Skip to main content

Table 3 Evaluation of sexual health educational interventions

From: Gaps in sexual health content of healthcare professional curriculum: a systematic review of educational interventions

Authors

Target Population

Intervention Objectives

Methods

Behavioral change outcomes

Rosen R, [25]

Senior residents

Confidence in taking a SHH

Self-reported evaluation

comfort levels regarding obtaining a sexual health history—90% improved

managing sexual health problems—56% improved

Cushing A, [55]

Fourth-year medical students

Attitudes, Intentions, Behavior changing

Self-reported evaluation,

one-year

follow-up

Out of 92% of participants reported behavioral change with proportional distribution among clinical settings:

Obstetrics & Gynecology (82%) and Infectious disease (75%) were the most asked settings, while Internal medicine (18.4%) and Surgical (8.8%) were the most minor reported settings

Loeb DF, [26]

Medical residents

Rates of SHH and specific component documentation

Chart reviewed

Rates of sexual health history documented were improved after the intervention (p < .01*)

The mean of sexual health-specific components increased after the intervention (p < .01*), with more frequent documented components of:

Current sexual activity (17.1% pre vs. 20.7% post-intervention)

Number of current partners (12.7% pre vs. 16.9% post-intervention)

Sexual behaviors (0.8% pre vs. 1.5% post)

Contraception (4.9% pre vs. 6.5% post)

History of sexually transmitted infections (4.6% pre vs. 7.3% post)

Issues with sexual performance (2.4% pre; vs. 6.5% post)

History of abuse (1.36% pre vs. 2.3% post)

Zabar S, [27]

Health professionals

Communication skills

Clinical

performance

OSCE (pre-post test), only one simulation on SHH taking

Chart review(pre-post)

Pre-post changes found in communication follow domains: (not specific for sexual health skills)

Data gathering (p = .003)

Rapport building (p = .001)

Patient education (p = .02)

Clinical performance (only one question was specific to sexual health)

Improvement was found in the question about the current patient activity (p = .002)

Wang LY, [28]

Health professionals

Frequency of addressing cancer- relating sexual health issues

Self-reported survey

Significant improvement in the frequency of addressing sexual health issues in all domains between pre and post-intervention:

Bringing up (18.3% pre; vs. 45.2% post; p = .001**)

Coordinating care (19.7% pre; vs. 57.1% post; p < .001**)

Provision of sexual health during the diagnosis/treatment (19% pre vs. 60% post; p < .0001**) and in the surveillance phase (23.2% pre vs. 51.6% post; p = .003*)

McBain L, [54]

Medical students

Confidence, comfort levels, and skills in performing a genital examination

Self–reported questionnaire

Pre-post intervention and 1-year cohort

Skills, Confidence, and Comfort levels were improved (p < .001**), with higher range scores for female exam compared to a man

Ross MW, [47]

Nursing and midwifery students

Knowledge

Communication skills

Attitude

Self-reported survey

Knowledge and communication skills improved in all domains

Attitudes toward anal sex and abortion were not changed after the intervention

Frasca K, [34]

Internal medicine residents

Behavioral change in sexual history taking

A qualitative method, self-reported assessment

6/8 participants applied the new skills to their clinical practice

Five reported they planned to include sexual history-taking skills in future practice

White BP, [37]

 

Confidence

Comfort

preparedness

Self–reported assessment

Overall preparedness to provide comprehensive sexual health care improved from (M = 2.84, SD = 1.17) to (M = 4.37, SD = 0.49), CI 1.50 [1.03, 1.97], p < 0.5*)

Comfort in initiating discussions about sexual health with patients improved from (M = 3.43, SD = 1.19) to (M = 4.40, SD = 0.89), CI 0.97

[ 0.45 – 1.48], p < 0.5*

Confidence providing sexual health improved from (M = 3.13, SD = 1.01) to (M = 4.40, SD = 0.68), CI 1.27 [0.88 – 1.66], p < 0.5*

Roth LT, [42]

Medicine residents

impact on clinical practice

Self–reported assessment, based on Kirkpatric Model

Clinical practice changes are reported in the following domains:

40% Asked about sexual identity

(72% to 88.4%, p = .02)

40% asked about gender identity

(23.3% to 43.5%, p = .02)

Mert – Karadas M, [51]

Nursing students

Communication skills and SSH taking

Online OSCE

Students conducted individual interviews and recorded the sexual history taken

The study found an improvement in Effective communication skills median scores in the post-test (97.00 [87.00–99.00], p < .001**) compared to the pre-test (80.50 [64.00–92.00])

Reproductive SHH-taking skills improved from (70.52 [42.32–95.50]) in the pre-test to (93.51 [64.00–100.00], p < .001**) in the post-test

  1. Acronym: SHH Sexual Health History, OSCE Objective Structured Clinical Examination, M Mean, SD Standard Deviation, CI Confidence Interval
  2. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.001