Skip to main content

Table 3 Factors associated with scopophobia in the assessed sample

From: Association of scopophobia with online learning fatigue among medical students in Brazil

 

High risk of scopophobia

 
 

No

(N = 242)

Yes

(N = 41)

Total

(N = 283)

p-value

Age

   

0.91401

N

242

41

283

 

Median (IQR)

22.0 (21.0, 26.0)

23.0 (21.0, 25.0)

23.0 (21.0, 26.0)

 

Sex, n (%)

   

0.02312

Female

150 (62.0%)

31 (75.6%)

181 (64.0%)

 

Male

91 (37.6%)

9 (22.0%)

100 (35.3%)

 

Other

1 (0.4%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (0.4%)

 

I would rather not answer it

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.4%)

1 (0.4%)

 

Semester attending, n (%)

   

0.31643

1st

1 (0.4%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (0.4%)

 

2nd

12 (5.0%)

4 (9.8%)

16 (5.7%)

 

3rd

2 (0.8%)

2 (4.9%)

4 (1.4%)

 

4th

43 (17.8%)

7 (17.1%)

50 (17.7%)

 

5th

46 (19.0%)

4 (9.8%)

50 (17.7%)

 

6th

19 (7.9%)

7 (17.1%)

26 (9.2%)

 

7th

24 (9.9%)

6 (14.6%)

30 (10.6%)

 

8th

85 (35.1%)

9 (22.0%)

94 (33.2%)

 

9th

7 (2.9%)

1 (2.4%)

8 (2.8%)

 

10th

3 (1.2%)

0 (0.0%)

3 (1.1%)

 

12th

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.4%)

1 (0.4%)

 

Region of Brazil, n (%)

   

0.26632

Northeast

219 (92.4%)

33 (84.6%)

252 (91.3%)

 

Southeast

8 (3.4%)

3 (7.7%)

11 (4.0%)

 

South

10 (4.2%)

3 (7.7%)

13 (4.7%)

 

Missing information

5

2

7

 

Occupation, n (%)

   

0.48362

Others

1 (0.4%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (0.4%)

 

I only study

208 (86.0%)

38 (92.7%)

246 (86.9%)

 

I work and study

33 (13.6%)

3 (7.3%)

36 (12.7%)

 

Family income, n (%)

   

0.01822

Up to 1 MW

6 (2.5%)

4 (9.8%)

10 (3.5%)

 

Up to 3 MWs

23 (9.5%)

8 (19.5%)

31 (11.0%)

 

Up to 5 MWs

21 (8.7%)

4 (9.8%)

25 (8.8%)

 

More than 5 MWs

192 (79.3%)

25 (61.0%)

217 (76.7%)

 

Number of people in the same dwelling, n (%)

   

0.00112

With 1 person

40 (16.5%)

9 (22.0%)

49 (17.3%)

 

With 2 to 4 people

158 (65.3%)

16 (39.0%)

174 (61.5%)

 

With 5 or more people

32 (13.2%)

8 (19.5%)

40 (14.1%)

 

I live alone

12 (5.0%)

8 (19.5%)

20 (7.1%)

 

Person the student lives with, n (%)

   

0.06182

Partner

36 (14.9%)

5 (12.2%)

41 (14.5%)

 

Other

28 (11.6%)

4 (9.8%)

32 (11.3%)

 

Parent(s)

165 (68.2%)

25 (61.0%)

190 (67.1%)

 

Alone

13 (5.4%)

7 (17.1%)

20 (7.1%)

 

Existence of children in the dwelling, n (%)

   

0.90722

No

185 (76.4%)

31 (75.6%)

216 (76.3%)

 

Yes

57 (23.6%)

10 (24.4%)

67 (23.7%)

 

Self evaluation of academic performance, n (%)

   

0.75282

The same as usual

61 (25.2%)

10 (24.4%)

71 (25.1%)

 

Better than usual

65 (26.9%)

9 (22.0%)

74 (26.1%)

 

Worse than usual

116 (47.9%)

22 (53.7%)

138 (48.8%)

 

ZEF, total score

   

0.00231

N

242

41

283

 

Median (IQR)

39.0 (28.0, 49.0)

49.0 (38.0, 58.0)

40.0 (29.0, 50.0)

 

Mean (SD)

39.5 (14.4)

47.0 (14.9)

40.5 (14.7)

 

Min - Max

15–75

16–72

15–75

 

ZEF, overall score

   

0.00041

N

242

41

283

 

Median (IQR)

9.0 (7.0, 12.0)

12.0 (9.0, 14.0)

9.0 (7.0, 12.0)

 

Mean (SD)

9.2 (3.2)

11.1 (3.4)

9.4 (3.3)

 

Min - Max

3–15

3–15

3–15

 

ZEF, visual score

   

0.00811

N

242

41

283

 

Median (IQR)

6.0 (4.0, 9.0)

9.0 (6.0, 10.0)

6.0 (5.0, 9.0)

 

Mean (SD)

7.1 (3.4)

8.4 (3.1)

7.2 (3.4)

 

Min - Max

3–15

3–15

3–15

 

ZEF, social score

   

0.02801

N

242

41

283

 

Median (IQR)

6.0 (4.0, 9.0)

8.0 (6.0, 12.0)

6.0 (4.0, 10.0)

 

Mean (SD)

7.0 (3.5)

8.2 (3.6)

7.1 (3.7)

 

Min - Max

3–15

3–14

3–15

 

ZEF, motivational score

   

0.01521

N

242

41

283

 

Median (IQR)

9.0 (7.0, 12.0)

11.0 (8.0, 13.0)

9.0 (7.0, 12.0)

 

Mean (SD)

9.2 (3.3)

10.5 (3.7)

9.4 (3.4)

 

Min - Max

3–15

3–15

3–15

 

ZEF, emotional score

   

0.00261

N

242

41

283

 

Median (IQR)

7.0 (4.0, 9.0)

10.0 (6.0, 11.0)

7.0 (5.0, 10.0)

 

Mean (SD)

7.1 (3.2)

8.8 (3.5)

7.4 (3.3)

 

Min - Max

3–15

3–15

3–15

 
  1. 1Kruskal-Wallis p-value; 2Chi-Square p-value, 3Goodman and Kruskal’s lambda coefficient p-value; MW = minimum wage