From: Enhancing self-care education amongst medical students: a systematic scoping review
Facilitators of Success | References | |
---|---|---|
Student-level | Interested students. • Older, with a greater level of maturity and appreciation for the need for self-care interventions • Students with higher stress levels pre-intervention | |
Students’ adherence to intervention | ||
Voluntary participation | ||
Program-level | Validated program | |
Occurred during more conducive periods | ||
Provision of individualised options | [160] | |
Provision of incentives (e.g., financial, academic points) | ||
Safe space • Small group format • Open, non-judgmental, collaborative discussion to destigmatize mental health concerns • Personal sharing of own struggles • Empathetic facilitators • Peer/clinician led class • Inter-professional learning to breakdown traditional hierarchies between professions | [7, 56, 58, 64, 65, 83, 115, 138, 139, 144, 145, 154, 155, 167, 168, 177] | |
Large group size or single session to stay within resource constraints | ||
Continuous feedback and improvement processes | ||
Tangible end product creating a sense of accomplishment | [158] | |
Readily available online material (e.g., videos, audiotapes, readings) for students to learn at own pace, anonymously and to reach rural areas | ||
Barriers to Success | References | |
Student-level | Low adherence (e.g., due to personal stress) | [5, 6, 49, 63, 64, 67, 80, 85, 87, 90, 100, 115, 118, 121, 123, 126, 131, 149, 158, 179] |
Mandatory participation (e.g., leading to resentment for program) | ||
Lack of anonymity and concern about stigma | ||
Poor understanding of intervention by students | ||
Program-level | Did not cater to individual preference of self-care practices | |
Large group size | ||
Poor scheduling (e.g. Scheduled near or in exam periods)_ | ||
Treating wellness as a skill which in doing so stigmatises medical learners and harm their wellness | [192] | |
Targeting learners instead of learning environment sending the message that they are the problem and not the system | [192] | |
Hierarchy between facilitators and students | ||
Lack of support • Lack of faculty/trained facilitators • Lack of time allocated to discuss/practice intervention; intervention too short or infrequent | [5,6,7, 56, 58, 67, 68, 75, 90, 91, 96, 131, 137, 143, 145, 155, 161, 166, 173, 180] |