Skip to main content

Table 3 Students’ perspective of the simulation (n = 122)

From: Integrated virtual simulation and face-to-face simulation for clinical judgment training among undergraduate nursing students: a mixed-methods study

Scales/Domains

Score, Mean (SD)

t

p-value

Integrated (n = 61)

Simulation (n = 61)

1.Students’ satisfaction and self-confidence (SSS)

4.23 (0.386)

4.18 (0.429)

0.70

0.485

Student satisfaction

4.37 (0.493)

4.24 (0.541)

1.30

0.198

Self-confidence in Learning

4.15 (0.384)

4.14 (0.412)

0.11

0.910

2.Educational practice practices in simulation scale (EPSS)

4.33 (0.401)

4.24 (0.431)

1.16

0.250

Active learning

4.25 (0.435)

4.13 (0.498)

1.45

0.149

Collaboration

4.57 (0.487)

4.63 (0.456)

0.77

0.444

Diverse ways of learning

4.43 (0.442)

4.34 (0.642)

0.90

0.368

High expectations

4.37 (0.605)

4.31 (0.666)

0.50

0.619

3. Simulation Design Scale (SDS)

4.25 (0.387)

4.11 (0.443)

1.74

0.085

Objective/information

4.12 (0.570)

4.00 (0.671)

1.08

0.284

Support

4.23 (0.522)

4.31 (0.364)

1.79

0.077

Problem-solving

4.31 (0.364)

4.25 (0.423)

0.73

0.465

Feedback

4.41 (0.467)

4.30 (0.534)

1.22

0.226

Fidelity

4.09 (0.588)

3.81 (0.881)

2.06

0.042

  1. Integrated, the non-immersive virtual simulation and high-fidelity face-to-face simulation integrated program arm