and qualitative analyses. We recruited 374 first year medical students as our subjects with 188 (age = 17.97 ± 0.65 years, 37.2% male) for the experiment group and 186 (age = 18.02 ± 0.63 years, 40.3% male) for the control group. For quantitative analysis, Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21), Chinese College Student Academic Burnout Inventory (CCSABI) and Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) were used and a 5-point Likert scale was used to indicate students’ overall satisfaction with CSMHEC. For qualitative analysis, a thematic analysis method was adopted to gain insights from the feedback of medical students.

Results

Medical students in the experiment group saw a significant decline in psychological distress (p < 0.001, d = 0.31) and academic burnout (p < 0.001, d = 1.46), while they experienced a significant increase in life satisfaction levels after the intervention (p < 0.001, d = 0.48). Compared with students in the control group, students in the experiment group had statistically significant lower levels of psychological distress (p < 0.05, d = 0.23) and academic burnout (p < 0.001, d = 0.70), but statistically significant higher levels of life satisfaction in the post-test (p < 0.01, d = 0.31). Most students in the experiment group were satisfied with CSMHEC and themes extracted in the thematic analysis shed light on how the course could be improved.

Conclusions

Implementing a mental health education course like CSMHEC in medical curriculum can be effective in helping medical students improve psychological health. More research needs to be conducted on further refinement and better design of such a course to implement in medical education.

Peer Review reports

Background

Medical education is known to be a long and painstaking process that requires hard work and continuous efforts. Such a demanding process may bring about various mental health problems like stress, anxiety, depression and burnout. These problems may lead to a set of serious consequences in medical students, such as poor academic performance [1], sleep disturbance [2], alcohol and drug abuse [3, 4], low self-worth [5] and even suicide [6,7,8]. As a healthy mental state is important for student well-being in general, which is essential for a medical student to succeed finishing study in medical university and become a qualified health professional thereafter, there is an urgent need to implement effective interventions early.

Literature shows that different interventions have been developed to increase medical students’ mental health literacy and help medical students improve psychological well-being. Davies and colleagues [9] designed an evidence-based intervention called Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) eLearning course and conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT). The results strongly demonstrated the efficacy of the program in raising medical students’ confidence in helping a friend with mental health problems and in reducing medical students’ stigma towards mental illnesses. A systematic review and meta-analysis [10] on the effectiveness of mindfulness training for medical students and students of other health professions included 19 studies covering both randomized and non-randomized controlled trials. It was found that mindfulness-based interventions were effective in reducing stress, anxiety and depression while enhancing mindfulness, self-efficacy and empathy among health professional students. In addition, the research conducted by Gallego-Gómez et al. [11] used an RCT to evaluate an intervention which combined music therapy and Progressive Muscle Relaxation (PMR) to help nursing students alleviate pressure before exams. The results showed that compared with the students in the control group, students in the experiment group had lower stress levels before the Clinical Nursing exam and achieved significantly higher scores in the exam. Also adopting an RCT design, Sahranavard and colleagues [12] tested the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) among female medical students in Iran and found that CBT was effective in lowering medical students’ levels of anxiety while increasing their levels of hardiness and self-efficacy.

Although some medical institutions provided psychotherapeutic programs such as counseling and relaxation training to medical students, it is found that the utilization rate of these psychological services was not as high as expected [13]. The reasons behind this trend are probably that some medical students who suffer from mental health problems are ashamed of seeking help and worried that the revelation of their poor mental states may exert detrimental impacts on their social relationship, academic assessment and career prospects [14]. Studies indicated that people were reluctant to use public mental health services due to the social stigma towards psychiatric disorders [15, 16], and medical students and health professionals are no exception. Therefore, medical educators need to find out a feasible and efficacious approach to helping medical students increase mental health literacy and enhance psychological health. Implementing a mental health education course in medical curriculum may be such a promising approach and we conducted the current research to test the effectiveness of this approach and to gain further insights on how the course could be improved from students’ feedback (e.g. students’ satisfaction levels with and opinions about the course).

In September 2019, China Medical University provided a mental health education course called the College Student Mental Health Education Course (CSMHEC) to first-year medical students. As a pilot program, CSMHEC was not given to all first-year medical students, but only to students of some majors concerning medicine (preventive medicine, nursing, medical imaging, biomedical engineering, basic medical science and health service administration). This is because the schedule was tight for first-year students of other majors concerning medicine such as clinical medicine and dentistry. The aims of CSMHEC are to familiarize students with the definition and standard of mental health, help students develop emotion regulation skills, stress coping strategies, environment adaptation abilities, learning potentials and problem-solving abilities. CSMHEC focuses on college students’ psychological characteristics and aims to help students clarify some irrational beliefs and stereotyped views. By taking this course, medical students are expected to acquire knowledge on basic theories and concepts in psychology, cultivate self-care awareness, develop high adaptability and grasp strategies to deal with distress. The current study aimed to examine the effectiveness of implementing CSMHEC in undergraduate medical education and to identify any potential problems with the course design and course delivery from the implementation.

Methods

Setting

This study was conducted at China Medical University, a major medical university in Northeast China. In China Medical University, there are three kinds of programs for undergraduate medical students, i.e. the four-year program, the five-year program and the eight-year program. The four-year program covers students majoring in bioscience, biomedical engineering, medical examination, rehabilitation therapy, nursing, bioinformatics, health service administration and biotechnology. The five-year program covers students majoring in clinical medicine, basic medical science, anesthesiology, medical imaging, ophthalmology, psychiatry, pediatrics, dentistry, preventive medicine, pharmacy and forensic medicine. The eight-year program covers students majoring in clinical medicine and students in the eight-year program do not take entrance exams for postgraduate study and they can get a Master’s Degree or a Doctor’s Degree in Medicine after they finish 8 years of study. Considering the course schedule and teaching resources, our institution made the decision that as a pilot program, CSMHEC was given to some first-year medical students in the four-year program and in the five-year program, who are majored in preventive medicine, nursing, medical imaging, biomedical engineering, basic medical science and health service administration.

Study design

This is a quasi-experimental study with both quantitative and qualitative analyses. For the quantitative analysis, a quasi-experiment was conducted to test the effectiveness of the intervention (CSMHEC). The measurement tools of medical students’ mental health included Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21), Chinese College Student Academic Burnout Inventory (CCSABI) and the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). In the first course of CSMHEC, students in the experiment group were asked to finish these psychological scales (pre-test) and in the last course of CSMHEC, besides completing the psychological scales again (post-test), students were also invited to fill out a questionnaire about their satisfaction with CSMHEC and their opinions about the course. This course satisfaction questionnaire resulted in quantitative data from responses to a Likert-type question, and qualitative data from textual comment responses to open-ended questions. For the qualitative data, we used a thematic analysis method to gain some insights on how the course could be improved from the implementation of CSMHEC based on medical students’ feedback. The students in the control group completed the same kind of psychological scales at about the same time as the students in the experiment group, but students in the control group did not take CSMHEC and thus did not fill out the course satisfaction questionnaire. The design of the current research is presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Design of the current research

Full size image

Participants and data collection

In the last week of September 2019, the research investigator from the department of psychology (the corresponding author of this paper and also one of the lecturers of CSMHEC) explained the purpose of the study to students in the first course of CSMHEC to recruit subjects for the experiment group. At approximately the same time in the same week, trained research investigators from the English department tried to help recruit medical students who did not take CSMHEC as subjects for the control group. We used random cluster sampling method, and 374 first-year medical students agreed to participate and became our subjects. As for the demographic characteristics, there were 188 medical students in the experiment group (aged 17.97 ± 0.65 years, 37.2% male) and 186 students in the control group (aged 18.02 ± 0.63 years, 40.3% male). Student’s t-test showed that there was no significant difference in the two groups in terms of medical student age (t = − 0.730, p > 0.05). The result of Chi-square test revealed that there was no significant difference in the two groups with regard to gender (χ2 = 0.376, p > 0.05). Participants did not know which group they belonged to and research investigators received the training for conducting the survey beforehand. Data were collected through an online survey tool called Star Questionnaire. First, the purpose of the survey (i.e. “for research only”) was explained by each trained research investigator in person in class and then a two-dimensional code was projected onto a large screen. Participants scanned the two-dimensional code using their cellular phones and filled out the questionnaires online.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the authors’ affiliated university and complied with the code of the Declaration of Helsinki (1964) and its later amendments. Medical students were assured that participation was voluntary and they could withdraw anytime if they wanted to without any punishment. Students were told that all data obtained from the survey would be kept confidential and would be used for research purposes only. Every medical student who agreed to participate filled out questionnaires and the informed consent form online.

Measures

Psychological distress

Medical students’ psychological distress was measured by the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21) [17]. This 21-item questionnaire contained three subscales: Depression (7 items) (e.g. “I could see nothing in the future to be hopeful about”); Anxiety (7 items) (e.g. “I was worried about situations in which I might panic and make a fool of myself”); Stress (7 items) (e.g. “I tended to over-react to situations”). Students were asked about their emotional state in the past week and each item was rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (does not apply to me at all) to 4 (apply to me very much), with higher scores indicating higher levels of psychological distress. DASS-21 has been used in Chinese university students and demonstrated good psychometric properties [18]. In the current study, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of the scale for the experiment group were 0.895 (pre-test) and 0.922 (post-test) and the Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of the scale for the control group were 0.909 (pre-test) and 0.933 (post-test).

Academic burnout

Medical students’ overall levels of academic burnout were measured by the Chinese College Student Academic Burnout Inventory (CCSABI) [19]. Based on Maslach Burnout Inventory, Lian and colleagues developed CCSABI considering Chinese college students’ characteristics and demonstrated the sound psychometric properties of the questionnaire. CCSABI included 20 items and each item was rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (not true of me at all) to 5 (very true of me). Example questions in CCSABI are “When I wake up in the morning, thinking about studying for the whole day, I feel exhausted” and “I can catch up with my academic work in college”. After the negatively worded items were reverse scored, the sum score was calculated with higher sum scores indicating higher levels of academic burnout. CCSABI is now the most widely used academic burnout inventory among college students in China and demonstrated good reliability among Chinese medical students [20, 21]. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of CCSABI for the experiment group in the present study were 0.804 (pre-test) and 0.885 (post-test) and the Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for the control group were 0.819 (pre-test) and 0.890 (post-test).

Life satisfaction

Life satisfaction, as a major component of subjective well-being, was measured with the 5-item Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) [22]. Example items of SWLS are “In most ways, my life is close to my ideal” and “So far, I have gotten the important things I want in life”. Medical students rated each item on a 7-point Likert scale and the total score ranges from 7 to 35 with a higher score indicating a higher level of life satisfaction. The Chinese version of SWLS has been used in medical students and has demonstrated satisfactory reliability [23]. In the present study, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of the scale for the experiment group were 0.865 (pre-test) and 0.903 (post-test) and the Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for the control group were 0.835 (pre-test) and 0.893 (post-test).

College student mental health education course (CSMHEC)

In the last week of September 2019, participants in the experiment group took an intensive 8-session mental health education course, the CSMHEC. The course took 2 months (8 weeks), 1.5 h per session and one session per week, so altogether there were 12 h of theoretical lectures. The lectures were given by four specialists from the department of psychology in China Medical University and they all held Master’s Degrees in Psychology. The content and aims of CSMHEC are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 The course content and aims of CSMHEC
Full size table

Analyses

Quantitative analysis

Independent samples t-tests were used to compare baseline levels of psychological study variables (DASS-21, CCSABI, SWLS) between the experiment group and the control group and to compare levels of psychological study variables between the experiment group and the control group after the intervention. Paired samples t-tests were used to compare the levels of psychological study variables in the experiment group before and after the students in the group took CSMHEC and were used to compare the levels of psychological study variables in the control group in the pre-test and post-test without the intervention. All t-tests were performed by SPSS 22.0 version and a p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. For paired samples t-tests and independent samples t-tests, effect size was measured by Cohen’s d using GPower 3.1. According to Cohen [24], effect size was interpreted as small (Cohen’s d ≥ 0.20), medium (Cohen’s d ≥ 0.50) and large (Cohen’s d ≥ 0.80). As for medical students’ feedback about the course CSMHEC in the experiment group, SPSS 22.0 was employed to analyze the quantitative data about students’ overall satisfaction with CSMHEC.

Qualitative analysis

Thematic analysis method was adopted to gain insights from medical students’ answers to open-ended questions (qualitative data) in the feedback. The open-ended questions used in the course satisfaction questionnaire were designed by QHW (the first author) and then QHW discussed with TJD (the corresponding author). Considering the limited time issue in class, after discussion, QHW and TJD finally reached the agreement that the number of open-ended questions asked in the survey was reduced from five to three. Students in the experiment group typed in their answers to the three open-ended questions using their cellular phones through an online survey tool called Star Questionnaire and then the texts were exported. In order to elicit honest answers from students and to control bias, the course satisfaction questionnaire was answered in complete anonymity without any identifier. For qualitative analysis, based on principles of grounded theory [25], an inductive thematic analysis approach [26] was adopted in the current study. First, QHW encoded the exported texts and extracted the concurrent words to search for themes. Then a thematic ‘map’ was generated and a discussion was held between QHW and TJD. Themes extracted initially were compared and further refined and the finalized themes were agreed upon by both authors after a consensus was reached.

Results

Comparisons of baseline levels of psychological variables between the experiment group and the control group

Independent samples t-tests were used to compare the psychological variables between the experiment group and the control group before implementing CSMHEC in the experiment group. The results presented in Fig. 2a show that there were no significant differences between the experiment group and the control group regarding medical students’ levels of psychological distress (29.74 ± 7.09 vs 29.08 ± 7.06, t = 0.915, p > 0.05), academic burnout (51.16 ± 8.26 vs 50.73 ± 8.42, t = 0.503, p > 0.05) and life satisfaction (22.56 ± 5.87 vs 22.68 ± 5.29, t = − 0.215, p > 0.05). The homogeneity of the two groups in baseline levels of the psychological study variables laid the foundation for testing the effectiveness of the intervention.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Results of the quasi-experiment. a. Comparisons of baseline levels of psychological variables between the experiment group and the control group. b. Comparisons of psychological variables in the experiment group before and after the intervention. c. Comparisons of psychological variables in the control group between the pre-test and the post-test without the intervention. d. Comparisons of psychological variables between the experiment group and the control group in the post-test. (Note. the experiment group: N = 188; the control group: N = 186; DASS-21: the 21-item Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales; CCSABI: Chinese College Student Academic Burnout Inventory; SWLS: Satisfaction With Life Scale; ns: not significant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001)

Full size image

Comparisons of psychological variables in the experiment group before and after the intervention

Figure 2b shows the levels of psychological variables in the experiment group before and after medical students took CSMHEC, which were compared by paired samples t-tests. The results reveal that after taking CSMHEC, students in the experiment group had significantly lower levels of psychological distress (29.74 ± 7.09 vs 27.97 ± 6.92, t = 4.244, p < 0.001, d = 0.31) and significantly lower levels of academic burnout (51.16 ± 8.26 vs 42.85 ± 9.94, t = 19.997, p < 0.001, d = 1.46). Meanwhile, Medical students’ life satisfaction levels were significantly higher (22.56 ± 5.87 vs 25.35 ± 6.09, t = − 6.588, p < 0.001, d = 0.48) after the intervention.

Comparisons of psychological variables in the control group between the pre-test and the post-test without the intervention

Medical students in the control group completed the same psychological scales at approximately the same time as those in the experiment group. Without taking CSMHEC, medical students in the control group finished the same questionnaires twice in the pre-test and in the post-test with 2 months interval and the results of paired samples t-tests are presented in Fig. 2c. As can be seen, medical students in the control group saw no significant differences in their levels of psychological distress (29.08 ± 7.06 vs 29.73 ± 8.27, t = − 1.117, p > 0.05), academic burnout (50.73 ± 8.42 vs 50.08 ± 10.64, t = 1.114, p > 0.05), or life satisfaction (22.68 ± 5.29 vs 23.45 ± 6.22, t = − 1.684, p > 0.05) between the pre-test and the post-test.

Comparisons of psychological variables between the experiment group and the control group after implementing CSMHEC

To compare medical students’ levels of the studied psychological variables between the experiment group and the control group after the intervention, independent samples t-tests were used. Figure 2d shows that after taking CSMHEC, students in the experiment group had a significantly lower level of psychological distress than those in the control group (27.97 ± 6.92 vs 29.73 ± 8.27, t = − 2.230, p < 0.05, d = 0.23). It is noticeable that the academic burnout level of the students in the experiment group was also significantly lower than that of the students in the control group with a larger effect size (42.85 ± 9.94 vs 50.08 ± 10.64, t = − 6.792, p < 0.001, d = 0.70). On the other hand, students in the experiment group saw a significantly higher level of life satisfaction than students in the control group (25.35 ± 6.09 vs 23.45 ± 6.22, t = 2.983, p < 0.01, d = 0.31).

Medical students’ overall satisfaction with CSMHEC

In the last course of CSMHEC, medical students in the experiment group (N = 188) completed a course satisfaction questionnaire and the result of analysis of quantitative data is shown in Fig. 3. As can be seen from the bar chart, a large majority of students were either very satisfied with the course (n = 102, 54.3%) or satisfied with the course (n = 51, 27.1%). Students who were unsure about their attitudes towards the course accounted for a small proportion (n = 9, 4.8%). It is noticeable that four students were not very satisfied with the course (2.1%) and the percentage of medical students who were not satisfied with the course at all was much larger (n = 22, 11.7%).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Survey about medical students’ overall satisfaction with CSMHEC

Full size image

Thematic analysis of medical students’ qualitative feedback on CSMHEC

Through asking open-ended questions, we collected feedback from medical students in the experiment group after they took CSMHEC and analyzed the qualitative data using the thematic analysis method. Details about the open-ended questions, the extracted themes and students’ quotes are presented in Table 2. As can be seen from the table, most students endorsed the value of the course in helping them to manage their emotions more effectively, familiarizing them with basic concepts in psychology, having a clearer idea of themselves and getting to know the common mental health problems among college students and strategies to cope with these problems. Regarding the good aspects of the course, a large number of students claimed that when taking CSMHEC, they felt relaxed and interested, the course content was closely related to their real life in college and they thought that the course lecturers were kind and responsible. As for the aspects of the course that need to be improved, students presented the view that they preferred more interaction, more cases and more E-educational activities.

Table 2 Thematic analysis of the feedback on CSMHEC from medical students in the experiment group (N = 188)
Full size table

Discussion

This quasi-experimental study tested the effectiveness of implementing an intensive 8-week mental health education course in undergraduate medical curriculum and tried to gain insights from students’ feedback on how the course could be improved. Statistics show that after taking CSMHEC, medical students in the experiment group saw a significant decline in psychological distress and academic burnout, while their levels of life satisfaction increased significantly. Compared with students in the control group, students in the experiment group had significantly lower levels of psychological distress and academic burnout but significantly higher levels of life satisfaction in the post-test. This result is encouraging and confirmed that at least the short-term effect of CSMHEC was significant. Three themes, with interaction, case and E-education as the key words, emerged from qualitative data in the thematic analysis, giving further insights for the aspects of the course that need to be improved.

Embedding mental health education course early in medical curriculum

The College Student Mental Health Education Course, as a pilot program, is not a compulsory course for all first-year students at the medical university where the present study was conducted. In China, students get admitted to medical universities directly after finishing their study at senior high schools through Chinese National College Entrance Exam, so it is likely that many students are not clear of the challenges they will have to face in the process of learning medicine. Literature shows that mental health problems such as depression, anxiety and burnout may set in from the outset of medical education [27, 28]. The first academic year in medical university is a crucial transitional period for medical students in China and differences in the learning environment and teaching methods between senior high schools and medical universities may act as stressors. Some medical students cannot adapt to the new academic environment and teaching mode, thus feeling stressed and suffering from mental health problems like anxiety and burnout. Therefore, early intervention is needed and implementing a mental health education course like CSMHEC in medical curriculum may be a promising approach.

CSMHEC helped medical students understand the features of college students’ psychological development and the related psychological problems that may arise in this process. Through taking CSMHEC, medical students could know basic theories in psychology, develop a healthy level of self-awareness, get familiar with common mental health problems (stress, anxiety, depression, burnout) they may encounter in the process of learning medicine and grasp the coping strategies to combat these problems. As a general education course, CSMHEC was given to whole classes of medical students, so students taking the mental health education course did not have to worry about stigma. Literature shows that medical students and physicians had lower levels of help-seeking and were reluctant to use public psychiatric services when they suffered from mental health problems due to stigmatization [29,30,31]. It was expected that CSMHEC could not only increase medical students’ mental health literacy, but also break their moulds of thinking and enable them to realize some inherent unreasonable perceptions, thereby changing their maladaptive behaviors. It is hoped that after taking the course, in the future, if the students were afflicted by mental illnesses, they could actively seek assistance from the counseling center on campus or from public mental health services.

Insights on how the course could be improved

The teaching of CSMHEC was still based on didactic lectures, combined with some interaction mainly through questions asked by teachers in class. Sometimes medical students also interacted with each other through small group discussions on a course-related topic or around a specific case assigned by teachers. Medical students in the experiment group presented the view that they preferred more interaction with teachers and peers. Previous research has revealed that interactive education is an effective teaching mode that can take different forms in medical education [32,33,34]. It is suggested that medical educators pay more attention to teacher-student and student-student communication in class.

At the end of each module of CSMHEC, there were several cases about college students’ psychological problems related to the content of that specific module. The purpose was to nurture medical students’ critical thinking, analytical ability and problem-solving skills. First, medical students needed to understand the problems presented in the cases, and then reflected upon the knowledge they acquired in the related module so as to figure out the appropriate approaches to tackling the problems. Through this process, it is intended that medical students could internalize the knowledge acquired and more importantly, could integrate theory with practice. Students in the experiment group said that they thought some cases were interesting which aroused their curiosity and eagerness to learn. Extant literature has recorded the effectiveness of the case-based approach in medical education [35, 36] and medical educators can make the most of this approach to facilitate their teaching.

With the advance of technology and easy access to the Internet, the teaching and learning modes are undergoing dramatic changes. Various online educational softwares such as Yun Class, TengXun Class and U Class are now very popular in China. Medical teachers can make good use of such E-educational software to supplement the traditional blackboard and PowerPoint teaching format. For example, in the preparation stage before class, medical teachers can set different forms of questions (multiple choice questions, filling in the blanks, etc.) or make a survey specifically related to the content of the course. During class hours, after didactic teaching of some theories, medical teachers can ask students to answer the related questions or fill out the survey online using their cellular phones. A great advantage of this approach is that E-educational software may calculate the correct rate for each question immediately and with reference to the statistics, medical teachers are able to identify medical students’ knowledge gaps and make demonstrations accordingly. In the present study, we also used an online survey tool called Star Questionnaire for collecting the quantitative and qualitative data. Medical students taking CSMHEC in the experiment group said that they welcomed this teaching format of combining the traditional didactic lecture with the modern electronic interaction and they preferred more utilization of the E-educational software. Empirical studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of using online teaching resources in medical education [37, 38] and medical educators can combine the traditional face-to-face didactic lectures with modern on-line interactions to make their teaching more effective.

Strengths and contributions of the current research

Although a large number of cross-sectional studies reported medical students’ mental health problems and different psychotherapeutic programs have been developed to help medical students improve psychological well-being, we found that there are few studies focusing on the effectiveness of a mental health education course to this end. Zhang et al. [39] adopted a pre-post intervention design and applied a positive psychology education course for medical students in China. Results show that after the intervention, participants’ levels of hope, life satisfaction and subjective happiness were improved significantly, while their levels of depression and anxiety were reduced considerably. Compared with Zhang’s study, our research used a larger sample of medical students and adopted a quasi-experimental design with a control group to test the effectiveness of implementing a mental health education course in medical curriculum, thus adding testing power to the result of the trial. In addition, our research also included qualitative analysis which provided further insights on the better design of such a mental health education course to implement in medical education. Our research, together with Zhang’s study, provided evidence that embedding a classroom-based mental health education course in regular medical curriculum can be a feasible and effective approach to helping medical students enhance psychological health.

Limitations and future directions

Whereas the present study contributes to the literature on developing effective intervention programs to help improve medical students’ psychological health, we have to acknowledge that our study has several limitations. First, we could not use an RCT design but a quasi-experimental design instead because our institution arranged to give CSMHEC to some but not all first-year medical students due to their different course schedules. Second, students in the experiment group may have the expectations that their psychological well-being would improve after taking the mental health education course which could amplify the better outcomes in the intervention group. Third, this study was conducted in only one medical university in China, so generalizability of the conclusions should be made with caution. Fourth, we did not do follow-up tests for medical students in the experiment group due to the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak as we thought this traumatic event would have exerted considerable impacts on the mental state of our subjects. Considering these limitations, future studies in different cultures need to be conducted, if possible, by using an RCT design and with follow-up tests.

Conclusions

This study tested the efficacy of implementing an intensive 8-week mental health education course CSMHEC in medical education. The results demonstrated the effectiveness of the course on decreasing medical students’ psychological distress and academic burnout while enhancing their life satisfaction levels and students’ qualitative feedback shed light on how the course could be improved. Medical institutions and the related authorities may consider implementing a mental health education course like CSMHEC in regular medical curriculum to help medical students improve psychological health.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed in the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CSMHEC:

College Student Mental Health Education Course

DASS-21:

The 21-item Depression Anxiety Stress Scales

CCSABI:

Chinese College Student Academic Burnout Inventory

SWLS:

Satisfaction With Life Scale

MHFA:

Mental Health First Aid

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

PMR:

Progressive Muscle Relaxation

CBT:

Cognitive behavioral therapy

References

  1. Kötter T, Wagner J, Brüheim L, Voltmer E. Perceived medical school stress of undergraduate medical students predicts academic performance: an observational study. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17:256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Waqas A, Khan S, Sharif W, Khalid U, Ali A. Association of academic stress with sleeping difficulties in medical students of a Pakistani medical school: a cross sectional survey. Peer J. 2015;3:e840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pickard M, Bates L, Dorian M, Greig H, Saint D. Alcohol and drug use in second-year medical students at the University of Leeds. Med Educ. 2000;34:148–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Trostler M, Li Y, Plankey MW. Prevalence of binge drinking and associated co-factors among medical students in a US Jesuit University. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2014;40(4):336–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hu KS, Chibnall JT, Slavin SJ. Maladaptive perfectionism, Impostorism, and cognitive distortions: threats to the mental health of pre-clinical medical students. Acad Psychiatry. 2019;43:381–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Curran TA, Gawley E, Casey P, Gill M, Crumlish N. Depression, suicidality and alcohol abuse among medical and business students. Ir Med J. 2009;102(8):249–52.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rotenstein LS, Ramos MA, Torre M, Segal JB, Peluso MJ, Guille C, et al. Prevalence of depression, depressive symptoms, and suicidal ideation among medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016;316(21):2214–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Massle FS, Power DV, Eacker A, Harper W, et al. Burnout and suicidal ideation among U.S. medical students. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:334–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Davies EB, Beever E, Glazebrook C. A pilot randomised controlled study of the mental health first aid eLearning course with UK medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18:45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McConville J, McAleer R, Hahne A. Mindfulness training for health profession students — the effect of mindfulness training on psychological well-being, learning and clinical performance of health professional students: a systematic review of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials. Explore. 2017;13(1):26–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gallego-Gómez JI, Balanza S, Leal-Llopis J, García-Méndez JA, Oliva-Pérez J, Doménech-Tortosa J, et al. Effectiveness of music therapy and progressive muscle relaxation in reducing stress before exams and improving academic performance in nursing students: a randomized trial. Nurse Educ Today. 2020;84:104217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sahranavard S, Esmaeili A, Salehiniya H, Behdani S. The effectiveness of group training of cognitive behavioral therapy-based stress management on anxiety, hardiness and self-efficacy in female medical students. J Edu Health Promot. 2019;8:49.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Givens JL, Tjia J. Depressed medical students’ use of mental health services and barriers to use. Acad Med. 2002;77:918–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chand SP, Chibnall JT, Slavin SJ. Cognitive behavioral therapy for maladaptive perfectionism in medical students: a preliminary investigation. Acad Psychiatry. 2018;42:58–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kudva KG, SEI H, Gupta AK, Kurokawa S, Liu BS, MVC A-V, et al. Stigma in mental illness: Perspective from eight Asian nations. Asia-Pacific Psychiatr. 2020:e12380.

  16. Wang YC, Lin YT, Liu CM, Hwang TJ, Hsieh MH, Chien YL, et al. Stigmas toward psychosis-related clinical features among the general public in Taiwan. Asia-Pacific Psychiatr. 2019:e12370.

  17. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the Beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995;33(3):335–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lu S, Hu SQ, Guan YH, Xiao J, Cai D, Gao ZH, et al. Measurement Invariance of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 Across Gender in a Sample of Chinese University Students. Front Psychol. 2018;9:2064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lian R, Yang LX, Wu LH. Relationship between professional commitment and learning burnout of undergraduates and scales developing. Acta Psychol Sin. 2005;37(5):632–6.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang M, Guan H, Li YZ, Xing CX, Rui B. Academic burnout and professional self-concept of nursing students: a cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Today. 2019;77:27–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ling L, Qin S, Shen LF. An investigation about learning burnout in medical college students and its influencing factors. Int J Nurs Sci. 2014;1:117–20.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess. 1985;49:71–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang QH, Wang L, Shi M, Li XL, Liu R, Liu J, et al. Empathy, burnout, life satisfaction, correlations and associated socio-demographic factors among Chinese undergraduate medical students: an exploratory cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19:341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Strauss AL, Corbin JM. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Adhikari A, Dutta A, Sapkota S, Chapagain A, Aryal A, Pradhan A. Prevalence of poor mental health among medical students in Nepal: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17:232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Muzafar Y, Khan HH, Ashraf H, Hussain W, Sajid H, Tahir M, et al. Burnout and its associated factors in medical students of Lahore, Pakistan. Cureus. 2015;7(11):e390.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Semple D, Smith R. Oxford handbook of psychiatry. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 279–317.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schwenk TL, Davis L, Wimsatt LA. Depression, stigma, and suicidal ideation in medical students. JAMA. 2010;304:1181–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Schomerus G, Matschinger H, Angermeyer MC. The stigma of psychiatric treatment and help-seeking intentions for depression. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009;259:298–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tonkin AL, Taverner D, Latte J, Doecke C. The Effect of an Interactive Tutorial on the Prescribing Performance of Senior Medical Students. Med Educ Online. 2006;11:9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Vaughan JI, Jeffery HE, Raynes-Greenow C, Gordon A, Hirst J, Hill DA, et al. A method for developing standardised interactive education for complex clinical guidelines. BMC Med Educ. 2012;12:108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. De Jong Z, van Nies JAB, Peters SWM, Vink S, Dekker FW, Scherpbier A. Interactive seminars or small group tutorials in preclinical medical education: results of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2010;10:79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Blewett EL, Kisamore JL. Evaluation of an interactive, case-based review session in teaching medical microbiology. BMC Med Educ. 2009;9:56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cendan JC, Silver M, Ben-David K. Changing the student clerkship from traditional lectures to small group case-based sessions benefits the student and the faculty. J Surg Educ. 2011;68(2):117–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sawarynski KE, Baxa DM. Utilization of an online module bank for a research training curriculum: development, implementation, evolution, evaluation, and lessons learned. Med Educ Online. 2019;24:1611297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chin RYK, Tjahjono R, Rutledge MJR, Lambert T, Deboever N. The evaluation of e-learning resources as an adjunct to otolaryngology teaching: a pilot study. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19:181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang XQ, Zhang BS, Wang MD. Application of a classroom-based positive psychology education course for Chinese medical students to increase their psychological well-being: a pilot study. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20:323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the lecturers of CSMHEC and the research investigators as well as the students for their participation

Funding

This study was funded by Liaoning Higher Education Research Program (LQNR201705). The funder played no role in the design of the study or collection, analysis, interpretation of data, or in the writing of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. English Department, School of Fundamental Sciences, China Medical University, No. 77 Puhe Road, Shenyang North New Area, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, People’s Republic of China

    Qinghua Wang

  2. Department of Psychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, China Medical University, No. 77 Puhe Road, Shenyang North New Area, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, People’s Republic of China

    Tianjiao Du

Authors
  1. Qinghua Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tianjiao Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

QHW was in charge of the study design, questionnaire survey, drafting and revising the manuscript. TJD made substantial intellectual contributions to the conception of the study, analyses of the data and draft of the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tianjiao Du.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of China Medical University and every medical student who agreed to participate filled out questionnaires and the informed consent form online.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Content on interpersonal skills integrated into CSMHEC.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Q., Du, T. Implementation of the college student mental health education course (CSMHEC) in undergraduate medical curriculum: effects and insights. BMC Med Educ 20, 505 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02438-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02438-1

Keywords

BMC Medical Education

ISSN: 1472-6920

Contact us