Skip to main content

Table 2 Descriptive analysis of the participants’ performance with LifeVac® and DeCHOKER® devices during an adult victim FBAO

From: Would anti-choking devices be correctly and quickly managed by health science students? A manikin crossover trial

Variables

LifeVac®

DeCHOKER®

p-value

Place the mask correctly covering the victim’s nose and mouth

1.000

 Yes

38 (88.4)

42 (97.7)

 

 No

5 (11.6)

1 (2.3)

 

Fix the mask to the victim’s airway

0.007

 Yes

39 (90.7)

41 (95.3)

 

 No

4 (9.3)

2 (4.7)

 

Push in handle

-

 Yes

42 (97.7)

-

 

 No

1 (2.3)

-

 

Pull handle (LifeVac®) // Pull the plunger out with force (DeCHOKER®)

-

 Yes

43 (100.0)

43 (100.0)

 

 No

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

 

Keep the mask fixed to the victim’s airway throughout the procedure

0.164

 Yes

32 (74.4)

34 (86.0)

 

 No

11 (25.6)

6 (14.0)

 

Perform all the steps correctly

0.125

 Yes

27 (62.8)

35 (81.4)

 

 No

16 (37.2)

8 (18.6)

 

Correct compliance rate

100 (80.0 – 100.0)

100 (100.0 – 100.0)

0.192a

  1. Continuous variables are expressed with median (interquartile range)
  2. Categorical variables are expressed with absolute frequency (relative frequency)
  3. FBAO Foreign Body Airway Obstruction
  4. p-values calculated by Chi-square test or Fisher’s Exact Test as appropriate
  5. aWilcoxon test