Skip to main content

Table 3 The multiple analysis of variance for evaluating the impact of factors on the total score of scales

From: Attitudes toward learning communication skills among Iranian medical students

Ā 

Important in MC

Excuse

Learning

Overconfidence

Ī’

P-value

Ī²

P-value

Ī²

P-value

Ī²

P-value

Gender (female vs. male)

2.51

<ā€‰0.001

0.92

0.003

1.31

<ā€‰0.001

0.41

0.075

Ethnicity (others vs. Fars)

Ā Ā 

āˆ’0.61

0.092

āˆ’0.81

0.017

Ā Ā 

Family burden (More children vs. single)

4.84

<ā€‰0.001

1.44

0.018

0.84

0.135

Ā Ā 

High school field (experimental Sciences vs. mathematics)

āˆ’1.42

0.105

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

0.45

0.150

Pre university field (experimental Sciences vs. mathematics)

3.23

0.055

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

High school Type (others vs. federal)

āˆ’3.64

0.019

āˆ’1.82

0.021

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

Pre university Type (others vs. federal)

4.32

0.008

2.07

0.012

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

Presence in communication skills courses (yes vs. no)

1.96

0.004

2.12

<ā€‰0.001

0.50

0.123

Ā Ā 

Self-report from communication skills (good vs excellent)

āˆ’1.25

0.314

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

Self-report from communication skills (medium vs excellent)

āˆ’2.55

0.047

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

Self-report from communication skills (poor vs excellent)

āˆ’3.70

0.017

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

Need to further learning (yes vs. no)

4.33

<ā€‰0.001

Ā Ā 

1.37

0.001

Ā Ā 

Motherā€™s education (high school vs. middle school)

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

0.39

0.299

Motherā€™s education (academic vs. middle school)

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

0.71

0.052

  1. Variables were selected by using the Generalized Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) in stepwise method