Skip to main content

Table 2 Validity evidence based on the scale's internal structure

From: Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the “Modification of Hall’s professionalism scale for use with pharmacists”

Exploratory Factor Analysis

Adequacy of the correction matrix

Bartlett

6737.0 (df = 741)a

Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO)

0.81

Factors

6

Explained variance

53.7%

Waste distribution

Weighted Root Mean Square Residual (WRSR)

0.0356

Chi-square ratio for degree of freedom (X2/df)

757.625

Non-Normed Fit Index (NNFI)

0.98

Comparative Fit Index (CFI)

0.98

Goodness of Fit Index (GFI)

1.0

Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA)

0.027

Root Mean Squared Residual (RSMR)

0.0437

ap < 0,001; bp = ,99

Replicability adjusted by H index

Factor Index Confidence Interval

Factor Index Confidence Interval

Factor Index Confidence Interval

Autonomy

0.962

0.945 – 0.980

Vocation

0.935

0.919 – 0.945

Professional Council

0.878

0.799 – 0.915

Self-regulation

0.838

0.795 – 0.858

Continuing Education

0.867

0.810 – 0.887

Altruism

0.828

0.779 – 0.845

Quality and effectiveness of factor score estimates

Index

Factor

Autonomy

Vocation

Professional Council

Self-regulation

Continuing Education

Altruism

Factor Determinacy Index

0.981

0.967

0.937

0.916

0.931

0.910

Expected percentage of true differences

96.2%

94.4%

91.5%

90%

91%

89.6%