Skip to main content

Table 2 Patient demographic and clinical characteristics

From: Modified paramedian versus conventional paramedian technique in the residency training: an observational study

 

Conventional Method

Modified Method

p value*

Spinal Group (n)

N = 128

N = 128

 

Age (years)

30.17 ± 2.53

30.05 ± 2.61

0.697

Height (cm)

159.22 ± 2.78

159.69 ± 2.86

0.185

Weight (kg)

63.98 ± 4.13

64.23 ± 4.27

0.634

BMI (kg/m2)

25.23 ± 1.38

25.18 ± 1.36

0.754

Parity, n (%)

  

0.617

Nulliparous

62 (48.44)

66 (51.56)

 

Multiparous

66 (51.56)

62 (48.44)

 

Epidural group (n)

N = 77

N = 77

 

Age (years)

30.14 ± 2.22

29.92 ± 2.38

0.553

Height (cm)

159.86 ± 2.71

160.04 ± 2.84

0.685

Weight (kg)

64.34 ± 3.78

64.39 ± 4.18

0.936

BMI (kg/m2)

25.17 ± 1.19

25.13 ± 1.30

0.844

Parity, n (%)

  

0.629

 Nulliparous

39 (50.65)

36 (46.75)

 

 Multiparous

38 (49.35)

41 (53.25)

 

Combined group(n)

N = 53

N = 55

 

Age (years)

30.02 ± 2.26

30 ± 2

0.800

Height (cm)

159.64 ± 2.90

160 ± 3

0.248

Weight (kg)

64 ± 4

64 ± 4

0.401

BMI (kg/m2)

25 ± 1.2

25 ± 1.1

0.908

Parity, n (%)

  

0.847

Nulliparous

27 (50.94)

27 (49.09)

 

Multiparous

26 (49.06)

28 (50.91)

 
  1. Values are the mean ± standard deviation or number (percentage)
  2. *Differences between groups were evaluated by the two sample t-test or χ2 test
  3. Abbreviation: BMI body mass index
  4. *Note that the minimum sample size for conventional and modified method groups were defined without patients’ information so that an estimated prevalence of 50% for modified method compared to conventional method