Skip to main content

Table 2 Themes and categories from open-ended responses

From: Longitudinal qualitative study of paired mentor-mentee perspectives on the abstract submission process

Themes

Categories

Description

Assembling abstract

Individual or team approach

Who initiates and guides process

 

Deadlines and time crunch

Last minute push due to delays in getting feedback; poor planning

 

Time away from other pursuits

Divert time and effort from other responsibilities and personal life

Quality of research

Improves research quality

Interim pause and analyses foster project optimization

 

Challenges due to data volume and quality

Insufficient and poor-quality data

 

Submitting far in advance of meeting

Partial results and incomplete analyses

 

Scope of project changed

Unexpected negative results; surprising favorable results

 

Inter-personal interactions

Role of collaborators

Make insightful contributions; impede if delay in providing input

 

Dependence on statisticians

Improve analytical rigor; limited access for consultation

 

Impact of mentees

Facilitate if diligent; impede if wait until last minute

 

Impact of mentors

Facilitate if provide guidance; impede if delay in providing feedback

Submission process

Formatting nuances

Rules for word counts, sub-sections, tables and figures

 

Technical issues

Uploading to website; required conflict of interest statements

Impact on careers

Minimal boost to mentors’ careers

Perfunctory to demonstrate productivity; risk of publicly revealing work early

 

Marked advance to mentees’ careers

Foster scholarship, networking, experience

 

Benefits to mentors and mentees from presenting work

Get input of experts; be recognized as contributors to the field; enhance reputations

Psychological

Stressful

Meet deadlines; prompt collaborators; ensure respectable quality

impact

Angst about meeting

Will have to present to experts

 

Unforeseen events

Situations outside of control (i.e. impact of COVID-19)