Table 1 Overview of reviews
Study | Stated aim | Definition or conceptualisation of person-centredness | Population | Setting | Rater | Other selection criteria | Assessment tool used | N of studies included | N of instruments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hudon et al., 2011 | Identify and compare instruments, subscales, or items | The four dimensions common to Mead and Bower’s review and Stewart et al | Not specified | Ambulatory family medicine | Patient | Measuring at least two dimensions | Modified Version of STARD | 26 | 13 |
Köberich & Farin, 2015 | Provide an overview of instruments | Kitson et al.’s three core themes | Nurses | Not specified | Patient (adults only) | Measuring at least two of the core themes | None | 12 | 4 |
Brouwers et al., 2017 | Review existing instruments | Stewart et al.’s six dimensions | Physicians or medical students | Not specified | Not specified | Measuring at least three dimensions | COSMIN | 13 | 14 |
Ekman et al., 2020 | Review and evaluate direct observation tools | The framework endorsed by the Institute of Medicine | Not specified | Not specified | Direct observation | Excluding clinical encounters | None | 19 | 16 |