Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Rating of physiotherapy student clinical performance in a paediatric setting: are assessors consistent in their rating of a simulated clinical student performance?

Original Submission
10 Feb 2021 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Mar 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kathleen E. Norman
13 Apr 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
16 Nov 2021 Author responded Author comments - Courtney R Clark
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Nov 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Nov 2021 Author responded Author comments - Courtney R Clark
Resubmission - Version 4
29 Nov 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 4
15 Dec 2021 Author responded Author comments - Courtney R Clark
Resubmission - Version 5
15 Dec 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 5
6 Jan 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kathleen E. Norman
26 Jan 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
23 Jun 2022 Author responded Author comments - Courtney R Clark
Resubmission - Version 6
23 Jun 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 6
28 Jun 2022 Author responded Author comments - Courtney R Clark
Resubmission - Version 7
28 Jun 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 7
11 Jul 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kathleen E. Norman
24 Jul 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
22 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Courtney R Clark
Resubmission - Version 8
22 Jan 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 8
6 Mar 2023 Author responded Author comments - Courtney R Clark
Resubmission - Version 9
6 Mar 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
10 Mar 2023 Editorially accepted
24 Apr 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12909-023-04149-9

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page