Skip to main content

Table 2 Differences in non-consensus items among levels of anesthesiologists in each round of Delphi study

From: Indigenizing and co-producing the ACGME anesthesiology milestone in Taiwan: a Delphi study and subgroup analysis

Domain

R

JVS

SVS

χ2

V

p

Round 1

   

29.20

0.185

< 0.001

NSNC

41 a (14.44%)

22 b (7.72%)

6 c (2.11%)

   

Consensus

244 a (85.56%)

263 b (92.28%)

279c(97.89%)

   

Round 2

   

12.67

0.122

0.013

NSNC

5 a (1.76%)

2a (0.7%)

0 a (0%)

   

SNC

5 a (1.76%)

1 a (0.35%)

0 a (0%)

   

Consensus

273 a (96.48%)

280 a,b (98.95%)

283 b (100%)

   

Round 3

   

9.07

0.103

0.059

NSNC

0 a (0%)

1 a (0.35%)

0 a (0%)

   

SNC

5 a (1.76%)

1 a (0.35%)

0 a (0%)

   

Consensus

279 a (98.24%)

282 a (99.3%)

284 a (100%)

   
  1. Note. Each subscript letter denotes a subset of ID categories whose column proportions do not differ significantly from each other at the 0.05 level. V, Cramer’s V. SNC, stable non-consensus. NSNC, non-stable non-consensus