Skip to content


  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

How physicians perceive and utilize information from a teratogen information service: The Motherisk Program

BMC Medical Education20044:6

  • Received: 28 October 2003
  • Accepted: 05 April 2004
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports



Teratogen information services have been developed around the world to disseminate information regarding the safety of maternal exposures during pregnancy. The Motherisk Program in Toronto, Canada, fields thousands of these inquiries per year. Our primary objective was to evaluate the perception and utilization of information received from us by physicians. Our secondary objective was to examine their information seeking behavior, in particular regarding teratogen information.


A one page survey was sent to physicians who had called Motherisk for information concerning pregnancy exposures in the previous 30 days for three months. Among the questions that were asked were demographics, which included gender, years in practice, specialty, information resources, and how they utilized the information received from Motherisk.


We received 118/200 completed questionnaires (59% response rate). The mean age of the respondents was: 42 ± 9 years, mean years of practice was: 14 ± 8 years, males: 46(38%) and females 72(62%) and 95(80%) were family physicians. 56(48%) researched their question prior to calling Motherisk, 106(91%) and passed on the information received to their patient verbatim. The top four resources for information were: 1) The CPS (PDR), 2) textbooks, 3) journals and 4) colleagues. Only 8% used the Medline for gathering information.


Physicians feel that a teratogen information service is an important component in the management of women exposed to drugs, chemicals, radiation and infections diseases etc. during pregnancy. Despite the advent of the electronic age, a minority of the physicians in our survey elected to use electronic means to seek information.


  • teratogen information
  • physician
  • sources of information
  • perception of risk


Subsequent to the thalidomide tragedy, teratogen information services were developed in response to the public and health professionals need for evidence-based information regarding the safety/risk of exposures to drugs, chemicals, radiation and infectious diseases etc, during pregnancy and lactation. The vast majority of these services are telephone information lines, with a minority who see the women in a clinic setting [1]. Because of the paucity of this type of information, several of the centers, often in collaboration with other services around the world, also began to carry out outcome studies on the safety/risk of various exposures, which have been and continue to be published in peer reviewed journals. Over the years as a group, they have also sought ways of improving how this research is carried out [2]. This collaborative research has added substantially to the evidence based information, culminating over the years in a relatively large body of research in this field, which in turn can be transferred to the women and their health care providers [312].

The Motherisk Program is a teratogen information service that has been operating at The Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Canada since 1985. Over the years there has been a steady increase in the number of calls to our service per year, with 31,000 in 2002. Adding to this number of documented calls, there are approximately 12,000 callers per year who listen to our recorded information and do not patch through to a counselor, thus bringing up the overall total number of calls the service receives to approximately 43,000 calls per year. We also see between 450–500 women per year in our clinic, where a letter is sent to her attending physician following her visit, documenting the evidence based information that was given to her regarding her exposure and any other reproductive risks.

Approximately 3000 of the telephone calls a year are directly from physicians. However, 90% of all the callers have been referred to our line by their physicians, as our service is very well known in Toronto and surrounding areas, as well as a substantial number of calls from the rest of Canada and the US. We have heard from many of our callers that it is standard practice during a pregnant women's first visit to her physician after confirmation of pregnancy, to be given Motherisk's phone number in case she has any questions regarding exposures during pregnancy.

The physicians who call us, have told us that they had heard about us mostly from word of mouth from their colleagues or quite frequently from having read the reviews which are published monthly in The Canadian Family Physician journal as "The Motherisk Update". These reviews evolve from actual questions asked by physicians using our fax service. Recently we published a history of our questions and answers and found that the most common questions physicians ask are in order of frequency: 1) antidepressants, 2) anti-epileptics, 3) antihistamines [13]. The physicians that call us on the telephone do not receive written information as time constraints do not allow, however if they request documentation, they are referred to our fax service. Most appear to be satisfied with the information they receive over the telephone, because it is rare that there is a request for written information following a telephone call.

There is a relative lack of published research in the literature examining physicians information seeking behavior in general and in particular reproductive toxicology. Studies carried out in the US, Canada, Norway, Australia and Switzerland, found that little had changed in physician information seeking behavior over the years despite the increased access to medical information. In all studied countries, use of electronic means to seek information was low and most physicians relied heavily on word of mouth from their colleagues, their own experience, drug product monographs, textbooks and journals [1418].

Over the years we have delivered information to thousands of physicians via the telephone, but have never followed up to assess how they perceive the information received, or in turn how they use this information to counsel their pregnant patients. Our objectives were to assess utilization of information received, as well as information seeking behavior, in particular teratogen information.


The Motherisk Program has been participating in a course for medical students for the past ten years, run by the University of Toronto Medical School entitled "Determinants of Health in the Community" which aims to teach 2nd year medical students about the inter-relationships between health issues and social determinants of health, which involves working with community agencies. The 2002–2003 student, developed a one page questionnaire, (see additional file 1) which was faxed to the physicians. The form consisted of 12 questions which could be filled out in less than 5 minutes following pilot testing. The first 6 questions dealt with demographics, such as age, gender, speciality, length of practice and numbers of pregnant women seen each year. The next 3 questions asked about information seeking behaviour. We listed eight resources to choose from: medline (PUBMED), colleagues, drug companies, textbooks, peer reviewed journals, media, Compendium of Pharmaceuticals and Specialties (CPS), which is the Canadian equivalent to the Physicians Desk Reference (PDI) in the USA and patients. They were then asked to rank in order their most frequently used resources. The latter part of the questionnaire asked several questions pertaining to the information that was received from Motherisk and how it was perceived by them in terms of clinical importance. At the end of the questionnaire, two lines were left empty and in this space participants were invited to make any additional comments. We chose to use a convenience sample of physicians who had called Motherisk requesting information in December 2002, January and February 2003. They were faxed the questionnaire within 1–2 weeks after their telephone call to Motherisk. To improve the response rate, the physician was sent a reminder fax 1 week after the first one.

Descriptive statistics in numbers and percentages were used to describe results.


200 questionnaires were sent out to physicians who had called the program over a three month period and 118 were returned, with a response rate of 59%. They originated from all over Canada, with 46 from Toronto and surrounding areas, 38 from other parts of Ontario and the remaining 34 distributed throughout the rest of the country from all provinces. The demographics of the physicians are described in (Table 1). Most of the respondents (91%) passed on the information to their patients verbatim, despite the fact that almost half had researched the question prior to calling Motherisk. 12 of the respondents reported that they suggested a lower dose of the drug they prescribed to their pregnant patients and most of them reported the information they received was not different than they had expected. The top four sources for information were 1) The CPS, (PDR), 2) textbooks, 3) journals, 4) colleagues. (Table 2) Only 8% described the medline as being their number one source of information.
Table 1

Demographics of respondents N = 118

Age: mean ± SD

42 ± 9 years


female = 62% male = 38%


family physicians = 80%


OBS/Gynecology = 9%


other 11%

Years of practice: mean ± SD

14 ± 9 years

Table 2

Perception and utilization of information N= 118



Research prior to calling Motherisk


Was information sufficient


Was information passed on verbatim to patient


Was information different than expected


Did you lower dose of drug


Most of the physicians (89%) made comments at the bottom of the questionnaire, saying the services of Motherisk was very valuable to them and how they routinely pass on the telephone number to their patients. Several mentioned that the information from Motherisk is documented in the patient's chart as "information given to patient as per Motherisk".


To our knowledge, this is the first study of its kind to evaluate physicians perceptions and utilization of information received from a teratogen information service.

There were several interesting findings. Half of the respondents described researching their question first and almost all described the information not different than they expected. These findings lead us to believe that this group of physicians are perhaps not necessarily calling Motherisk for new information, but rather for reassurance. This confirms the findings of a study published where the authors found that physicians consult on average at least 3 sources before adopting a practice [19].

The finding of the 10% who advised their patient to lower the dosage of the drug, reflect a trend to lower drug dosage, often to ineffective levels during pregnancy, which we have found in other studies we carried out regarding antidepressant use during pregnancy. We never advise physicians to lower the dosage of a particular drug, we have found that they counsel their patients due to fears of teratogenicity and feel if the dose is reduced this may lower the teratogenic risk [20, 21].

The findings regarding physicians information seeking behavior, also confirmed the results in other studies examining such behavior. Previous researchers found that while more than 90% of physicians owned a computer, less than 10% were using them to access Medline [1418]. We were aware that physicians were not using this service, because often women who call us will tell us that they called their physician prior to contacting Motherisk and was told that there was no information on the safety of a particular drug in pregnancy. Later the counselor would find a published study on the Medline and we would have to assume that the physician did not attempt to look up the information.

It was also interesting to note that far more female physicians called us than males; 62% versus 38%. It is difficult to explain why this was so, one of the reasons (we have been told this by our callers), could be that more women today choose a physician that is female, so consequently more females would be the attending physician when a woman becomes pregnant.

There are several limitations to this study, mainly the sample size is small and our response rate was not extremely high (59%). It could be that the physicians who did not return the questionnaire or who do not call Motherisk for information may be very different from the respondents. They may be the ones who are consulting electronic means for information and feel comfortable with the information they have in counseling pregnant women on exposures in pregnancy. Another limitation, is that this survey was completed by physicians who were inquiring about teratogen information and the results may not be applicable to physician information seeking behaviors in general.

In summary, the results of our survey furnished us with information that allows us to better understand how physicians perceive this type of service and how they transfer the information to their pregnant patients. It was reassuring to know that physicians respect and trust the data that is given to them by a teratogen information service, which was evidenced by most of them passing on the information verbatim to their pregnant patients.


Authors’ Affiliations

The Motherisk Program, The Hospital for Sick Children Toronto, Canada
The University of Toronto Medical School, Toronto, Canada


  1. Leen-Mitchell M, Martinez L, Gallegos S, Robertson J, Carey JC: Mini-review: A history of organized teratology information services in North America. Teratology. 2000, 61 (4): 314-7. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9926(200004)61:4<314::AID-TERA11>3.0.CO;2-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Chambers CD, Braddock SR, Briggs GG, Einarson A, Johnson YR, Miller RK, Polifka JE, Robinson LK, Stepanuk K, Lyons Jones K: Postmarketing surveillance for human teratogenicity: a model approach. Teratology. 2001, 64 (5): 252-61. 10.1002/tera.1071.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Einarson A, Shuhaiber S, Koren G: Effects of antibacterials on the unborn child: what is known and how should this influence prescribing. Paediatr Drugs. 2001, 3 (11): 803-16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Jones KL, Johnson KA, Dick LM, Felix RJ, Kao KK, Chambers CD: Pregnancy outcomes after first trimester exposure to phentermine/fenfluramine. Teratology. 2002, 65 (3): 125-30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Loebstein R, Addis A, Ho E, Andreou R, Sage S, Donnenfeld AE, Schick B, Bonati M, Moretti M, Lalkin A, Pastuszak A, Koren G: Pregnancy outcomefollowing gestational exposure to fluoroquinolones: a multicenter, prospective controlled study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998, 42 (6): 1336-9.Google Scholar
  6. Kulin NA, Pastuszak A, Sage SR, Schick-Boschetto B, Spivey G, Feldkamp M, Ormond K, Matsui D, Stein-Schechman AK, Cook L, Brochu J, Rieder M, Koren G: Pregnancy outcome following maternal use of the new selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: a prospective controlled multicenter study. JAMA. 1998, 279 (8): 609-10. 10.1001/jama.279.8.609.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Einarson A, Fatoye B, Sarkar M, Lavigne SV, Brochu J Chambers C, Mastroiacovo P, Mastroiacovo P, Addis A, Matsui D, Schuler L, Einarson TR, Koren G: Pregnancy outcome following gestational exposure to venlafaxine: a multicenter prospective controlled study. Am J Psychiatry. 2001, 158 (10): 1728-30. 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.10.1728.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Bailey B, Addis A, Lee A, Sanghvi K, Mastroiacovo P, Mazzone T, Bonati M, Paolini C, Garbis H, Val T, De Souza CF, Matsui D, Schechtman AS, Conover B, Lau M, Koren G: Cisapride use during human pregnancy: a prospective, controlled multicenter study. Dig Dis Sci. 1997, 42 (9): 1848-52. 10.1023/A:1018898707449.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Magee LA, Schick B, Donnenfeld AE, Sage SR, Conover B, Cook L, McElhatton PR, Schmidt MA, Koren G: The safety of calcium channel blockers in human pregnancy: a prospective, multicenter cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996, 174 (3): 823-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Koren G, Pastuszak A, Ito S: Drugs in pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1998, 338 (16): 1128-37. 10.1056/NEJM199804163381607.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Shuhaiber S, Einarson A, Radde IC, Sarkar M, Koren G: A prospective-controlled study of pregnant veterinary staff exposed to inhaled anesthetics and x- rays. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2002, 15 (4): 363-73.Google Scholar
  12. Pastuszak AL, Levy M, Schick B, Zuber C, Feldkamp M, Gladstone J, Bar-Levy F, Jackson E, Donnenfeld A, Meschino W, et al: Outcome after maternal varicella infection in the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1994, 330 (13): 901-905. 10.1056/NEJM199403313301305.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Einarson A, Portnoi G, Koren G: Update on motherisk updates. Seven years of questions and answers. Can Fam Physician. 2002, 48: 1301-4.Google Scholar
  14. Gorman P: Information needs in primary care: a survey of rural and non rural primary care physicians. Medinfo. 2001, 10 (Pt 1): 338-42.Google Scholar
  15. Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Walker AE, Thomas RE: Changing physicians'behavior: what works and thoughts on getting more things to work. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2002, 22 (4): 237-43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Forsetlund L, Talseth KO, Bradley P, Nordheim L, Bjorndal A: Many aslip between cup and lip. Process evaluation of a program to promote and support evidence-based public health practice. Eval Rev. 2003, 27 (2): 179-209. 10.1177/0193841X02250528.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Askew DA, Clavarino AM, Glasziou PP, Del Mar CB: General practice research: attitudes and involvement of Queensland general practitioners. Med J Aust. 2002, 177 (2): 74-7.Google Scholar
  18. Koller M, Grutter R, Peltenburg M, Fischer JE, Steurer J: Use of the Internet by medical doctors in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly. 2001, 131 (17–18): 251-4.Google Scholar
  19. Lockyer J, Jennett P, Parboosingh J, Maes W: Raising questions in clinical practice. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 1988, 8 (1): 21-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Jasper JD, Miropolsky Vlad, Varma Bindiya, Einarson Adrienne: Determinants of physician prescribing and non-prescribing of antidepressant medication during pregnancy. (Abstract) OTIS meeting. 2002, June , Scottsdale, Arizona, USAGoogle Scholar
  21. Bonari L, Einarson A, Jasper JD, Einarson TR, Koren G: Determinants of women's decision making, regarding the use of antidepressants during pregnancy. (Abstract) The North American Society for Psychosocial Obstetrics and Gynecology. 31st Annual meeting, February 19th–22nd. 2003, , Lihue, HawaiiGoogle Scholar
  22. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:


© Einarson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.