Skip to main content

Table 1 Review findings with a focus on pedagogical methods and evaluation outcomes

From: A systematic review of intellectual and developmental disability curriculum in international pre-graduate health professional education

Author, Year of publication, COO

Speciality

Pedagogical Methodology

Focus of Content

Evaluation Method

Evaluation Outcome

Kirkpatrick Level

BEME Scores

[23]

Keisling et al. 2017

USA

• Psychology

• SLP (speech language pathology)

• Audiology

• Nutrition

• Social work

• Nursing

Experiential (patient/family experiences)

Theoretical (didactic) Interprofessional

Perspective/Awareness

Participant Evaluation

Improvements in family centered care competencies with comments reflecting a desire for more family centred experiences

3

4

[24]

Weber et al. 2021 

USA

• Audiology

• Genetic counselling

• Nursing

• OT (occupational therapy)

• PT (physiotherapy)

• Psychology

• Social work

• SLP

• Other non- healthcare professional programs and/or post-graduate traineesa

Interprofessional

Theoretical (didactic)

Experiential (clinical)

Perspective/Awareness

Medical/Clinical Knowledge

Participant Evaluation

Training enhances participants leadership competencies and attitudes towards working in interdisciplinary teams

2B

3

[25]

Weiss et al. 2020

USA

• SLP

• Special educationa

Interprofessional

Experiential (clinical)

Medical/Clinical Knowledge

Participant Evaluation

Intervention Evaluation

Learning Assessment

Increases amongst all measures including: knowledge of transdisciplinary approach (TA), understanding and comfort with the other discipline, and higher confidence in using TA

3

4

[26]

Garavatti et al. 2018

USA

• Medicine

• PT

Experiential (clinical)

Interprofessional

Perspective/Awareness

Participant Evaluation

Students reported increased comfort in dealing with rehabilitation situations after attending the intervention

2A

3

[27]

Howell et al. 2012

USA

• OT

• Psychology

Interprofessional

Experiential (clinical)

Perspective/Awareness

Intervention Evaluation

Students were more prepared to represent their profession in an interprofessional team

1

1

[28]

Coret et al. 2018

Canada

• Medicine

Experiential (patient/family experiences)

Medical/Clinical Knowledge

Perspective/Awareness

Learning Assessment

Participant Evaluation

Intervention Evaluation

Patient educators may help facilitate communication skills teaching amongst medical students

2B

3

[29]

Lewis et al. 2018

Australia

• SLP

• OT

Experiential (clinical)

Interprofessional

Medical/Clinical Knowledge

Intervention Evaluation

Students found the DVD role-playing interprofessional workshop to be a learning benefit

2A

2

[30]

Havercamp et al. 2016

USA

• Medicine

Theoretical (didactic)

Experiential (patient/family experiences)

Medical/Clinical Knowledge

Perspective/Awareness

Intervention Evaluation

Participant Evaluation

Students reported improved knowledge, skills, confidence, and comfort in caring for patients with ASD

3

4

[31]

Watkins et al. 2016

UK

• Medicine

Experiential (clinical)

Perspective/Awareness

Medical/Clinical Knowledge

Participant Evaluation

Students reported improvements in affect and understanding, as well as knowledge and skills

2B

4

[32]

Thomas et al. 2014

UK

• Medicine

Experiential (clinical)

Theoretical (didactic)

Perspective/Awareness

Medical/Clinical Knowledge

Participant Evaluation

Improvements in students’ perceived skills, comfort, and the type of clinical approach

3

4

[33]

Iacono et al. 2011

Australia

• Social work

• OT

• PT

• Nursing

• Other non-professional degreesa

Experiential (clinical)

Interprofessional

Perspective/Awareness

Participant Evaluation

Intervention Evaluation

No significant differences, although qualitative results show differences in perception and understanding

0

2

[34]

Feely et al. 2020

Ireland

• Social work

Theoretical (didactic)

Experiential (clinical)

Perspective/Awareness

Medical/Clinical Knowledge

Intervention Evaluation

Participant evaluation

Students reported a positive experience with increased comfort and greater empathy

1

3

[35]

Marks et al. 2018

Belgium

• Dentistry

Experiential (clinical)

Medical/Clinical knowledge

Other

There were no significant changes in residents’ and caregivers' knowledge, behaviour, attitude, and self-efficacy on oral health

0

1

[36]

Watters et al. 2015

USA

• Dentistry

Experiential (clinical)

Medical/Clinical Knowledge

Perspective/Awareness

Participant Evaluation

Improved self-efficacy and intent to treat patients with special needs

3

4

[37]

Harwood et al. 2014

UK

• Medicine

Theoretical (didactic)

Experiential (patient/family experiences)

Medical/Clinical Knowledge

Perspective/Awareness

Participant Evaluation

The online module has increased knowledge, skills, and reducing stigmatizing attitudes

4A

1

[38]

Jacobson et al. 2011

USA

• Medicine

Experiential (clinical)

Medical/Clinical Knowledge

Learning assessment

Students had more comfort with patients but showed no changes in their attitude or mental status examination performances

2A

1

[39]

Shields et al. 2014

Australia

• PT

Experiential (clinical)

Medical/Clinical Knowledge

Participant Evaluation

Students rated an improvement in their professional skills relating to implementing a Progressive Resistance Training programme

3

4

[40]

Karl et al. 2013

USA

• Medicine

Experiential (clinical)

Immersive(Learning at a specialized medical facility)

Perspective/Awareness

Medical/Clinical knowledge

Participant Evaluation

Improved comfort levels and increased awareness of attitudes that affect patient care

2B

4

[41]

Salama et al. 2020

Saudi Arabia

• Dentistry

Theoretical (didactic)

Medical/Clinical Knowledge

Participant Evaluation

Learning Assessment

The intervention was effective in providing all levels of dental students with the basic instructive information to care for patients with IDD

2B

2

[42]

Taslibeyaz et al. 2017

Turkey

• Medicine

Theoretical (didactic)

Experiential

(clinical)

Medical/Clinical Knowledge

Learning Assessment

Increase in achievement scores for students in the interactive group

2B

4

[43]

Jones et al. 2015

Canada

• Medicine

• Nursing

• Clinical psych

• OT

• PT

Theoretical (didactic)

Interprofessional

Experiential (patient/family experiences)

Medical/Clinical Knowledge

Perspective/Awareness

Participant Evaluation

Learning Assessment

Significant differences in knowledge and skills following intervention

Positive trend in students’ attitude changes following the intervention

2B

4

[44]

Tsilimingras et al. 2018

USA

• Medicine

• Nursing

• Psychology

• Physician assistants

• Post-graduate physiciansa

Theoretical (didactic)

Experiential (clinical)

Interprofessional

Medical/Clinical Knowledge

Perspective/Awareness

Participant Evaluation

Improvements in attitudes towards interprofessional clinical practice

2a

3

[45]

Phadraig et al. 2015

Ireland

• Dentistry

Theoretical (didactic)

Experiential (workshops)

Perspective/Awareness

Participant Evaluation

No significant difference in student attitudes before and after intervention

0

1

[46]

Van Wieringen et al. 2015

South Africa

• Medicine

Theoretical (didactic)

Experiential (patient/family experiences)

Other

Participant Evaluation

Positive differences found in quality and nature of IDD training on clinical rotations

2B

3

[47]

Hoang et al. 2023

USA

• Medicine

Theoretical (didactic)

Experiential (clinical)

Medical/Clinical Knowledge

Participant Evaluation

Learning Assessment

The virtual training sessions on behaviour analytic procedures increased students’ ability to apply such procedures in clinical roleplay with patients with neurodevelopmental disabilities

2B

4

[48]

Nash-Patel et al. 2022

UK

• Nursing

Experiential (patient/family experiences)

Perspective/Awareness

Participant Evaluation

The co-designed arts based relational learning programme was effective at reducing fears and anxieties between nurses and young patients with IDD

2A

2

[49]

Matteucci et al. 2023

USA

•Dentistry

Theoretical (didactic)

Experiential (clinical)

Medical/Clinical Knowledge

Participant Evaluation

Learning Assessment

Remote behaviour skills training for dental students and professionals was effective at encouraging providers to implement behaviour techniques in the care of patients with IDD

2B

3

[50]

Phadraig et al. 2022

Ireland

• Dentistry

Theoretical (didactic)

Perspective/Awareness

Participant Evaluation

A didactic training session led by an individual with autism promoted modest increases in openness towards caring for patients with autism

2A

3

[51]

Berger et al. 2023

Canada

• Medicine

Theoretical (didactic)

Experiential (patient/family experiences)

Perspective/Awareness

Participant Evaluation

This curricular programme increased student confidence in interacting with patients with IDD but did not increase their sense of community inclusion

2A

4

[52]

Zencirci et al.

2022

Turkey

• Medicine

Theoretical (didactic)

Experiential (clinical)

Experiential (patient/family experiences)

Perspective/Awareness

Participant Evaluation

This mixed method training programme was effective in improving attitudes of senior medical students towards patients with IDD

2A

4

[53]

Jacob et al.

2022

USA

• Medicine

Theoretical (didactic)

Experiential (clinical)

Experiential (patient/family experiences)

Perspective/Awareness

Participant Evaluation

Medical students who participated in this programme reported improvements in comfort and confidence in interacting with patients with IDD and their families. However, families did not appear to trust physicians, with no significant changes after the program

2A

4

[54]

Lee et al. 2023

USA

• Nursing

• Social work

• Psychology

• Recreation therapya

• Exercise sciencea

• Public healtha

Theoretical (didactic)

Interprofessional

Perspective/Awareness

Participant Evaluation

This interprofessional program enhanced health professional students’ self-perceived competencies on the care of individuals with IDD

2A

3

  1. aNot included in this study