Skip to main content

Table 1 The ECG interpretation accuracy of each physicians

From: Impact of automatic acquisition of key clinical information on the accuracy of electrocardiogram interpretation: a cross-sectional study

 

Diagnostic Classification

Physicians

Senior or junior

All ECGs

Life threatening diagnosis

Arrhythmia

Hypertrophy

Ischemia, or infarction

Conduction disturbances

others

Common-ECG

AI-ECG

Common-ECG

AI-ECG

Common-ECG

AI-ECG

Common-ECG

AI-ECG

Common-ECG

AI-ECG

Common-ECG

AI-ECG

Common-ECG

AI-ECG

01

cardiologists

37 (74%)

37 (74%)

8 (80%)

8 (80%)

15 (83.33%)

16 (88.89%)

2 (40%)

1 (20%)

10 (71.43%)

11 (78.57%)

7 (100%)

6 (85.71%)

3 (50%)

3 (50%)

02

trainees

5 (10%)

7 (14%)

3 (30%)

3 (30%)

2 (11.11%)

3 (16.67%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

2 (14.29%)

3 (21.43%)

1 (14.29%)

2 (28.57%)

1 (16.67%)

0 (0%)

03

trainees

11 (22%)

16 (32%)

4 (40%)

6 (60%)

7 (38.89%)

5 (27.78%)

0 (0%)

1 (20%)

2 (14.29%)

5 (35.71%)

2 (28.57%)

4 (57.14%)

0 (0%)

1 (16.67%)

04

cardiologists

18 (36%)

19 (38%)

7 (70%)

5 (50%)

7 (38.89%)

8 (44.44%)

1 (20%)

0 (0%)

3 (21.43%)

4 (28.57%)

5 (71.43%)

4 (57.14%)

1 (16.67%)

0 (0%)

05

trainees

8 (16%)

11 (22%)

3 (30%)

2 (20%)

5 (27.78%)

4 (22.22%)

0 (0%)

1 (20%)

1 (7.14%)

6 (42.86%)

2 (28.57%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

06

cardiologists

18 (36%)

27 (54%)

4 (40%)

6 (60%)

10 (55.56%

12 (66.67%)

0 (0%)

3 (60%)

4 (28.57%)

4 (28.57%)

2 (28.57%)

6 (85.71%)

1 (16.67%)

2 (33.33%)

07

trainees

18 (36%)

25 (50%)

3 (30%)

4 (40%)

8 (44.44%)

12 (66.67%)

2 (40%)

2 (20%)

4 (28.57%)

5 (35.71%)

2 (28.57%)

2 (28.57%)

2 (33.33%)

4 (66.67%)

08

trainees

20 (40%)

20 (40%)

7 (70%)

7 (70%)

8 (44.44%)

6 (33.33%)

1 (20%)

0 (0%)

4 (28.57%)

8 (57.14%)

6 (85.71%)

6 (85.71%)

1 (16.67%)

0 (0%)

09

cardiologists

26 (52%)

24 (48%)

7 (70%)

6 (60%)

11 (61.11%

9 (50%)

1 (20%)

3 (60%)

8 (57.14%)

3 (21.43%)

5 (71.43%)

6 (85.71%)

1 (16.67%)

3 (50%)

10

trainees

15 (30%)

22 (44%)

5 (50%)

5 (50%)

8 (44.44%)

8 (44.44%)

1 (20%)

2 (40%)

1 (7.14%)

5 (35.71%)

4 (57.14%)

4 (57.14%)

1 (16.67%)

2 (33.33%)

11

trainees

10 (20%)

13 (26%)

3 (30%)

2 (20%)

5 (27.78%)

6 (33.33%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

2 (14.29%)

4 (28.57%)

3 (42.86%)

2 (28.57%)

0 (0%)

1 (16.67%)

12

trainees

5 (10%)

17 (34%)

2 (20%)

7 (70%)

4 (22.22%)

6 (33.33%)

0 (0%)

1 (20%)

0 (0%)

4 (28.57%)

1 (14.29%)

5 (71.43%)

0 (0%)

1 (16.67%)

13

trainees

9 (18%)

11 (22%)

2 (20%)

2 (20%)

4 (22.22%)

7 (38.89%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

2 (14.29%)

1 (7.14%)

2 (28.57%)

3 (42.86%)

0 (0%)

1 (16.67%)

14

cardiologists

18 (36%)

21 (42%)

3 (30%)

5 (50%)

7 (38.89%)

9 (50%)

1 (20%)

0 (0%)

3 (21.43%)

5 (35.71%)

6 (85.71%)

6 (85.71%)

0 (0%)

1 (16.67%)

15

trainees

9 (18%)

8 (16%)

3 (30%)

3 (30%)

2 (11.11%)

4 (22.22%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

3 (21.43%)

1 (7.14%)

4 (57.14%)

2 (28.57%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

16

trainees

16 (32%)

15 (30%)

3 (30%)

3 (30%)

5 (27.78%)

6 (33.33%)

2 (40%)

0 (0%)

3 (21.43%)

3 (21.43%)

6 (85.71%)

6 (85.71%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

17

trainees

15 (30%)

18 (36%)

3 (30%)

4 (40%)

7 (38.89%)

7 (38.89%)

2 (40%)

3 (60%)

0 (0%)

2 (14.29%)

6 (85.71%)

5 (71.43%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

18

trainees

13 (26%)

13 (36%)

5 (50%)

4 (40%)

7 (38.89%)

7 (38.89%)

0 (0%)

1 (20%)

1 (7.14%)

1 (7.14%)

5 (71.43%)

4 (57.14%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

19

trainees

16 (32%)

20 (40%)

3 (30%)

6 (60%)

8 (44.44%)

9 (50%)

1 (20%)

1 (20%)

3 (21.43%)

6 (42.86%)

4 (57.14%)

4 (57.14%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

  1. ECG, Electrocardiograph; AI-ECG, artificial intelligence-assisted ECG diagnostic system