Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of the mean difference of participants’ scores in each item and domain of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) between pre and post-test in two arms (n = 122)

From: Integrated virtual simulation and face-to-face simulation for clinical judgment training among undergraduate nursing students: a mixed-methods study

Items/Domain

Scores, Mean (SD)

t

p-value

Integrated (n = 61)

Simulation (n = 61)

1.Focused observations

1.44 (0.807)

0.98 (0.764)

3.23

0.002

2.Recognizing deviations

1.25 (0.722)

0.82 (0.619)

3.50

0.001

3.Information seeking

1.07 (0.727)

0.80 (0.401)

2.47

0.015

Effective discovery processes

1.25 (0.512)

0.87 (0.351)

4.82

 < 0.001

4.Prioritizing data

1.07 (0.574)

0.57 (0.670)

4.36

 < 0.001

5.Making sense of data

1.13 (0.645)

0.80 (0.440)

3.28

0.001

Valid interpretation of the material

1.10 (0.499)

0.69 (0.400)

5.01

 < 0.001

6.Calm, confident manner

0.75 (0.434)

0.77 (0.761)

0.15

0.884

7.Clear communication

0.93 (0.602)

0.51 (0.722)

3.54

0.001

8.Well-planning intervention

0.77 (0.529)

0.64 (1.033)

0.88

0.379

9.Being skillful

0.89 (0.551)

0.85 (0.872)

0.25

0.804

Effective feedback was given

0.84 (0.362)

0.69 (0.620)

1.56

0.121

10.Evaluation/self-analysis

1.02 (0.671)

0.84 (0.916)

1.24

0.217

11.Commitment to improvement

1.07 (0.727)

0.67 (1.121)

2.30

0.023

Effective reflection

1.04 (0.601)

0.75 (0.883)

2.10

0.038

Total score

11.38 (3.661)

8.26 (4.733)

4.07

 < 0.001

  1. Integrated, the non-immersive virtual simulation and high-fidelity face-to-face simulation integrated program arm