Skip to main content

Table 3 Report of respondents’ characteristics versus the factors that facilitated or hindered the transfer of learning (complete variable information in Table 5, Additional file 2)

From: Does participation in the European Trauma Course lead to new behaviours and organisational change? A Portuguese experience

 

As an INDIVIDUAL, what FACILITATORS did you encounter in introducing new behaviours?*

Confidence in ETC methodology

Peer support

Decision-making experience

Institution support

All answers (% of respondents)

83 (45.6%)

50 (27.5%)

35 (19.2%)

9 (4.9%)

 

As an INDIVIDUAL, what OBSTACLES did you encounter in introducing new behaviours?

None

I´m the only one with ETC training

Low self-efficacy

Lack of motivation

Other priorities

Other

All answers (% of respondents)

13 (9%)

28 (19.4%)

27 (18.8%)

26 (18.1%)

28 (19.4%)

21 (14.6%)

Previous trauma courses

No

4a,b (33.3%)

6b (24.0%)

17a (73.9%)

12a,b (50.0%)

9a,b (37.5%)

10a,b (52.6%)

ATLS

1b (8.3%)

15a (60.0%)

3b (13.0%)

6a,b (25.0%)

12a,b (50.0%)

5a,b (26.3%)

Previous experience in teaching

No

6a,b (46.2%)

11a,b (39.3%)

17a (63.0%)

9a,b (34.6%)

7b (25.0%)

6a,b (28.6%)

Yes

7a,b (53.8%)

17a,b (60.7%)

10b (37.0%)

17a,b (65.4%)

21a (75.0%)

15a,b (71.4%)

 

In your INSTITUTION, what FACILITATORS did you encounter in introducing new behaviours?

None

Formal leadership status

Human resources availability

Material resources availability

Number of ETC professionals accredited

All answers (% of respondents)

7 (7.9%)

10 (11.2%)

21 (23.6%)

24 (27.0%)

25 (28.1%)

Previous trauma courses

No

6a (85.7%)

4a,b (40.0%)

6a,b (33.3%)

5a,b (23.8%)

5b (20.8%)

 

In your INSTITUTION, what OBSTACLES did you encounter in introducing new behaviours?*

Formal leadership status

Lack of human resources

Lack of knowledge about ETC methodology

Lack of material resources

Nonacceptance of the ETC methodology by colleagues

All answers (% of respondents)

38 (17.1%)

65 (29.3%)

69 (31.1%)

30 (13.5%)

16 (7.2%)

  1. Data are presented as counts and percentages (n, %). * No correlations were found. Bold values represent comparisons mentioned in the text. Values in the same row not sharing the same subscript (a, b) are significantly different at p < 0.05 in the two-sided test of equality for column proportions. Tests adjusted for all pairwise comparisons within a row of each innermost suitable using Bonferroni’s correction. European Trauma Course (ETC)