Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality assessment of included studies

From: Effectiveness of flipped classroom in pharmacy education – a meta-analysis

NO.

Study ID

EPHPP components

Overall rating

Selection bias

Study design

Confouders

Blinding

Data collection

Withdrawals/droupouts

1

Prescott, et al. 2016

2

2

3

3

2

3

3

2

He, et al. 2019

1

1

1

3

2

1

1

3

Kangwantas, et al. 2017

2

2

3

3

3

3

3

4

Gloudeman, et al. 2018

2

2

3

3

3

3

3

5

Goh, et al. 2019

2

2

2

3

3

2

3

6

Taglieri, et al. 2017

2

2

3

3

2

3

3

7

Lockman, et al. 2017

2

2

1

3

2

1

2

8

Koo, et al. 2016

2

2

1

3

3

1

2

9

Munson, et al. 2015

2

2

3

3

3

3

3

10

Wong, et al. 2014

2

2

1

3

3

1

2

11

Bossaer, et al. 2016

3

2

3

3

3

3

3

12

Cotta, et al. 2016

2

2

3

3

3

3

3

13

McLaughlin, et al. 2014

2

2

1

3

2

3

2

14

McLaughlin, et al. 2013

2

2

3

3

3

1

3

15

Pierce, et al. 2012

3

2

3

3

3

3

3

16

Stewart, et al. 2013

2

2

2

3

2

3

2

17

Donihi, et al. 2014

3

2

3

3

3

3

3

18

Sumanasekera, et al. 2020

3

2

3

3

3

3

3

19

Nazar, et al. 2019

2

2

3

3

3

3

3

20

Anderson, et al. 2017

1

1

1

3

2

1

1

21

Chen, et al. 2020

2

2

3

3

3

3

3

22

Wang, et al. 2019

2

1

3

3

3

1

3

  1. EPHPP, The Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool; 1 = Strong methodological quality;2 = Moderate methodological quality;3 = Poor methodological quality