Skip to main content

Table 2 Frequency distribution of users satisfaction with the navid system based on its components during the COVID-19 pandemic

From: Learner satisfaction with synchronous and asynchronous virtual learning systems during the COVID-19 pandemic in Tehran university of medical sciences: a comparative analysis

Component

Type of learners

Satisfaction level with the Navid system and its components

Statistical test result

Satisfaction with the component

Dissatisfaction with the component

Number (percentage)

Number (percentage)

Pvalue

User-friendliness of the platform’s visual design

Employees

(15) 70

(85) 430

0/02

Students

(16) 30

(84) 250

0/04

Easy access to the system

Employees

(15) 70

(85) 430

0/005

Students

(19) 50

(81) 230

0/006

Appropriate volume of provided content

Employees

(30) 150

(70) 350

< 0/001

Students

(38) 106

(62) 174

< 0/001

Instant access to content

Employees

(26) 130

(74) 370

< 0/001

Students

(27) 80

(73) 200

0/004

Easy access to support services

Employees

(40) 200

(60) 300

< 0/001

Students

(68) 188

(32) 92

0/135

Appropriate workload

Employees

(40) 200

(60) 300

0/001

Students

(57) 160

(43) 120

< 0/001

Appropriate dedicated time for completing assignments

Employees

(34) 170

(66) 330

0/001

Students

(43) 120

(57) 160

< 0/001

Effective feedback on assignments

Employees

(57) 280

(43) 220

0/22

Students

(81) 225

(19) 55

< 0/001

Variety of content presented

Employees

(36) 180

(64) 320

< 0/001

Students

(49) 135

(51) 145

< 0/001

Interaction among learners

Employees

(74) 370

(26) 130

0/007

Students

(62) 175

(38) 105

< 0/001

Interaction between learners and teachers

Employees

(66) 330

(34) 170

0/003

Students

(54) 150

(46) 130

< 0/001

Need for more time

Employees

(21) 100

(79) 400

0/07

Students

(46) 130

(54) 150

0/001