Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | BMC Medical Education

Fig. 2

From: Delivering medical leadership training through the Healthcare Leadership Academy: a four year analysis

Fig. 2

HLA scholarship programme course evaluation. A Average ranking of the benefits of the HLA scholarship programme (1 = highest, 12 = lowest. B Course quality responses. C Areas of course improvement feedback. D Upset plot to identify any consistently-identified areas of improvement of the course. E Most useful aspect of the course from selected major domains of mentoring, networking, and speakers. F Upset plot indicating overlap of domains most valued by participants. G Upset plot outlining useful areas of course valued based on training stage

Back to article page

BMC Medical Education

ISSN: 1472-6920

Contact us