These are the lessons learnt from this study, which can be seen as additional to having a solid evidence-base of effectiveness and acceptability of learning tools using virtual patients |
a) Introducing learning innovations using virtual patients is more likely when CR has been explicitly taught already because both student and tutors have a language to express what they are doing, and therefore learning can be recognized and measured |
b) Opportunistic implementation of online learning innovations using virtual patients to address limited face-to-face teaching capacity can build local support for virtual patients and may reduce institutional barriers to formally approving curriculum changes |
c) Training and sharing information on key features of learning tools using virtual patients can help, that emphasises: - the position of virtual patients as complementary rather than a replacement of face-to-face teaching - capacity for online learning approaches to involve students that are typically quiet during face-to-face teaching - opportunities for using virtual patients in group learning situations not just individual study - ways in which virtual patient learning tools can save or optimize tutor time |
d) Adoption is more likely when evidence of effectiveness and acceptability are combined with support for dissemination, cases and scenarios that are realistic, and with adaptable resources by developers |