Peer Review reports
From: The perceived relevance, utility and retention of basic sciences in general practice
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10 Apr 2024 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 22 Apr 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 23 Apr 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Valerie Minogue |
| 29 Apr 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ameya Ashok Hasamnis |
| 29 Apr 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Amber Heck |
| 14 Jun 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Bunmi S. Malau-Aduli |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 14 Jun 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 21 Jun 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Bunmi S. Malau-Aduli |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 21 Jun 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 28 Jun 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Valerie Minogue |
| 5 Jul 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 8 Jul 2024 | Editorially accepted | |
| 29 Jul 2024 | Article published | 10.1186/s12909-024-05750-2 |
You can find further information about peer review here.