Table 5 Residents’ satisfaction with how the exam was held
Questions | Strongly agree | Agree | No opinion | Disagree | Strongly disagree |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. The duration of each station was appropriate | 4(45%) | 5(55%) | |||
2. The exam was well administered | 5(55%) | 4(45%) | |||
3. The instructions for each station were clear | 6(67%) | 3(33%) | |||
4. The equipment provided was in line with the requirements of each station | 5(55%) | 4(45%) | |||
5. The requirements in all stations were in accordance with the training given in the practical courses | 6(67%) | 3(33%) | |||
6. Assessment with OSATS method promotes the practical knowledge of residents | 5(55%) | 4(45%) | |||
7. This exam was an opportunity to learn | 8(89%) | 1(11%) | |||
8. This method identified the weak points of the residents in performing the skills | 7(78%) | 2(22%) | |||
9. Assessment with OSATS method increases the stress caused by the exam in the residents | ---- | 2(22%) | 4(45%) | 2(22%) | 1(11%) |
10. This method henceforth be used as part of the evaluation of practical courses in the residency | 3(33%) | 5(56%) | 1(11%) | ||
11. Overall the performance of the exam was satisfactory. | 7(78%) | 1(11%) | 1(11%) |