Table 3 FC, OSCE questionnaire results
From: Evaluation of the effectiveness of using flipped classroom in puncture skills teaching
Content | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1: I understand the OSCE assessment model very well | 30/64 (46.88%) | 27/64 (42.19%) | 7/64 (10.93%) | 0 | 0 |
Q2: I believe that OSCE is beneficial to the overall competence of medical students in internship | 36/64 (56.25%) | 22/64 (34.38%) | 6/64 (9.37%) | 0 | 0 |
Q3: I believe that OSCE is a true reflection of the clinical competence of medical students | 26/64 (40.63%) | 29/64 (45.31%) | 9/64 (14.06%) | 0 | 0 |
Q4: OSCE is more innovative and objective than traditional exams | 34/64 (53.13%) | 25/64 (39.06%) | 5/64 (7.81%) | 0 | 0 |
Q5:I really like the way OSCE is evaluated | 29/64 (45.31%) | 26/64 (40.63%) | 8/64 (12.50%) | 0 | 1/64 (1.56%) |
Q6: OSCE needs to be extended to the residency exam | 26/64 (40.62%) | 24/64 (37.50%) | 11/64 (17.19%) | 2/64 (3.13%) | 1/64 (1.56%) |
Q7: Through discussion and analysis in class, I have a deeper and more comprehensive grasp of knowledge | 11/29 (37.93%) | 17/29 (58.62%) | 1/29 (3.45%) | 0 | 0 |
Q8: Compared with TC, I think FC is more prominent in the improvement of students’ self-learning ability | 10/29 (34.48%) | 17/29 (58.62%) | 2/29 (6.90%) | 0 | 0 |
Q9: I would like our hospital to continue teaching in the FC model | 10/29 (34.48%) | 13/29 (44.83%) | 5/29 (17.24%) | 0 | 1/29 (3.45%) |