Table 2 Students’ perception of the training program via asynchronous remote training (n = 60)
Questions | Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neither agree, nor disagree | Agree | Fully agree |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The platform is easy to use and navigate | 0 | 3.3 | 1.7 | 28.3 | 66.7 |
The instructions and supporting information are clear and easy to find | 0 | 3.3 | 5 | 45 | 46.7 |
The asynchronous remote training methodology allowed me to acquire practical skills | 1.7 | 8.3 | 25 | 50 | 15 |
The provided feedback helped me to improve from session to session | 1.6 | 3.3 | 6.7 | 31.7 | 56.7 |
Questions | Very insecure | Insecure | Neither confident, nor insecure | Confident | Very confident |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
When I first performed the technique, I felt: | 25 | 43.3 | 25 | 6.7 | 0 |
When I performed the technique the last time, I felt: | 1.7 | 3.3 | 20 | 41.7 | 33.3 |
Questions | Not prepared | Not very prepared | Neutral | Prepared | Very prepared |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
After completing the training, how well prepared do you feel to perform the neurodynamic techniques on a real patient? | 3.3 | 11.7 | 36.7 | 41.7 | 6.6 |
Values expressed in percentages | |||||