Skip to main content

Table 1 Key characteristics of included studies

From: The impact of train-the-trainer programs on the continued professional development of nurses: a systematic review

Author (year), country

Objective/aim

Study design

Study population and setting

Outcomes

Results

Direction of effecta

Trainee (Transfer of knowledge, skills or practice from trainer to trainee)

 Anderson et al. [37]

USA

To implement and evaluate a palliative care professional development program for ICU bedside nurses.

Quasi-experi-mental

428 nurses

10 ICUs and 5 health centers

Skills: Percentage self-reporting ‘very good’ or ‘excellent’ skills on 15 tasks pre- and post- training.

Improved skillsb: Mean percentage change: 35.07, P < 0.01

Beneficial (skills)

 de Beuers et al. [33]

Netherlands

Examine the effect of a TTT intervention and implementation as usual versus only implementation as usual

Cluster RTC

Intervention group: 121 mental health nurses

Control group: 51 mental health nurses

Psychiatric departments

Knowledge: Mean score on trainees’ self-evaluation of patients’ suicidal behavior (7 items, total score range, 7–35)

Practice: Mean percent correct on 125 items on guideline adherence; correct responses to 5 videoclips of interactions between healthcare professionals and suicidal characters (pre- and 3 months post-training, intervention vs. control).

Improved knowledge: Mean difference 2.7 (95% CI: 1.7–3.8, P < 0.001)

Improved practice: Mean difference 6.6 (95% CI: 3.2–10.0, P < 0.001)

(both outcomes adjusted for department and baseline score)

Beneficial (knowledge)

Beneficial (practice)

 Kalisch et al. [13]

USA

To test the impact of a TTT intervention on the level of satisfaction with nursing teamwork and the amount of missed nursing care.

Quasi-experi-mental

242 nurses

Inpatient hospital units

Knowledge: Mean number of correct answers (range, 0–15) to knowledge test pre, post and 2 months after training.

Improved knowledge: Mean difference pre/post: 0.51 (95% CI: 0.19; 0.84)

2 months: 0.40 (95% CI: 0.06; 0.74)

P = 0.005

Beneficial (knowledge)

 Nyamathi et al. [6]

India

To evaluate the effectiveness of a TTT program in enhancing knowledge of prevention, transmission, and treatment of HIV and counseling among nurses in a major government-sponsored medical hospital in Delhi, India.

Quasi-experi-mental

100 nurses

Tertiary-care public hospital

Knowledge: Mean score (range, 0–21) on 21 items testing knowledge pre- and post-training.

Improved knowledge:

Pre-training: 12.8 (SD, 4)

Post-training: 16.4 (SD, 4.15), P < 0.001

Beneficial (knowledge)

 Ramberg and Wasserman [34]

Sweden

To assess whether implementation of suicide preventive activities in psychiatric healthcare clinics by key persons had any effect on the staff’s perception of being sufficiently trained for their work with patients who had attempted suicide, and their perception of clarity in this work.

Quasi-experimental with control group

Intervention group:

103 nurses and nursing assistants

Control group:

135 nurses and nursing assistants

11 psychiatric healthcare clinics

Knowledge: Percent of self-ratings of being ‘sufficiently trained’ and perceiving their ‘work made difficult by lacking knowledge’ pre and 1.5 years into the 2-year program.

Improved knowledge ‘Sufficiently trained’ self-ratings among nurses and nursing assistants, pre/post:

Intervention group: 52.3/54.5, P = 1.00; 23.7/47.5, P = 0.003

Control group: 45.8/43.8, P = 1.00, 37.2/31.0, P = 0.458

Decreased ‘lack of knowledge’ among nursing assistants, pre/post:

Intervention group: 52.5/30.5, P = 0.01

Control group: 54.0/50.6, NS

Pre/post between-group difference, P < 0.016

Beneficial (knowledge)

 Rholdon et al. [32]

USA

To evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of a simulation-learning based training using a TTT model on the acquisition and retention of knowledge about infant safe sleep practices among nursing staff employed at a women’s and children’s hospital located in southwest Louisiana.

Quasi-experi-mental

74 nurses

Specialty women’s and children’s hospital

Knowledge: Mean score on 11-question pre/post knowledge test (KR-20 = 0.60)

Improved knowledge

Pre-training: 0.6

Post-training: 0.78

3 months after training: 0.81

P < 0.001

Beneficial (knowledge)

 Warming et al. [35]

Denmark

To evaluate the effect of a transfer technique education program alone (TTT) or in combination with physical fitness training compared with a control group following their usual routine.

Cluster RTC

Intervention group:

86 nurses

Control group:

51 nurses

11 wards at a university hospital

Knowledge: Mean score (range, n/a) on 4 items about what to do in four situations pre-training and 12 months later.

Increased knowledge, pre/post:

Intention-to-treat analysis

Interrvention group: 11.45/13.06, NS

Control group:10.8/11.91, NS

P values not reported

Per protocol analysis

Intervention group: 11.10/13.33

Control group: 10.78/ 11.90 at 12 months, P = 0.045

Beneficial (knowledge)

Trainers (transfer of knowledge or skills from master trainer to trainer)

 Smith et al. [31]

USA

Explore the generalizability of a geriatric mental health training program that was used successfully with a culturally homogeneous group of long-term care providers in the rural Midwest USA.

Quasi-experimental with control group

Trainers: 31 nurses

Trainees: 92 nurses and nurse aides

14 long-term care facilities

Control (direct trainer): 101 nurses and nurse aides

10 long term care facilities

Knowledge: Mean score on 77-item pre/post knowledge test

Increased knowledge, pre/post

Intention-to-treat analysis

Intervention group: 50.67/51.5, P = 0.51

Control group: 52.6/56.4, P < 0.005

Direct trainer superior to TTT, P < 0.0001

Beneficial (knowledge)

 Carta et al. [38]

Country not reported

To report on:

• a health education program on patient handling techniques carried out among nurses and healthcare assistants

• a TTT program to implement safer patient handling techniques within the framework of a multidisciplinary intervention.

Quasi-experi-mental

48 nurses

Hospital

Knowledge: Mean score (range unclear) on 20-item test pre- and 1 month post-training

Skills: Mean score (range, 0–30; three skills scored 0–10) based on observation pre- and 1 month post-training).

Improved knowledge, pre/post: 29.8/33.5, P < 0.05

Improved skills, pre/post:

Supine transfer board: 26.5/29.9, P < 0.05

Transfer holding belts: 11.1/27.4, NS

Hoist: 25.9/28.8, NS

Beneficial (knowledge)

Beneficial (skills)

 Karayurt et al. [36]

Turkey

To describe curriculum, development and evaluation of a breast cancer TTT program.

Quasi-experi-mental

82 nurses

Hospitals and community health centers

Knowledge: Mean score (range, 0–100) on 25-item knowledge test pre- and post-training.

Improved knowledge, pre/post: 55.7/80.1, P < 0.001

Beneficial (knowledge)

 Sinvani et al. [30]

USA

To describe and evaluate an innovative multicomponent delirium CAM-ICU champion education and training. program to improve delirium detection by critical care nurses across a large integrated health system.

Quasi-experi-mental

63 nurses

14 ICUs

Knowledge: Percent of correct completions on five delirium cases on 6-item questionnaire pre- and post-training.

Mean percent of correct completions improved 12.95% on 9 of 30 items (P < 0.05)

Beneficial (knowledge)

  1. Abbreviations: CAM Confusion assessment method, CI Confidence interval, HIV Human immunodeficiency virus, ICU Intensive care unit, NS Not statistically significant, SD Standard deviation
  2. aRegardless of statistical significance levels, the effect direction for each independent outcome was counted as beneficial if data indicated an improvement or not beneficial if data indicated a negative effect. This was also the case if TTT intervention was not superior in comparison with the control group
  3. bAnderson et al. [37] and Sinvani et al. [30] reported outcomes as results of each individual questionnaire item and multiple features of each case presented with no confidence intervals. For simplicity, we calculated the mean percentage change for items and cases for these studies. For Anderson et al. [37], we calculated the mean percentage change for each item. Sinvani et al. [30] reported a mean increase for each feature in each case, and the total mean was calculated directly from these