Skip to main content

Table 3 Evaluation of the simulated experience and values of validation index, according to medical undergraduate students

From: Validation of clinical simulation scenarios for the teaching of soft skills in child-centered care

Item

3

4

5

I-CVI

 

(n) %

(n) %

(n) %

 

Q1 – Prior knowledge of the previous modules helped in understanding the scenarios

(1) 6

(6) 33

(11) 61

0.94

Q2 – The materials provided for theoretical framework were sufficient to support the solution of the scenarios

(1) 6

(8) 44

(9) 50

0.94

Q3 – The demonstration of support and the procedural support information were essential for the achievement of the objectives

(1) 6

(5) 28

(12) 67

0.94

Q4 – The simulation corresponded to the proposed theme

-

-

(18) 100

1.00

Q5 – A safe and respectful environment has been established

-

(1) 6

(17) 94

1.00

Q6 – The didactic resources used were adequate

-

(4) 24

(13) 76

1.00

Q7 – I felt motivated to take part in the simulation

(1) 5.5

(7) 38.8

(10) 55.5

0.94

Q8 – After the simulations I feel more prepared for the professional exercise

-

(6) 33

(12) 67

1.00

Q9 – I rate as positive the feedback I received during the debriefing

-

(3) 17

(15) 83

1.00

Q10 – The objectives and goals of the simulation were explained in the debriefing

-

(2) 11

(16) 89

1.00

S-CVI/Ave

   

0.98

  1. 1 – Totally disagree; 2 – Partially disagree; 3 – Neither agree nor disagree (indifferent); 4 – Partially agree; 5 – Totally agree. I-CVI – represents the content validity index regarding each evaluated item. S-CVI/Ave is the average of the I-CVIs in each domain. An I-CVI ≥ 0.8. and S-CVI/AVE ≥ 0.9 were considered for validation