Skip to main content

Table 6 Ratings of students and assessors for OSCEs in a survey with a four-point Likert scale

From: Objective structured clinical examination as a competency assessment tool of students’ readiness for advanced pharmacy practice experiences in South Korea: a pilot study

Questionnairesa

Patient counseling, mean (SD)

Prescription review, mean (SD)

Drug information service, mean (SD)

OTC counseling, mean (SD)

Pharmaceutical care service, mean (SD)

Student

Assessor

p value**

Student

Assessor

p value**

Student

Assessor

p value**

Student

Assessor

p value**

Student

Assessor

p value**

The exam was difficult

2.80 (0.93)

2.50 (0.87)

0.21

2.95 (0.80)

2.00

< 0.01

2.20 (0.68)

2.75 (0.43)

0.31

2.65 (0.79)

2.00

0.05

2.75 (0.89)

2.00

< 0.01

The time given for the exam was sufficient

3.50 (0.50)

3.50 (0.50)

1.00

3.45 (0.50)

3.25 (0.43)

0.46

3.50 (0.50)

3.50 (0.50)

1.00

3.50 (0.50)

3.75 (0.43)

0.36

3.50 (0.50)

3.50 (0.50)

1.00

The questions were appropriate for evaluating the clinical performance

3.16 (0.87)

3.25 (0.43)

0.85

3.47 (0.50)

3.00

0.08

3.37 (0.48)

3.00

0.15

3.11 (0.72)

3.50 (0.50)

0.78

3.32 (0.57)

3.25 (0.43)

0.78

Pharmacy OSCEs prior to APPEs are needed in the future

3.65 (0.48)

3.75 (0.43)

0.70

3.50 (0.50)

3.00

0.06

3.60 (0.49)

3.50 (0.50)

0.71

3.65 (0.48)

3.50 (0.50)

0.57

3.50 (0.59)

3.50 (0.50)

1.00

Students’ clinical performance would be improved if the OSCEs were conducted in the future

3.75 (0.43)

3.75 (0.43)

1.00

3.65 (0.48)

3.00

0.02

3.65 (0.48)

3.50 (0.50)

0.57

3.75 (0.43)

3.75 (0.43)

1.00

3.70 (0.46)

3.75 (0.43)

0.84

  1. **Statistically significant difference between students and assessors, p < 0.05 in chi-square or Fisher’s exact test
  2. aScoring on a four-point Likert scale was as follows: 4-point = strongly agree; 3-point = agree; 2-point = disagree; 1-point = strongly disagree