Skip to main content

Table 2 Critical Appraisal

From: Measurement of person-centred consultation skills among healthcare practitioners: a systematic review of reviews of validation studies

 

Hudon 2011

Köberich 2015

Brouwers 2017

Ekman 2020

Is the review question clearly and explicitly stated?

✓

✓

✓

✓

Were the inclusion criteria appropriate for the review question?

✓

✓

✓

✓

Was the search strategy appropriate?

✓

✓

✓

-

Were the sources and resources used to search for studies adequate?

✓

-

✓

✓

Were the criteria for appraising studies appropriate?

✓

-

✓

-

Was critical appraisal conducted by two or more reviewers independently?

✓

-

✓

-

Were there methods to minimize errors in data extraction?

✓

-

✓

-

Were the methods used to combine studies appropriate?

-

✓

✓

✓

Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed?a

-

-

-

-

Were recommendations for policy and/or practice supported by the reported data?

-

✓

✓

✓

Were the specific directives for new research appropriate?

✓

✓

✓

✓

  1. aBoth Hudon and Köberich did an extensive search for grey literature