Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Modified paramedian versus conventional paramedian technique in the residency training: an observational study

Original Submission
22 May 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
31 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John D Mitchell
24 Oct 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Liang Zhu
25 Nov 2019 Author responded Author comments - Shih Hong Chen
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Nov 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Dec 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John D Mitchell
4 Jan 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Liang Zhu
19 Feb 2020 Author responded Author comments - Shih Hong Chen
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Feb 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Feb 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Liang Zhu
27 Feb 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John D Mitchell
28 Apr 2020 Author responded Author comments - Shih Hong Chen
Resubmission - Version 4
28 Apr 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 4
29 May 2020 Author responded Author comments - Shih Hong Chen
Resubmission - Version 5
29 May 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 5
11 Jun 2020 Author responded Author comments - Shih Hong Chen
Resubmission - Version 6
11 Jun 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
23 Jun 2020 Editorially accepted
2 Jul 2020 Article published 10.1186/s12909-020-02118-0

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page