Table 3 Perceived consequences for research misconduct among residents (n = 6200)
Variables | n(%) | M ± SD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Very strong influence | Strong influence | Moderate influence | A little influence | No influence | ||
Personal academic reputation | 1607(25.9) | 2219(35.8) | 720(11.6) | 756(12.2) | 898(14.5) | 3.46 ± 1.37 |
The reputation of the institution and academic community | 1846(29.8) | 2249(36.3) | 780(12.6) | 818(13.2) | 507(8.2) | 3.66 ± 1.25 |
The normal progression of research activities | 1783(28.8) | 2292(37.0) | 749(12.1) | 647(10.4) | 729(11.8) | 3.61 ± 1.32 |
The rational allocation of research resources | 1684(27.2) | 2435(39.3) | 718(11.6) | 746(12.0) | 616(9.9) | 3.62 ± 1.28 |
The entire academic environment | 2034(32.8) | 2016(32.5) | 862(13.9) | 714(11.5) | 574(9.3) | 3.68 ± 1.29 |
Public trust in researchers | 1714(27.6) | 2190(35.3) | 762(12.3) | 718(11.6) | 816(13.2) | 3.53 ± 1.35 |
Research integrity throughout the society | 1752(28.3) | 2284(36.8) | 770(12.4) | 752(12.1) | 642(10.4) | 3.61 ± 1.29 |
Total score | - | - | - | - | - | 25.16 ± 8.47 |