Table 3 Summary of preceptor post-training interview analysis key themes
1. Preceptor experiences with their first post-training student |
 No major issues |
 Time management can be a challenge - addressed by careful planning and adequate staffing. |
 The start of placement can be difficult – planning for the student & establishing a routine. |
 Difficult to provide challenges for highly performing students. |
2. Effect of training on preceptor attitudes and practices |
Attitudes |
 Training was beneficial regardless of the experience of the preceptor. |
 Appreciating the importance of giving the student a better placement experience |
 Initial orientation and setting expectations are important for both preceptors and students. |
 Course overview helps to identify student level of knowledge. |
 More conscious of providing regular feedback throughout the placement. |
Practices |
 Networking allowed for sharing of ideas and learning from each other’s experiences. |
 Enhanced teaching skills have led to improved lines of communication. |
 Better insight into the student perspective and ways to manage students. |
 Improved understanding of feedback techniques – videos were useful. |
 Better understanding of the student evaluation form and providing honest student appraisal |
 Involving students in the feedback process |
3. Effect on preceptor confidence levels |
More confident in: |
 Precepting ability – reinforcement of knowledge for experienced preceptors |
 Planning for a student and setting expectations |
 Tailoring precepting to the student |
 Managing students |
 Providing constructive feedback |
 Discussing evaluation reports with students |
4. Suggested areas for future training |
 Refresher every few years for experienced preceptors |
 More on placement requirements and student level of knowledge/skills |
 Preceptor checklist from the university to ensure that all requirements are completed. |
 More input into the design of placement activities |
 Regular communication from the university during placements |
 Generational differences, student conflict, challenging high performers |