Table 5 shows the items’ distractor efficiency, difficulty index, and discrimination index (n = 59)
DE | DIF | DIS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interpretation | NU | % | Interpretation | NU | % | Interpretation | NU | % |
Excellent | 22 | 37.3 | Difficult | 0 | 0.0 | Excellent | 16 | 72.7 |
Acceptable | 20 | 90.9 | Good | 0 | 0.0 | |||
Easy | 2 | 9.1 | Acceptable | 3 | 13.6 | |||
- | - | - | None | 3 | 13.6 | |||
Moderate | 13 | 22 | Difficult | 7 | 53.8 | Excellent | 8 | 61.5 |
Acceptable | 6 | 46.2 | Good | 0 | 0.0 | |||
Easy | 0 | 0.0 | Acceptable | 4 | 30.8 | |||
- | - | - | None | 1 | 7.7 | |||
Good | 22 | 37.3 | Difficult | 5 | 22.7 | Excellent | 17 | 77.3 |
Acceptable | 17 | 77.3 | Good | 0 | 0.0 | |||
Easy | 0 | 0.0 | Acceptable | 3 | 13.6 | |||
- | - | - | None | 2 | 9.1 | |||
Poor | 2 | 3.4 | Difficult | 2 | 100.0 | Excellent | 0 | 0.0 |
Acceptable | 0 | 0.0 | Good | 0 | 0.0 | |||
Easy | 0 | 0.0 | Acceptable | 0 | 0.0 | |||
- | - | - | Non | 2 | 100.0 | |||